<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-41-225-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Statistical distribution of mirror-mode-like structures in the magnetosheaths of unmagnetised planets – Part 1: Mars as<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> observed by the MAVEN spacecraft</article-title><alt-title>Mirror-mode-like structures at Mars</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Mirror-mode-like structures at Mars}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Simon Wedlund et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Simon Wedlund</surname><given-names>Cyril</given-names></name>
          <email>cyril.simon-wedlund@oeaw.ac.at</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-7615</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Volwerk</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4455-3403</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Mazelle</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5332-9561</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Rojas Mata</surname><given-names>Sebastián</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-156X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Stenberg Wieser</surname><given-names>Gabriella</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-2937</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Futaana</surname><given-names>Yoshifumi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-3517</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Halekas</surname><given-names>Jasper</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Rojas-Castillo</surname><given-names>Diana</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6931-1742</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Bertucci</surname><given-names>César</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Espley</surname><given-names>Jared</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Austrian Academy of Sciences, Space Research Institute, Graz, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, Université de Toulouse,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> CNRS, UPS, CNES, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Autonomous City of Buenos Aires, Argentina</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Laboratory for Planetary Magnetospheres, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Cyril Simon Wedlund (cyril.simon-wedlund@oeaw.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>31</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>41</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>225</fpage><lpage>251</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>July</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>April</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Cyril Simon Wedlund et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/angeo-41-225-2023.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/angeo-41-225-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/angeo-41-225-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/angeo-41-225-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e211">In this series of papers, we present statistical maps of mirror-mode-like (MM) structures in the magnetosheaths of Mars and Venus and calculate the probability of detecting them in spacecraft data. We aim to study and compare them with the same tools and a similar payload at both planets. We consider their dependence on extreme ultraviolet (EUV) solar flux levels (high and low) and, specific to Mars, on Mars Year (MY) as well as atmospheric seasons (four solar longitudes Ls).
We first use magnetic-field-only criteria to detect these structures and present ways to mitigate ambiguities in their nature. In line with many previous studies at Earth, this technique has the advantage of using one instrument (a magnetometer) with good time resolution, facilitating comparisons between planetary and cometary environments. Applied to the magnetometer data of the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft from November 2014 to February 2021 (MY32–MY35), we detect events closely resembling MMs lasting in total more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">170</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s, corresponding to about 0.1 % of MAVEN's total time spent in the Martian plasma environment. We calculate MM-like occurrences normalised to the spacecraft's residence time during the course of the mission. Detection probabilities are about 1 % at most for any given controlling parameter. In general, MM-like structures appear in two main regions: one behind the shock and the other close to the induced magnetospheric boundary, as expected from theory. Detection probabilities are higher on average in low-solar-EUV conditions, whereas high-solar-EUV conditions see an increase in detections within the magnetospheric tail. We tentatively link the former tendency to two combining effects: the favouring of ion cyclotron waves the closer to perihelion due to plasma beta effects and, possibly, the non-gyrotropy of pickup ion distributions. This study is the first of two on the magnetosheaths of Mars and Venus.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Austrian Science Fund</funding-source>
<award-id>P32035-N36</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Swedish National Space Agency</funding-source>
<award-id>145/19</award-id>
<award-id>79/19</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page226?><p id="d1e234">Mirror modes (MMs) are magnetic bottles of various sizes and shapes containing high-density plasma drifting with the ambient plasma. They are often found in the magnetosheaths of solar system objects, either magnetised like Earth  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref> or weakly to non-magnetised like comets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.2"/>, Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref> and Mars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e261">Arising from plasma microinstabilities themselves triggered by an ion temperature anisotropy in the plasma, MM waves are compressional, essentially linearly polarised, ultra-low-frequency (ULF), long-wavelength transverse waves which are non-propagating in the plasma rest frame <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.5"/>. The drift MM instability is typically triggered in a weakly magnetised plasma (that is, in a high plasma beta <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a condition that is met in a planetary magnetosheath, whereas the Alfvén ion cyclotron instability takes over for low plasma-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. The MM instability is expected to grow when the MM instability criterion (MMI) is fulfilled for a plasma composed of charged species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.6"/>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M5" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MMI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where subscripts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the directions parallel and perpendicular to the ambient magnetic field direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The species temperature is noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the perpendicular plasma beta <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures the competing effects of plasma and magnetic pressures so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> representing the species density.</p>
      <p id="d1e472">Several mechanisms at the origin of the temperature anisotropy have been proposed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.7"/>. At every object with a well-defined bow shock (Earth, Mars, Venus and comets nearing perihelion), the quasi-perpendicular (noted “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>”) shock provides in its wake a preferential heating of the ions along the perpendicular direction to the magnetic field, favouring the generation of MMs. Another possibility exists, specific to environments with weak gravity (Mars, Venus, comets): in their extended exosphere, ions created by photoionisation are picked up by the solar wind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.8"/>. In the plasma rest frame, the velocity distribution function of these pickup ions takes the form of an unstable ring-beam distribution, with the relative value of both parallel and perpendicular components depending only on the local cone angle between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> field and the bulk plasma velocity vector at the location of the ionisation. For large-enough cone angles, the ring component of the distribution results in an ion temperature anisotropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is a source of free energy for microinstabilities such as MMs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e531">Because of their stationary nature, MMs can be convected downstream of their birth place, likely unchanged, by their surrounding plasma. As a consequence, many structures end up piling up against the magnetospheric boundary in the deep magnetosheath, where they are finally detected, as, for example, shown by Earth observations close to the magnetopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e538"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In spacecraft data, the signature of MMs takes the form of sudden dips or peaks in the magnetic field intensity in antiphase with plasma density variations, lasting a few seconds to tens of seconds. Considering that spacecraft are essentially at rest with respect to the ambient plasma and for plasma speeds of the order of 100 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, their sizes are at Mars of the order of a not insignificant fraction of a planetary radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3389.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. In addition, MMs likely share a common ancestor with magnetic holes (MHs), which are isolated magnetic field depressions usually found in the upstream solar wind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref> or in the magnetosheath of planets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e581">Traditionally, several ways of detecting MM structures have been used. The most widespread and easiest method is to use magnetic-field-only measurements with ad hoc criteria constraining the compressibility and the quasi-linear polarisation of the detected structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.13"/>. It has the advantage of using a well-calibrated instrument, the magnetometer, that has been flown on many space missions and has a high temporal resolution, good accuracy and excellent reliability over an extended mission lifetime. However, ambiguities in the nature of the detected structures always remain: for example, highly compressional structures may meet all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field criteria without necessarily fulfilling the MMI or the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anticorrelation behaviour, pointing to other types of waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.14"/>. Moreover, the criteria chosen are somewhat arbitrary and may either include many false positive detections or miss altogether most of the events if too stringent. Most of these ambiguities can at least be partially lifted with the use of dedicated plasma measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e615">A complementary approach is to use the property of MMs of having variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and plasma density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in antiphase. One caveat is that plasma measurements need to have sufficient temporal resolution to be able to capture structures not lasting more than a few tens of seconds: many ion instruments on earlier planetary space missions such as Mars Express or Venus Express (VEX) have a 192 s scanning rate, which is much too low to be of help. Electron measurements can fare better: at Mars, for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.16"/> looked instead at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> antiphase behaviour (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the electron density) of highly compressional linear structures to argue in favour of MMs. This was also because no ion instrument was flown on Mars Global Surveyor (MGS). Recently, a new study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.17"/> has taken advantage of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> criterion with magnetometer and ion instruments used in combination to detect MM-like structures across the first 4 years of measurements with MAVEN (Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN). They remarked that most structures likely form at the bow shock, where they take the shape of peaks or that of a mix of peaks and dips, with the latter in agreement with the case study results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.18"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page227?><p id="d1e689">A separate approach using plasma measurements and magnetic field data relies on the hierarchical scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.19"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.20"/> based on so-called “transport” ratios that formalise correlations in Fourier space between magnetic field and plasma pressure. This method is well suited for statistical surveys and has successfully been used at Mars by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.21"/> and at Venus by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.22"/>. Both studies presented two-dimensional maps of the distribution of low-frequency wave modes, showing that MMs are present in the magnetosheath and magnetotail at probabilities of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the bulk of the wave activity is contained in the Alfvén and quasi-parallel slow modes. This method is dependent on the plasma measurements and their Fourier analysis, which makes use of rather large temporal windows to be computationally feasible. Moreover, it is based on magnetohydrodynamic considerations, which may not be entirely reliable for kinetic microinstabilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e719">Alternatively, and to lift most ambiguities, the precise study of the MMI, with the derivation of robust ion and electron temperature anisotropy estimates at enough time resolution to be relevant to MMs, is ideally the best way of characterising MMs. This remains, however, to this day a challenging task more suited to case studies. Such an in-depth characterisation of MMs was for the first time made by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.24"/>. It was made possible by the arrival in 2014 at Mars of the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft, which carries magnetometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.25"/> and high-time-resolution plasma instruments, such as the Solar Wind Ion Analyzer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">SWIA;</named-content></xref> and the Solar Wind Electron Analyzer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.27"><named-content content-type="pre">SWEA</named-content></xref>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.28"/> described a classical event in December 2014 at the end of Mars Year 32 (MY32) containing a train of MMs lodged against the induced magnetospheric boundary (IMB). From considerations of the MMI and the size of these structures, the authors argued for a remote generation region in the immediate wake of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bow shock, in a way similar to Earth observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. With MAVEN, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.30"/> presented for the first time maps of the distribution of the temperature anisotropy at Mars using the maximum temperature perpendicular to the ambient magnetic field. Predictably, the Martian magnetosheath exhibits a strong anisotropy especially at regions controlled by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> shock for low Mach numbers. These anisotropies are especially conducive to the growth of MMs and Alfvén ion cyclotron waves.</p>
      <p id="d1e778">We aim in this series of papers to provide for the first time occurrence probability maps in different conditions at Mars (present paper, abbreviated Part 1) and Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">Part 2,</named-content></xref> using the same method of investigation. For simplicity, reproducibility and to allow for future comparisons at other solar system objects such as comets, we opt for a magnetic-field-only analysis in the same way as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78" id="text.32"/> using the magnetometers on board MAVEN and VEX. Contrary to Venus, no long-term statistical study has ever been dedicated to MMs at Mars, a gap we propose to address here.
In this way, we have the unique chance of directly comparing planets with the very same detection criteria, here based on, for example, the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.33"/>. Although ambiguities do remain regarding the nature of the detected structures, such a comparison remains meaningful as long as we are careful to remove false positive candidate structures that are obviously not MMs. Such work will serve as a basis for re-evaluating past datasets at Mars, Venus and comets.</p>
      <p id="d1e793">In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, we present our method of detection of MM-like events at Mars, based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria determined statistically from a subset of carefully chosen data. After describing techniques to mitigate the presence of false positive detections (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>), we apply the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria to the whole MAVEN magnetometer dataset between November 2014 and February 2021, covering four Mars Years, MY32 to MY35 included (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>). We proceed to create 2D maps of MM-like events normalised by the spacecraft residence time, which are in effect a probability to observe MM-like structures within a given grid cell (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). We then study and discuss in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> the dependence of these probabilities on several physical parameters of interest, such as Mars Year (MY), solar extreme ultraviolet (EUV) flux and Mars season, parameterised by the solar longitude Ls. For simplicity in this first comparative study based on a magnetic-field-only perspective, solar wind drivers such as dynamic pressure, interplanetary magnetic field configuration and strength or nature of the shock are left for future work. We conclude our present study with suggestions for improvements and new controlling parameters to explore (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Detecting mirror-mode-like structures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p id="d1e838">We use for this study the magnetic field investigation package on board MAVEN (abbreviated MAG in the following), which consists of two triaxial fluxgate magnetometers mounted at the extremity of boomlets  on the spacecraft's solar panels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.34"/>. It allows for the measurement of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> components of the magnetic field with a nominal frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz and an accuracy better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Because the structures we are looking for in the dataset are expected to last from a few seconds up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–20 s  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.35"/>, the high time resolution of the instrument is downsampled to  1 s .</p>
      <p id="d1e880">As supporting instrument for the event cases shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> (last panel), we use MAVEN's Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA) electrostatic ion analyser, which measures ion differential fluxes with a maximum temporal resolution of 4 s <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.36"/>. Specific modes are<?pagebreak page228?> available depending on energy/angle scanning and telemetry modes; we considered two modes here: SWICA (SWIA Coarse Archive, 8 s resolution), suited to magnetosheath conditions, and SWIFA (SWIA Fine Archive, 4 s resolution), designed for the monitoring of solar wind ions. Density moments are manually calculated from SWICA and SWIFA modes depending on the region considered.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Detection method</title>
      <p id="d1e898">The detection of MM-like structures is based on spacecraft magnetometer data using magnetic-field-only criteria. This has the advantage of a faster and unified detection across planets such as Mars or Venus, at the expense of the certainty that these detections are MM proper. We follow here the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.37"/>. These authors first used magnetic field and plasma data in coincidence to identify the unmistakable signature of a train of MMs during the early part of the mission and could then validate a set of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria to closely match these observations. Their rearranged series of criteria are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> for convenience. These criteria assume that the sought structures are compressional in nature (Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and that they are quasi-linearly polarised (Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>). Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> need to be simultaneously fulfilled in order for a MM-like event to be selected. After the initial detection, additional constraints can be put on the found intervals such as Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (quasi-linear polarisation) and Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (presence in the magnetosheath as opposed to in the solar wind). We briefly describe these criteria in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>, as the reader is referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.38"/> (and references therein) for further consideration and motivation regarding the specific values chosen for each criterion.</p>
      <p id="d1e969">Because the method is based only on criteria on the magnetic field and not on a more involved plasma data analysis, the possibility of false positive detections exists: we describe steps to mitigate this aspect in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>, with caveats discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>. Consequently, the events we are expected to capture here are candidate MMs, dubbed <italic>mirror-mode-like</italic> in the following (“MM-like”), to use the original nomenclature of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="text.39"/> at Venus. Moreover, we refer in the following to the detections as “events” as we go through each 1 s of magnetic field data, whereas “structures” refer to a MM-like fluctuation as a whole <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">a dip or a peak, or a mix of them, as in</named-content></xref>, which may contain several detected events. When accumulating detection events in a statistical spatial grid, the detection probability will simply be referred to as “probability of MM-like structures”.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e990">Magnetic-field-only criteria for detecting MM-like structures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">adapted from</named-content></xref>: magnetic field fluctuation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>); MVA angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between maximum (minimum) variance direction and that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>); ratio of MVA eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between maximum (intermediate) and intermediate (minimum) eigenvalues (Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>); moving standard deviation of magnetic azimuth and elevation angles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) and average background field over a 2 min interval (Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>).
We use most of the revised set of values in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.42"/>, except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changed from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for symmetry. The angular variation across a train of events is estimated by calculating the moving standard deviation noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a 2 min period (in accordance with the background field calculations); because angular variations in magnetic field azimuth and elevation need to be kept below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for linearly polarised structures, we choose here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">No.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Criterion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Value</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reason</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Inspired from</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Compressional structure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.43"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.44"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Compressional structure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.45"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.46"/>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.47"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Perpendicular wave propagation direction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.48"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.49"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Quasi-linearly polarised waves</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.50"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.51"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Quasi-linearly polarised waves</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.52"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="text.53"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Quasi-linearly polarised waves</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="text.54"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="text.55"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">imf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Magnetosheath conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.56"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{$B$-field-only criteria}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria</title>
      <p id="d1e1731">First, we estimate the background magnetic field intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a low-pass Butterworth filter as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.57"/> for Venus and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.58"/> for Mars. We adopt a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> min window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">band</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz), a passband ripple of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> dB and a stopband attenuation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> dB.</p>
      <p id="d1e1792">Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ensures that the structure is compressional with an absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field fluctuation of:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M98" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            that is, magnetic field fluctuations are larger than or equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the background field. To obtain criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, we then perform a moving minimum variance analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.59"><named-content content-type="pre">noted MVA; see</named-content></xref> with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s moving window, which is about the width of the larger MM structures found at Mars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.60"/>, and a shift of 1 s. From the MVA, we define two angles: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the angle between the maximum (minimum) variance eigenvector direction and that of the background magnetic field. A small (large) enough angle denotes also a compressional wave with propagation in the direction perpendicular to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.61"/>, as expected and shown in the kinetic MM simulations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.62"/>. We use also the ratio of the maximum-to-intermediate eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (intermediate-to-minimum eigenvalues <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to further constrain the shape of the variance ellipsoid into a cigar-shaped one <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">quasi-linear polarisation; see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1986">Example of MM-like detections at Mars, using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> on 8 September 2016, at relatively high solar activity. From top to bottom:
total magnetic field strength, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the background magnetic field calculated as a Butterworth low-pass filter over 2 min;
magnetic field azimuth (left axis) and elevation (right axis) angles;
MVA angles between the maximum (minimum) variance eigenvector direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and that of the background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> field on left axis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on right axis). The threshold values for selections of MMs are indicated by blue and red dotted lines for each respective angle;
MVA eigenvalue ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on left axis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, right axis), with their respective thresholds in dotted lines;
magnetic field and ion density variations so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> need to be in antiphase with respect to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for a typical MM behaviour. We downsample the magnetic field variations to the resolution of that of the ion instrument and calculate the background density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the same Butterworth filter as for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the solar wind before 00:15 UT, the SWIFA mode (4 s resolution) of SWIA is chosen for the calculation of the density moment variation, whereas afterwards the SWICA mode is preferred (8 s resolution) as per the recommendation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.64"/>.
We indicate below the figure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, radial distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in units of Mars' radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Solar longitude was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and average solar EUV flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the bow shock normal and the interplanetary magnetic field direction was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (reminiscent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bow shock conditions) assuming a smooth shock geometry as explained in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.65"/>.
The original detections using Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> appear as grey and vertical green lines, with the green portion representing the final detections with removal of false positives (Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>). The start position of the bow shock region in dotted purple is estimated through the predictor–corrector algorithm of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.66"/>. To replace this event in MAVEN's timeline of EUV activity and Ls ranges, see first orange dot in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2426">Example of MM-like detections at Mars, using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> on 23 March 2019, at relatively low solar activity. Conditions were: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (reminiscent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bow shock conditions). Ion density moments were calculated with the 8 s SWICA mode in the magnetosheath before 18:54 UT, and with the 4 s SWIFA mode afterwards. Otherwise, same caption as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. To replace this event in MAVEN's timeline of EUV activity and Ls ranges, see second orange dot in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2532">At this stage and using Criteria 1–4, the total number of detected 1 s duration MM-like events in the 1 November 2014–7 February 2021 MAVEN dataset was 2 046 533. Two examples of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only detections are presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> (higher solar activity conditions) and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> (lower solar activity) as events in green and grey. We will come back to discussing them in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Removal of false positive detections</title>
      <p id="d1e2556">The detection criteria 1–4 of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> may not exclude structures which may closely resemble MMs but, in effect, are not.</p>
      <?pagebreak page230?><p id="d1e2561">Some structures, appearing as highly compressional, can be generated upstream of and in and around the bow shock surface; they testify to the variability and complex structure of the Martian shock. These non-MM structures include upstream waves such as proton cyclotron waves (PCWs) and ULF foreshock waves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for observations and simulations</named-content></xref>. Because PCWs are linked to pickup ion processes, they are usually observed at Mars when the exosphere is particularly extended and neutral hydrogen densities significantly increase, that is, around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">270</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (just after perihelion, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ph</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and during the dust storm season for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx56" id="paren.68"/>, in the whole upstream region. PCWs are non-compressive in nature, which is ruled out by Criteria 1–2. Foreshock waves, on the other hand, are linked to back-streaming ions in the quasi-parallel shock. Both types of upstream waves are generated with a circular polarisation, characteristics which are filtered out by our Criteria 3–4 ensuring quasi-linear polarisation.
