<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-37-315-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Phenomena preceding major earthquakes interconnected<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> through a physical model</article-title><alt-title>Phenomena preceding major earthquakes </alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Phenomena preceding major earthquakes }?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~A.~Varotsos et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Varotsos</surname><given-names>Panayiotis A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sarlis</surname><given-names>Nicholas V.</given-names></name>
          <email>nsarlis@phys.uoa.gr</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8483-519X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Skordas</surname><given-names>Efthimios S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1269-4903</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Physics, Section of Solid State Physics,  National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografos 157 84, Athens, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physics, Solid Earth Physics Institute,  National and
Kapodistrian University of Athens,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Panepistimiopolis, Zografos 157 84, Athens, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nicholas V. Sarlis (nsarlis@phys.uoa.gr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>37</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>315</fpage><lpage>324</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>26</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Panayiotis A. Varotsos et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e105">The analysis of earthquake time series in a new time domain termed
natural time enables the uncovering of hidden properties in time series of
complex systems and has been recently employed as the basis of a method to
estimate seismic risk. Natural time also enables the determination of the
order parameter of seismicity, which is a quantity by means of which one can identify when the system approaches the critical point (the mainshock
occurrence is considered the new phase). Applying this analysis, as an
example, to the Japanese seismic data from 1 January 1984 until the
super-giant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku earthquake on 11 March 2011, we find
that almost 3 months before its occurrence the entropy change of seismicity under time
reversal is minimized on 22 December 2010, which signals an impending major
earthquake. On this date the order parameter fluctuations of seismicity
exhibit an abrupt increase. This increase is accompanied by various phenomena; e.g., from this date the horizontal GPS azimuths start to become gradually
oriented toward the southern direction, while they had random orientation
during the preceding period. Two weeks later, a minimum of the order
parameter fluctuations of seismicity appears accompanied by anomalous Earth
magnetic field variations and by full alignment of the orientations of GPS
azimuths southwards leading to the most intense crust uplift. These phenomena
are discussed and found to be in accordance with a physical model which
seems to explain on a unified basis anomalous precursory changes observed
either in ground-based measurements or in satellite data.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page316?><p id="d1e124">Almost 8 years have passed since the Tōhoku earthquake
(EQ)  that occurred on 11 March 2011 in Japan with magnitude
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) 9.0, the largest magnitude ever recorded in Japan.
In the meantime, independent research groups reported
anomalous precursory variations of quantities like the
geomagnetic field <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.1"/>, seismicity upon
analyzing it  in natural time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.2"/>, and
Earth's surface displacements measured by Global Positioning
System (GPS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.3"/>. In the 1980s, a short-term
earthquake prediction method was introduced based on the observation of
seismic electric signals (SESs), which are low-frequency transient changes in
the electric field of the Earth preceding EQs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.4"/>.
Several SESs recorded within a short time are termed SES activity
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.5"/>. Major EQs are preceded by intense SES activities accompanied
by evident Earth magnetic field variations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.6"/> mainly recorded
on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.7"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="altparen.8"/>). This method was
motivated by a physical model for SES generation, which also foresees that
some additional transient multidisciplinary phenomena should be
simultaneously generated and ended well before the EQ rupture as
schematically shown in Fig. 1a. This was in direct contrast to other proposed
precursory mechanisms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.9"/> that usually exhibit anomalous behavior
becoming more intense upon approaching the EQ failure as seen in Fig. 1b. The
scope of the present study is twofold: first, investigate whether the
transient phenomena foreseen by this model actually appeared before the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ, having been observed by ground-based measurements or by GPS data; second, report other precursory phenomena that appeared before the Tōhoku
EQ almost simultaneously with the transient phenomena that
were expected on the basis of this model.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e179">Schematic diagram showing the two distinct approaches proposed for a
precursory behavior. <bold>(a)</bold> The case of the physical model for SES
generation, which differs greatly from other suggested mechanisms
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.10"/> in which the anomalous precursory behavior becomes more intense
upon approaching the EQ occurrence <bold>(b)</bold>. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e197">The aforementioned physical model for SES generation, termed the pressure
stimulated polarization current (PSPC) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="altparen.11"/>; summarized
also in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.12"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="altparen.13"/>), suggests the following
(see Fig. 2): in the Earth, electric dipoles always exist <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.14"/> due
to lattice imperfections (point and linear defects; e.g., see
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.15"/>) in the ionic constituents of rocks. In the future focal
region of an EQ, where the electric dipoles have initially random
orientations (Fig. 2c), the stress, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, starts to gradually increase
due to an excess stress disturbance (Fig. 2a). Let us call this
stage A hereafter. When this gradually increasing stress reaches a critical value
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the electric dipoles exhibit a cooperative
orientation (Fig. 2e) resulting in the emission of a transient SES (Fig. 2b) with current density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We call this stage B.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.16"/> pointed out that the PSPC model is unique among other models
in that SESs would be generated spontaneously during the gradual increase in
stress without requiring any sudden change in stress such as microfracturing
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.17"/> (or faulting).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e250">Schematic diagram of the physical model proposed for the SES
generation. <bold>(a)</bold> Before an EQ, the stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> gradually
increases in the focal area versus the time t towards reaching a critical
value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> reaches
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a transient electric signal is emitted that constitutes
an SES. <bold>(c)</bold> Random orientation of the electric dipoles at small
stress. <bold>(d)</bold> Partial orientation at an intermediate stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(e)</bold> Cooperative orientation of the electric
dipoles when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e347">Observations of SES activities in Japan <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.18"/>, in China
(see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.19"/>, and references therein; for example see the
geoelectric field changes depicted in Fig. 2b of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="altparen.20"/>, that started
almost 50 d before the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.0 Wenchuan EQ in 2008), and in Mexico
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">see p. 220 of</named-content></xref> and in California (where magnetic field
variations similar to those associated with the SES activities in Greece have
been reported; e.g., see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx1" id="altparen.22"/>; see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.23"/>)
have shown that their lead time lies in the range from a few weeks to a few
months or so, in agreement with earlier observations in Greece
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.24"/> (where the maximum lead time observed is 5.5 months or so;
e.g., see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="altparen.25"/>). Hence, the SES observations in
various EQ-prone areas reveal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.26"/> that before the occurrence of
major EQs there is a crucial timescale (from a few weeks to around a few
months or so), in which the critical stress <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is attained
and changes in other associated physical quantities should become also
detectable <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e406">This paper is structured as follows: in the next section, i.e., Sect. 2, we
present the anomalous variations of multidisciplinary nature observed before
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ by independent research groups, while our own findings
obtained by natural time analysis of the seismicity of Japan are given in
Sect. 3. In the subsequent Sect. 4, we investigate whether the observed
precursory variations are in accordance with the PSPC model, and in the final
