Journal cover Journal topic
Annales Geophysicae An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 1.490
IF 5-year value: 1.445
IF 5-year
CiteScore value: 2.9
SNIP value: 0.789
IPP value: 1.48
SJR value: 0.74
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 88
Scimago H
h5-index value: 21
Volume 28, issue 8
Ann. Geophys., 28, 1615–1624, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Ann. Geophys., 28, 1615–1624, 2010
© Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

  31 Aug 2010

31 Aug 2010

Estimating the seismotelluric current required for observable electromagnetic ground signals

J. Bortnik1, T. E. Bleier2, C. Dunson2, and F. Freund3,4 J. Bortnik et al.
  • 1Dept. of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Room 7115 Math Sciences Bldg., UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1565, USA
  • 2QuakeFinder LLC., 250 Cambridge Ave., Suite 204, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
  • 3NASA Ames Research Center, Code SGE, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000, USA
  • 4Carl Sagan Center, SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

Abstract. We use a relatively simple model of an underground current source co-located with the earthquake hypocenter to estimate the magnitude of the seismotelluric current required to produce observable ground signatures. The Alum Rock earthquake of 31 October 2007, is used as an archetype of a typical California earthquake, and the effects of varying the ground conductivity and length of the current element are examined. Results show that for an observed 30 nT pulse at 1 Hz, the expected seismotelluric current magnitudes fall in the range ~10–100 kA. By setting the detectability threshold to 1 pT, we show that even when large values of ground conductivity are assumed, magnetic signals are readily detectable within a range of 30 km from the epicenter. When typical values of ground conductivity are assumed, the minimum current required to produce an observable signal within a 30 km range was found to be ~1 kA, which is a surprisingly low value. Furthermore, we show that deep nulls in the signal power develop in the non-cardinal directions relative to the orientation of the source current, indicating that a magnetometer station located in those regions may not observe a signal even though it is well within the detectable range. This result underscores the importance of using a network of magnetometers when searching for preseismic electromagnetic signals.

Publications Copernicus