However, due to relative phase velocities with respect to the solar wind plasma, they may become steepened in the vicinity of the shock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.69"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for comets and Mars, respectively</named-content></xref>, their nonlinear growth stage tending towards more elliptical and quasi-linear polarisations, and with a rotation of the magnetic field across the structure in the steepened edge of the structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.70"/>. These nonlinearly evolved waves may sometimes be captured as MM-like by our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only detection Criteria 1–4.</p>
      <p id="d1e2655">Other types of structures, such as the so-called “fast-mode” type waves, can have similar compressional and polarisation characteristics as MMs; they occur deeper in the magnetosheath and in the magnetosphere. For example, fast-mode magnetosonic waves with quasi-linear polarisations have been observed at Mars downstream of the IMB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.71"/>, in a manner reminiscent of similar waves found downstream of the magnetic pileup boundary at comet 1P/Halley <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.72"/>, each time with MM waves in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> antiphase situated just upstream of the boundary. In contrast, the magnetosonic-type waves found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.73"/> close to the ionosphere and generated at the IMB by solar-wind-driven pressure pulses in the foreshock region are usually elliptically polarised. However, as before, certain associated steepened wave packets with strong fluctuations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) could also display a more quasi-linear polarisation and be potentially kept as MM-like candidates if we only apply Criteria 1–4 of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2709">In all previous cases, magnetic field intensity and plasma density will typically be in phase, as opposed to the expected MM behaviour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.74"/>. However, this information is sometimes neither available at the desired (high) time resolution nor practical to derive as in large statistical surveys. We suggest here two mitigation strategies for our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only investigation: (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) making sure that the magnetic field across the structures does not rotate more than about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as theoretically predicted for MMs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.75"/> and in agreement with past observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.76"/>, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) restricting the detections to magnetosheath conditions only and excluding the region around the bow shock to avoid foreshock transients and upstream waves.</p>
      <?pagebreak page231?><p id="d1e2758">Strategy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) constrains the detected events to behaviours more reminiscent of MMs: we apply Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> which ensures that the magnetic field does not rotate significantly across a MM-like structure.
From the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s magnetic field vector in MSO coordinates, thereby ignoring higher-frequency features which are not at the same scale as the ion-scale candidate mirror-mode structures, magnetic azimuth and elevation angles are defined as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M162" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>arctan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            First, within our original database of candidate MM-like detections, we define so-called “detection periods” containing all events consecutively detected, with two periods separated by a minimum of 30 s between one another. We discard periods of isolated singular events, defined as a detected event lasting no more than 1 s within a period. In this way, some of these discarded isolated events (DIEs) are not part of the usual quasi-periodic train of MM structures, which would result in more than one detection within a period. They are instead more reminiscent of the so-called “linear magnetic holes” (LMHs), in the original definition of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.77"/>, structures that we wish to filter out from the database. In contrast, if multiple detections occur consecutively within a whole period, these events may represent in reality either a large MM-like structure or a train of shorter MM-like structures, depending on the length of the period they belong to.
The particular value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s between detection periods was chosen empirically as double the length of the longest MM structures found at Mars or Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.78"><named-content content-type="pre">see, for example</named-content></xref>. We then estimate how much azimuth and elevation angles fluctuate at the detected position of the candidate event by calculating their running standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> min sliding interval, keeping only those events where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">az</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">el</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each angle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page232?><p id="d1e2943">Complementarily, strategy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>) may make use of the position of the bow shock crossing in the spacecraft data and ignore the detected events in a range of radial distances around it (or equivalently, in a range of durations around the time of the crossing). For this part, we use the automatic bow shock detection technique explained in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.80"/>, who used a predictor–corrector algorithm based on magnetic field measurements only at Mars. Their list of automatically detected crossings is freely available <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.81"/>. It discriminates between (i) crossings from the solar wind into the magnetosheath  and from the magnetosheath into the solar wind and (ii) quasi-perpendicular (noted “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>” in the following) and quasi-parallel (noted “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>') bow shock crossings. The latter aspect is useful for investigating how the shock configuration impacts the spatial distribution of MM-like structures (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>). It is important to note here that the technique of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.82"/> is biased towards the detection of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> crossings as it is based on the classic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field signature of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> shock, with clearly defined foot, ramp and overshoot. Between 2014 and 2021 of MAVEN operations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.83"/> recorded a total of 11 967 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2962 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> “clear” crossings, discarding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">615</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> crossings where the shock signatures were difficult to automatically ascertain.
In addition, knowing where the shock is can be used to automatically ensure that the structures are located in the magnetosheath. In turn, this naturally fulfils Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, where the background magnetic field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bg</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> needs to be 2 times higher than the average, but highly variable, interplanetary magnetic field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mtext>imf</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3111">Total numbers of MM-like events <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detected at Mars, according to the criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, incrementally, from 1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021 with the MAVEN/MAG instrument. DIE means discarding of isolated events. The most drastic decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurs when including the criterion on magnetic field azimuth and elevation angles, which should not change across a given event by more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Criterion 5).
</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Criteria</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Difference</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Decrease</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Comment</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2 046 533</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Original database</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">307 614</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">738</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">919</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Large angular fluctuations removed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">283 792</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">822</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Isolated events removed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> DIE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">176 041</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">751</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Shock and solar wind events removed, final database</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{2}?></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3376">In practice, knowing when the bow shock crossing took place, we first identify in spacecraft ephemerides the portion of the orbit in the solar wind as opposed to inside the bow shock structure.
Then, we remove all MM-like events that are closer than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.075</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) to the shock position, assuming that those are shock substructures, situated immediately upstream, at or downstream of the shock itself. This value was chosen empirically from a subset of orbits with magnetic fluctuations that were incorrectly captured by the original detection algorithm (see for an illustration Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3405">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> displays the number of MM-like events detected when incrementally applying the criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, together with the two mitigation strategies discussed above. From the original <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MM-like events detected in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1"/>, strategy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (using Criteria 5 and ignoring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">822</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isolated events) removed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total number of events: we end up with only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">283</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">792</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MM-like detections. Criterion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> is the criterion that removes most of those events due to the harsh constraint on the stability of the magnetic field angular fluctuations within trains of MM-like events. It shows moreover that Criterion 5 is of utmost importance to remove from the database candidates that are not linearly polarised. Applying strategy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to filter out shock substructures and solar wind magnetic holes (based on Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and an automatic estimate of the position of the shock) removes another <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">107</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">751</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events, resulting in a total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MM-like events in our final database.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>2.2.3</label><title>Examples and caveats of the method</title>
      <p id="d1e3524">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> (high solar activity conditions) and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> (low solar activity) show examples of MM-like detections, with total magnetic field and Criteria 1–4 of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Detections matching Criteria 1–4 in coincidence are shown as vertical grey and green lines, with the green lines marking the final detections with the removal of false positives (Criteria 1–4 and 5–6 in coincidence).</p>
      <p id="d1e3533">The events of 8 September 2016 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>) occur at and in the wake of a predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> bow shock crossing, with angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the normal to the shock surface and the average interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) direction of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Comparison of magnetic field and density variations is displayed in the bottom panel, with magnetic field (left axis, blue) and density (right axis, red) fluctuations being in antiphase when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have opposite signs. For the detections in grey in the ramp of the shock as initially captured by Criteria 1–4 but without removal of false positives, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> appear mostly in phase at the cruder resolution of the SWIA instrument (here 8 s, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> having most of the time the same sign in the bottom panel). Together with the position within the shock ramp, this implies a false positive detection: further applying Criteria 5–6, they are correctly removed from the final database, leaving only the events in green. The events in green display a mix of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in-phase and antiphase behaviours (bottom panel), with some of the shorter detected events appearing in phase, a characteristic more reminiscent of fast mode-type (e.g. magnetosonic) waves; this is however difficult to unambiguously ascertain owing to SWIA's 8 s resolution which cannot capture these shorter magnetic field structures. Around 00:19:30 UT, some oscillations are clearly in antiphase, whereas before and after they seem to become in phase again. Closer to 00:30 UT, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuations appear again in antiphase but are not captured by the detection algorithm, due to constraints on the linearity of the structures. This points further to the necessity of a more in-depth case study as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.84"/> to ascertain the nature of the fluctuations captured by our algorithm and shows the limitations of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only algorithm to detect MM structures. From a general point of view, the temperature anisotropies responsible for the generation of MMs are expected to take place in the wake of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> shock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.85"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. Consequently, we expect such time series, together with those discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.86"/> (24 December 2014 around 11:25 UT, also at high solar activity) or <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.87"/> (26 December 2014 around 15:00 UT in their Fig. 1), to harbour “textbook” examples of MM occurrences.</p>
      <?pagebreak page233?><p id="d1e3719">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> (23 March 2019), detections occur in the solar wind region around 19:15 UT (not shown) and in the magnetosheath towards the IMB around 18:38 UT, behind a predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shock (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, noted “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” in the following). Multiple crossings of the shock from the magnetosheath into the solar wind take place. The automatic estimate of the shock's location following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.88"/> pinpoints the last great magnetic field enhancement around 19:05 UT, whereas the magnetosheath-to-solar wind position is visually closer to 18:52 UT: this is due to the fact that automatic estimate choosing the last occurrence of a shock-like structure when crossing from the magnetosheath to the solar wind. In the solar wind after 19:05 UT, magnetic field and density seem mostly in phase: two “linear magnetic hole” (LMH) candidates (not shown) are first captured by Criteria 1–4. After they are removed from the database using Criteria 5–6, only MM-like events which are roughly in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> antiphase (around 18:39 UT) are kept.</p>
      <p id="d1e3795">That said, other events deeper in the magnetosheath (around 18:33 and 18:36 UT) and part of the database in grey are also removed because they are isolated events: the second of these events around 18:36 UT presents a clear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anticorrelation. This shows that although the detection method using Criteria 1–6 appears quite apt at detecting regions where MM-like events are present and at removing events that are clearly not MMs, it may also ignore promising candidates (especially around 18:30–18:34 UT). Conversely, as already mentioned in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, we expect the method to also keep events that are likely not MMs although situated in the magnetosheath but with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in phase.
For illustration, isolated 1 s events, discarded in the final database, amount to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">822</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> additional events, which make about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the final total number of events (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>).
As a consequence, on this criterion only (isolated event), we estimate that the frequency of true MM-like detections in our final database could be underestimated by about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3865">Another aspect is that several individual structures as part of trains of MMs are likely to have been missed by our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only method; see, for example, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, around 18:35 UT where clear <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> anticorrelations are not captured even by the original detection method. This is an inherent caveat of any automatic detection method based on somewhat arbitrary thresholds and a possibly flawed estimate of the background field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">who used upper and lower quartiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to overcome some of this difficulty</named-content></xref>. Choosing laxer detection criteria would increase the likelihood of capturing such structures; however this would also be at the expense of increasing false positive detections.</p>
      <p id="d1e3905">Finally, we only consider in our study so-called “linear” MM-like structures; theoretically, single MMs are purely growing modes, which an elliptical polarisation would prevent. However, as shown in studies made in the Earth's magnetosheath <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.90"/>, MMs can also be elliptically polarised in certain conditions. A discrimination between all polarisations states is difficult to achieve with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria and is outside of the scope of our study. Therefore, our method may miss a certain (but difficult to estimate) amount of structures which are MMs but are non-linearly polarised in nature.</p>
      <p id="d1e3918">Several tests have been made on reduced datasets to find the sweet spot of all criteria gathered in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.91"><named-content content-type="pre">see also the discussion in</named-content></xref> to keep as many confirmed MM-like structures as possible whilst avoiding other compressional structures that are not MMs. This points overall to the difficulty of characterising such structures reliably with magnetometer-only data.
In all cases, after applying our mitigation strategies, the number of events that are captured is thus most likely a lower estimate of the frequency of linearly and non-linearly polarised MM-like structures present around Mars.
As shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, one way to mitigate these aspects is to check for the antiphase behaviour between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–8 s resolution), at the expense of the smaller MM-like structures. This is outside the scope of our current work which aims at evaluating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only method of detection; using the full plasma instrumentation on board MAVEN is thus left to a future study, in a way similar to the recent study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.92"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Mapping technique</title>
      <p id="d1e3973">Calculating MM-like occurrence probabilities and mapping them in the magnetosheath of Mars proceed as follows.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Detection probability</title>
      <p id="d1e3983">First, we apply the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> in coincidence to the whole MAVEN dataset, from November 2014 to February 2021. This yields the timing and duration of MM-like structures, noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. It is important to remark here that a full dip or peak of any given MM-like structure is usually longer than the total sum of 1 s detections for that structure. This arises from the fact that all the criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> must be simultaneously met to validate this as a detection. Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can only be an underestimate of the total duration of a structure. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.93"/>, we evaluate such an underestimate to at least <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on visual comparisons in the subset of events presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> and in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.94"/>, who, with the same detection algorithm,<?pagebreak page234?> captured 33 s out of a total of 77 s of visually identified MM structures.</p>
      <p id="d1e4056">Second, we define a spatial grid for the data accumulation. We start with spacecraft coordinates expressed in the Mars Solar Orbital (MSO) coordinate system (sometimes called  “Sun-state” coordinates), where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> axis points towards the Sun from the centre of Mars, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> points towards Mars' north pole and is perpendicular to the orbital plane defined as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane passing through the centre of Mars, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> completing the right-hand triad. We then transform this system into aberrated MSO coordinates by rotating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anticlockwise around the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> axis in order to account for the apparent “aberration” of the orbital motion of Mars with respect to the average direction of the solar wind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.95"/>. The new aberrated coordinate system, aligned with the average apparent solar wind direction, is noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (although  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by construction). For brevity, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) direction is sometimes referred to as “subsolar” (“antisolar”) direction in the following, although, strictly speaking, they should be referred to as “subsolar-wind” and “antisolar-wind” directions.</p>
      <p id="d1e4253">A two-dimensional cylindrical coordinate grid can then be created, with the abscissa <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> axis and the ordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MSO</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>. The grid resolution is chosen so that, on average, the residence time of the spacecraft in each grid cell is large enough in all cells covered by the spacecraft's orbit. For example, for Mars (average planetary radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3389.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) and applied to MAVEN 2014–2021 ephemerides, a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ensures that the spacecraft residence time in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cell is of the order of 500–1000 s (8–16 min) per grid cell for a typical Mars year of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">687</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Earth days; for a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, average residence times are of the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h). The latter resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is thus chosen to maximise the statistical significance of the MM-like detections. Examples of spacecraft residence times with this grid resolution are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, left panels, for several consecutive Mars years.</p>
      <p id="d1e4440">We can now define the probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of detecting MM-like events in a chosen spatial grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the total duration of the detected events <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> divided by the accumulated residence time of the spacecraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.96"><named-content content-type="pre">see also</named-content></xref>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M290" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the number of events found in each grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other words, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the percentage of observations containing a MM-like event at any given point in the magnetosheath. The accumulation of the events in the grid, including those crossing a cell boundary, is naturally taken into account using a bi-variate histogram accumulation.</p>
      <p id="d1e4596">An example of spacecraft residence time and MM-like detection probabilities is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a, b.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> is discussed further in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>. As mentioned above, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an underestimate of the total duration of MM-like structures in the magnetometer dataset, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is also underestimated: we thus refer to it as a “detection probability” of detecting MM-like structures.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4627">Mission-wide results at Mars as observed by the MAVEN/MAG instrument from MY32 to MY35 (1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021). <bold>(a)</bold> Spacecraft residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> Percentage occurrence of detecting MM-like structures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h in any given grid cell. <bold>(c)</bold> Magnetic field fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In panel <bold>(c)</bold>, the mean magnetic fluctuation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highlighted by an arrow on the colour bar.
In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, the average residence time in a grid cell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given for reference. In panel <bold>(b)</bold>, the average probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a grid cell, ignoring all grid cells for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h (vertical arrow in the colour bar of panel <bold>a</bold>), is also given.
The average positions of the “nominal” bow shock (BS) and of the induced magnetospheric boundary (IMB) are given for reference as black continuous lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.97"><named-content content-type="post">noted “E08”</named-content></xref>, based on MGS data. Other bow shock positions representative of Mars Express and MAVEN datasets are in dotted lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.98"><named-content content-type="post">all points, noted “H19”</named-content></xref> and as dashed lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.99"><named-content content-type="post">all points, noted “SW22”</named-content></xref>. The average IMB and the BS lines roughly delimit the magnetosheath region; of note, detections seemingly outside of this average bow shock on the picture are in reality always inside the shock for individual events. Coordinates are solar wind-aberrated, normalised to the radius of Mars (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3389.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km).
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>2.3.2</label><title>Characterisation with respect to physical parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e4831">To study how the distribution of MM-like structures varies during the time of the mission, we choose several controlling physical parameters, which are summarised in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. We discriminate our results against the following.
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4838">Mars Year (MY): on average, one MY lasts 1.88 Earth years (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">687</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> Earth days). Because MAVEN started its scientific investigation in November 2014, we consider data from this date (after the autumn equinox of MY32) up to MY35 (ending on 7 February 2021). Precise start and end times for each MY were obtained from the equation of time of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.100"/> (their Eq. 14).  For reference, MY32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [31 January 2013–18 June 2015 12:34 UT], MY33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [18 June 2015 12:34 UT–5 May 2017 11:45 UT], MY34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [5 May 2017 11:45 UT–23 March 2019 11:32 UT] and MY35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [23 March 2019 11:32 UT–7 February 2021 11:12 UT].</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e4881">EUV flux levels: following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.101"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.102"/>, we use two EUV flux levels: one “high” for EUV fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and one “low” for fluxes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00277</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This limit, noted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the following, is the median of the EUV flux in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2014</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2021</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> period as calculated from FISM-IUVS' daily irradiance at 121.5 nm (Lyman-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> line), itself derived from the Mars EUVM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.103"/>. It is also close to the threshold value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.0029 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> considered by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.104"/> for the first year of MAVEN observations. During the time of the mission, the solar activity went from medium to low (from MY32 to MY34) followed by a slight recovery during MY35; local peaks in the measured EUV flux correspond to perihelion conditions and local dips to aphelion conditions (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page235?><p id="d1e5007">Solar longitude (Ls): Ls measures the position of a planet in its orbit around the Sun. Because Mars has a relatively high orbital eccentricity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϵ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0935</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is tilted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to its orbital plane, Ls is also a measure of atmospheric seasons. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) corresponds to perihelion (aphelion) conditions. In this study, we use four ranges centred on equinoxes and solstices: Ls1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [315–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] (northern hemisphere [NH] spring equinox), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [45–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] (NH summer solstice), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls3</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [135–225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] (NH autumn equinox), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls4</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [225–315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] (NH winter solstice). Season timings were also obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.105"/> (their Eqs. 15–19). See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> for the centred seasons with respect to time.</p></list-item></list>
As discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.106"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.107"/>, each controlling parameter is co-dependent on other parameters. The Martian atmosphere depends on a complex interplay between heliocentric distance, axial tilt and atmospheric circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.108"/>. At perihelion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the solar EUV flux is largest (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) and causes the Martian exosphere to progressively heat up and significantly expand <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.109"/>.
In their study of the hydrogen (H) exosphere's seasonal variability, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.110"/>, confirmed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.111"/>, found a peak of H column density around the NH winter solstice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">270</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting either a degree of latency in the exosphere's response to solar inputs, a seasonal component due to lower atmosphere dynamics or both.
Simultaneously to these complex changes, increased EUV fluxes lead to increased ionisation in the ionosphere and in the exosphere far in the upstream solar wind (increased charge exchange and pickup ion process), leading to the induced magnetospheric obstacle to the solar wind to grow in size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.112"/>. Consequently, one Ls bin (representing a Martian season) encompasses effects arising from several mechanisms affecting the extent of the exosphere and that of the Mars plasma environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.113"/>: global atmospheric circulation, presence of dust storms or EUV inputs, themselves a function of heliocentric distance and solar cycle <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.114"/>. Similarly, any given Mars year includes variations in atmospheric seasons and EUV flux (since the solar EUV flux varies significantly with heliocentric distance, to which the solar activity variations are superimposed). Either Mars years, Ls or EUV flux levels indiscriminately contain all bow shock geometries, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> alike.</p>
      <p id="d1e5242">For each of the above controlling parameters, external drivers include the highly variable solar wind inputs, such as dynamic pressure and Mach number <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.115"/>. This makes it all the more difficult in practice to isolate the role of a single controlling parameter from the others. For example, one way to help disentangle these effects would be to study the seasonal changes at a fixed EUV flux level or, inversely, to study a EUV flux level at a fixed seasonal bin. However, depending on the chosen binning, the event statistics may become too low for a statistically significant interpretation. We leave this for a future study, when MAVEN will have completed several additional MYs, and choose a complementary approach using the probability density function (PDF) of the total number of detected events as a guide (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e5252">Lyman-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> daily modelled irradiance levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between MY32 and MY35 as derived from the EUVM instrument on board MAVEN and corrected with the FISM-M EUVM model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.116"/>. The median of the irradiance throughout this period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (horizontal dashed line) which separates in our study high EUV conditions from low EUV conditions at Mars. Mars years (MYs) and northern hemisphere seasons (Ls) are highlighted, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> marking the northern spring equinox and the start of a new Mars Year. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls3</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls4</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for brevity. The timings of aphelia (local minima of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and perihelia (local maxima, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are indicated as short vertical grey lines. Solar cycle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> started in December 2019, marked as a vertical dotted line. The orange dots correspond to the timings of the two examples presented in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e5499">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/> presents the general statistics of our MM-like structure database, with a total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events detected between 1 November 2014 and 7 February 2021 (last day of MY35), with a total residence time of the spacecraft in the<?pagebreak page236?> magnetosheath and magnetosphere of about 4.4 Earth years, compared to a total orbiting time of 6.1 Earth years. For each controlling parameter we calculate the residence time of MAVEN inside the bow shock of Mars and the global observation ratio of MM-like events. By contrast, we also calculate the total residence time of MAVEN and the proportion in percentage that MAVEN spends inside the bow shock during its orbiting time around Mars, using the fast bow shock detection of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.117"/> to pinpoint where the magnetosheath finishes and the solar wind starts in the individual orbits. During the time span covered, MAVEN remains about 70 % of its orbiting time downstream of the bow shock. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, we will discuss the significance of these ratios and contrast them against the detection probability maps.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e5523">Statistics of MM-like event in the magnetosheath of Mars found from 1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021 with the MAVEN/MAG instrument, following the detections performed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> and for different cases. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the total number of MM-like events found (equivalent to a duration in s because of the magnetometer resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total duration that the spacecraft spent inside the bow shock of Mars during that time (excluding thus the time spent in the solar wind), whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total time spent by MAVEN in the whole volume of space, given here as a comparison. Observation ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the percentage of MM-like detections in the magnetosheath, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mtext>msh</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the proportion of the full orbit coverage that MAVEN effectively spends in the magnetosheath; both are expressed in percentages.
</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  [s]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [s]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [s]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mtext>msh</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [%]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MY32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14 285</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12 519 185</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.114</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18 005 770</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MY33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">58 584</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">41 047 441</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.143</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59 120 895</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MY34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50 315</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39 389 107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.128</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">59 188 581</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MY35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">52 857</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46 748 279</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.113</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">56 662 768</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">82.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EUV flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.77 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">88 688</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">74 105 086</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">105 764 081</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">70.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EUV flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">87 353</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">65 598 926</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.133</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">87 213 933</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">75.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ls1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [315–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49 497</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39 072 449</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.127</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52 184 340</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">74.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ls2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [45–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">56 591</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">38 690 683</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.146</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">51 082 098</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">75.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ls3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [135–225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">36 928</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">30 274 297</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.122</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">41 449 456</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">73.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ls4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [225–315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33 025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">31 666 583</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.104</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">48 262 120</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">65.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">176 041</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">139 704 012</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">192 978 014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">72.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{3}?></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results: mapping MM-like occurrence around Mars</title>
      <p id="d1e6099">We now present the statistics and the 2D cylindrical coordinate occurrence maps of MM-like structures in the magnetosheath of Mars resulting from our automatic detections described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Overview of the full dataset</title>
      <p id="d1e6113">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the probability density function (PDF) of several characteristic quantities for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MM-like events detected from 1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021 (MY32 to MY35): magnetic field intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (panel a) as well as those of Criteria <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> inside the structures (panels b to f). For each, we indicate the bin position of the peak of the distribution. Most detected events exhibit characteristics that are close to the criteria threshold values (panels b, c and e). The eigenvalue ratios extracted from the MVA (panels e and f) show that the variance ellipsoid is cigar-shaped, although not exceedingly so, with most values having <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The variance ellipsoid is also oriented along the average background magnetic field direction, as shown in panels (c) and (d), with most values having <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≲</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Together, these criteria make sure that the structures are highly compressional and quasi-linearly polarised, as expected from MMs.</p>
      <p id="d1e6231">The spatial distribution of the detected structures is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> as maps for the full dataset considered here, with a bin resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For reference, we also indicate the “nominal” bow shock (BS) and induced magnetospheric boundary (IMB, sometimes referred to as “magnetic pileup boundary”) from several previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.118"/>. Because these boundary positions were determined statistically and represent an average over an extensive range of geophysical conditions, their exact position may vary by a few grid cells for individual observations and should only be taken as<?pagebreak page237?> a rough indicator of the shape of the boundaries around that point.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a displays the residence time of the spacecraft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: on average, MAVEN spends a little less than 47 h in each cell with a very homogeneous coverage throughout, except in the subsolar region in the upstream solar wind and in the deep magnetospheric tail in the antisolar-wind direction. The regions of maximum orbital coverage are close to the IMB and around the terminator plane in the magnetosheath.</p>
      <p id="d1e6268">The spacecraft residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is then used as a normalising factor to calculate the probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of detecting MM-like events (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), expressed here in percentage and in logarithmic scale. In this representation, we ignore all grid cells for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h to ensure a good statistics: MAVEN thus stays a minimum cumulated time in each cell equivalent to about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> times the duration of the longest single MM-like structure at Mars (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s).</p>
      <p id="d1e6329">MM-like structures are mostly confined to two main regions: one in the immediate vicinity of the predicted shock (at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and one in the magnetosheath pressed against the IMB. Both of these regions have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with maximum values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % reached in the subsolar region of the magnetosheath, close to the IMB. A third region can be identified in the magnetospheric tail, where occasional high probabilities are encountered. Qualitatively, this is very similar to the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.119"/>, who showed that MM waves were predominantly present in MAVEN's first year of operations in the deep magnetosheath and in the tail. They reported average occurrence ratios of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> somewhat uniformly distributed in the volume of space, with peaks between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> occurring in three main regions: the middle of the magnetosheath for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, closer to the IMB for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and in the magnetospheric tail inside the statistical IMB.
Although our main detection regions are similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.120"/>, both in position and shape, we report here much lower absolute detection probabilities of MM-like events (maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). If we take into account the length of the datasets considered in each study, their results included about 4 months of observation during MY32 and thus are most comparable to our Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a. However, a quantitative comparison with the values of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.121"/> appears extremely challenging at this stage. One reason is that the two detection methods are fundamentally different: ours uses a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s resolution at the expense of an ambiguity in the nature of the detected structure with a clear underestimate of the total duration of the found events, whereas theirs uses wave analysis techniques based on transport ratios with a cruder time resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s with a Fourier transform on consecutive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s intervals), looking for the mode producing the maximum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field power in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s window. In that way, our quantitative results are more comparable to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.122"/>, who recently found, with similar techniques as ours (but using the additional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> antiphase behaviour), an occurrence rate of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average over the first 4 years of MAVEN data.
The strategies we applied to help remove possible false positive detections may, to a certain extent, have filtered out legitimate events. Moreover, as explained in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1"/>, the total duration of MM-like events <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>struct</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is underestimated in our approach by more than 50 % because of inherent limitations in the detection method. All points combined, this implies that our detection probability should be seen as a lower estimate (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e6561">Probability density functions (PDF) for the criteria given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> for the MM-like events detected with MAVEN/MAG from MY32 to MY35 (1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021). <bold>(a)</bold> Total magnetic field intensity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in bins of 1 nT. <bold>(b)</bold> Magnetic field fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>: angles between average magnetic field direction and maximum (minimum) variance direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>maxV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>minV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Panels <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>: ratios of maximum to intermediate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (intermediate to minimum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>int</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) eigenvalues, in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. The position of the maximum of the PDF and its typical bin is marked by a grey zone. All bins are uniformly distributed.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e6711">Daily detection rate of MM-like events as observed by the MAVEN/MAG instrument from MY32 to MY35 (1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021), using the criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and considering magnetosheath-only observations. The red line corresponds to the running mean of the black curve over 7 d, and the dotted green line corresponds to Mars Year averages (given as numbers in the top). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the median of the whole signal in black, with its corresponding standard deviation. Because MAVEN can spend up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of its time per orbit in the solar wind (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), all numbers quoted here could tentatively be multiplied by a factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detections d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> giving a conservative estimate.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page238?><p id="d1e6783">In contrast to the two main high-probability regions discussed above, we identify a region of low probabilities in the portion of the sheath behind the terminator plane and in the tail, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We hypothesise that this is due to the plasma flow configuration which may preferentially transport the MMs almost unchanged from their birth region behind the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> shock down to the IMB and along it.</p>
      <p id="d1e6815">Quantitatively, these results are in line with studies at Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.123"/>, which registered detection probabilities of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average, with maxima of occurrences taking place immediately behind the shock and close to the IMB. As in our results, these authors also pointed out increased occurrences in the magnetospheric tail.
It is important to remark here that the average modelled position of the shock appears in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b to fall in the middle of the distribution; however, because we removed shock substructures from the dataset (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>) and considered only magnetosheath events, all of the events shown here are in effect in the magnetosheath and not in the solar wind. This attests to the high variability of the shock position and the limitations of a single modelled curve to represent accurately the position of the shock, a conclusion in conformity with dedicated studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.124"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6841">Probability density functions (PDFs) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MM-like events detected from the end of MY32 to the end of MY35. Panels <bold>(a)</bold>–<bold>(c)</bold> discriminate between two irradiance levels, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (low EUV flux, blue lines) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (high EUV flux, red lines). Panels <bold>(d)</bold>–<bold>(f)</bold> discriminate between four Ls seasons (Ls1–4), as defined in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. These PDFs are calculated for the following parameters:
Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>: radial polar coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in bins of 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The radius of Mars is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3389.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km;
Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>: EUV irradiance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in bins of 0.1 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>: seasons (Ls), in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The PDF is normalised to the total number of detected events, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">176</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">041</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Some remarkable features are pointed out by a vertical dashed line, i.e. transition region in PDF in panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>.
Moreover, we also include: in panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold>, the range of positions of the subsolar and terminator standoff bow shock distances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ss</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>td</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.125"><named-content content-type="post">between low and high EUV conditions</named-content></xref> and the range of subsolar IMB positions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ss,imb</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.126"/>; in panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold>, the median value of the EUV flux <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>, the aphelion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and perihelion positions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e7192">Magnetic field compressional fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the detected events are next shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c. Following Criterion 1, we consider only events with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Fluctuations are comparatively higher in the magnetosheath (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and relatively low in the magnetosphere (delimited by the average IMB, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bg</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). More precisely, some of the largest magnetic fluctuations occur close to the terminator plane around the shock and in the subsolar magnetosheath closing in on the IMB, with values often reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and above. Median fluctuations are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the detected events at the chosen grid resolution.
In the magnetosphere's tail, certain cell-by-cell fluctuations are quite abrupt from low to high values, in part due to the increasingly poor orbital coverage in this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e7313">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> displays the daily detection rate of MM-like detections inside the bow shock during the entire mission. The numbers quoted here represent an accumulation of the detected events in the magnetosheath over a full 24 h of observation by MAVEN. However, during the time span considered here, MAVEN spent at most <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of its time in the solar wind per orbit (see <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>O</mml:mi><mml:mtext>msh</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>), and so all magnetosheath detection rates quoted here should be multiplied by about a factor at least <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to compensate for the absence of temporal coverage when in the solar wind. For simplicity, we will quote the numbers below as they are,<?pagebreak page239?> and apply a corrective factor when generalising and comparing to other studies.
On average throughout MY32 to MY35 with MAVEN, we find <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detections per day (ignoring single isolated 1 s events; see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>) fulfilling the criteria of Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. Because of the MAG resolution chosen, this represents 68 s of detected events per day, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> detections per hour.
Large departures from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> d average in red can be seen, but they appear to steadily decline over time. This behaviour coincides with a progressive decline of EUV flux and solar activity at Mars during that period (compare with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).
For further comparisons, we look at the evolution of this detection rate with respect to MY, assuming that MAVEN's orbit coverage of the magnetosheath was similar between MYs. The latter assumption is mostly fulfilled for MY33 and MY34 (as can be seen later in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, left column), with similar orbits and a similar amount of time spent in Mars' environment, whereas MY32, and to a lesser extent MY33, have quite different spatio-temporal coverages. The mean daily detection rate over each MY changes little (dotted green line on the figure), with MY33 having more detections (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> detections d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in mostly high EUV flux) than any other year and MY34 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> detections d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in mostly low EUV flux) having less detections. As expected, MY32 seems to be a clear outlier due to a looser coverage around the subsolar magnetosheath and MAVEN probing only the later portion of the full MY. This suggests that we cannot compare absolute detection numbers between MYs without first normalising to the spacecraft's residence time during that period. Such a normalisation is performed and discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e7438">Following  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.127"/> who used MAVEN measurements over a period of 3 months, magnetic holes in the solar wind represent about 2.1 LMHs d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, lasting about 20 s each, that is, a total of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–50 s of LMH detection per day. This number can be tentatively compared to our results if we consider that applying Criteria 1–4 only on MAVEN's magnetometer data does not filter out solar wind LMHs from our MM-like event database. In that case, we obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 180 s of events per day. Removing the 50 s d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of LMHs, we end up with 130 s d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a number marginally larger than our corrected (lower) estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s of MM-like detections in the magnetosheath (Criteria 1–6). This would be statistically consistent with the hypothesis that the majority of the events captured in the solar wind are isolated events reminiscent of LMHs, as discussed when attempting to remove false positive detections (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2"/>). Conversely, if we assume that a typical MM-like structure lasts about 10 s on average <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.128"><named-content content-type="pre">as in</named-content></xref>, we end up with 100 s divided by 10 s, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MMs d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Mars' magnetosheath.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Spatial dependence on physical parameters</title>
      <p id="d1e7549">Spatial maps of MM-like structures around Mars detected with MAVEN using magnetic-field measurements are discussed below with respect to the controlling parameters expounded in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS2"/>. Before examining these in more detail, we present a few considerations based on their probability density function (PDF).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e7556">Residence time (left), probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of detecting MM-like structures (middle) and departure from the total detection probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right) at Mars, binned by MY. The percentage difference is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with positive hot-hued (negative cold-hued) values showing where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The total rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field data only with MAVEN/MAG were used in the detection, from 1 November 2014 to 7 February 2021. <bold>(a)</bold> MY32. <bold>(b)</bold> MY33. <bold>(c)</bold> MY34. <bold>(d)</bold> MY35. Bow shock average positions are shown as dotted lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.129"><named-content content-type="post">MY32, MY33 and all points, noted H19</named-content></xref> and in dashed lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.130"><named-content content-type="post">for each MY, noted SW22</named-content></xref>. See also caption of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for other details.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Probability density function (PDF)</title>
      <?pagebreak page240?><p id="d1e7715">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> presents the PDF of the detected MM-like structures with respect to radial polar coordinate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (panels a and d, in bins of 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is the resolution of our 2D distribution maps), EUV flux levels (panels b and e, in bins of 0.1 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Ls (panels c and f, in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Each PDF is discriminated against high and low solar flux levels (panels a–c) and against Ls ranges (panels d–f, with Ls1–4 for NH spring, summer, autumn and winter) to illustrate the co-dependence of the studied parameters.
Panels (b) and (f) represent the baseline statistics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and Ls parameters. They highlight the bins where the PDFs have larger values and hence the parameter has a good statistical coverage.
For example, the sharp drop in PDF occurring for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b is due to the smaller spacecraft orbital coverage above this threshold: this is also clearly seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>, where only MY32 and MY33 contribute to the statistics, with the threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> just above the irradiance local peaks during MY34 and MY35. Successive Ls ranges are in contrast quite homogeneously distributed with relatively constant PDFs throughout (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f), with the Ls2 range having the largest PDF overall. Note that in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b and f, the finite width of EUV (single precision compared to the double precision <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold) and Ls bins results in expected overlaps at the borders between blue, red, orange and purple lines.</p>
      <p id="d1e7866">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, d, we see a combined peak of the PDFs in the 1.2–1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins, close to the position of the IMB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.131"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ss,imb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.33</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>td,imb</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see</named-content></xref>. The PDF drops by almost half around 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, roughly 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ahead of the bow shock's variable subsolar position. Hence, a rather homogeneous ring of MM-like structures around the planet forms, centred on 1.2–1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as already seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.
Overall, the distributions look very similar for all EUV and Ls ranges considered. However, we see two more prominent peaks of the PDF: one  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inwards of the terminator standoff distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mtext>td</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (true for all EUV conditions and Ls ranges) and the other 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outwards of it (low EUV conditions, Ls2 contributing most, Ls4 the least due to reduced spatial coverage of MAVEN in these conditions). These two peaks correspond in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> to the tail detections around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the centre of Mars and to the detection enhancement around the average shock position in the terminator plane around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8030">The co-dependence between EUV flux and Ls range is clearly seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c and e. Obviously, aphelion and perihelion conditions mostly correspond to PDFs for low and high EUV solar fluxes, respectively. The main peak in the PDF appears in bin <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> within the “Ls2” range (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f), slightly after aphelion conditions.
No peak in the PDF particularly stands out for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and higher EUV fluxes, although a relatively lower PDF seems to occur around perihelion conditions. Complementarily, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f and  e, range Ls2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, containing aphelion conditions) is dominated by low EUV fluxes, whereas Ls4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, containing perihelion conditions) is dominated by high EUV flux, with the first range strongly peaking at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the second range at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, these two Ls ranges appear to be a good proxy of conditions driven by seasons only at an almost constant EUV flux, either low or high. The remaining two Ls ranges, Ls1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Ls3 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), have similar distributions with respect to EUV flux and are thus more comparable to one another.</p>
      <?pagebreak page241?><p id="d1e8223">Overall, these preliminary results are consistent with past observations at Mars, be it with MGS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.132"/> or with MAVEN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.133"/>, who all noted that MM structures seemed to pile up against the IMB. This suggests that MMs, after being created upstream of their detection place, are convected down to it with the ambient plasma flow. Using the full MAVEN plasma complement and owing to the ambient plasma becoming less unstable to MMs the further away from the shock, the locus of generation of the MMs found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.134"/> was inferred to be in the immediate wake of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> shock, a condition that seems to predominate in the 2014–2021 MAVEN dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.135"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e8256">Residence time (left) and probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in % of detecting MM-like structures (middle) at Mars, with respect to EUV irradiance levels. <bold>(a)</bold> Low EUV fluxes. <bold>(b)</bold> High EUV fluxes. <bold>(c)</bold> Relative difference between high and low EUV levels with respect to the total detection probability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed in percentage. As before, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the map obtained in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b. The colour yellow indicates regions with the same probabilities between the two conditions, whereas blue “cold” hue (red “hot” hue) regions indicate where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is dominated by low (high) EUV conditions.
Bow shock average positions are shown as dotted lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.136"><named-content content-type="post">all points, noted H19</named-content></xref> and as dashed lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.137"><named-content content-type="post">for each EUV flux level, noted SW22</named-content></xref>. See also caption of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for other details.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=503.61378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e8359">Probability density function of EUV-discriminated relative detection probabilities, for the “full magnetosheath” <bold>(a)</bold>, and for the “deep magnetosheath” <bold>(b)</bold>. As in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, we calculate the relative difference between high and low EUV levels with respect to the total detection probability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, expressed in percentage, with positive values showing preponderance towards high EUV conditions, and negative values towards low EUV conditions. “Full magnetosheath” considers the detection probabilities outside of the average IMB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.138"><named-content content-type="pre">defined by the fit of</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for MGS data at high EUV flux conditions</named-content></xref>, whereas “Deep magnetosheath” only considers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the narrow region delimited by the two black continuous lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, between the two average fits of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.139"/>. Generalised extreme value (GEV) fits to the distributions are shown in orange, together with their peak position (dotted vertical line). The symmetric position where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as dashed green line. Deviation from a symmetric distribution is given by the skewness of the distributions: negative skewness highlights a distribution whose mass is concentrated on the left (low EUV conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas a positive skewness has the distribution concentrated towards the right (high EUV conditions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A kurtosis of more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> as calculated here implies that the tails of the distributions are heavier than those of the normal distribution. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PDF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) represents the percentage of the total PDF that lies on the left (right) of the “zero” dashed green line.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Dependence on Mars Year</title>
      <?pagebreak page242?><p id="d1e8548">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> presents, for four MYs (panels a–d), the spacecraft residence time (left panels), the MM-like detection probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (middle panels), and their relative difference (right panels) with respect to the total detection probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (taken from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b), in the same format as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Because MAVEN started observing late in Oct. 2014 (towards the end of MY32), the statistical coverage for MY32 is lower than for MY33–MY35, with a residence time in a grid cell on average about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> times less than any other year. Similarly, because of the orbit being more compact around the planet during MY35 (panel d), the mean residence time in a given grid cell is significantly higher than for the other years. However, relatively high average residence times above 5 h ensure a good statistical coverage of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial plane.</p>
      <p id="d1e8616">The detection probabilities are shown in percentages on the middle panels, when, as for Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, all grid cells for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h are discarded to ensure an optimal statistics. For each MY, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches about 1 % at most. The higher probabilities appear close to the IMB in the magnetosheath at SZA angles ranging from the subsolar point (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to almost the terminator plane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and in a lesser measure, around the bow shock's predicted position (in effect, in the wake of the true bow shock position). This is in line with our conclusions in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>. On the rightmost figure panels, negative (positive) percentages are represented by cold (hot) hues for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MY</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e8716">As remarked before, interannual variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mars co-depends on EUV flux levels and, to a lesser degree, to exosphere variations (parameterised with Ls), although these latter effects are significantly damped over a full MY. For example, during MY32, the EUV flux levels were always high with MAVEN observing only at high Ls values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]) as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. The predominance of red hues especially around the shock (rightmost plot of panel a) points to detections expanding outward under larger EUV fluxes, an effect following the well-known phenomenon of the shock's expansion into the solar wind in those conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.140"/>.
However, due to the lower statistical orbital coverage during that year compared to MY33–MY35, it is difficult to draw further conclusions on the overall trend of this year's rate.</p>
      <p id="d1e8754">From MY33 to MY35, less and less detections are seen in and around the shock (less and less red cells on rightmost panels), with MM-like structures mostly confined to a narrow region lodged against the IMB (MY35, middle panels, even factoring the somewhat reduced spatial coverage due to MAVEN's altered orbit in 2019) and in the tail behind the terminator plane (MY33). The slight increase of EUV flux during the second part of MY35 does not seem to be enough to alter this general trend: in effect, global EUV levels for MY34 and MY35 are comparable. Looking more globally into the evolution of the number of detected MM-like events, the ratio of the number of detections to the time of residence of the spacecraft inside the shock steadily diminishes from MY33 to MY35 (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.143</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.128</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.113</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>).</p>
      <?pagebreak page243?><p id="d1e8793">This behaviour mimics rather well the evolution of the average EUV flux during that time (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>) and points to a modulating influence of the solar flux in the number of detections, and possibly their spatial distribution, throughout MY33–MY35.
From Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>, the fractional change between MY33 and MY34 and between MY34 and MY35 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.128</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.143</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.113</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.128</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (relative decrease in detection rates). During that time, the average EUV flux for MY33–MY35 was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.99</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.71</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and 2.74mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to the rather similar fractional changes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> (MY33–MY34), whereas MY34–MY35 had a slight increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>. The influence of the EUV flux on MM detections is further investigated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8880">As for the mission-wide results, the region containing most MM-like structures spans <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> grid cells on average, that is, 0.2–0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 700–1000 km. At the subsolar point, this region fills a significant portion of the narrower magnetosheath. With the predicted position of the IMB from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.141"/> for the comparatively higher solar conditions encountered by MGS, MM-like structures seem to “leak” into the magnetosphere, although we cannot say for sure if these detections are in fact inward of the IMB or not. For example, an appreciable part of the detections seemingly present in the solar wind upstream of the average shock position <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.142"/> are in fact just behind the actual shock, whose position continuously varies with the solar wind upstream conditions. A cursory examination of individual detections for a reduced dataset in December 2014 and September 2016 pleads in favour of this latter idea (see, for example, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Dependence on EUV flux</title>
      <p id="d1e8932">At Mars, variations in EUV flux combine two main aspects: the solar cycle variations, on the one hand, and the variations of the EUV input due to the large eccentricity of Mars' orbit on the other (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). By modifying the global energy input to the Martian atmosphere–ionosphere–exosphere system, both aspects lead to variations in Mars' exospheric extent and ionisation levels and are among the key drivers of the bow shock and IMB positions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.143"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e8940">More precisely, two combined effects are expected to take place with respect to the generation of MM structures. First, an increased EUV flux favours the expansion of the exosphere in the upstream solar wind, resulting in a swelling of all the plasma boundaries including that of the bow shock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.144"/>. Second, for a given static exosphere, an increased EUV flux also increases the local ionisation in the exosphere, thereby increasing the number of newly born ions and thus pickup ions created <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.145"/>. In turn, these newly picked-up ions may contribute to heating in the perpendicular direction to the magnetic field, helping the plasma to become marginally unstable to the MM instability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.146"><named-content content-type="pre">MMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see</named-content></xref>. These two effects should lead to MMs becoming more frequent and extended in space for higher EUV flux levels, regardless of the nature of the shock.</p>
      <p id="d1e8964">To study how far this reasoning may hold, we now investigate in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> how the EUV flux modifies the detection<?pagebreak page244?> probability of MM-like structures. We consider two ranges: one for low EUV fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, panel a) and one for high EUV fluxes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>EUV</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, panel b), as previously defined in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>. To facilitate comparisons between the two conditions, we calculate in panel c the departure from the total detection probability, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the total detection probability from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b. A negative percentage (cold hues) implies in this way that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas a positive value (hot hues) implies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9118">On average, the spacecraft resides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h in a grid cell (left panels), with a very similar spatial coverage except in the solar wind upstream of the bow shock at the subsolar point, and in the deep magnetospheric tail in the antisolar direction. Thus we expect relatively more fluctuations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in these regions. As previously adopted, a good statistics is ensured by discarding all grid cells for which the cumulated spacecraft residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h (about half a full orbit duration), which helps contain that effect. As the exosphere expands with increasing EUV flux, the obstacle to the solar wind flow grows in size, with the bow shock and IMB both swelling up. The swelling of the bow shock is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> by comparing the dashed shock curves of  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.147"/> in panels a and b, representing “EUV low” and “EUV high” conditions, respectively, with the fixed curves of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.148"/> (“H19”) or those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.149"/> (“E08”).</p>
      <p id="d1e9168">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, we observe an outward displacement of the location of high detection probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> around the bow shock (red region for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to the outward displacement of the relevant boundaries with increasing EUV flux. This is consistent with the exosphere comparatively shrinking for low solar EUV flux, with pickup ion effects becoming less prominent around the shock <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.150"/>, leading to less MM-unstable conditions there. Because Ls variations are averaged out during a full MY containing all four seasons, the EUV flux thus appears to be the main driver of this tendency. Moreover, the higher the solar activity and the EUV flux, the less events seem present in the deeper magnetosheath and upstream of the dayside IMB (slight dominance of colder hues there in panel c).</p>
      <p id="d1e9198">This is studied in more detail in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> which presents the PDF of the relative difference between high and low EUV conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c), first in the whole magnetosheath <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.151"><named-content content-type="pre">upstream of the average fitted IMB line of</named-content><named-content content-type="post">panel a</named-content></xref> and second in what we term the “deep magnetosheath” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.152"><named-content content-type="pre">upstream of the average fitted IMB line and downstream of the nominal shock line of</named-content><named-content content-type="post">panel b</named-content></xref>, that is, the region between the two continuous black lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c. The “deep magnetosheath” distribution is negatively skewed towards low EUV conditions (generalised extreme value [GEV] fit peaking at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>hi-lo</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, skewness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, kurtosis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), confirming our impression from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c. In contrast, the “full magnetosheath” distribution is much more symmetric with a positive skewness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a larger kurtosis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showing the presence of wider, more uniformly distributed tails. The positive skewness is due in part to the values above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to a geometric effect, that is, the outward displacement of the shock at large EUV conditions; when ignoring these large values, the corrected skewness becomes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, close to the deep magnetosheath values.</p>
      <p id="d1e9337">On top of the solar activity-led expansion of the associated plasma boundaries, we thus note from Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> that, on average (i) the detection probability in the magnetosheath is perceptibly higher for low EUV flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.121</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average per cell) than for high EUV flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.111</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), especially in the near-subsolar magnetosheath and up to about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (ii) in contrast, detection probabilities appear higher in the tail for high EUV flux than for low EUV flux.</p>
      <p id="d1e9398">Following conclusion (i), we observe a perceptible decrease of the total detection probabilities with increasing EUV flux, when comparing them to the residence time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>in</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.133</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.120</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>, from low to high EUV flux).
This is in part due to MY32, containing only high EUV fluxes and encompassing perihelion conditions, and for which we calculated noticeably smaller ratios than for other years. However, this conclusion is in direct disagreement with our first expectation that more pickup ions due to higher EUV fluxes would lead to the generation of more MM structures around Mars.</p>
      <p id="d1e9447">In that aspect, it is useful to compare these maps to similar ones found at Venus for MM-like detections and temperature anisotropy. At Venus, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="text.153"/> found higher detection levels in the magnetosheath for lower solar activity than at maximum activity. They also noted that the maximum of detection probability moved from just behind the shock at solar minimum down to the IMB at solar maximum. A similar evolution in the spatial distribution of the temperature anisotropy was recently presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.154"/>, with the maxima of anisotropy moving from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between solar minimum and solar maximum conditions. In agreement with our findings here with conclusion (ii) at Mars, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.155"/> calculated comparatively higher anisotropies in the Venusian magnetospheric tail at solar maximum than at solar minimum. Finally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.156"/> found also that the MM instability criterion was fulfilled significantly more often during solar minimum than during solar maximum conditions, in keeping with the higher detection levels at solar minimum.
Our companion paper (Part 2) on the distribution of MM-like structures at Venus further discusses these aspects with the full Venus Express dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.157"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e9494">Consequently, Mars and Venus qualitatively display a similar tendency towards higher MM detection probabilities in low solar activity conditions, a conclusion which appears in contradiction with the addition of pickup ions to the ambient plasma at higher EUV fluxes.</p>
      <?pagebreak page245?><p id="d1e9498">We suggest here two phenomena that likely play complementary roles in enforcing this apparently contradictory trend.
First, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="text.158"/> have observed an enhanced turbulence due to the presence of so-called proton cyclotron waves (PCWs) becoming much more prominent the closer to perihelion conditions. This is in turn linked to the local plasma <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which plays a leading role in favouring the MM instability over the Alfvén Ion Cyclotron instability (typically for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as predicted by the theory of microinstabilities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.159"/>. In solar maximum conditions, the plasma <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is on average lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in the solar wind and in the dayside magnetosheath, as shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.160"/> for Venus and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.161"/> for the solar wind. Consequently, the ion cyclotron instability may preferentially grow over MMs, resulting in significantly less MM detections in solar maximum conditions or for increased EUV fluxes. This would explain why large EUV fluxes (closer to perihelion conditions) have comparatively lower detection rates of MM-like structures, especially since PCWs have very different magnetic signatures (non-compressional, left-hand elliptically polarised and MVA direction at small angles to background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field direction) and would not be captured by our detection criteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.162"/>.
Second, the distributions of pickup ions at Mars and comets are expected to be non-gyrotropic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.163"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content></xref>, which is known to modify the wave mode properties, the linear growth rate, the instability threshold, or even produce new wave modes that may consume the additional free energy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.164"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>. This may in turn favour other modes over MMs, although this specific question remains open.
Further study of these two aspects is needed with the use of full plasma suite on board MAVEN; it is left for the future.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e9576">Residence time (left) and probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of detecting MM-like structures (middle) at Mars, and departure from total detection probability <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right), with respect to Mars season (binned by Ls). <bold>(a)</bold> Ls <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [315–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ls1. <bold>(b)</bold> Ls <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [45–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ls2. <bold>(c)</bold> Ls <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [135–225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ls3. <bold>(d)</bold> Ls <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> [225–315<inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Ls4. The percentage difference is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with positive hot-hued (negative cold-hued) values showing where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The total rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tot</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b. Bow shock average positions are shown as dotted lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.165"><named-content content-type="post">all points, noted H19</named-content></xref> and as dashed lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.166"><named-content content-type="post">for each Ls range, noted SW22</named-content></xref>. See also caption of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for other details.
</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/41/225/2023/angeo-41-225-2023-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS4">
  <label>3.2.4</label><title>Dependence on season (Ls)</title>
      <p id="d1e9823">Dependence of MM-like structures on Martian season is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, with residence times on the left,  detection probabilities in the middle and percentage departures from the total detection probability on the right, as before. In contrast to MY discrimination, the average residence times in a grid cell is quite similar for all four Ls ranges considered, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h per grid cell, with the smallest residence time for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls3</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [135–225<inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] (see also Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>f and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). This is due to a combination of relatively large spatial extension for the orbit and missing that Ls range during MY32 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). Conversely, the highest residence time is for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls2</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [45–135<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] because of an orbital coverage less spatially extended in space and despite the Ls range being also missed during MY32.</p>
      <p id="d1e9894">The detection probabilities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (middle panels, ignoring cells for which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sc</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h) display a rather similar behaviour for all Ls ranges with two main distribution loci: one around the shock and the other immediately upstream of the IMB. The Ls range [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls4</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">225</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d) includes perihelion condition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">251</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, local maximum of EUV flux) as well as the peak of exospheric H density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.167"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">270</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; see</named-content></xref>. It seems to contain, overall, smaller detection probabilities in the locus closest to the IMB than at aphelion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ls</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">71</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, local minimum of EUV flux, included in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b). This is in agreement with the findings of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3"/>, where larger EUV flux levels create noticeably less MM-like structures in the subsolar magnetosheath than smaller EUV levels do, as a likely result of a combination of comparatively lower plasma-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.168"/> leading to PCWs being the fastest growing mode in those conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.169"/>, and, possibly, non-gyrotropic effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e10020">From a statistical viewpoint, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b for Ls2 (respectively, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d for Ls4) resembles most Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b). This is in line with the conclusions of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>e, where we emphasised that the Ls2 (Ls4) range is representative of low (high) EUV flux conditions. Moreover, Ls1 and Ls3 ranges are mutually comparable as they have roughly similar PDFs over a rather large EUV flux range: these two ranges thus mostly display changes due to seasonal effects. In this view, the Ls1 range has a more evenly spread distribution of MM-like events around the shock, whereas the Ls3 range displays comparatively sharper and less spatially extended features.
It is interesting to note that, in contrast to other Ls ranges, the Ls4 range displays its highest detection probability in the deep magnetospheric tail just behind the IMB (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d, middle plot and red region on the rightmost plot). This is a characteristic we have seen most often displayed at high EUV fluxes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b) and during MY33 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b), which is consistent with this Ls range encompassing perihelion conditions (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e10054">In this paper, we have aimed at creating maps of detection probabilities of mirror-mode (MM)-like structures in the Martian environment, in a quest to better characterise MMs across weakly magnetised and unmagnetised planets. Because magnetometers are a common instrument on space missions, with similar resolution and characteristics, they are an ideal tool to compare specific low-frequency wave modes such as the ubiquitous MMs. This study is the first of two at Mars and Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.170"><named-content content-type="pre">see </named-content><named-content content-type="post">for the companion paper as Part 2</named-content></xref>, using for the first time the same magnetic-field-only detection criteria and the same representation at both planets. At Mars, we use the MAVEN data between 2014 and 2021, and at Venus, we use the Venus Express data between 2006 and 2014.</p>
      <p id="d1e10064">We examined how these detection probability maps in MSO coordinates change with respect to MY, atmospheric seasons (Ls) and solar EUV flux. Overall, MM-like structures are mostly confined to two regions: one immediately<?pagebreak page246?> behind the bow shock, especially at larger solar zenith angles (SZA), and one closer to the induced magnetospheric boundary (IMB). This picture is in good agreement with previous studies at Mars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.171"/> and Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77 bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.172"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10073">We linked the most dramatic changes in the spatial distribution of MM-like structures with solar EUV flux variations. First, the regions of high MM-like occurrences contract and expand following the EUV flux-led variations of the shock and the IMB.
Second, with similar statistics, the higher the EUV flux (and, to a certain extent, solar activity), the lower the probability of detecting MM-like events around the shock and the dayside IMB. Simultaneously, high EUV flux conditions contain larger detection probabilities in the magnetospheric tail, downstream of the IMB.</p>
      <?pagebreak page247?><p id="d1e10076">The first behaviour contradicts the simple picture that, as the solar EUV flux and ionisation levels increase in the extended exosphere, the creation of additional pickup ions may lead to an increased ion temperature anisotropy in the entire volume of space, both in the solar wind and in the magnetosheath – a favourable condition for MM generation.  We highlight two possible reasons that may explain the discrepancy: the potential predominance of low plasma-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at high solar activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.173"/>, leading to an increased presence of PCWs at and around perihelion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.174"/>, favouring their growth over MMs, and, possibly, the non-gyrotropic nature of pickup ions at Mars and Venus <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.175"/>. Investigating in full the reason(s) of this discrepancy could be achieved by the full use of the plasma suite on board MAVEN, with the Solar Wind Ion Analyzer (SWIA) and the Solar Wind Electron Analyzer (SWEA) complementing the magnetometer data.</p>
      <p id="d1e10096">The second behaviour above is also reflected in changes with respect to atmospheric seasons (or solar longitude Ls): we have found that the northern hemisphere winter season (encompassing perihelion conditions, and thus higher EUV fluxes) contained less MM-like structures around the shock with compressive signatures more often observed in the magnetospheric tail (nightside downstream of the IMB). Such structures in this unusual region pose questions as to their nature, origin and characteristics and will need a dedicated study to ascertain them, preferably with the full plasma suite.</p>
      <p id="d1e10099">We emphasise several possible tracks to continue and expand on this first work.
First, this work should be redone with coincident plasma/magnetometer measurements. Although we may lose somewhat in temporal resolution with respect to magnetic field measurements (SWIA has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> s resolution in the magnetosheath, whereas SWEA can reach down to 2 s), we will gain the certitude of a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> antiphase behaviour, which is a necessary characteristic of MMs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.176"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">for a recent study using SWIA</named-content></xref>. Complementary techniques such as using transport ratios to characterise the low-frequency wave environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.177"/> could also usefully be applied to the full MAVEN dataset, as shown early in the mission <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.178"/>. Comparing all of these results with our present ones will give a measure of the accuracy of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-field-only method over more foolproof methods and may help reinterpret past and present datasets from a new perspective.
Second, to expand our current study, we should also look at the dependence of MM detection probabilities with respect to upstream solar wind conditions (density, velocity, magnitude and orientation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mtext>IMF</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as well as the shock nature (quasi-parallel or quasi-perpendicular). The latter would help in determining the respective effects of unstable pickup ion distributions and quasi-perpendicular shock heating in the generation of the temperature anisotropy at the origin of MM structures. All studies could finally be performed in Mars Solar Electric coordinates, oriented along the solar wind convection electric field.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e10167">The calibrated MAVEN/MAG datasets are available from the NASA Planetary Data System (PDS) at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17189/1414178</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.179"/>. The FISM-P Mars Solar Spectral Irradiance model is available at the LASP Interactive Solar Irradiance Datacenter (LISIRD) of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (<uri>https://lasp.colorado.edu/lisird/data/fism_p_ssi_mars</uri>, last access: 19 May 2023, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.180"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="altparen.181"/>)  and at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17189/1517691" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17189/1517691</ext-link> (Version 2.21, MAVEN Release 28, released 9 February 2022, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="altparen.182"/>) through NASA PDS archives. Predicted bow shock times, spatial coordinates and shock geometry (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Bn</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the 2014–2021 dataset (up to Mars Year 35) are available on Zenodo at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5725288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5725288</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.183"><named-content content-type="pre">Version 3,</named-content></xref>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e10214">CSW and MV instigated the project, made the calculations and the main interpretation, drew the figures, and wrote the main text for this study. CM, SRM, GSW, YF, JH, DRC, CB and JE contributed to the data validation and interpretation, numerous ideas and science discussions, and helped with the writing of the main text and text revision.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e10220">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e10226">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e10232">Cyril Simon Wedlund and Martin Volwerk thank the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), and SRM thanks the Swedish National Space Agency for their support. The authors thank Charlotte Götz (Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK) and Arnaud Beth (Imperial College London, UK) for useful feedback on magnetosonic waves, as well as Christian Möstl, Zoltan Vörös, Luis Preisser, Owen Roberts and Adriana Settino (IWF-ÖAW, Graz) for useful discussions with respect to bow shock crossings, Earth's turbulence, mirror modes and magnetosheath jets. The authors thank Emmanuel Penou for help and access to the CLWeb viewing and analysis software (v16.09) from IRAP/Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées.
This research was supported by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, through ISSI International Team project no. 517 (Towards a Unifying Model for Magnetic Depressions in Space Plasmas, led by MV) and project no. 499 (Similarities and Differences in the Plasma at Comets and Mars, led by Charlotte Götz).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e10237">This research has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (project no. P32035-N36) and the Swedish National Space Agency (contract  nos. 145/19 and 79/19).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e10243">This paper was edited by Dalia Buresova and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ala-Lahti et~al.(2018)Ala-Lahti, Kilpua, Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen,
and Sou{\v{c}}ek}}?><label>Ala-Lahti et al.(2018)Ala-Lahti, Kilpua, Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen,
and Souček</label><?label ala-lahti_statistical_2018?><mixed-citation>Ala-Lahti, M. M., Kilpua, E. K. J., Dimmock, A. P., Osmane, A., Pulkkinen, T.,
and Souček, J.: Statistical analysis of mirror mode waves in sheath
regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection, Ann. Geophys., 36,
793–808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Allison and McEwen(2000)}}?><label>Allison and McEwen(2000)</label><?label allison_post-pathfinder_2000?><mixed-citation>Allison, M. and McEwen, M.: A post-Pathfinder evaluation of areocentric solar
coordinates with improved timing recipes for Mars seasonal/diurnal climate
studies, Planet. Space Sci., 48, 215–235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00092-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00092-6</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Bertucci et~al.(2004)Bertucci, Mazelle, Crider, Mitchell, Sauer,
Acu{\~{n}}a, Connerney, Lin, Ness, and Winterhalter}}?><label>Bertucci et al.(2004)Bertucci, Mazelle, Crider, Mitchell, Sauer,
Acuña, Connerney, Lin, Ness, and Winterhalter</label><?label bertucci_mgs_2004?><mixed-citation>Bertucci, C., Mazelle, C., Crider, D. H., Mitchell, D. L., Sauer, K.,
Acuña, M. H., Connerney, J. E. P., Lin, R. P., Ness, N. F., and
Winterhalter, D.: MGS MAG/ER observations at the magnetic pileup
boundary of Mars: draping enhancement and low frequency waves, Adv.
Space Res., 33, 1938–1944, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.054</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Brinca and
Romeiras(1998)}}?><label>Brinca and
Romeiras(1998)</label><?label brinca_stability_stationary_nongyrotropic_1998?><mixed-citation>Brinca, A. L. and Romeiras, F. J.: On the stability of stationary
nongyrotropic distribution functions: Coupling and purely growing waves, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 9275–9284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA01995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JA01995</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Chamberlin et al.(2008)}?><label>Chamberlin et al.(2008)</label><?label Chamberlin2008?><mixed-citation>Chamberlin, P. C., Woods, T. N., and Eparvier, F. G.:
Flare Irradiance Spectral Model (FISM): Flare component algorithms and results, Space Weather, 6, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007SW000372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007SW000372</ext-link>, 2008 .</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Coates(2011)}}?><label>Coates(2011)</label><?label coates_pickup_ion_2011?><mixed-citation>Coates, A.: Pickup Ion Observations at Solar System Bodies, in: Advances in
Geosciences,  Planet. Sci., 25,   11–28,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814355377_0002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9789814355377_0002</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Coates} et~al.(1996){Coates}, {Johnstone}, and
{Neubauer}}}?><label>Coates et al.(1996)Coates, Johnstone, and
Neubauer</label><?label coates_cometary_ion_pressure_anisotropies_1996?><mixed-citation>Coates, A. J., Johnstone, A. D., and Neubauer, F. M.: Cometary ion
pressure anisotropies at comets Halley and Grigg-Skjellerup, J. Geophys.
Res., 101, 27573–27584, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JA02524</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Connerney et~al.(2015)Connerney, Espley, Lawton, Murphy, Odom,
Oliversen, and Sheppard}}?><label>Connerney et al.(2015)Connerney, Espley, Lawton, Murphy, Odom,
Oliversen, and Sheppard</label><?label connerney_maven_2015?><mixed-citation>Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J., Lawton, P., Murphy, S., Odom, J., Oliversen,
R., and Sheppard, D.: The MAVEN Magnetic Field Investigation, Space
Sci. Rev., 195, 257–291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Delva et~al.(2011){Delva}, {Mazelle}, and
{Bertucci}}}?><label>Delva et al.(2011)Delva, Mazelle, and
Bertucci</label><?label delva_upstream_ion_2011?><mixed-citation>Delva, M., Mazelle, C., and Bertucci, C.: Upstream Ion Cyclotron Waves
at Venus and Mars, Space Sci. Rev., 162, 5–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9828-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-011-9828-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dimmock et~al.(2015)Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen, and
Nykyri}}?><label>Dimmock et al.(2015)Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen, and
Nykyri</label><?label dimmock_statistical_2015?><mixed-citation>Dimmock, A. P., Osmane, A., Pulkkinen, T. I., and Nykyri, K.: A statistical
study of the dawn-dusk asymmetry of ion temperature anisotropy and mirror
mode occurrence in the terrestrial dayside magnetosheath using THEMIS data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 5489–5503,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021192" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JA021192</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dong et~al.(2015){Dong}, {Bougher}, {Ma}, {Toth}, {Lee}, {Nagy},
{Tenishev}, {Pawlowski}, {Combi}, and {Najib}}}?><label>Dong et al.(2015)Dong, Bougher, Ma, Toth, Lee, Nagy,
Tenishev, Pawlowski, Combi, and Najib</label><?label dong_solar_wind_2015?><mixed-citation>Dong, C., Bougher, S. W., Ma, Y., Toth, G., Lee, Y., Nagy, A. F.,
Tenishev, V., Pawlowski, D. J., Combi, M. R., and Najib, D.: Solar
wind interaction with the Martian upper atmosphere: Crustal field
orientation, solar cycle, and seasonal variations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 120, 7857–7872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020990" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JA020990</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dubinin and
Fraenz(2016)}}?><label>Dubinin and
Fraenz(2016)</label><?label dubinin_ultra-low_frequency_waves_mars_venus_2016?><mixed-citation>Dubinin, E. and Fraenz, M.: Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves at Venus and Mars,
Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union (AGU), ISBN: 9781119055006, 216,
343–364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119055006.ch20" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/9781119055006.ch20</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Edberg et~al.(2008)Edberg, Lester, Cowley, and
Eriksson}}?><label>Edberg et al.(2008)Edberg, Lester, Cowley, and
Eriksson</label><?label edberg_statistical_2008?><mixed-citation>Edberg, N. J. T., Lester, M., Cowley, S. W. H., and Eriksson, A. I.:
Statistical analysis of the location of the Martian magnetic pileup
boundary and bow shock and the influence of crustal magnetic fields:
J. Geophys. Res., 113,
A08206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013096" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JA013096</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Edberg et~al.(2009)Edberg, Brain, Lester, Cowley, Modolo, Fr{\"{a}}nz,
and Barabash}}?><label>Edberg et al.(2009)Edberg, Brain, Lester, Cowley, Modolo, Fränz,
and Barabash</label><?label edberg_plasma_2009?><mixed-citation>Edberg, N. J. T., Brain, D. A., Lester, M., Cowley, S. W. H., Modolo, R., Fränz, M., and Barabash, S.: Plasma boundary variability at Mars as observed by Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Express, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3537–3550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3537-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-27-3537-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Erd{\H{o}}s and Balogh(1996)}}?><label>Erdős and Balogh(1996)</label><?label erdos_statistical_1996?><mixed-citation>Erdős, G. and Balogh, A.: Statistical properties of mirror mode structures
observed by Ulysses in the magnetosheath of Jupiter, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 101, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA02207" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JA02207</ext-link>,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Erkaev} et~al.(2001){Erkaev}, {Schaffenberger}, {Biernat},
{Farrugia}, and {Vogl}}}?><label>Erkaev et al.(2001)Erkaev, Schaffenberger, Biernat,
Farrugia, and Vogl</label><?label erkaev_analysis_2001?><mixed-citation>Erkaev, N. V., Schaffenberger, W., Biernat, H. K., Farrugia, C. J., and
Vogl, D. F.: Analysis of mirror modes convected from the bow shock to the
magnetopause, Planet. Space Sci., 49, 1359–1364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00057-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00057-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Espley et~al.(2004)Espley, Cloutier, Brain, Crider, and
Acu{\~{n}}a}}?><label>Espley et al.(2004)Espley, Cloutier, Brain, Crider, and
Acuña</label><?label espley_observations_2004?><mixed-citation>Espley, J. R., Cloutier, P. A., Brain, D. A., Crider, D. H., and Acuña,
M. H.: Observations of low-frequency magnetic oscillations in the Martian
magnetosheath, magnetic pileup region, and tail, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 109, A07213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA010193</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Forbes et~al.(2008)Forbes, Lemoine, Bruinsma, Smith, and
Zhang}}?><label>Forbes et al.(2008)Forbes, Lemoine, Bruinsma, Smith, and
Zhang</label><?label forbes_solar_2008?><mixed-citation>Forbes, J. M., Lemoine, F. G., Bruinsma, S. L., Smith, M. D., and Zhang, X.:
Solar flux variability of Mars' exosphere densities and temperatures,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031904</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fowler et~al.(2021)Fowler, Hanley, McFadden, Chaston, Bonnell,
Halekas, Espley, DiBraccio, Schwartz, Mazelle, Mitchell, Xu, and
Lillis}}?><label>Fowler et al.(2021)Fowler, Hanley, McFadden, Chaston, Bonnell,
Halekas, Espley, DiBraccio, Schwartz, Mazelle, Mitchell, Xu, and
Lillis</label><?label fowler_maven_observations_2021?><mixed-citation>Fowler, C. M., Hanley, K. G., McFadden, J. P., Chaston, C. C., Bonnell, J. W.,
Halekas, J. S., Espley, J. R., DiBraccio, G. A., Schwartz, S. J., Mazelle,
C., Mitchell, D. L., Xu, S., and Lillis, R. J.: MAVEN Observations of Low
Frequency Steepened Magnetosonic Waves and Associated Heating of the Martian
Nightside Ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126,
e2021JA029615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029615" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA029615</ext-link>,  2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fr{\"{a}}nz et~al.(2017)Fr{\"{a}}nz, Echer, Marques~de Souza, Dubinin,
and Zhang}}?><label>Fränz et al.(2017)Fränz, Echer, Marques de Souza, Dubinin,
and Zhang</label><?label franz_ultra_2017?><mixed-citation>Fränz, M., Echer, E., Marques de Souza, A., Dubinin, E., and Zhang, T. L.:
Ultra low frequency waves at Venus: Observations by the Venus Express
spacecraft, Planet. Space Sci., 146, 55–65,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.08.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2017.08.011</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Garnier et~al.(2022){Garnier}, {Jacquey}, {Gendre}, {G{\'{e}}not},
{Mazelle}, {Fang}, {Gruesbeck}, {S{\'{a}}nchez-Cano}, and
{Halekas}}}?><label>Garnier et al.(2022)Garnier, Jacquey, Gendre, Génot,
Mazelle, Fang, Gruesbeck, Sánchez-Cano, and
Halekas</label><?label garnier_drivers_martian_bow_shock_2022?><mixed-citation>Garnier, P., Jacquey, C., Gendre, X., Génot, V., Mazelle, C.,
Fang, X., Gruesbeck, J. R., Sánchez-Cano, B., and Halekas, J. S.:
The Drivers of the Martian Bow Shock Location: A Statistical Analysis of
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN and Mars Express Observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e30147,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA030147</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gary(1992)}}?><label>Gary(1992)</label><?label gary_mirror_1992?><mixed-citation>Gary, S. P.: The mirror and ion cyclotron anisotropy instabilities, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 8519, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA00299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JA00299</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gary(1993)}}?><label>Gary(1993)</label><?label gary_theory_1993?><mixed-citation>Gary, S. P.: Theory of Space Plasma Microinstabilities, Cambridge
University Press, google-Books-ID: hMiulET5wpwC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511551512</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gary and Winske(1992)}}?><label>Gary and Winske(1992)</label><?label gary_correlation_1992?><mixed-citation>Gary, S. P. and Winske, D.: Correlation function ratios and the identification
of space plasma instabilities, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 97, 3103–3111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JA02752</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{G{\'{e}}not et~al.(2001)G{\'{e}}not, Schwartz, Mazelle, Balikhin, Dunlop,
and Bauer}}?><label>Génot et al.(2001)Génot, Schwartz, Mazelle, Balikhin, Dunlop,
and Bauer</label><?label genot_kinetic_2001?><mixed-citation>Génot, V., Schwartz, S. J., Mazelle, C., Balikhin, M., Dunlop, M., and
Bauer, T. M.: Kinetic study of the mirror mode, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
21611–21622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JA000457</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page249?><ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{G{\'{e}}not et~al.(2009)G{\'{e}}not, Budnik, Jacquey, Dandouras, and
Lucek}}?><label>Génot et al.(2009)Génot, Budnik, Jacquey, Dandouras, and
Lucek</label><?label genot_mirror_2009?><mixed-citation>Génot, V., Budnik, E., Jacquey, C., Dandouras, I., and Lucek, E.: Mirror
modes observed with Cluster in the Earth's magnetosheath:
statistical study and IMF/solar wind dependence, in: Advances in
Geosciences, Vol. 14,  263–283, World Scientific Publishing Company,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812836205_0019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/9789812836205_0019</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Glassmeier et~al.(1993)Glassmeier, Motschmann, Mazelle, Neubauer,
Sauer, Fuselier, and Acu{\~{n}}a}}?><label>Glassmeier et al.(1993)Glassmeier, Motschmann, Mazelle, Neubauer,
Sauer, Fuselier, and Acuña</label><?label glassmeier_mirror_1993?><mixed-citation>Glassmeier, K. H., Motschmann, U., Mazelle, C., Neubauer, F. M., Sauer, K.,
Fuselier, S. A., and Acuña, M. H.: Mirror modes and fast magnetoacoustic
waves near the magnetic pileup boundary of comet P/Halley, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 98, 20955–20964,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02582" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JA02582</ext-link>,  1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gruesbeck et~al.(2018)Gruesbeck, Espley, Connerney, DiBraccio,
Soobiah, Brain, Mazelle, Dann, Halekas, and
Mitchell}}?><label>Gruesbeck et al.(2018)Gruesbeck, Espley, Connerney, DiBraccio,
Soobiah, Brain, Mazelle, Dann, Halekas, and
Mitchell</label><?label gruesbeck_three-dimensional_2018?><mixed-citation>Gruesbeck, J. R., Espley, J. R., Connerney, J. E. P., DiBraccio, G. A.,
Soobiah, Y. I., Brain, D., Mazelle, C., Dann, J., Halekas, J., and Mitchell,
D. L.: The Three-Dimensional Bow Shock of Mars as Observed by
MAVEN, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 4542–4555,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025366" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JA025366</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas(2017)}}?><label>Halekas(2017)</label><?label halekas_seasonal_2017?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S.: Seasonal variability of the hydrogen exosphere of Mars,
J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 122, 901–911,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005306" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JE005306</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas and
McFadden(2021)}}?><label>Halekas and
McFadden(2021)</label><?label halekas_using_solar_wind_helium_2021?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S. and McFadden, J. P.: Using Solar Wind Helium to Probe the
Structure and Seasonal Variability of the Martian Hydrogen Corona, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 126, e07049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JE007049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JE007049</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas et~al.(2015)Halekas, Taylor, Dalton, Johnson, Curtis,
McFadden, Mitchell, Lin, and Jakosky}}?><label>Halekas et al.(2015)Halekas, Taylor, Dalton, Johnson, Curtis,
McFadden, Mitchell, Lin, and Jakosky</label><?label halekas_solar_2015?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S., Taylor, E. R., Dalton, G., Johnson, G., Curtis, D. W.,
McFadden, J. P., Mitchell, D. L., Lin, R. P., and Jakosky, B. M.: The Solar
Wind Ion Analyzer for MAVEN, Space Sci. Rev., 195, 125–151,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0029-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-013-0029-z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas et~al.(2017{\natexlab{a}})Halekas, Brain, Luhmann, DiBraccio,
Ruhunusiri, Harada, Fowler, Mitchell, Connerney, Espley, Mazelle, and
Jakosky}}?><label>Halekas et al.(2017a)Halekas, Brain, Luhmann, DiBraccio,
Ruhunusiri, Harada, Fowler, Mitchell, Connerney, Espley, Mazelle, and
Jakosky</label><?label halekas_flows_2017?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S., Brain, D. A., Luhmann, J. G., DiBraccio, G. A., Ruhunusiri, S.,
Harada, Y., Fowler, C. M., Mitchell, D. L., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley,
J. R., Mazelle, C., and Jakosky, B. M.: Flows, Fields, and Forces in the
Mars-Solar Wind Interaction, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 11320–11341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024772" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JA024772</ext-link>,
2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas et~al.(2017{\natexlab{b}})Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Harada,
Collinson, Mitchell, Mazelle, McFadden, Connerney, Espley, Eparvier, Luhmann,
and Jakosky}}?><label>Halekas et al.(2017b)Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Harada,
Collinson, Mitchell, Mazelle, McFadden, Connerney, Espley, Eparvier, Luhmann,
and Jakosky</label><?label halekas_structure_2017?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S., Ruhunusiri, S., Harada, Y., Collinson, G., Mitchell, D. L.,
Mazelle, C., McFadden, J. P., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., Eparvier,
F., Luhmann, J. G., and Jakosky, B. M.: Structure, dynamics, and seasonal
variability of the Mars-solar wind interaction: MAVEN Solar Wind
Ion Analyzer in-flight performance and science results, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 547–578,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023167</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Halekas et~al.(2020)Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Vaisberg, Harada, Espley,
Mitchell, Mazelle, Romanelli, DiBraccio, and Brain}}?><label>Halekas et al.(2020)Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Vaisberg, Harada, Espley,
Mitchell, Mazelle, Romanelli, DiBraccio, and Brain</label><?label halekas_properties_2020?><mixed-citation>Halekas, J. S., Ruhunusiri, S., Vaisberg, O. L., Harada, Y., Espley, J.,
Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., Romanelli, N., DiBraccio, G. A., and Brain,
D. A.: Properties of Plasma Waves Observed Upstream from Mars, World Library Catalog, Earth and Space Science Open Archive Section, Sol.
Syst. Phys., 125, e2020JA028221,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028221" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028221</ext-link>,  2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hall et~al.(2016)Hall, Lester, S{\'{a}}nchez-Cano, Nichols, Andrews,
Edberg, Opgenoorth, Fr{\"{a}}nz, Holmstr{\"{o}}m, Ramstad, Witasse, Cartacci,
Cicchetti, Noschese, and Orosei}}?><label>Hall et al.(2016)Hall, Lester, Sánchez-Cano, Nichols, Andrews,
Edberg, Opgenoorth, Fränz, Holmström, Ramstad, Witasse, Cartacci,
Cicchetti, Noschese, and Orosei</label><?label hall_annual_2016?><mixed-citation>Hall, B. E. S., Lester, M., Sánchez-Cano, B., Nichols, J. D., Andrews,
D. J., Edberg, N. J. T., Opgenoorth, H. J., Fränz, M., Holmström, M.,
Ramstad, R., Witasse, O., Cartacci, M., Cicchetti, A., Noschese, R., and
Orosei, R.: Annual variations in the Martian bow shock location as observed
by the Mars Express mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 11474–11494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023316</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hall et~al.(2019)Hall, S{\'{a}}nchez-Cano, Wild, Lester, and
Holmstr{\"{o}}m}}?><label>Hall et al.(2019)Hall, Sánchez-Cano, Wild, Lester, and
Holmström</label><?label hall_martian_2019?><mixed-citation>Hall, B. E. S., Sánchez-Cano, B., Wild, J. A., Lester, M., and
Holmström, M.: The Martian Bow Shock Over Solar Cycle
23–24 as Observed by the Mars Express Mission, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 4761–4772,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JA026404</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hasegawa(1969)}}?><label>Hasegawa(1969)</label><?label hasegawa_drift_1969?><mixed-citation>Hasegawa, A.: Drift Mirror Instability in the Magnetosphere, Phys.
Fluids, 12, 2642, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1692407</ext-link>, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoilijoki et~al.(2016)Hoilijoki, Palmroth, Walsh, Pfau-Kempf, von
Alfthan, Ganse, Hannuksela, and Vainio}}?><label>Hoilijoki et al.(2016)Hoilijoki, Palmroth, Walsh, Pfau-Kempf, von
Alfthan, Ganse, Hannuksela, and Vainio</label><?label hoilijoki_mirror_2016?><mixed-citation>Hoilijoki, S., Palmroth, M., Walsh, B. M., Pfau-Kempf, Y., von Alfthan, S.,
Ganse, U., Hannuksela, O., and Vainio, R.: Mirror modes in the Earth's
magnetosheath: Results from a global hybrid-Vlasov simulation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 4191–4204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JA022026</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jarvinen et~al.(2022){Jarvinen}, {Kallio}, and
{Pulkkinen}}}?><label>Jarvinen et al.(2022)Jarvinen, Kallio, and
Pulkkinen</label><?label jarvinen_ultra-low_foreshock_mars_2022?><mixed-citation>Jarvinen, R., Kallio, E., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Ultra-low Frequency
Foreshock Waves and Ion Dynamics at Mars, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e30078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030078" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA030078</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Jin et~al.(2022)Jin, Lei, Yiteng, Lianghai, and
Fuhao}}?><label>Jin et al.(2022)Jin, Lei, Yiteng, Lianghai, and
Fuhao</label><?label jin_statistical_analysis_2022?><mixed-citation>Jin, T., Lei, L., Yiteng, Z., Lianghai, X., and Fuhao, Q.: Statistical Analysis
of the Distribution and Evolution of Mirror Structures in the Martian
Magnetosheath,   Astrophys. J., 929, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f00" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f00</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Joy et~al.(2006)Joy, Kivelson, Walker, Khurana, Russell, and
Paterson}}?><label>Joy et al.(2006)Joy, Kivelson, Walker, Khurana, Russell, and
Paterson</label><?label joy_mirror_2006?><mixed-citation>Joy, S. P., Kivelson, M. G., Walker, R. J., Khurana, K. K., Russell, C. T., and
Paterson, W. R.: Mirror mode structures in the Jovian magnetosheath, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, A12212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011985" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JA011985</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Karlsson et~al.(2021){Karlsson}, {Heyner}, {Volwerk}, {Morooka},
{Plaschke}, {Goetz}, and {Hadid}}}?><label>Karlsson et al.(2021)Karlsson, Heyner, Volwerk, Morooka,
Plaschke, Goetz, and Hadid</label><?label karlsson_magnetic_holes_mercury_2021?><mixed-citation>Karlsson, T., Heyner, D., Volwerk, M., Morooka, M., Plaschke, F.,
Goetz, C., and Hadid, L.: Magnetic Holes in the Solar Wind and
Magnetosheath Near Mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
126, e28961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028961" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028961</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lucek et~al.(1999)Lucek, Dunlop, Balogh, Cargill, Baumjohann,
Georgescu, Haerendel, and Fornacon}}?><label>Lucek et al.(1999)Lucek, Dunlop, Balogh, Cargill, Baumjohann,
Georgescu, Haerendel, and Fornacon</label><?label lucek_identification_1999?><mixed-citation>Lucek, E. A., Dunlop, M. W., Balogh, A., Cargill, P., Baumjohann, W.,
Georgescu, E., Haerendel, G., and Fornacon, K.-H.: Identification of
magnetosheath mirror modes in Equator-S magnetic field data, Ann.
Geophys., 17, 1560–1573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-999-1560-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-999-1560-9</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Madanian et~al.(2020)Madanian, Halekas, Mazelle, Omidi, Espley,
Mitchell, and McFadden}}?><label>Madanian et al.(2020)Madanian, Halekas, Mazelle, Omidi, Espley,
Mitchell, and McFadden</label><?label madanian_magnetic_2020?><mixed-citation>Madanian, H., Halekas, J. S., Mazelle, C. X., Omidi, N., Espley, J. R.,
Mitchell, D. L., and McFadden, J. P.: Magnetic Holes Upstream of the
Martian Bow Shock: MAVEN Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JA027198</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mazelle et~al.(1989){Mazelle}, {R{\`{e}}me}, {Sauvaud}, {d'Uston},
{Carlson}, {Anderson}, {Curtis}, {Lin}, {Korth}, {Mendis}, {Neubauer},
{Glassmeier}, and {Raeder}}}?><label>Mazelle et al.(1989)Mazelle, Rème, Sauvaud, d'Uston,
Carlson, Anderson, Curtis, Lin, Korth, Mendis, Neubauer,
Glassmeier, and Raeder</label><?label mazelle_analysis_suprathermal_1989?><mixed-citation>Mazelle, C., Rème, H., Sauvaud, J. A., d'Uston, C., Carlson,
C. W., Anderson, K. A., Curtis, D. W., Lin, R. P., Korth, A.,
Mendis, D. A., Neubauer, F. M., Glassmeier, K. H., and Raeder, J.:
Analysis of suprathermal electron properties at the magnetic pile-up
boundary of comet P/Halley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 1035–1038,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i009p01035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL016i009p01035</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mazelle et~al.(1991){Mazelle}, {Belmont}, {Glassmeier}, {Le
Qu{\'{e}}au}, and {R{\`{e}}me}}}?><label>Mazelle et al.(1991)Mazelle, Belmont, Glassmeier, Le
Quéau, and Rème</label><?label mazelle_ultra_low_frequency_1991?><mixed-citation>Mazelle, C., Belmont, G., Glassmeier, K. H., Le Quéau, D., and
Rème, H.: Ultra low frequency waves at the magnetic pile-up boundary
of comet P/Halley, Adv. Space Res., 11, 73–77,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(91)90014-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0273-1177(91)90014-B</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mazelle et~al.(2004)Mazelle, Winterhalter, Sauer, Trotignon,
Acu{\~{n}}a, Baumg{\"{a}}rtel, Bertucci, Brain, Brecht, Delva, Dubinin,
{\O}ieroset, and Slavin}}?><label>Mazelle et al.(2004)Mazelle, Winterhalter, Sauer, Trotignon,
Acuña, Baumgärtel, Bertucci, Brain, Brecht, Delva, Dubinin,
Øieroset, and Slavin</label><?label mazelle_bow_2004?><mixed-citation>Mazelle, C., Winterhalter, D., Sauer, K., Trotignon, J., Acuña, M.,
Baumgärtel, K., Bertucci, C., Brain, D., Brecht, S., Delva, M., Dubinin,
E., Øieroset, M., and Slavin, J.: Bow Shock and Upstream Phenomena
at Mars, Space Sci. Revi., 111, 115–181,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAC.0000032717.98679.d0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/B:SPAC.0000032717.98679.d0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mitchell et~al.(2016)Mitchell, Mazelle, Sauvaud, Thocaven, Rouzaud,
Fedorov, Rouger, Toublanc, Taylor, Gordon, Robinson, Heavner, Turin,
Diaz-Aguado, Curtis, Lin, and Jakosky}}?><label>Mitchell et al.(2016)Mitchell, Mazelle, Sauvaud, Thocaven, Rouzaud,
Fedorov, Rouger, Toublanc, Taylor, Gordon, Robinson, Heavner, Turin,
Diaz-Aguado, Curtis, Lin, and Jakosky</label><?label mitchell_maven_2016?><mixed-citation>Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., Sauvaud, J.-A., Thocaven, J.-J., Rouzaud, J.,
Fedorov, A., Rouger, P., Toublanc, D., Taylor, E., Gordon, D., Robinson, M.,
Heavner, S., Turin, P., Diaz-Aguado, M., Curtis, D. W., Lin, R. P., and
Jakosky, B. M.: The MAVEN Solar Wind Electron Analyzer, Space Sci.
Rev., 200, 495–528, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0232-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-015-0232-1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Motschmann et~al.(1997){Motschmann}, {Kafemann}, and
{Scholer}}}?><label>Motschmann et al.(1997)Motschmann, Kafemann, and
Scholer</label><?label motschmann_nongyrotropy_1997?><mixed-citation>Motschmann, U., Kafemann, H., and Scholer, M.: Nongyrotropy in
magnetoplasmas: simulation of wave excitation and phase-space diffusion,
Ann. Geophys., 15, 603–613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-0603-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-997-0603-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{Lawton and Connerney(2023)}?><label>Lawton and Connerney(2023)</label><?label NASA2023?><mixed-citation>Lawton, P. and Connerney, J.:   MAVEN MAG Calibrated Data Bundle, NASA [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17189/1414178</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Price(1989)}}?><label>Price(1989)</label><?label price_mirror_waves_newborn_1989?><mixed-citation>Price, C. P.: Mirror waves driven by newborn ion distributions, J. Geophys.
Res., 94, 15001–15009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA094iA11p15001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA094iA11p15001</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page250?><ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Price et~al.(1986)Price, Swift, and Lee}}?><label>Price et al.(1986)Price, Swift, and Lee</label><?label price_numerical_1986?><mixed-citation>Price, C. P., Swift, D. W., and Lee, L.-C.: Numerical simulation of
nonoscillatory mirror waves at the Earth's magnetosheath, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 91, 101–112,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA01p00101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA091iA01p00101</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rojas Mata et~al.(2022){Rojas Mata}, {Stenberg Wieser}, {Futaana},
{Bader}, {Persson}, {Fedorov}, and
{Zhang}}}?><label>Rojas Mata et al.(2022)Rojas Mata, Stenberg Wieser, Futaana,
Bader, Persson, Fedorov, and
Zhang</label><?label rojas_mata_proton_temperature_2022?><mixed-citation>Rojas Mata, S., Stenberg Wieser, G., Futaana, Y., Bader, A., Persson,
M., Fedorov, A., and Zhang, T.: Proton Temperature Anisotropies in the
Venus Plasma Environment During Solar Minimum and Maximum, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e29611,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA029611</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Romanelli et~al.(2013){Romanelli}, {Bertucci}, {G{\'{o}}mez},
{Mazelle}, and {Delva}}}?><label>Romanelli et al.(2013)Romanelli, Bertucci, Gómez,
Mazelle, and Delva</label><?label romanelli_proton_cyclotron_mars_2013?><mixed-citation>Romanelli, N., Bertucci, C., Gómez, D., Mazelle, C., and Delva,
M.: Proton cyclotron waves upstream from Mars: Observations from Mars Global
Surveyor, Planet. Space Sci., 76, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.011</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Romanelli et~al.(2016){Romanelli}, {Mazelle}, {Chaufray},
{Meziane}, {Shan}, {Ruhunusiri}, {Connerney}, {Espley}, {Eparvier},
{Thiemann}, {Halekas}, {Mitchell}, {McFadden}, {Brain}, and
{Jakosky}}}?><label>Romanelli et al.(2016)Romanelli, Mazelle, Chaufray,
Meziane, Shan, Ruhunusiri, Connerney, Espley, Eparvier,
Thiemann, Halekas, Mitchell, McFadden, Brain, and
Jakosky</label><?label romanelli_proton_cyclotron_waves_2016?><mixed-citation>Romanelli, N., Mazelle, C., Chaufray, J. Y., Meziane, K., Shan, L.,
Ruhunusiri, S., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., Eparvier, F.,
Thiemann, E., Halekas, J. S., Mitchell, D. L., McFadden, J. P.,
Brain, D., and Jakosky, B. M.: Proton cyclotron waves occurrence rate
upstream from Mars observed by MAVEN: Associated variability of the Martian
upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121,
11113–11128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023270" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023270</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Romeo et~al.(2021){Romeo}, {Romanelli}, {Espley}, {Mazelle},
{DiBraccio}, {Gruesbeck}, and {Halekas}}}?><label>Romeo et al.(2021)Romeo, Romanelli, Espley, Mazelle,
DiBraccio, Gruesbeck, and Halekas</label><?label romeo_variability_upstream_2021?><mixed-citation>Romeo, O. M., Romanelli, N., Espley, J. R., Mazelle, C., DiBraccio,
G. A., Gruesbeck, J. R., and Halekas, J. S.: Variability of Upstream
Proton Cyclotron Wave Properties and Occurrence at Mars Observed by MAVEN,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e28616,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028616" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JA028616</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ruhunusiri et~al.(2015)Ruhunusiri, Halekas, Connerney, Espley,
McFadden, Larson, Mitchell, Mazelle, and
Jakosky}}?><label>Ruhunusiri et al.(2015)Ruhunusiri, Halekas, Connerney, Espley,
McFadden, Larson, Mitchell, Mazelle, and
Jakosky</label><?label ruhunusiri_low-frequency_2015?><mixed-citation>Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., McFadden,
J. P., Larson, D. E., Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., and Jakosky, B. M.:
Low-frequency waves in the Martian magnetosphere and their response to
upstream solar wind driving conditions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
8917–8924, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064968" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL064968</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ruhunusiri et~al.(2018){Ruhunusiri}, {Halekas}, {Espley},
{Eparvier}, {Brain}, {Mazelle}, {Harada}, {DiBraccio}, {Thiemann}, {Larson},
{Mitchell}, {Jakosky}, and {Sulaiman}}}?><label>Ruhunusiri et al.(2018)Ruhunusiri, Halekas, Espley,
Eparvier, Brain, Mazelle, Harada, DiBraccio, Thiemann, Larson,
Mitchell, Jakosky, and Sulaiman</label><?label ruhunusiri_one_hertz_waves_2018?><mixed-citation>Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., Espley, J. R., Eparvier, F., Brain,
D., Mazelle, C., Harada, Y., DiBraccio, G. A., Thiemann, E. M. B.,
Larson, D. E., Mitchell, D. L., Jakosky, B. M., and Sulaiman, A. H.:
One-Hertz Waves at Mars: MAVEN Observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 123, 3460–3476, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA024618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2017JA024618</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schwartz et~al.(1997)Schwartz, Burgess, and
Moses}}?><label>Schwartz et al.(1997)Schwartz, Burgess, and
Moses</label><?label schwartz_low-frequency_1997?><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. J., Burgess, D., and Moses, J. J.: Low-frequency waves in the
Earth's magnetosheath: present status, Ann. Geophys.,
14, 1134–1150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Shan et~al.(2020){Shan}, {Tsurutani}, {Ohsawa}, {Mazelle}, {Huang},
{Du}, {Ge}, and {Lu}}}?><label>Shan et al.(2020)Shan, Tsurutani, Ohsawa, Mazelle, Huang,
Du, Ge, and Lu</label><?label shan_observational_evidence_2020?><mixed-citation>Shan, L., Tsurutani, B. T., Ohsawa, Y., Mazelle, C., Huang, C., Du,
A., Ge, Y. S., and Lu, Q.: Observational Evidence for Fast Mode Periodic
Small-scale Shocks: A New Type of Plasma Phenomenon, Astrophys. J. Lett.,
905, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abcb02" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/2041-8213/abcb02</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Simon~Wedlund et~al.(2021)Simon~Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo}}?><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2021)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo</label><?label simon_wedlund_database_2022?><mixed-citation>Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Beth, A., Mazelle, C., Möstl, C., Halekas, J.,
Gruesbeck, J., and Rojas-Castillo, D.: Predicted times, spatial coordinates of bow shock crossings and shock geometry at Mars from the NASA/MAVEN mission, using spacecraft ephemerides and magnetic field data, with a predictor-corrector algorithm  (Version 3), Zenodo [data set]
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6320518" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6320518</ext-link>,   2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Simon~Wedlund et~al.(2022a)Simon~Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo}}?><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2022a)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo</label><?label simon_wedlund_a_fast_bow_shock_2022?><mixed-citation>Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Beth, A., Mazelle, C., Möstl, C., Halekas, J.,
Gruesbeck, J. R., and Rojas-Castillo, D.: A Fast Bow Shock Location
Predictor-Estimator From 2D and 3D Analytical Models: Application to Mars and
the MAVEN Mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127,
e2021JA029942, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029942" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA029942</ext-link>,  2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Simon~Wedlund et~al.(2022b)Simon~Wedlund, Volwerk,
Mazelle, Halekas, Rojas-Castillo, Espley, and
Möstl}}?><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2022b)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk,
Mazelle, Halekas, Rojas-Castillo, Espley, and
Möstl</label><?label simon_wedlund_making_waves_2022?><mixed-citation>Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Mazelle, C., Halekas, J., Rojas-Castillo, D.,
Espley, J., and Möstl, C.: Making Waves: Mirror Mode Structures Around Mars
Observed by the MAVEN Spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2021JA029811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029811" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JA029811</ext-link>,  2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Song et~al.(1994)Song, Russell, and Gary}}?><label>Song et al.(1994)Song, Russell, and Gary</label><?label song_identification_1994?><mixed-citation>Song, P., Russell, C. T., and Gary, S. P.: Identification of low-frequency
fluctuations in the terrestrial magnetosheath, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6011,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA03300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JA03300</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sonnerup and Scheible(1998)}}?><label>Sonnerup and Scheible(1998)</label><?label sonnerup_minimum_1998?><mixed-citation>
Sonnerup, B. U. Ö. and Scheible, M.: Minimum and Maximum Variance
Analysis, in: Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data, no.
SR-001 in ISSI Scientific Report, ISSI/ESA, ESA Publications Division, the Netherlands,   185–220, ISBN: 1608-280X, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Soucek et~al.(2008)Soucek, Lucek, and
Dandouras}}?><label>Soucek et al.(2008)Soucek, Lucek, and
Dandouras</label><?label soucek_properties_2008?><mixed-citation>Soucek, J., Lucek, E., and Dandouras, I.: Properties of magnetosheath mirror
modes observed by Cluster and their response to changes in plasma
parameters, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A04203,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012649" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JA012649</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Szeg{\"{o}} et~al.(2000){Szeg{\"{o}}}, {Glassmeier}, {Bingham},
{Bogdanov}, {Fischer}, {Haerendel}, {Brinca}, {Cravens}, {Dubinin}, {Sauer},
{Fisk}, {Gombosi}, {Schwadron}, {Isenberg}, {Lee}, {Mazelle}, {M{\"{o}}bius},
{Motschmann}, {Shapiro}, {Tsurutani}, and
{Zank}}}?><label>Szegö et al.(2000)Szegö, Glassmeier, Bingham,
Bogdanov, Fischer, Haerendel, Brinca, Cravens, Dubinin, Sauer,
Fisk, Gombosi, Schwadron, Isenberg, Lee, Mazelle, Möbius,
Motschmann, Shapiro, Tsurutani, and
Zank</label><?label szego_physics_mass_loaded_2000?><mixed-citation>Szegö, K., Glassmeier, K.-H., Bingham, R., Bogdanov, A., Fischer,
C., Haerendel, G., Brinca, A., Cravens, T., Dubinin, E., Sauer, K.,
Fisk, L., Gombosi, T., Schwadron, N., Isenberg, P., Lee, M.,
Mazelle, C., Möbius, E., Motschmann, U., Shapiro, V. D.,
Tsurutani, B., and Zank, G.: Physics of Mass Loaded Plasmas, Space Sci.
Rev., 94, 429–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026568530975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1026568530975</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Thiemann et~al.(2017)Thiemann, Chamberlin, Eparvier, Templeman,
Woods, Bougher, and Jakosky}}?><label>Thiemann et al.(2017)Thiemann, Chamberlin, Eparvier, Templeman,
Woods, Bougher, and Jakosky</label><?label thiemann_maven_2017?><mixed-citation>Thiemann, E. M. B., Chamberlin, P. C., Eparvier, F. G., Templeman, B., Woods,
T. N., Bougher, S. W., and Jakosky, B. M.: The MAVEN EUVM model of solar
spectral irradiance variability at Mars: Algorithms and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 2748–2767,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JA023512</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Trainer et~al.(2019)Trainer, Wong, McConnochie, Franz, Atreya,
Conrad, Lef{\`{e}}vre, Mahaffy, Malespin, Manning, Mart{\'{i}}n-Torres,
Mart{\'{i}}nez, McKay, Navarro-Gonz{\'{a}}lez, Vicente-Retortillo, Webster, and
Zorzano}}?><label>Trainer et al.(2019)Trainer, Wong, McConnochie, Franz, Atreya,
Conrad, Lefèvre, Mahaffy, Malespin, Manning, Martín-Torres,
Martínez, McKay, Navarro-González, Vicente-Retortillo, Webster, and
Zorzano</label><?label trainer_seasonal_2019?><mixed-citation>Trainer, M. G., Wong, M. H., McConnochie, T. H., Franz, H. B., Atreya, S. K.,
Conrad, P. G., Lefèvre, F., Mahaffy, P. R., Malespin, C. A., Manning, H.
L. K., Martín-Torres, J., Martínez, G. M., McKay, C. P.,
Navarro-González, R., Vicente-Retortillo, Á., Webster, C. R., and
Zorzano, M.-P.: Seasonal Variations in Atmospheric Composition as
Measured in Gale Crater, Mars, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 124, 3000–3024, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006175" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JE006175</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Treumann et~al.(2004)Treumann, Jaroschek, Constantinescu, Nakamura,
Pokhotelov, and Georgescu}}?><label>Treumann et al.(2004)Treumann, Jaroschek, Constantinescu, Nakamura,
Pokhotelov, and Georgescu</label><?label treumann_strange_2004?><mixed-citation>Treumann, R. A., Jaroschek, C. H., Constantinescu, O. D., Nakamura, R., Pokhotelov, O. A., and Georgescu, E.: The strange physics of low frequency mirror mode turbulence in the high temperature plasma of the magnetosheath, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 647–657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-647-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-11-647-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Trotignon et~al.(2006)Trotignon, Mazelle, Bertucci, and
Acu{\~{n}}a}}?><label>Trotignon et al.(2006)Trotignon, Mazelle, Bertucci, and
Acuña</label><?label trotignon_martian_2006?><mixed-citation>Trotignon, J., Mazelle, C., Bertucci, C., and Acuña, M.: Martian shock and
magnetic pile-up boundary positions and shapes determined from the Phobos 2
and Mars Global Surveyor data sets, Planet. Space Sci., 54,
357–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2006.01.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tsurutani(1991)}}?><label>Tsurutani(1991)</label><?label tsurutani_comets_1991?><mixed-citation>Tsurutani, B. T.: Comets: a Laboratory for Plasma Waves and
Instabilities, in: Cometary Plasma Processes,  189–209, American
Geophysical Union (AGU), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM061p0189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM061p0189</ext-link>,   1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tsurutani et~al.(1987)Tsurutani, Thorne, Smith, Gosling, and
Matsumoto}}?><label>Tsurutani et al.(1987)Tsurutani, Thorne, Smith, Gosling, and
Matsumoto</label><?label tsurutani_steepened_magnetosonic_1987?><mixed-citation>Tsurutani, B. T., Thorne, R. M., Smith, E. J., Gosling, J. T., and Matsumoto,
H.: Steepened magnetosonic waves at comet Giacobini-Zinner, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 92, 11074–11082,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA10p11074" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA092iA10p11074</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tsurutani et~al.(1999)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Smith, Buti, Moses,
Coroniti, Brinca, Slavin, and Zwickl}}?><label>Tsurutani et al.(1999)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Smith, Buti, Moses,
Coroniti, Brinca, Slavin, and Zwickl</label><?label tsurutani_mirror_1999?><mixed-citation>Tsurutani, B. T., Lakhina, G. S., Smith, E. J., But<?pagebreak page251?>i, B., Moses, S. L., Coroniti, F. V., Brinca, A. L., Slavin, J. A., and Zwickl, R. D.: Mirror mode structures and ELF plasma waves in the Giacobini-Zinner magnetosheath, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 6, 229–234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-6-229-1999" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-6-229-1999</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tsurutani et~al.(2011)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Verkhoglyadova, Echer,
Guarnieri, Narita, and Constantinescu}}?><label>Tsurutani et al.(2011)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Verkhoglyadova, Echer,
Guarnieri, Narita, and Constantinescu</label><?label tsurutani_magnetosheath_2011?><mixed-citation>Tsurutani, B. T., Lakhina, G. S., Verkhoglyadova, O. P., Echer, E., Guarnieri,
F. L., Narita, Y., and Constantinescu, D. O.: Magnetosheath and heliosheath
mirror mode structures, interplanetary magnetic decreases, and linear
magnetic decreases: Differences and distinguishing features,:   J.
Geophys. Res., 116, A2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015913" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JA015913</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Turner et~al.(1977){Turner}, {Burlaga}, {Ness}, and
{Lemaire}}}?><label>Turner et al.(1977)Turner, Burlaga, Ness, and
Lemaire</label><?label turner_magnetic_holes_solar_wind_1977?><mixed-citation>Turner, J. M., Burlaga, L. F., Ness, N. F., and Lemaire, J. F.:
Magnetic holes in the solar wind, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 1921,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA082i013p01921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA082i013p01921</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Volwerk et~al.(2008)Volwerk, Zhang, Delva, V{\"{o}}r{\"{o}}s, Baumjohann,
and Glassmeier}}?><label>Volwerk et al.(2008)Volwerk, Zhang, Delva, Vörös, Baumjohann,
and Glassmeier</label><?label volwerk_mirror-mode-like_2008?><mixed-citation>Volwerk, M., Zhang, T. L., Delva, M., Vörös, Z., Baumjohann, W., and
Glassmeier, K.-H.: Mirror-mode-like structures in Venus' induced
magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 113, E00B16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JE003154" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JE003154</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Volwerk et~al.(2016)Volwerk, Schmid, Tsurutani, Delva, Plaschke,
Narita, Zhang, and Glassmeier}}?><label>Volwerk et al.(2016)Volwerk, Schmid, Tsurutani, Delva, Plaschke,
Narita, Zhang, and Glassmeier</label><?label volwerk_mirror_2016?><mixed-citation>Volwerk, M., Schmid, D., Tsurutani, B. T., Delva, M., Plaschke, F., Narita, Y.,
Zhang, T., and Glassmeier, K.-H.: Mirror mode waves in Venus's
magnetosheath: solar minimum vs. solar maximum, Ann. Geophys., 34,
1099–1108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1099-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-34-1099-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Volwerk et~al.(2021)Volwerk, Mautner, Wedlund, Goetz, Plaschke,
Karlsson, Schmid, Rojas-Castillo, Roberts, and
Varsani}}?><label>Volwerk et al.(2021)Volwerk, Mautner, Wedlund, Goetz, Plaschke,
Karlsson, Schmid, Rojas-Castillo, Roberts, and
Varsani</label><?label volwerk_statistical_2021?><mixed-citation>Volwerk, M., Mautner, D., Wedlund, C. S., Goetz, C., Plaschke, F., Karlsson,
T., Schmid, D., Rojas-Castillo, D., Roberts, O. W., and Varsani, A.:
Statistical study of linear magnetic hole structures near Earth, Ann.
Geophys., 39, 239–253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Volwerk et~al.(2022){Volwerk}, {Simon Wedlund}, {Mautner},
{Stenberg Wieser}, {Rojas Mata}, {Futaana}, {Mazelle}, {Rojas-Castillo},
{Bertucci}, and {Delva}}}?><label>Volwerk et al.(2022)Volwerk, Simon Wedlund, Mautner,
Stenberg Wieser, Rojas Mata, Futaana, Mazelle, Rojas-Castillo,
Bertucci, and Delva</label><?label volwerk_MM_venus_2022?><mixed-citation>Volwerk, M., Simon Wedlund, C., Mautner, D., Rojas Mata, S., Stenberg Wieser, G., Futaana, Y., Mazelle, C., Rojas-Castillo, D., Bertucci, C., and Delva, M.: Statistical distribution of mirror mode-like structures in the magnetosheaths of unmagnetised planets: 2. Venus as observed by the Venus Express spacecraft, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-645" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2022-645</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wilson et~al.(2018)Wilson~III, Stevens, Kasper, Klein, Maruca,
Bale, Bowen, Pulupa, and Salem}}?><label>Wilson et al.(2018)Wilson III, Stevens, Kasper, Klein, Maruca,
Bale, Bowen, Pulupa, and Salem</label><?label wilson_iii_statistical_2018?><mixed-citation>Wilson III, L. B., Stevens, M. L., Kasper, J. C., Klein, K. G., Maruca, B. A.,
Bale, S. D., Bowen, T. A., Pulupa, M. P., and Salem, C. S.: The Statistical
Properties of Solar Wind Temperature Parameters Near 1 au, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.,
236, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab71c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/1538-4365/aab71c</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Yamauchi et~al.(2015)Yamauchi, Hara, Lundin, Dubinin, Fedorov,
Sauvaud, Frahm, Ramstad, Futaana, Holmstrom, and
Barabash}}?><label>Yamauchi et al.(2015)Yamauchi, Hara, Lundin, Dubinin, Fedorov,
Sauvaud, Frahm, Ramstad, Futaana, Holmstrom, and
Barabash</label><?label yamauchi_seasonal_2015?><mixed-citation>Yamauchi, M., Hara, T., Lundin, R., Dubinin, E., Fedorov, A., Sauvaud, J. A.,
Frahm, R. A., Ramstad, R., Futaana, Y., Holmstrom, M., and Barabash, S.:
Seasonal variation of Martian pick-up ions: Evidence of breathing
exosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 119, 54–61,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Statistical distribution of mirror-mode-like structures in the magnetosheaths of unmagnetised planets – Part 1: Mars as observed by the MAVEN spacecraft</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ala-Lahti et al.(2018)Ala-Lahti, Kilpua, Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen,
and Souček</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ala-Lahti, M. M., Kilpua, E. K. J., Dimmock, A. P., Osmane, A., Pulkkinen, T.,
and Souček, J.: Statistical analysis of mirror mode waves in sheath
regions driven by interplanetary coronal mass ejection, Ann. Geophys., 36,
793–808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-793-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Allison and McEwen(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Allison, M. and McEwen, M.: A post-Pathfinder evaluation of areocentric solar
coordinates with improved timing recipes for Mars seasonal/diurnal climate
studies, Planet. Space Sci., 48, 215–235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00092-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(99)00092-6</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bertucci et al.(2004)Bertucci, Mazelle, Crider, Mitchell, Sauer,
Acuña, Connerney, Lin, Ness, and Winterhalter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bertucci, C., Mazelle, C., Crider, D. H., Mitchell, D. L., Sauer, K.,
Acuña, M. H., Connerney, J. E. P., Lin, R. P., Ness, N. F., and
Winterhalter, D.: MGS MAG/ER observations at the magnetic pileup
boundary of Mars: draping enhancement and low frequency waves, Adv.
Space Res., 33, 1938–1944, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.04.054</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Brinca and
Romeiras(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brinca, A. L. and Romeiras, F. J.: On the stability of stationary
nongyrotropic distribution functions: Coupling and purely growing waves, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 9275–9284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA01995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JA01995</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chamberlin et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chamberlin, P. C., Woods, T. N., and Eparvier, F. G.:
Flare Irradiance Spectral Model (FISM): Flare component algorithms and results, Space Weather, 6, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007SW000372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007SW000372</a>, 2008 .

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Coates(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coates, A.: Pickup Ion Observations at Solar System Bodies, in: Advances in
Geosciences,  Planet. Sci., 25,   11–28,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814355377_0002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814355377_0002</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Coates et al.(1996)Coates, Johnstone, and
Neubauer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coates, A. J., Johnstone, A. D., and Neubauer, F. M.: Cometary ion
pressure anisotropies at comets Halley and Grigg-Skjellerup, J. Geophys.
Res., 101, 27573–27584, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA02524</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Connerney et al.(2015)Connerney, Espley, Lawton, Murphy, Odom,
Oliversen, and Sheppard</label><mixed-citation>
      
Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J., Lawton, P., Murphy, S., Odom, J., Oliversen,
R., and Sheppard, D.: The MAVEN Magnetic Field Investigation, Space
Sci. Rev., 195, 257–291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0169-4</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Delva et al.(2011)Delva, Mazelle, and
Bertucci</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delva, M., Mazelle, C., and Bertucci, C.: Upstream Ion Cyclotron Waves
at Venus and Mars, Space Sci. Rev., 162, 5–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9828-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-011-9828-2</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Dimmock et al.(2015)Dimmock, Osmane, Pulkkinen, and
Nykyri</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dimmock, A. P., Osmane, A., Pulkkinen, T. I., and Nykyri, K.: A statistical
study of the dawn-dusk asymmetry of ion temperature anisotropy and mirror
mode occurrence in the terrestrial dayside magnetosheath using THEMIS data,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 5489–5503,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021192" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021192</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Dong et al.(2015)Dong, Bougher, Ma, Toth, Lee, Nagy,
Tenishev, Pawlowski, Combi, and Najib</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, C., Bougher, S. W., Ma, Y., Toth, G., Lee, Y., Nagy, A. F.,
Tenishev, V., Pawlowski, D. J., Combi, M. R., and Najib, D.: Solar
wind interaction with the Martian upper atmosphere: Crustal field
orientation, solar cycle, and seasonal variations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 120, 7857–7872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020990" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA020990</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Dubinin and
Fraenz(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubinin, E. and Fraenz, M.: Ultra-Low-Frequency Waves at Venus and Mars,
Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union (AGU), ISBN: 9781119055006, 216,
343–364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119055006.ch20" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119055006.ch20</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Edberg et al.(2008)Edberg, Lester, Cowley, and
Eriksson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Edberg, N. J. T., Lester, M., Cowley, S. W. H., and Eriksson, A. I.:
Statistical analysis of the location of the Martian magnetic pileup
boundary and bow shock and the influence of crustal magnetic fields:
J. Geophys. Res., 113,
A08206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013096" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013096</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Edberg et al.(2009)Edberg, Brain, Lester, Cowley, Modolo, Fränz,
and Barabash</label><mixed-citation>
      
Edberg, N. J. T., Brain, D. A., Lester, M., Cowley, S. W. H., Modolo, R., Fränz, M., and Barabash, S.: Plasma boundary variability at Mars as observed by Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Express, Ann. Geophys., 27, 3537–3550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3537-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3537-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Erdős and Balogh(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Erdős, G. and Balogh, A.: Statistical properties of mirror mode structures
observed by Ulysses in the magnetosheath of Jupiter, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 101, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA02207" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JA02207</a>,
1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Erkaev et al.(2001)Erkaev, Schaffenberger, Biernat,
Farrugia, and Vogl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Erkaev, N. V., Schaffenberger, W., Biernat, H. K., Farrugia, C. J., and
Vogl, D. F.: Analysis of mirror modes convected from the bow shock to the
magnetopause, Planet. Space Sci., 49, 1359–1364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00057-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00057-5</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Espley et al.(2004)Espley, Cloutier, Brain, Crider, and
Acuña</label><mixed-citation>
      
Espley, J. R., Cloutier, P. A., Brain, D. A., Crider, D. H., and Acuña,
M. H.: Observations of low-frequency magnetic oscillations in the Martian
magnetosheath, magnetic pileup region, and tail, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 109, A07213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010193</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Forbes et al.(2008)Forbes, Lemoine, Bruinsma, Smith, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Forbes, J. M., Lemoine, F. G., Bruinsma, S. L., Smith, M. D., and Zhang, X.:
Solar flux variability of Mars' exosphere densities and temperatures,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L01201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031904</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fowler et al.(2021)Fowler, Hanley, McFadden, Chaston, Bonnell,
Halekas, Espley, DiBraccio, Schwartz, Mazelle, Mitchell, Xu, and
Lillis</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fowler, C. M., Hanley, K. G., McFadden, J. P., Chaston, C. C., Bonnell, J. W.,
Halekas, J. S., Espley, J. R., DiBraccio, G. A., Schwartz, S. J., Mazelle,
C., Mitchell, D. L., Xu, S., and Lillis, R. J.: MAVEN Observations of Low
Frequency Steepened Magnetosonic Waves and Associated Heating of the Martian
Nightside Ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126,
e2021JA029615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029615" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029615</a>,  2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fränz et al.(2017)Fränz, Echer, Marques de Souza, Dubinin,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fränz, M., Echer, E., Marques de Souza, A., Dubinin, E., and Zhang, T. L.:
Ultra low frequency waves at Venus: Observations by the Venus Express
spacecraft, Planet. Space Sci., 146, 55–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.08.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.08.011</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Garnier et al.(2022)Garnier, Jacquey, Gendre, Génot,
Mazelle, Fang, Gruesbeck, Sánchez-Cano, and
Halekas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garnier, P., Jacquey, C., Gendre, X., Génot, V., Mazelle, C.,
Fang, X., Gruesbeck, J. R., Sánchez-Cano, B., and Halekas, J. S.:
The Drivers of the Martian Bow Shock Location: A Statistical Analysis of
Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN and Mars Express Observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e30147,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030147</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gary(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gary, S. P.: The mirror and ion cyclotron anisotropy instabilities, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 8519, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA00299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JA00299</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gary(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gary, S. P.: Theory of Space Plasma Microinstabilities, Cambridge
University Press, google-Books-ID: hMiulET5wpwC, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551512</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Gary and Winske(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gary, S. P. and Winske, D.: Correlation function ratios and the identification
of space plasma instabilities, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 97, 3103–3111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02752</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Génot et al.(2001)Génot, Schwartz, Mazelle, Balikhin, Dunlop,
and Bauer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Génot, V., Schwartz, S. J., Mazelle, C., Balikhin, M., Dunlop, M., and
Bauer, T. M.: Kinetic study of the mirror mode, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
21611–21622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JA000457</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Génot et al.(2009)Génot, Budnik, Jacquey, Dandouras, and
Lucek</label><mixed-citation>
      
Génot, V., Budnik, E., Jacquey, C., Dandouras, I., and Lucek, E.: Mirror
modes observed with Cluster in the Earth's magnetosheath:
statistical study and IMF/solar wind dependence, in: Advances in
Geosciences, Vol. 14,  263–283, World Scientific Publishing Company,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812836205_0019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812836205_0019</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Glassmeier et al.(1993)Glassmeier, Motschmann, Mazelle, Neubauer,
Sauer, Fuselier, and Acuña</label><mixed-citation>
      
Glassmeier, K. H., Motschmann, U., Mazelle, C., Neubauer, F. M., Sauer, K.,
Fuselier, S. A., and Acuña, M. H.: Mirror modes and fast magnetoacoustic
waves near the magnetic pileup boundary of comet P/Halley, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 98, 20955–20964,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02582" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA02582</a>,  1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gruesbeck et al.(2018)Gruesbeck, Espley, Connerney, DiBraccio,
Soobiah, Brain, Mazelle, Dann, Halekas, and
Mitchell</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gruesbeck, J. R., Espley, J. R., Connerney, J. E. P., DiBraccio, G. A.,
Soobiah, Y. I., Brain, D., Mazelle, C., Dann, J., Halekas, J., and Mitchell,
D. L.: The Three-Dimensional Bow Shock of Mars as Observed by
MAVEN, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 4542–4555,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025366" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025366</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Halekas(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S.: Seasonal variability of the hydrogen exosphere of Mars,
J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 122, 901–911,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005306" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005306</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Halekas and
McFadden(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S. and McFadden, J. P.: Using Solar Wind Helium to Probe the
Structure and Seasonal Variability of the Martian Hydrogen Corona, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 126, e07049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JE007049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JE007049</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Halekas et al.(2015)Halekas, Taylor, Dalton, Johnson, Curtis,
McFadden, Mitchell, Lin, and Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S., Taylor, E. R., Dalton, G., Johnson, G., Curtis, D. W.,
McFadden, J. P., Mitchell, D. L., Lin, R. P., and Jakosky, B. M.: The Solar
Wind Ion Analyzer for MAVEN, Space Sci. Rev., 195, 125–151,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0029-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0029-z</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Halekas et al.(2017a)Halekas, Brain, Luhmann, DiBraccio,
Ruhunusiri, Harada, Fowler, Mitchell, Connerney, Espley, Mazelle, and
Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S., Brain, D. A., Luhmann, J. G., DiBraccio, G. A., Ruhunusiri, S.,
Harada, Y., Fowler, C. M., Mitchell, D. L., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley,
J. R., Mazelle, C., and Jakosky, B. M.: Flows, Fields, and Forces in the
Mars-Solar Wind Interaction, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 11320–11341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024772" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024772</a>,
2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Halekas et al.(2017b)Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Harada,
Collinson, Mitchell, Mazelle, McFadden, Connerney, Espley, Eparvier, Luhmann,
and Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S., Ruhunusiri, S., Harada, Y., Collinson, G., Mitchell, D. L.,
Mazelle, C., McFadden, J. P., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., Eparvier,
F., Luhmann, J. G., and Jakosky, B. M.: Structure, dynamics, and seasonal
variability of the Mars-solar wind interaction: MAVEN Solar Wind
Ion Analyzer in-flight performance and science results, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 547–578,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023167</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Halekas et al.(2020)Halekas, Ruhunusiri, Vaisberg, Harada, Espley,
Mitchell, Mazelle, Romanelli, DiBraccio, and Brain</label><mixed-citation>
      
Halekas, J. S., Ruhunusiri, S., Vaisberg, O. L., Harada, Y., Espley, J.,
Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., Romanelli, N., DiBraccio, G. A., and Brain,
D. A.: Properties of Plasma Waves Observed Upstream from Mars, World Library Catalog, Earth and Space Science Open Archive Section, Sol.
Syst. Phys., 125, e2020JA028221,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028221" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028221</a>,  2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hall et al.(2016)Hall, Lester, Sánchez-Cano, Nichols, Andrews,
Edberg, Opgenoorth, Fränz, Holmström, Ramstad, Witasse, Cartacci,
Cicchetti, Noschese, and Orosei</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hall, B. E. S., Lester, M., Sánchez-Cano, B., Nichols, J. D., Andrews,
D. J., Edberg, N. J. T., Opgenoorth, H. J., Fränz, M., Holmström, M.,
Ramstad, R., Witasse, O., Cartacci, M., Cicchetti, A., Noschese, R., and
Orosei, R.: Annual variations in the Martian bow shock location as observed
by the Mars Express mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 11474–11494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023316</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hall et al.(2019)Hall, Sánchez-Cano, Wild, Lester, and
Holmström</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hall, B. E. S., Sánchez-Cano, B., Wild, J. A., Lester, M., and
Holmström, M.: The Martian Bow Shock Over Solar Cycle
23–24 as Observed by the Mars Express Mission, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 124, 4761–4772,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026404</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Hasegawa(1969)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasegawa, A.: Drift Mirror Instability in the Magnetosphere, Phys.
Fluids, 12, 2642, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692407" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1692407</a>, 1969.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Hoilijoki et al.(2016)Hoilijoki, Palmroth, Walsh, Pfau-Kempf, von
Alfthan, Ganse, Hannuksela, and Vainio</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoilijoki, S., Palmroth, M., Walsh, B. M., Pfau-Kempf, Y., von Alfthan, S.,
Ganse, U., Hannuksela, O., and Vainio, R.: Mirror modes in the Earth's
magnetosheath: Results from a global hybrid-Vlasov simulation, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 4191–4204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022026</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Jarvinen et al.(2022)Jarvinen, Kallio, and
Pulkkinen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jarvinen, R., Kallio, E., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Ultra-low Frequency
Foreshock Waves and Ion Dynamics at Mars, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e30078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030078" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA030078</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Jin et al.(2022)Jin, Lei, Yiteng, Lianghai, and
Fuhao</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jin, T., Lei, L., Yiteng, Z., Lianghai, X., and Fuhao, Q.: Statistical Analysis
of the Distribution and Evolution of Mirror Structures in the Martian
Magnetosheath,   Astrophys. J., 929, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f00" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f00</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Joy et al.(2006)Joy, Kivelson, Walker, Khurana, Russell, and
Paterson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Joy, S. P., Kivelson, M. G., Walker, R. J., Khurana, K. K., Russell, C. T., and
Paterson, W. R.: Mirror mode structures in the Jovian magnetosheath, J.
Geophys. Res., 111, A12212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011985" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011985</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Karlsson et al.(2021)Karlsson, Heyner, Volwerk, Morooka,
Plaschke, Goetz, and Hadid</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karlsson, T., Heyner, D., Volwerk, M., Morooka, M., Plaschke, F.,
Goetz, C., and Hadid, L.: Magnetic Holes in the Solar Wind and
Magnetosheath Near Mercury, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
126, e28961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028961" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028961</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lucek et al.(1999)Lucek, Dunlop, Balogh, Cargill, Baumjohann,
Georgescu, Haerendel, and Fornacon</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lucek, E. A., Dunlop, M. W., Balogh, A., Cargill, P., Baumjohann, W.,
Georgescu, E., Haerendel, G., and Fornacon, K.-H.: Identification of
magnetosheath mirror modes in Equator-S magnetic field data, Ann.
Geophys., 17, 1560–1573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-999-1560-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-999-1560-9</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Madanian et al.(2020)Madanian, Halekas, Mazelle, Omidi, Espley,
Mitchell, and McFadden</label><mixed-citation>
      
Madanian, H., Halekas, J. S., Mazelle, C. X., Omidi, N., Espley, J. R.,
Mitchell, D. L., and McFadden, J. P.: Magnetic Holes Upstream of the
Martian Bow Shock: MAVEN Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 125, e2019JA027198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA027198</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Mazelle et al.(1989)Mazelle, Rème, Sauvaud, d'Uston,
Carlson, Anderson, Curtis, Lin, Korth, Mendis, Neubauer,
Glassmeier, and Raeder</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mazelle, C., Rème, H., Sauvaud, J. A., d'Uston, C., Carlson,
C. W., Anderson, K. A., Curtis, D. W., Lin, R. P., Korth, A.,
Mendis, D. A., Neubauer, F. M., Glassmeier, K. H., and Raeder, J.:
Analysis of suprathermal electron properties at the magnetic pile-up
boundary of comet P/Halley, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, 1035–1038,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i009p01035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i009p01035</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Mazelle et al.(1991)Mazelle, Belmont, Glassmeier, Le
Quéau, and Rème</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mazelle, C., Belmont, G., Glassmeier, K. H., Le Quéau, D., and
Rème, H.: Ultra low frequency waves at the magnetic pile-up boundary
of comet P/Halley, Adv. Space Res., 11, 73–77,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(91)90014-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(91)90014-B</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Mazelle et al.(2004)Mazelle, Winterhalter, Sauer, Trotignon,
Acuña, Baumgärtel, Bertucci, Brain, Brecht, Delva, Dubinin,
Øieroset, and Slavin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mazelle, C., Winterhalter, D., Sauer, K., Trotignon, J., Acuña, M.,
Baumgärtel, K., Bertucci, C., Brain, D., Brecht, S., Delva, M., Dubinin,
E., Øieroset, M., and Slavin, J.: Bow Shock and Upstream Phenomena
at Mars, Space Sci. Revi., 111, 115–181,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAC.0000032717.98679.d0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SPAC.0000032717.98679.d0</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Mitchell et al.(2016)Mitchell, Mazelle, Sauvaud, Thocaven, Rouzaud,
Fedorov, Rouger, Toublanc, Taylor, Gordon, Robinson, Heavner, Turin,
Diaz-Aguado, Curtis, Lin, and Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., Sauvaud, J.-A., Thocaven, J.-J., Rouzaud, J.,
Fedorov, A., Rouger, P., Toublanc, D., Taylor, E., Gordon, D., Robinson, M.,
Heavner, S., Turin, P., Diaz-Aguado, M., Curtis, D. W., Lin, R. P., and
Jakosky, B. M.: The MAVEN Solar Wind Electron Analyzer, Space Sci.
Rev., 200, 495–528, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0232-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0232-1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Motschmann et al.(1997)Motschmann, Kafemann, and
Scholer</label><mixed-citation>
      
Motschmann, U., Kafemann, H., and Scholer, M.: Nongyrotropy in
magnetoplasmas: simulation of wave excitation and phase-space diffusion,
Ann. Geophys., 15, 603–613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-0603-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-997-0603-3</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Lawton and Connerney(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lawton, P. and Connerney, J.:   MAVEN MAG Calibrated Data Bundle, NASA [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17189/1414178</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Price(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Price, C. P.: Mirror waves driven by newborn ion distributions, J. Geophys.
Res., 94, 15001–15009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA094iA11p15001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA094iA11p15001</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Price et al.(1986)Price, Swift, and Lee</label><mixed-citation>
      
Price, C. P., Swift, D. W., and Lee, L.-C.: Numerical simulation of
nonoscillatory mirror waves at the Earth's magnetosheath, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 91, 101–112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA01p00101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA091iA01p00101</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Rojas Mata et al.(2022)Rojas Mata, Stenberg Wieser, Futaana,
Bader, Persson, Fedorov, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rojas Mata, S., Stenberg Wieser, G., Futaana, Y., Bader, A., Persson,
M., Fedorov, A., and Zhang, T.: Proton Temperature Anisotropies in the
Venus Plasma Environment During Solar Minimum and Maximum, J.
Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e29611,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029611</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Romanelli et al.(2013)Romanelli, Bertucci, Gómez,
Mazelle, and Delva</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romanelli, N., Bertucci, C., Gómez, D., Mazelle, C., and Delva,
M.: Proton cyclotron waves upstream from Mars: Observations from Mars Global
Surveyor, Planet. Space Sci., 76, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.10.011</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Romanelli et al.(2016)Romanelli, Mazelle, Chaufray,
Meziane, Shan, Ruhunusiri, Connerney, Espley, Eparvier,
Thiemann, Halekas, Mitchell, McFadden, Brain, and
Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romanelli, N., Mazelle, C., Chaufray, J. Y., Meziane, K., Shan, L.,
Ruhunusiri, S., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., Eparvier, F.,
Thiemann, E., Halekas, J. S., Mitchell, D. L., McFadden, J. P.,
Brain, D., and Jakosky, B. M.: Proton cyclotron waves occurrence rate
upstream from Mars observed by MAVEN: Associated variability of the Martian
upper atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121,
11113–11128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023270" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023270</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Romeo et al.(2021)Romeo, Romanelli, Espley, Mazelle,
DiBraccio, Gruesbeck, and Halekas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romeo, O. M., Romanelli, N., Espley, J. R., Mazelle, C., DiBraccio,
G. A., Gruesbeck, J. R., and Halekas, J. S.: Variability of Upstream
Proton Cyclotron Wave Properties and Occurrence at Mars Observed by MAVEN,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 126, e28616,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028616" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JA028616</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Ruhunusiri et al.(2015)Ruhunusiri, Halekas, Connerney, Espley,
McFadden, Larson, Mitchell, Mazelle, and
Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., Connerney, J. E. P., Espley, J. R., McFadden,
J. P., Larson, D. E., Mitchell, D. L., Mazelle, C., and Jakosky, B. M.:
Low-frequency waves in the Martian magnetosphere and their response to
upstream solar wind driving conditions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42,
8917–8924, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064968" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064968</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Ruhunusiri et al.(2018)Ruhunusiri, Halekas, Espley,
Eparvier, Brain, Mazelle, Harada, DiBraccio, Thiemann, Larson,
Mitchell, Jakosky, and Sulaiman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ruhunusiri, S., Halekas, J. S., Espley, J. R., Eparvier, F., Brain,
D., Mazelle, C., Harada, Y., DiBraccio, G. A., Thiemann, E. M. B.,
Larson, D. E., Mitchell, D. L., Jakosky, B. M., and Sulaiman, A. H.:
One-Hertz Waves at Mars: MAVEN Observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 123, 3460–3476, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA024618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JA024618</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Schwartz et al.(1997)Schwartz, Burgess, and
Moses</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwartz, S. J., Burgess, D., and Moses, J. J.: Low-frequency waves in the
Earth's magnetosheath: present status, Ann. Geophys.,
14, 1134–1150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Shan et al.(2020)Shan, Tsurutani, Ohsawa, Mazelle, Huang,
Du, Ge, and Lu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shan, L., Tsurutani, B. T., Ohsawa, Y., Mazelle, C., Huang, C., Du,
A., Ge, Y. S., and Lu, Q.: Observational Evidence for Fast Mode Periodic
Small-scale Shocks: A New Type of Plasma Phenomenon, Astrophys. J. Lett.,
905, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abcb02" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abcb02</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2021)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Beth, A., Mazelle, C., Möstl, C., Halekas, J.,
Gruesbeck, J., and Rojas-Castillo, D.: Predicted times, spatial coordinates of bow shock crossings and shock geometry at Mars from the NASA/MAVEN mission, using spacecraft ephemerides and magnetic field data, with a predictor-corrector algorithm  (Version 3), Zenodo [data set]
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6320518" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6320518</a>,   2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2022a)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk, Beth,
Mazelle, Möstl, Halekas, Gruesbeck, and
Rojas-Castillo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Beth, A., Mazelle, C., Möstl, C., Halekas, J.,
Gruesbeck, J. R., and Rojas-Castillo, D.: A Fast Bow Shock Location
Predictor-Estimator From 2D and 3D Analytical Models: Application to Mars and
the MAVEN Mission, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127,
e2021JA029942, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029942" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029942</a>,  2022a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Simon Wedlund et al.(2022b)Simon Wedlund, Volwerk,
Mazelle, Halekas, Rojas-Castillo, Espley, and
Möstl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simon Wedlund, C., Volwerk, M., Mazelle, C., Halekas, J., Rojas-Castillo, D.,
Espley, J., and Möstl, C.: Making Waves: Mirror Mode Structures Around Mars
Observed by the MAVEN Spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 127, e2021JA029811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029811" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JA029811</a>,  2022b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Song et al.(1994)Song, Russell, and Gary</label><mixed-citation>
      
Song, P., Russell, C. T., and Gary, S. P.: Identification of low-frequency
fluctuations in the terrestrial magnetosheath, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 6011,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA03300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JA03300</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Sonnerup and Scheible(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sonnerup, B. U. Ö. and Scheible, M.: Minimum and Maximum Variance
Analysis, in: Analysis Methods for Multi-Spacecraft Data, no.
SR-001 in ISSI Scientific Report, ISSI/ESA, ESA Publications Division, the Netherlands,   185–220, ISBN: 1608-280X, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Soucek et al.(2008)Soucek, Lucek, and
Dandouras</label><mixed-citation>
      
Soucek, J., Lucek, E., and Dandouras, I.: Properties of magnetosheath mirror
modes observed by Cluster and their response to changes in plasma
parameters, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 113, A04203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012649" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012649</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Szegö et al.(2000)Szegö, Glassmeier, Bingham,
Bogdanov, Fischer, Haerendel, Brinca, Cravens, Dubinin, Sauer,
Fisk, Gombosi, Schwadron, Isenberg, Lee, Mazelle, Möbius,
Motschmann, Shapiro, Tsurutani, and
Zank</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szegö, K., Glassmeier, K.-H., Bingham, R., Bogdanov, A., Fischer,
C., Haerendel, G., Brinca, A., Cravens, T., Dubinin, E., Sauer, K.,
Fisk, L., Gombosi, T., Schwadron, N., Isenberg, P., Lee, M.,
Mazelle, C., Möbius, E., Motschmann, U., Shapiro, V. D.,
Tsurutani, B., and Zank, G.: Physics of Mass Loaded Plasmas, Space Sci.
Rev., 94, 429–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026568530975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026568530975</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Thiemann et al.(2017)Thiemann, Chamberlin, Eparvier, Templeman,
Woods, Bougher, and Jakosky</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thiemann, E. M. B., Chamberlin, P. C., Eparvier, F. G., Templeman, B., Woods,
T. N., Bougher, S. W., and Jakosky, B. M.: The MAVEN EUVM model of solar
spectral irradiance variability at Mars: Algorithms and results, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 2748–2767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023512</a>,  2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Trainer et al.(2019)Trainer, Wong, McConnochie, Franz, Atreya,
Conrad, Lefèvre, Mahaffy, Malespin, Manning, Martín-Torres,
Martínez, McKay, Navarro-González, Vicente-Retortillo, Webster, and
Zorzano</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trainer, M. G., Wong, M. H., McConnochie, T. H., Franz, H. B., Atreya, S. K.,
Conrad, P. G., Lefèvre, F., Mahaffy, P. R., Malespin, C. A., Manning, H.
L. K., Martín-Torres, J., Martínez, G. M., McKay, C. P.,
Navarro-González, R., Vicente-Retortillo, Á., Webster, C. R., and
Zorzano, M.-P.: Seasonal Variations in Atmospheric Composition as
Measured in Gale Crater, Mars, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 124, 3000–3024, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006175" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JE006175</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Treumann et al.(2004)Treumann, Jaroschek, Constantinescu, Nakamura,
Pokhotelov, and Georgescu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Treumann, R. A., Jaroschek, C. H., Constantinescu, O. D., Nakamura, R., Pokhotelov, O. A., and Georgescu, E.: The strange physics of low frequency mirror mode turbulence in the high temperature plasma of the magnetosheath, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 11, 647–657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-647-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-11-647-2004</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Trotignon et al.(2006)Trotignon, Mazelle, Bertucci, and
Acuña</label><mixed-citation>
      
Trotignon, J., Mazelle, C., Bertucci, C., and Acuña, M.: Martian shock and
magnetic pile-up boundary positions and shapes determined from the Phobos 2
and Mars Global Surveyor data sets, Planet. Space Sci., 54,
357–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2006.01.003</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Tsurutani(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsurutani, B. T.: Comets: a Laboratory for Plasma Waves and
Instabilities, in: Cometary Plasma Processes,  189–209, American
Geophysical Union (AGU), <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM061p0189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM061p0189</a>,   1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Tsurutani et al.(1987)Tsurutani, Thorne, Smith, Gosling, and
Matsumoto</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsurutani, B. T., Thorne, R. M., Smith, E. J., Gosling, J. T., and Matsumoto,
H.: Steepened magnetosonic waves at comet Giacobini-Zinner, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 92, 11074–11082,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA10p11074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA092iA10p11074</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Tsurutani et al.(1999)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Smith, Buti, Moses,
Coroniti, Brinca, Slavin, and Zwickl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsurutani, B. T., Lakhina, G. S., Smith, E. J., Buti, B., Moses, S. L., Coroniti, F. V., Brinca, A. L., Slavin, J. A., and Zwickl, R. D.: Mirror mode structures and ELF plasma waves in the Giacobini-Zinner magnetosheath, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 6, 229–234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-6-229-1999" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-6-229-1999</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Tsurutani et al.(2011)Tsurutani, Lakhina, Verkhoglyadova, Echer,
Guarnieri, Narita, and Constantinescu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tsurutani, B. T., Lakhina, G. S., Verkhoglyadova, O. P., Echer, E., Guarnieri,
F. L., Narita, Y., and Constantinescu, D. O.: Magnetosheath and heliosheath
mirror mode structures, interplanetary magnetic decreases, and linear
magnetic decreases: Differences and distinguishing features,:   J.
Geophys. Res., 116, A2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015913" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015913</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Turner et al.(1977)Turner, Burlaga, Ness, and
Lemaire</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turner, J. M., Burlaga, L. F., Ness, N. F., and Lemaire, J. F.:
Magnetic holes in the solar wind, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 1921,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA082i013p01921" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA082i013p01921</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Volwerk et al.(2008)Volwerk, Zhang, Delva, Vörös, Baumjohann,
and Glassmeier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volwerk, M., Zhang, T. L., Delva, M., Vörös, Z., Baumjohann, W., and
Glassmeier, K.-H.: Mirror-mode-like structures in Venus' induced
magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 113, E00B16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JE003154" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JE003154</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Volwerk et al.(2016)Volwerk, Schmid, Tsurutani, Delva, Plaschke,
Narita, Zhang, and Glassmeier</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volwerk, M., Schmid, D., Tsurutani, B. T., Delva, M., Plaschke, F., Narita, Y.,
Zhang, T., and Glassmeier, K.-H.: Mirror mode waves in Venus's
magnetosheath: solar minimum vs. solar maximum, Ann. Geophys., 34,
1099–1108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1099-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-34-1099-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Volwerk et al.(2021)Volwerk, Mautner, Wedlund, Goetz, Plaschke,
Karlsson, Schmid, Rojas-Castillo, Roberts, and
Varsani</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volwerk, M., Mautner, D., Wedlund, C. S., Goetz, C., Plaschke, F., Karlsson,
T., Schmid, D., Rojas-Castillo, D., Roberts, O. W., and Varsani, A.:
Statistical study of linear magnetic hole structures near Earth, Ann.
Geophys., 39, 239–253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-39-239-2021</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Volwerk et al.(2022)Volwerk, Simon Wedlund, Mautner,
Stenberg Wieser, Rojas Mata, Futaana, Mazelle, Rojas-Castillo,
Bertucci, and Delva</label><mixed-citation>
      
Volwerk, M., Simon Wedlund, C., Mautner, D., Rojas Mata, S., Stenberg Wieser, G., Futaana, Y., Mazelle, C., Rojas-Castillo, D., Bertucci, C., and Delva, M.: Statistical distribution of mirror mode-like structures in the magnetosheaths of unmagnetised planets: 2. Venus as observed by the Venus Express spacecraft, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-645" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-645</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Wilson et al.(2018)Wilson III, Stevens, Kasper, Klein, Maruca,
Bale, Bowen, Pulupa, and Salem</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wilson III, L. B., Stevens, M. L., Kasper, J. C., Klein, K. G., Maruca, B. A.,
Bale, S. D., Bowen, T. A., Pulupa, M. P., and Salem, C. S.: The Statistical
Properties of Solar Wind Temperature Parameters Near 1&thinsp;au, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser.,
236, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab71c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aab71c</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Yamauchi et al.(2015)Yamauchi, Hara, Lundin, Dubinin, Fedorov,
Sauvaud, Frahm, Ramstad, Futaana, Holmstrom, and
Barabash</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yamauchi, M., Hara, T., Lundin, R., Dubinin, E., Fedorov, A., Sauvaud, J. A.,
Frahm, R. A., Ramstad, R., Futaana, Y., Holmstrom, M., and Barabash, S.:
Seasonal variation of Martian pick-up ions: Evidence of breathing
exosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 119, 54–61,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2015.09.013</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