section, i.e., Sect. 5, we summarize our conclusions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page317?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Anomalous variations of multidisciplinary nature observed by independent groups before the 2011 $M$~9 T\={o}hoku EQ}?><title>Anomalous variations of multidisciplinary nature observed by independent groups before the 2011 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Earth's magnetic field variations</title>
      <p id="d1e440"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.28"/> found anomalous behavior of geomagnetic diurnal variations
mainly in the vertical component at the Esashi station (ESA) located at about
135 km from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ focal zone for about 10 d, i.e.,
4–14 January 2011. They analyzed geomagnetic data of a 3-year period, i.e.,
from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012, by computing ratios of diurnal
variation range between the target station ESA and the remote reference
station Kakioka about 300 km from the EQ epicenter. To validate this
finding, further investigations were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.29"/> after
analyzing geomagnetic data of 16-year long-term observations in Japanese
stations. They again found that the mean values of the ratios of the diurnal
variations in the vertical component showed a clear anomaly exceeding the
statistical threshold during the aforementioned period, i.e.,
4–14 January 2011, and in addition they emphasized that this anomaly is
unique in over 16 years. This has been further validated by the most recent
study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.30"/>, who analyzed geomagnetic data of long-term
observations at 17 stations in Japan. They found that the above unique
anomaly in the vertical component has also been observed at a second station
at Mizusawa (MIZ) in the Tōhoku region, which is about 20 km southwest of
the ESA station. This fact that both ESA and MIZ show clear anomalies at the same time suggests that the
anomaly cannot be the result of observation system
error or artificial noises <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.31"/>. Furthermore, this anomaly cannot be
attributed to magnetic storms since it has been observed during a period in
which no moderate–strong magnetic storms were recorded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Earth's surface displacements</title>
      <p id="d1e469">Daily resolution data retrieved from the 1243 GPS stations in Japan were
utilized by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.32"/> to expose surface displacements before the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ. They applied the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.33"/> on
filtering long-term plate movements, short-term noise, and frequency-dependent
(i.e., semiannual and annual) variations from the three-component
GPS data for all stations. The N–S and E–W components were utilized to compute the
orientations of the horizontal azimuths, termed GPS azimuths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e487">Schematic diagram that compiles the multidisciplinary changes before
the Tōhoku EQ. Period of observations: from 12 December 2010 until
23 January 2011. The black text describes the observations by means of
residual GPS data, the brown text describes those obtained by means of Earth's magnetic field variations, the green text describes those obtained by detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), the blue text describes those
obtained by natural time analysis, and the purple text describes those obtained by anomalous
groundwater and radon changes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/315/2019/angeo-37-315-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e496">In general, the residual surface displacements are random
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.34"/>. However, as depicted by black text in Fig. 3,
southward movements became evident <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.35"/> on 5 January 2011, i.e.,
65 d before the Tōhoku EQ. Other changes before and after 5 January 2011
have also been observed as follows: while during the period
12–22 December 2010 random orientations of GPS azimuths prevailed, a gradual
alignment toward the southern direction started on 22 December 2010 and
continued until around 5 January 2011, accompanied with a gradual uplift of
the crust. The most intense crust uplift was observed approximately on
5 January 2011 together with the full alignment of GPS azimuths southwards
(more details are given in Sect. 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Changes in the level and temperature of confined groundwater</title>
      <p id="d1e513"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.36"/> reported that anomalous groundwater changes started 3 months before the Tōhoku EQ. In particular, groundwater level and temperature
decreased almost simultaneously in a 2000 m well at a spa, Goyo-onsen, in Iwate Prefecture, 155 km northwest of the epicenter.
This simultaneous decrease occurred only once in the 3.5-year records when considering that the
recordings started in this source since October 2007. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.37"/>
emphasized that Tōhoku EQ is the only EQ that was preceded by anomalous
changes in both water level and temperature. The exact date of the initiation
of this phenomenon is not mentioned explicitly by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.38"/>, because the
measurements were not made continuously but were taken intermittently and
irregularly (the average interval between them being 8 d). They plotted,
however, the consecutive measurements versus conventional time in their
Fig. 1 (period 2007–2012) in which one can read that the phenomenon
initiated around 20 December 2010, which agrees with what they state, i.e.,
around 3 months before Tōhoku EQ.</p>
      <p id="d1e524">In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.39"/> reported that, according to radon concentration
measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.40"/> in the groundwater in the Izu Peninsula
(at a distance about 500 km from the epicenter), an increase started almost
3 months before Tōhoku EQ. This increase occurred only this time during a
35-year observation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Precursory changes observed by means of natural time analysis of Japanese seismicity</title>
      <p id="d1e542">Natural time analysis uncovers important hidden properties in time series of
complex systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.41"/> and has been recently employed by Turcotte
and coworkers as the basis of a new methodology (nowcasting) to estimate the
current seismic risk level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Natural time analysis background</title>
      <?pagebreak page318?><p id="d1e558">In a time series comprising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> EQs, the natural time for the occurrence of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th EQ of energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In natural time
analysis, we study the evolution of the pair <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          denotes the normalized energy released during the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th EQ. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for earthquakes are estimated through the relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.43"/>
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e722">It is widely accepted <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.44"/> that the observed earthquake
scaling laws indicate the existence of phenomena closely associated with the
proximity of the system to a critical point (the mainshock is the new
phase). In particular, it has been indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.45"/> that it seems
possible that systems that operate persistently near a threshold of
instability are in some way like thermodynamic systems near critical points
(EQ can be regarded as a stick-slip frictional instability of a preexisting
fault). The order parameter of seismicity is the quantity by<?pagebreak page319?> which one can
identify the approach of the dynamical system to a critical point (the
mainshock is the new phase). It was argued by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.46"/> that the
variance
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          of natural time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> weighted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M33" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          may serve as an order parameter of seismicity.</p>
      <p id="d1e859">The entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in natural time is defined <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.47"/> by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M35" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the brackets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote
averages with respect to the distribution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Notably, the functional given by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) has been shown <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.48"/> to exhibit positivity,
concavity, and experimental stability, which are the three requirements in
order to be characterized as entropic functional. Furthermore, note that the
entropy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a dynamic entropy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.49"/> depending on the sequential
order of the events and not simply a statistical entropy (e.g., Shannon
entropy) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content></xref>. Upon considering time reversal
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="true" mathvariant="normal">^</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="true">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes to a
value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M44" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The physical meaning of the entropy change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
natural time under time reversal is discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.51"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.52"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1243">Using a moving window of length <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (number of events) sliding through the
time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> consecutive events, the entropy in natural time is
determined for each position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the sliding window.
Thus, a time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained. By considering the standard
deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.53"/> the complexity measure
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M53" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where the denominator has been selected to correspond to the standard
deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.54"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1461"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constitutes a key measure that may identify <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.55"/>
when the system approaches the critical point (dynamic
phase transition). For example, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has
been applied for the identification of the time of an impending sudden
cardiac death risk <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.56"/>. Furthermore, it has been used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.57"/> for the study of the predictability of the
Olami–Feder–Christensen (OFC) model for earthquakes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.58"/>, which is
probably <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.59"/> the most studied non-conservative self-organized
criticality (SOC) model. The OFC model originated by a simplification of the
Burridge and Knopoff spring–block model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.60"/> by mapping it into a
non-conservative cellular automaton simulating the earthquake's behavior and
introducing dissipation in the family of SOC systems. In particular, it was
found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits a clear minimum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.61"/> (or maximum
if we define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> instead of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; e.g., see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="altparen.62"/>) before a large avalanche in the OFC model, which
corresponds to a large earthquake. For example, by analyzing the seismicity
during the period 2012–2017 in natural time in the Chiapas region of Mexico
where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.2 earthquake occurred on 7 September 2017, we observed
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.63"/> that the entropy change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seismicity under time
reversal was minimized almost 3 months before and in particular on
14 June 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Results from natural time analysis of seismicity</title>
      <p id="d1e1589">Interesting results have been recently obtained upon analyzing the Japan
seismic catalog in natural time and computing the fluctuations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To compute the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuations, we use a sliding
natural time window comprising the number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of EQs that would occur on
average in a few months or so <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.64"/>. We then
calculate the average value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the standard deviation
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the ensemble of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained. The quantity
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          is defined as the variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.65"/>. The time
evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value can then be pursued by sliding the excerpt <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
through the EQ catalog, and the corresponding minimum value is labeled
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The following key results have been obtained.</p>
      <p id="d1e1747"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="text.66"/> found that the fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
seismicity exhibited a clearly detectable minimum approximately at the time
of the initiation of a pronounced SES activity recorded by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx40" id="text.67"/> around
2 months before the volcanic–seismic
swarm activity in 2000 in the Izu Islands region, Japan.</p>
      <p id="d1e1773"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.68"/> analyzed the Japan seismic catalog in natural time from
1 January 1984 to 11 March 2011, and their results showed that the
fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seismicity exhibited distinct minima
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a few months before all the shallow earthquakes of
magnitude 7.6 or larger that occurred during this 27-year period in the
Japanese area <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">148</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Among these minima, the minimum
before the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ observed at around 5 January 2011 was the
deepest. Subsequently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.69"/> found that the spatiotemporal
variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> enable the estimation of the<?pagebreak page320?> epicentral
area of the impending mainshock for all these EQs of magnitude 7.6 or larger.</p>
      <p id="d1e1849">In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.70"/> focused on the minima <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
preceding all magnitude 8 (and 9) class EQs in the Japanese area from
1 January 1984 to 11 March 2011 and applied detrended fluctuation analysis
(DFA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.71"/> to the earthquake magnitude time series. DFA has
been established as a standard method to investigate long-range correlations
in non-stationary time series in diverse fields <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.72"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,
see</named-content></xref> including the study of geomagnetic data associated
with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.0 Tōhoku EQ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.73"/>. The results of DFA are described in
terms of the so-called DFA exponent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.74"/>, hereafter labeled
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> means random, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0.5 means long-range
correlations, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 0.5 means anti-correlations). The following
three main features have been identified <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.75"/>: the minima
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed during periods when long-range temporal
correlations between EQ magnitudes have been developed since the
corresponding DFA exponent is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Before (<italic>bef</italic>) the
minima <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> there exists a stage in which an evident
anti-correlated behavior appears showing a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bef</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in the DFA exponent markedly smaller than 0.5. Finally, after (<italic>aft</italic>)
the minima <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the long-range correlations break down to an
almost random behavior (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), possibly turning to anti-correlation
exhibiting a minimum  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aft</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aft</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These three main features of temporal
correlations between EQ magnitudes can be visualized in Fig. 3 for the case
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ. The deepest minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed
around 5 January 2011 during a period in which long-range correlations
between EQ magnitudes prevail with a DFA exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Before this
minimum an anti-correlated behavior was identified on 22 December 2010 with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bef</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. After <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the long-range
correlations break down on 13 January 2011 to an almost random behavior with
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and subsequently the behavior turned to anti-correlation on
23 January 2011 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aft</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As explained in the
next section, the main features of the temporal correlations between EQ
magnitudes obtained by DFA appeared simultaneously with distinct phases of
crustal deformation identified by GPS measurements described in the previous
section.</p>
      <p id="d1e2136">Recently we have shown that almost 3 months before the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku
earthquake, i.e., on 22 December 2010, the following additional facts have
been observed: first, the complexity measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with
the fluctuations of the entropy change of seismicity under time reversal
exhibited an abrupt increase which conforms to the seminal work by Lifshitz and
Slyozov <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.76"/> and independently by  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="text.77"/> for phase
transitions showing that the characteristic size of the minority phase
droplets exhibits a scaling behavior in which time growth has the form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.78"/>. It was also found that the increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows the latter form and that the prefactors
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are proportional to the scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.79"/>. Second, the Tsallis entropic index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.80"/> shows a simultaneous increase which interestingly exhibits the
same exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.81"/>. Third, a minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the change <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the entropy of seismicity in the
entire Japanese region under time reversal was found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.82"/>, who
also demonstrated that the probability of obtaining such a minimum by chance is
approximately 3 %, thus showing that it is statistically significant. In addition, the robustness of the appearance
of this minimum on 22 December 2010 upon changing the EQ depth, the EQ
magnitude threshold, and the size of the area investigated has been
documented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.83"/>. Such a minimum is of precursory nature, signaling
that a large EQ is impending
according to the natural time analysis of the OFC model as mentioned in Sect. 3.1.
Fourth, studying the fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seismicity
in the entire Japanese region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">125</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">148</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus the
conventional time from 1 January 1984 until the Tōhoku EQ occurrence on 11 March 2011,
we find <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.84"/> a large fluctuation
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> upon the occurrence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8 earthquake near Chichijima on 22 December 2010.
This finding has also been
checked for several lengths from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 500 events,
which also revealed the following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.85"/>:
upon increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> it is observed  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.86"><named-content content-type="pre">see Figs. 2b and
4e of</named-content></xref> that
the increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fluctuation on 22 December 2010 becomes
distinctly larger – obeying the interrelation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">114.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – which does
not happen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.87"><named-content content-type="pre">see Fig. 4a–d of</named-content></xref>
for the increases in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuations
upon the occurrences of all other shallow
EQs in Japan of magnitude 7.6 or larger during the period from 1 January 1984 to the time
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ. Hence, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuation on 22 December 2010  accompanying
the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is unique. Its presence is of paramount importance for the validity
of the physical model that will be discussed in the next section.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Compatibility of the observed precursory phenomena with the PSPC physical model</title>
      <p id="d1e2502">Let us now discuss the multidisciplinary observations described in the
previous two sections (and compiled in Fig. 3) that preceded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku
EQ. As we shall see all these observations are directly evidenced from the
PSPC model, except probably of the anomalous changes in the level and
temperature of confined groundwater.</p>
      <?pagebreak page321?><p id="d1e2512">A striking fact is that around 5 January 2011 the phenomenon of aligned
orientations of the GPS azimuths occurred almost simultaneously with two
other phenomena, i.e., the initiation of the anomalous Earth magnetic field
variations and the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the fluctuations of the
order parameter of seismicity. This is strikingly reminiscent of the
mechanism of the emission of SES activity (stage B of PSPC model) in which,
upon reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the electric dipoles exhibit
cooperative orientation that also reflects alignment of the horizontal GPS
azimuths (black in Fig. 3), as expected by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.88"/>, leading to the most
intense crust uplift. Such an SES emission is directly evidenced by the
observed anomalous variations of the Earth's magnetic field mainly in the
vertical component (brown in Fig. 3). This emission is consistent with the
observation of the deepest minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around
5 January 2011 of the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity (blue
in Fig. 3) in view of the up-to-date experimental results mentioned above
that an SES activity initiates almost simultaneously with both the
observation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the establishment of long-range
temporal correlation between earthquake magnitudes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2566">Another striking fact is that the aforementioned simultaneous appearance of
the three phenomena around 5 January 2011 has been preceded by a stage of an
evident anti-correlated behavior between earthquake magnitudes since it was
found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bef</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upon the occurrence on
22 December 2010 of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8 EQ in southern Japan at 27.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
143.94<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. On the same date, the horizontal GPS azimuths, which were
initially random, started to become gradually oriented toward the southern
direction probably due to an excess stress disturbance. This may also
originate the simultaneous appearance of various phenomena, including the
large abrupt increase in the order parameter fluctuations along with an
abrupt increase in the complexity measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the change in the
entropy of seismicity under time reversal (recall that this change is
then minimized); an increase in the Tsallis entropic index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.89"/>;
and start of groundwater anomalous changes, i.e., groundwater level drop,
temperature decrease, and increase in radon concentration. This corresponds to
stage A of the PSPC model, according to which an excess stress disturbance
starts gradually increasing until reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2647">After the occurrence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at around 5 January 2011, the
intense crust uplift was gradually mitigated and the orientations of GPS
azimuths returned <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.90"/> to random around 13 January 2011, thus
agreeing with the DFA exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.91"/>. The behavior
turned to anti-correlation around 23 January 2011 with DFA exponent
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aft</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a shift of earthquake-related stress
disturbance was observed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.92"/>, where westward movements replaced
the southward ones; i.e., the orientations of the residual displacements were
realigned along the western direction and the crust depressed. After this
change on 23 January 2011 the stress disturbance gradually approached the
threshold of the fault rupture, and the orientations of the residual
displacements became random again <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.93"/>, in agreement with the DFA
exponent of the earthquake magnitude time series being close to 0.5 until
around 10 February 2011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.94"><named-content content-type="pre">see Fig. 5 of</named-content></xref>, which indicates
random behavior. This fact that the Tōhoku EQ occurred after the emergence of
an almost random behavior did not come as a surprise since it is strikingly
reminiscent of similar findings in other complex time series as follows: in
the case of electrocardiograms, for example, the long-range temporal
correlations that characterize the healthy heart rate variability break down
for individuals at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD), and this is often
accompanied by the emergence of uncorrelated randomness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.95"/>
(SCD could be viewed as a critical phenomenon; e.g., see
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx57" id="altparen.96"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2726">Several phenomena of multidisciplinary nature preceded the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 Tōhoku EQ that
occurred on 11 March 2011. Leaving aside the details, these phenomena were
mainly accumulated around two dates, i.e., 22 December 2010 and
5 January 2011, which concur with the two stages A and B of the PSPC physical
model, respectively. These phenomena include the following.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>a.</label>
      <p id="d1e2738">Around the date 22 December 2010:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label>
      <p id="d1e2743">The entropy change of seismicity under time reversal is minimized along with increased fluctuations (since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases).</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label>
      <p id="d1e2758">There is an increase in the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity.</p></list-item><list-item><label>3.</label>
      <p id="d1e2762">The DFA exponent decreased to the value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bef</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the lowest observed during the period 1984–2011
of our study, pointing to an evident anti-correlated behavior in the earthquake magnitude time series.</p></list-item><list-item><label>4.</label>
      <p id="d1e2786">The horizontal GPS azimuths started to become gradually oriented toward the southern direction (while they had random orientations
during the preceding period 12–22 December 2010).</p></list-item><list-item><label>5.</label>
      <p id="d1e2790">Anomalous changes in the groundwater started (level drop, temperature decrease,
and probably increase in radon concentration).</p></list-item><list-item><label>6.</label>
      <p id="d1e2794">Increase in the Tsallis entropic index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list></p></list-item><list-item><label>b.</label>
      <p id="d1e2805">Around the date 5 January 2011:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label>
      <p id="d1e2810">Unprecedented minimum  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the fluctuations of the order parameter of seismicity.</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label>
      <p id="d1e2825">Anomalous magnetic field variations started (which, according to Maxwell equations, should be accompanied by a strong SES activity).</p></list-item><list-item><label>3.</label>
      <p id="d1e2829">Full alignment of the orientations of the GPS azimuths southwards accompanied by the most intense crust uplift.</p></list-item><list-item><label>4.</label>
      <p id="d1e2833">Long-range temporal correlations in the earthquake magnitude time series.</p></list-item></list></p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2836">All the above phenomena were observed to begin and end well before the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> 9
Tōhoku EQ occurrence as schematically shown in Fig. 1a in accordance with the
PSPC model (Fig. 2).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2850">No data sets were used in this article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2856">PAV, NVS, and ESS designed the research, performed the research,
analyzed the results, and reviewed the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2862">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2868">This paper was edited by Georgios Balasis and reviewed by
two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Bernardi et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Bernardi, A., Fraser-Smith, A. C., McGill, P. R., and Villard, O. G.: ULF
magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta
earthquake, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 68, 45–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(91)90006-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0031-9201(91)90006-4</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Burridge and Knopoff(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Burridge, R. and Knopoff, L.: Model and theoretical seismicity, B. Seismol.
Soc. Am., 57, 341–371, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Carlson et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Carlson, J. M., Langer, J. S., and Shaw, B. E.: Dynamics of earthquake
faults,
Rev. Mod. Phys., 66, 657–670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.657" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/RevModPhys.66.657</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Chen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-H., Yeh, T.-K., Liu, J.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Wen, S., Yen, H.-Y., and
Chang, S.-H.: Surface Deformation and Seismic Rebound: Implications and
Applications, Surv. Geophys., 32, 291–313,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Chen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C.-H., Wen, S., Liu, J.-Y., Hattori, K., Han, P., Hobara, Y., Wang,
C.-H., Yeh, T.-K., and Yen, H.-Y.: Surface displacements in Japan before the
11 March 2011 M 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, J. Asian Earth Sci.,
80, 165–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Fan et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Fan, Y.-Y., Du, X.-B., Zlotnicki, J., Tan, D.-C., An, Z.-H., Chen, J.-Y.,
Zheng, G.-L., Liu, J., and Xie, T.: The Electromagnetic Phenomena Before the
Ms8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake, Chinese J. Geophys., 53, 997–1010,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cjg2.1570</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Fraser-Smith et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>Fraser-Smith, A. C., Bernardi, A., McGill, P. R., Ladd, M. E., Helliwell,
R. A., and Villard, O. G.: Low-frequency magnetic-field measurements near
the epicenter of the Ms-7.1 Loma-Prieta earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17,
1465, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i009p01465" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL017i009p01465</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Goldberger et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng,
C.-K., and Stanley, H. E.: Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with
disease and aging, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2466–2472,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012579499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.012579499</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Han et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Han, P., Hattori, K., Xu, G., Ashida, R., Chen, C.-H., Febriani, F., and
Yamaguchi, H.: Further investigations of geomagnetic diurnal variations
associated with the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw
 9.0), J. Asian Earth Sci., 114, 321–326,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Han et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Han, P., Hattori, K., Huang, Q., Hirooka, S., and Yoshino, C.:
Spatiotemporal
characteristics of the geomagnetic diurnal variation anomalies prior to the
2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0) and the possible coupling of multiple
pre-earthquake phenomena, J. Asian Earth Sci., 129, 13–21,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Holliday et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Holliday, J. R., Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Klein, W., Tiampo, K. F.,
and
Donnellan, A.: Space-Time Clustering and Correlations of Major Earthquakes,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 238501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.238501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.238501</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Huang(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Q.: Retrospective investigation of geophysical data possibly
associated
with the Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China, J. Asian Earth
Sci., 41, 421–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.014</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Kanamori(1978)</label><mixed-citation>Kanamori, H.: Quantification of Earthquakes, Nature, 271, 411–414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/271411a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/271411a0</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Lifshitz and Slyozov(1961)</label><mixed-citation>Lifshitz, I. and Slyozov, V.: The kinetics of precipitation from
supersaturated
solid solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 19, 35–50,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3</ext-link>, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Luginbuhl et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., Hawkins, A., and Turcotte, D. L.: Nowcasting
Earthquakes: A Comparison of Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma and at the
Geysers, California, Pure  Appl. Geophys., 175, 49–65,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1678-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-017-1678-8</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Luginbuhl et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., and Turcotte, D. L.: Natural Time and
Nowcasting
Earthquakes: Are Large Global Earthquakes Temporally Clustered?, Pure
Appl. Geophys., 175, 661–670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1778-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-018-1778-0</ext-link>,
2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Molchanov and Hayakawa(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Molchanov, O. A. and Hayakawa, M.: Generation of ULF electromagnetic
emissions
by microfracturing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3091–3094,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00781</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Olami et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Olami, Z., Feder, H. J. S., and Christensen, K.: Self-organized criticality
in
a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 68, 1244–1247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.1244" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physrevlett.68.1244</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Orihara et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Orihara, Y., Kamogawa, M., and Nagao, T.: Preseismic Changes of the Level
and
Temperature of Confined Groundwater related to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake,
Sci. Rep., 4, 6907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06907" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06907</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Peng et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S. V., Goldberger, A. L., Havlin, S., Simons, M., and
Stanley, H. E.: Finite-size effects on long-range correlations: Implications
for analyzing DNA sequences, Phys. Rev. E, 47, 3730–3733,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.47.3730" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.47.3730</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Peng et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H. E., and
Goldberger, A. L.: Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides, Phys. Rev. E,
49, 1685–1689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.49.1685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.49.1685</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ram\'{\i}rez-Rojas et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Ramírez-Rojas et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ramírez-Rojas, A., Telesca, L., and Angulo-Brown, F.: Entropy of
geoelectrical time series in the natural time domain, Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 11, 219–225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-219-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-11-219-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ram\'{\i}rez-Rojas et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Ramírez-Rojas et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Ramírez-Rojas, A., Flores-Márquez, E. L., Sarlis, N. V., and
Varotsos,
P. A.: The Complexity Measures Associated with the Fluctuations of the
Entropy in Natural Time before the Deadly Mexico M8.2 Earthquake on 7
September 2017, Entropy, 20, 477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060477" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/e20060477</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page323?><ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Ramos et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Ramos, O., Altshuler, E., and Måløy, K. J.: Quasiperiodic Events in an
Earthquake Model, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 098501,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.098501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physrevlett.96.098501</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Rikitake(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Rikitake, T.: Current research in earthquake prediction, D. Reidler
Publishing
Company Dordrecht Holland, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Rong et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Rong, Y., Wang, Q., Ding, X., and Huang, Q.: Non-uniform scaling behavior in
Ultra-Low-Frequency (ULF) geomagnetic signals possibly associated with the
2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake, Chinese J. Geophys., 55, 3709,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.018</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Rundle et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Donnellan, A., Grant Ludwig, L., Luginbuhl,
M.,
and Gong, G.: Nowcasting earthquakes, Earth   Space Sci., 3, 480–486,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000185" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016EA000185</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Rundle et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Rundle, J. B., Luginbuhl, M., Giguere, A., and Turcotte, D. L.: Natural Time,
Nowcasting and the Physics of Earthquakes: Estimation of Seismic Risk to
Global Megacities, Pure  Appl. Geophys., 175, 647–660,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1720-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-017-1720-x</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Sarlis and Varotsos(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. and Varotsos, P.: Magnetic field near the outcrop of an almost
horizontal conductive sheet, J. Geodyn., 33, 463–476,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00008-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00008-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Sarlis et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N., Skordas, E., and Varotsos, P.: The change of the entropy in
natural time under time-reversal in the Olami-Feder-Christensen earthquake
model, Tectonophysics, 513, 49–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.025</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Sarlis et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Nagao, T., Kamogawa, M.,
Tanaka, H., and Uyeda, S.: Minimum of the order parameter fluctuations of
seismicity before major earthquakes in Japan, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
110, 13734–13738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312740110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1312740110</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Sarlis et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Nagao, T., Kamogawa, M., and
Uyeda, S.: Spatiotemporal variations of seismicity before major earthquakes
in the Japanese area and their relation with the epicentral locations, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 986–989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422893112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1422893112</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Sarlis et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Varotsos, P. A.: A remarkable change of
the
entropy of seismicity in natural time under time reversal before the
super-giant M9 Tohoku earthquake on 11 March 2011, Europhys.
Lett., 124, 29001, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/124/29001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/124/29001</ext-link>,
2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Sarlis et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Ramírez-Rojas, A., and
Flores-Márquez, E. L.: Natural time analysis: On the deadly Mexico M8.2
earthquake on 7 September 2017, Physica A, 506, 625–634,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.098</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Telesca and Lovallo(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Telesca, L. and Lovallo, M.: Non-uniform scaling features in central Italy
seismicity: A non-linear approach in investigating seismic patterns and
detection of possible earthquake precursors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
L01308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL036247</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Tsallis(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Tsallis, C.: Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, J.
Stat.
Phys., 52, 479–487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF01016429</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Tsunomori and Tanaka(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Tsunomori, F. and Tanaka, H.: Anomalous change of groundwater radon
concentration monitored at Nakaizu well in 2011, Radiat. Meas., 60,
35–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.11.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.11.006</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Uyeda et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Uyeda, S., Nagao, T., Orihara, Y., Yamaguchi, T., and Takahashi, I.:
Geoelectric potential changes: Possible precursors to earthquakes in Japan,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4561–4566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.97.9.4561</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Uyeda et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Uyeda, S., Hayakawa, M., Nagao, T., Molchanov, O., Hattori, K., Orihara, Y.,
Gotoh, K., Akinaga, Y., and Tanaka, H.: Electric and magnetic phenomena
observed before the volcano-seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu Island
Region, Japan, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 7352–7355,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072208499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.072208499</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Uyeda et al.(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>Uyeda, S., Kamogawa, M., and Tanaka, H.: Analysis of electrical activity and
seismicity in the natural time domain for the volcanic-seismic swarm activity
in 2000 in the Izu Island region, Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B02310,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JB005332</ext-link>, 2009a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Uyeda et al.(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>Uyeda, S., Nagao, T., and Kamogawa, M.: Short-term earthquake prediction:
Current status of seismo-electromagnetics, Tectonophysics, 470, 205–213,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.07.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2008.07.019</ext-link>, 2009b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Varotsos(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P.: The Physics of Seismic Electric Signals, TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Varotsos(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P.: Point defect parameters in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-PbF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> revisited, Solid
State Ionics, 179, 438–441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.055</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984a)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Physical Properties of the variations of
the
electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I, Tectonophysics,
110, 73–98, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90059-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(84)90059-3</ext-link>, 1984a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984b)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Physical Properties of the variations of
the
electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, II, Tectonophysics,
110, 99–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90060-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(84)90060-X</ext-link>, 1984b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Thermodynamics of Point Defects and their
Relation with Bulk Properties, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Varotsos and Lazaridou(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. and Lazaridou, M.: Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in
Greece based on Seismic Electric Signals, Tectonophysics, 188, 321–347,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90462-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(91)90462-2</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Varotsos et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P., Alexopoulos, K., Nomicos, K., and Lazaridou, M.: Earthquake
prediction and electric signals, Nature, 322, 120,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/322120a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/322120a0</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Varotsos et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P., Alexopoulos, K., and Lazaridou, M.: Latest aspects of
earthquake
prediction in Greece based on Seismic Electric Signals,II,
Tectonophysics, 224, 1–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(93)90055-O" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0040-1951(93)90055-O</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>P. Varotsos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P., Sarlis, N., and Skordas, E.: Scale-specific order parameter
fluctuations of seismicity in natural time before mainshocks, Europhys.
Lett., 96, 59002,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/96/59002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/96/59002</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Varotsos et al.(2003a)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Attempt to distinguish
electric signals of a dichotomous nature, Phys. Rev. E, 68, 031106,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031106</ext-link>, 2003a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Varotsos et al.(2003b)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Electric Fields that
“arrive” before the time derivative of the magnetic field prior to major
earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 148501,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148501" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148501</ext-link>, 2003b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Varotsos et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.: Entropy
in Natural Time Domain, Phys. Rev. E, 70, 011106,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.011106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.70.011106</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page324?><ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.: Natural
entropy fluctuations discriminate similar-looking electric signals emitted
from systems of different dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 011110,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.011110" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.71.011110</ext-link>, 2005a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Tanaka, H. K., and Skordas, E. S.: Some
properties of the entropy in the natural time, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 032102,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.032102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.71.032102</ext-link>, 2005b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005c)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Tanaka, H. K., and Skordas, E. S.: Similarity
of fluctuations in correlated systems: The case of seismicity, Phys. Rev. E,
72, 041103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.72.041103" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/physreve.72.041103</ext-link>, 2005c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Varotsos et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.:
Identifying sudden cardiac death risk and specifying its occurrence time by
analyzing electrocardiograms in natural time, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 064106,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2768928" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.2768928</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>P. A. Varotsos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Natural Time Analysis:
The
new view of time. Precursory Seismic Electric Signals, Earthquakes and other
Complex Time-Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16449-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-16449-1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Varotsos et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.:
Seismic
Electric Signals: An additional fact showing their physical interconnection
with seismicity, Tectonophysics, 589, 116–125,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.020</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Varotsos et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Study of the temporal
correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 9192–9206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020580" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JA020580</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Varotsos et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Tsallis Entropy Index q
and the Complexity Measure of Seismicity in Natural Time under Time Reversal
before the M9 Tohoku Earthquake in 2011, Entropy, 20, 757,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/e20100757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/e20100757</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Varotsos et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Natural time analysis:
Important changes of the order parameter of seismicity preceding the 2011 M9
Tohoku earthquake in Japan, Europhys. Lett., 125, 69001,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/125/69001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1209/0295-5075/125/69001</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Wagner(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, C.: Theorie der Alterung von Niederschlägen durch Umlösen
(Ostwald-Reifung), Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie, Berich.
Bunsen. Gesell., 65, 581–591, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Xu et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Xu, G., Han, P., Huang, Q., Hattori, K., Febriani, F., and Yamaguchi, H.:
Anomalous behaviors of geomagnetic diurnal variations prior to the 2011 off
the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw9.0), J. Asian Earth Sci., 77, 59–65, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Phenomena preceding major earthquakes interconnected through a physical model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The analysis of earthquake time series in a new time domain termed
natural time enables the uncovering of hidden properties in time series of
complex systems and has been recently employed as the basis of a method to
estimate seismic risk. Natural time also enables the determination of the
order parameter of seismicity, which is a quantity by means of which one can identify when the system approaches the critical point (the mainshock
occurrence is considered the new phase). Applying this analysis, as an
example, to the Japanese seismic data from 1 January 1984 until the
super-giant <i>M</i> 9 Tōhoku earthquake on 11 March 2011, we find
that almost 3 months before its occurrence the entropy change of seismicity under time
reversal is minimized on 22 December 2010, which signals an impending major
earthquake. On this date the order parameter fluctuations of seismicity
exhibit an abrupt increase. This increase is accompanied by various phenomena; e.g., from this date the horizontal GPS azimuths start to become gradually
oriented toward the southern direction, while they had random orientation
during the preceding period. Two weeks later, a minimum of the order
parameter fluctuations of seismicity appears accompanied by anomalous Earth
magnetic field variations and by full alignment of the orientations of GPS
azimuths southwards leading to the most intense crust uplift. These phenomena
are discussed and found to be in accordance with a physical model which
seems to explain on a unified basis anomalous precursory changes observed
either in ground-based measurements or in satellite data.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Bernardi et al.(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Bernardi, A., Fraser-Smith, A. C., McGill, P. R., and Villard, O. G.: ULF
magnetic field measurements near the epicenter of the Ms 7.1 Loma Prieta
earthquake, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 68, 45–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(91)90006-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(91)90006-4</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Burridge and Knopoff(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Burridge, R. and Knopoff, L.: Model and theoretical seismicity, B. Seismol.
Soc. Am., 57, 341–371, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Carlson et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Carlson, J. M., Langer, J. S., and Shaw, B. E.: Dynamics of earthquake
faults,
Rev. Mod. Phys., 66, 657–670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.657" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.657</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Chen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-H., Yeh, T.-K., Liu, J.-Y., Wang, C.-H., Wen, S., Yen, H.-Y., and
Chang, S.-H.: Surface Deformation and Seismic Rebound: Implications and
Applications, Surv. Geophys., 32, 291–313,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chen et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C.-H., Wen, S., Liu, J.-Y., Hattori, K., Han, P., Hobara, Y., Wang,
C.-H., Yeh, T.-K., and Yen, H.-Y.: Surface displacements in Japan before the
11 March 2011 M 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake, J. Asian Earth Sci.,
80, 165–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.11.009</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Fan et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, Y.-Y., Du, X.-B., Zlotnicki, J., Tan, D.-C., An, Z.-H., Chen, J.-Y.,
Zheng, G.-L., Liu, J., and Xie, T.: The Electromagnetic Phenomena Before the
Ms8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake, Chinese J. Geophys., 53, 997–1010,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1570" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1570</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Fraser-Smith et al.(1990)</label><mixed-citation>
Fraser-Smith, A. C., Bernardi, A., McGill, P. R., Ladd, M. E., Helliwell,
R. A., and Villard, O. G.: Low-frequency magnetic-field measurements near
the epicenter of the Ms-7.1 Loma-Prieta earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 17,
1465, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i009p01465" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL017i009p01465</a>, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Goldberger et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Peng,
C.-K., and Stanley, H. E.: Fractal dynamics in physiology: Alterations with
disease and aging, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 2466–2472,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012579499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012579499</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Han et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Han, P., Hattori, K., Xu, G., Ashida, R., Chen, C.-H., Febriani, F., and
Yamaguchi, H.: Further investigations of geomagnetic diurnal variations
associated with the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw
 9.0), J. Asian Earth Sci., 114, 321–326,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2015.02.022</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Han et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Han, P., Hattori, K., Huang, Q., Hirooka, S., and Yoshino, C.:
Spatiotemporal
characteristics of the geomagnetic diurnal variation anomalies prior to the
2011 Tohoku earthquake (Mw 9.0) and the possible coupling of multiple
pre-earthquake phenomena, J. Asian Earth Sci., 129, 13–21,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.07.011</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Holliday et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Holliday, J. R., Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Klein, W., Tiampo, K. F.,
and
Donnellan, A.: Space-Time Clustering and Correlations of Major Earthquakes,
Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 238501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.238501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.238501</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Huang(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, Q.: Retrospective investigation of geophysical data possibly
associated
with the Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, China, J. Asian Earth
Sci., 41, 421–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.014</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Kanamori(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Kanamori, H.: Quantification of Earthquakes, Nature, 271, 411–414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/271411a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/271411a0</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Lifshitz and Slyozov(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Lifshitz, I. and Slyozov, V.: The kinetics of precipitation from
supersaturated
solid solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 19, 35–50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3</a>, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Luginbuhl et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., Hawkins, A., and Turcotte, D. L.: Nowcasting
Earthquakes: A Comparison of Induced Earthquakes in Oklahoma and at the
Geysers, California, Pure  Appl. Geophys., 175, 49–65,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1678-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1678-8</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Luginbuhl et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
Luginbuhl, M., Rundle, J. B., and Turcotte, D. L.: Natural Time and
Nowcasting
Earthquakes: Are Large Global Earthquakes Temporally Clustered?, Pure
Appl. Geophys., 175, 661–670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1778-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1778-0</a>,
2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Molchanov and Hayakawa(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Molchanov, O. A. and Hayakawa, M.: Generation of ULF electromagnetic
emissions
by microfracturing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3091–3094,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00781</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Olami et al.(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Olami, Z., Feder, H. J. S., and Christensen, K.: Self-organized criticality
in
a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 68, 1244–1247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.1244" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.1244</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Orihara et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Orihara, Y., Kamogawa, M., and Nagao, T.: Preseismic Changes of the Level
and
Temperature of Confined Groundwater related to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake,
Sci. Rep., 4, 6907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06907</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Peng et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S. V., Goldberger, A. L., Havlin, S., Simons, M., and
Stanley, H. E.: Finite-size effects on long-range correlations: Implications
for analyzing DNA sequences, Phys. Rev. E, 47, 3730–3733,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.47.3730" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.47.3730</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Peng et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Peng, C.-K., Buldyrev, S. V., Havlin, S., Simons, M., Stanley, H. E., and
Goldberger, A. L.: Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides, Phys. Rev. E,
49, 1685–1689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.49.1685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.49.1685</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Ramírez-Rojas et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramírez-Rojas, A., Telesca, L., and Angulo-Brown, F.: Entropy of
geoelectrical time series in the natural time domain, Nat. Hazards Earth
Syst. Sci., 11, 219–225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-219-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-219-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Ramírez-Rojas et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramírez-Rojas, A., Flores-Márquez, E. L., Sarlis, N. V., and
Varotsos,
P. A.: The Complexity Measures Associated with the Fluctuations of the
Entropy in Natural Time before the Deadly Mexico M8.2 Earthquake on 7
September 2017, Entropy, 20, 477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060477" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/e20060477</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Ramos et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Ramos, O., Altshuler, E., and Måløy, K. J.: Quasiperiodic Events in an
Earthquake Model, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 098501,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.098501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.098501</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Rikitake(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Rikitake, T.: Current research in earthquake prediction, D. Reidler
Publishing
Company Dordrecht Holland, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Rong et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Rong, Y., Wang, Q., Ding, X., and Huang, Q.: Non-uniform scaling behavior in
Ultra-Low-Frequency (ULF) geomagnetic signals possibly associated with the
2011 M9.0 Tohoku earthquake, Chinese J. Geophys., 55, 3709,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.11.018</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Rundle et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Donnellan, A., Grant Ludwig, L., Luginbuhl,
M.,
and Gong, G.: Nowcasting earthquakes, Earth   Space Sci., 3, 480–486,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000185" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000185</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Rundle et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Rundle, J. B., Luginbuhl, M., Giguere, A., and Turcotte, D. L.: Natural Time,
Nowcasting and the Physics of Earthquakes: Estimation of Seismic Risk to
Global Megacities, Pure  Appl. Geophys., 175, 647–660,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1720-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1720-x</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Sarlis and Varotsos(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N. and Varotsos, P.: Magnetic field near the outcrop of an almost
horizontal conductive sheet, J. Geodyn., 33, 463–476,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00008-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-3707(02)00008-X</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Sarlis et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N., Skordas, E., and Varotsos, P.: The change of the entropy in
natural time under time-reversal in the Olami-Feder-Christensen earthquake
model, Tectonophysics, 513, 49–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2011.09.025</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Sarlis et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Nagao, T., Kamogawa, M.,
Tanaka, H., and Uyeda, S.: Minimum of the order parameter fluctuations of
seismicity before major earthquakes in Japan, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
110, 13734–13738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312740110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1312740110</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Sarlis et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Nagao, T., Kamogawa, M., and
Uyeda, S.: Spatiotemporal variations of seismicity before major earthquakes
in the Japanese area and their relation with the epicentral locations, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 986–989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422893112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422893112</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Sarlis et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Varotsos, P. A.: A remarkable change of
the
entropy of seismicity in natural time under time reversal before the
super-giant M9 Tohoku earthquake on 11 March 2011, Europhys.
