Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 1.490 IF 1.490
  • IF 5-year value: 1.445 IF 5-year
    1.445
  • CiteScore value: 2.9 CiteScore
    2.9
  • SNIP value: 0.789 SNIP 0.789
  • IPP value: 1.48 IPP 1.48
  • SJR value: 0.74 SJR 0.74
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 88 Scimago H
    index 88
  • h5-index value: 21 h5-index 21
Volume 15, issue 9
Ann. Geophys., 15, 1089–1098, 1997
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-1089-8
© European Geosciences Union 1997

Special issue: Wind Measurements

Ann. Geophys., 15, 1089–1098, 1997
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-1089-8
© European Geosciences Union 1997

  30 Sep 1997

30 Sep 1997

Intercalibration of HRDI and WINDII wind measurements

M. D. Burrage, W. R. Skinner, and P. B. Hays M. D. Burrage et al.
  • Space Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Abstract. The High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) and the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) in- struments, which are both on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, measure winds by sensing the Doppler shift in atmospheric emission features. Because the two observation sets are frequently nearly coincident in space and time, each provides a very e.ective validation test of the other. Discrepancies due to geophysical di.erences should be much smaller than for comparisons with other techniques (radars, rockets, etc.), and the very large sizes of the coincident data sets provide excellent statistics for the study. Issues that have been examined include relative systematic o.sets and the wind magnitudes obtained with the two systems. A significant zero wind position di.erence of ~6 m s–1 is identified for the zonal component, and it appears that this arises from an absolute perturbation in WINDII winds of –4 m s–1 and in HRDI of +2 m s–1. Altitude o.sets appear to be relatively small, and do not exceed 1 km. In addition, no evidence is found for the existence of a systematic wind speed bias between HRDI and WINDII. However, considerable day-to-day variability is found in the quality of the agreement, and RMS di.erences are surprisingly large, typically in the range of 20±30 m s–1.

Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation