Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-97
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2018-97
29 Aug 2018
 | 29 Aug 2018
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Improvements to Predictions of the Ionospheric Annual Anomaly by the International Reference Ionosphere Model

Steven Brown, Dieter Bilitza, and Erdal Yiğit

Abstract. The annual anomaly is the ionospheric phenomena in which the globally-averaged electron density is greater in January than it is in July. This anomaly causes the ionospheric solsticial variation – a variation with a periodicity of one year that is in-phase with the January solstice – to be more pronounced over the Northern Hemisphere than the Southern Hemisphere. Predictions of the magnitude of annual anomaly using the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) model have been shown to be unreliable so far. The objective of our study is to investigate model prediction of the magnitude of the annual ionospheric anomaly using new ionospheric indices as inputs in the IRI model. These new indices improve predictions ionospheric variations that differ over the two hemispheres. We present a retrospective analysis of the IRI predictions of the ionospheric daytime annual anomaly and solsticial variation using a model-data comparison with observations from over 40 ionosondes for high, moderate, and low solar cycle conditions. Our results show that there is an overall 33 % underestimation of the magnitude of the annual anomaly when the by the IRI. When the new ionospheric indices as used in the IRI, model predictions underestimate the magnitude of the annual anomaly by 6 %. This indicates an improvement of the model predictions when using the new indices. We show that the underestimation of the annual anomaly by IRI is related to a similar underestimation of the magnitude of the ionospheric solsticial variation over the Northern Hemisphere. Based on our results, we infer that the underlying processes of the annual anomaly must vary across each hemisphere.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Steven Brown, Dieter Bilitza, and Erdal Yiğit

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Steven Brown, Dieter Bilitza, and Erdal Yiğit
Steven Brown, Dieter Bilitza, and Erdal Yiğit

Viewed

Total article views: 1,475 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
975 432 68 1,475 87 82
  • HTML: 975
  • PDF: 432
  • XML: 68
  • Total: 1,475
  • BibTeX: 87
  • EndNote: 82
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Aug 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,406 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,404 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
The ionosphere varies the most over the Northern hemisphere. This is called the annual anomaly. Ionospheric models, such as the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI), underrepresent the anomaly. The ionosphere affects radio waves, so it is important to always improve these models. We show that it is considering the ionosphere's hemispheric behavior is required to improve IRI. We suggest that the annual anomaly is caused by processes which differ over each hemisphere.