Lett., 124, 29001, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/124/29001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/124/29001</a>,
2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Sarlis et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., Varotsos, P. A., Ramírez-Rojas, A., and
Flores-Márquez, E. L.: Natural time analysis: On the deadly Mexico M8.2
earthquake on 7 September 2017, Physica A, 506, 625–634,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.04.098</a>, 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Telesca and Lovallo(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Telesca, L. and Lovallo, M.: Non-uniform scaling features in central Italy
seismicity: A non-linear approach in investigating seismic patterns and
detection of possible earthquake precursors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
L01308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036247</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Tsallis(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsallis, C.: Possible generalization of Boltzmann-Gibbs statistics, J.
Stat.
Phys., 52, 479–487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016429</a>, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Tsunomori and Tanaka(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsunomori, F. and Tanaka, H.: Anomalous change of groundwater radon
concentration monitored at Nakaizu well in 2011, Radiat. Meas., 60,
35–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.11.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.11.006</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Uyeda et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Uyeda, S., Nagao, T., Orihara, Y., Yamaguchi, T., and Takahashi, I.:
Geoelectric potential changes: Possible precursors to earthquakes in Japan,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 4561–4566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.9.4561</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Uyeda et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Uyeda, S., Hayakawa, M., Nagao, T., Molchanov, O., Hattori, K., Orihara, Y.,
Gotoh, K., Akinaga, Y., and Tanaka, H.: Electric and magnetic phenomena
observed before the volcano-seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu Island
Region, Japan, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 7352–7355,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072208499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.072208499</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Uyeda et al.(2009a)</label><mixed-citation>
Uyeda, S., Kamogawa, M., and Tanaka, H.: Analysis of electrical activity and
seismicity in the natural time domain for the volcanic-seismic swarm activity
in 2000 in the Izu Island region, Japan, J. Geophys. Res., 114, B02310,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JB005332</a>, 2009a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Uyeda et al.(2009b)</label><mixed-citation>
Uyeda, S., Nagao, T., and Kamogawa, M.: Short-term earthquake prediction:
Current status of seismo-electromagnetics, Tectonophysics, 470, 205–213,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.07.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2008.07.019</a>, 2009b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Varotsos(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P.: The Physics of Seismic Electric Signals, TERRAPUB, Tokyo, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Varotsos(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P.: Point defect parameters in <i>β</i>-PbF<sub>2</sub> revisited, Solid
State Ionics, 179, 438–441, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.055</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984a)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Physical Properties of the variations of
the
electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, I, Tectonophysics,
110, 73–98, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90059-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90059-3</a>, 1984a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1984b)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Physical Properties of the variations of
the
electric field of the earth preceding earthquakes, II, Tectonophysics,
110, 99–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90060-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(84)90060-X</a>, 1984b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Varotsos and Alexopoulos(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. and Alexopoulos, K.: Thermodynamics of Point Defects and their
Relation with Bulk Properties, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Varotsos and Lazaridou(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. and Lazaridou, M.: Latest aspects of earthquake prediction in
Greece based on Seismic Electric Signals, Tectonophysics, 188, 321–347,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90462-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(91)90462-2</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Varotsos et al.(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P., Alexopoulos, K., Nomicos, K., and Lazaridou, M.: Earthquake
prediction and electric signals, Nature, 322, 120,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/322120a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/322120a0</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Varotsos et al.(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P., Alexopoulos, K., and Lazaridou, M.: Latest aspects of
earthquake
prediction in Greece based on Seismic Electric Signals,II,
Tectonophysics, 224, 1–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(93)90055-O" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(93)90055-O</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>P. Varotsos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P., Sarlis, N., and Skordas, E.: Scale-specific order parameter
fluctuations of seismicity in natural time before mainshocks, Europhys.
Lett., 96, 59002,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/96/59002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/96/59002</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Varotsos et al.(2003a)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Attempt to distinguish
electric signals of a dichotomous nature, Phys. Rev. E, 68, 031106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.68.031106</a>, 2003a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Varotsos et al.(2003b)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Electric Fields that
“arrive” before the time derivative of the magnetic field prior to major
earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 148501,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148501" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.148501</a>, 2003b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Varotsos et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.: Entropy
in Natural Time Domain, Phys. Rev. E, 70, 011106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.011106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.011106</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005a)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.: Natural
entropy fluctuations discriminate similar-looking electric signals emitted
from systems of different dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 011110,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.011110" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.011110</a>, 2005a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005b)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Tanaka, H. K., and Skordas, E. S.: Some
properties of the entropy in the natural time, Phys. Rev. E, 71, 032102,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.032102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.71.032102</a>, 2005b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Varotsos et al.(2005c)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Tanaka, H. K., and Skordas, E. S.: Similarity
of fluctuations in correlated systems: The case of seismicity, Phys. Rev. E,
72, 041103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.72.041103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.72.041103</a>, 2005c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Varotsos et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.:
Identifying sudden cardiac death risk and specifying its occurrence time by
analyzing electrocardiograms in natural time, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 064106,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2768928" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2768928</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>P. A. Varotsos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Natural Time Analysis:
The
new view of time. Precursory Seismic Electric Signals, Earthquakes and other
Complex Time-Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16449-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16449-1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Varotsos et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., Skordas, E. S., and Lazaridou, M. S.:
Seismic
Electric Signals: An additional fact showing their physical interconnection
with seismicity, Tectonophysics, 589, 116–125,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.12.020</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Varotsos et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Study of the temporal
correlations in the magnitude time series before major earthquakes in Japan,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 119, 9192–9206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020580" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020580</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Varotsos et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Tsallis Entropy Index q
and the Complexity Measure of Seismicity in Natural Time under Time Reversal
before the M9 Tohoku Earthquake in 2011, Entropy, 20, 757,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/e20100757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/e20100757</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Varotsos et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Varotsos, P. A., Sarlis, N. V., and Skordas, E. S.: Natural time analysis:
Important changes of the order parameter of seismicity preceding the 2011 M9
Tohoku earthquake in Japan, Europhys. Lett., 125, 69001,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/125/69001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/125/69001</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Wagner(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, C.: Theorie der Alterung von Niederschlägen durch Umlösen
(Ostwald-Reifung), Zeitschrift für Elektrochemie, Berich.
Bunsen. Gesell., 65, 581–591, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Xu et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, G., Han, P., Huang, Q., Hattori, K., Febriani, F., and Yamaguchi, H.:
Anomalous behaviors of geomagnetic diurnal variations prior to the 2011 off
the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake (Mw9.0), J. Asian Earth Sci., 77, 59–65, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.08.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
