Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-25
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-2022-25
05 Oct 2022
 | 05 Oct 2022
Status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal ANGEO and is expected to appear here in due course.

A comparison of Jason-2 plasmasphere electron content measurements to ground-based measurements

Andrew J. Mazzella Jr. and Endawoke Yizengaw

Abstract. Previous studies utilizing the Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers aboard Jason satellites have performed measurements of plasmasphere electron content (PEC) by determining the total electron content (TEC) above these satellites, which are at altitudes of about 1340 km. This study uses similar methods to determine PEC for the Jason–2 receiver for 24 July 2011. These PEC values are compared to previous determinations of PEC from a chain of ground–based GPS receivers in Africa using the SCORPION method, with a nominal ionosphere–plasmasphere boundary at 1000 km. The Jason–2 PECs with elevations greater than 60° were converted to equivalent vertical PEC and compared to SCORPION vertical PEC determinations. In addition, slant (off–vertical) PECs from Jason–2 were compared to a small set of nearly co–aligned ground–based slant PECs. The latter comparison avoids any conversion of Jason–2 slant PEC to equivalent vertical PEC, and can be considered a more representative comparison. The mean difference between the vertical PEC (ground–based minus Jason–2 measurements) values is 0.82±0.28 TEC units (1 TEC unit = 1016 electrons–m-2). Similarly, the mean difference between slant PEC values is 0.168±0.924 TEC units. The Jason–2 slant PEC comparison method may provide a reliable determination for the plasmasphere baseline value for the ground–based receivers, especially if the ground stations are confined to only mid–latitude or low–latitude regions, which can be affected by a non–negligible PEC baseline.

Andrew J. Mazzella Jr. and Endawoke Yizengaw

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on angeo-2022-25', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Andrew Mazzella, 30 Nov 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on angeo-2022-25', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Jan 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Andrew Mazzella, 13 Jan 2023

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on angeo-2022-25', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Nov 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Andrew Mazzella, 30 Nov 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on angeo-2022-25', Anonymous Referee #2, 01 Jan 2023
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Andrew Mazzella, 13 Jan 2023

Andrew J. Mazzella Jr. and Endawoke Yizengaw

Andrew J. Mazzella Jr. and Endawoke Yizengaw

Viewed

Total article views: 618 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
524 79 15 618 27 6 6
  • HTML: 524
  • PDF: 79
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 618
  • Supplement: 27
  • BibTeX: 6
  • EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Oct 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 591 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 591 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 05 Jun 2023
Download
Short summary
Global Positioning System (GPS) measurements of plasmasphere electron content (PEC) by Jason-2 are compared to PEC for ground-based GPS receivers in Africa. Jason-2 vertical PEC measurements corroborated the ground-based measurements and its co-aligned slant PEC values were generally close to the ground-based slant PEC values. This correspondence indicates that the Jason-2 PEC measurements could be used to resolve some ambiguities in the determination of the ground-based PEC values.