Volume 29, issue 9
Ann. Geophys., 29, 1581–1585, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Ann. Geophys., 29, 1581–1585, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1581-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
12 Sep 2011
12 Sep 2011
Reply to Stauning's comment on "The PC index: review of methods" by McCreadie and Menvielle (2010)
- 1University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 2LATMOS (Laboratoire Atmosphres, Milieux, Observations Spatiales), UVSQ/CNRS, Guyancourt, France
- 3Dept. des Sciences de la Terre, Univ. Paris Sud, Orsay, France
- 1University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
- 2LATMOS (Laboratoire Atmosphres, Milieux, Observations Spatiales), UVSQ/CNRS, Guyancourt, France
- 3Dept. des Sciences de la Terre, Univ. Paris Sud, Orsay, France
Download & links
-
Notice on corrigendum
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
-
Article
(279 KB)
How to cite: McCreadie, H. and Menvielle, M.: Reply to Stauning's comment on "The PC index: review of methods" by McCreadie and Menvielle (2010), Ann. Geophys., 29, 1581–1585, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1581-2011, 2011.
