<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-37-289-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> with tailward ion flows</article-title><alt-title>Magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X.~Sun et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Xiaoying</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Weining William</given-names></name>
          <email>wliu@nssc.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Suping</given-names></name>
          <email>spduan@nssc.ac.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Space Weather, National Space Science
Center (NSSC), Chinese Academy<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> of Sciences (CAS), Beijing,
100190, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Weining William Liu (wliu@nssc.ac.cn) and Suping Duan (spduan@nssc.ac.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>37</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>289</fpage><lpage>297</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Xiaoying Sun et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e107">Electromagnetic field and plasma data from the Time History of Events and
Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) near-Earth probes are used
to investigate magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit on
27 August 2014 during an intense substorm with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT. THEMIS-D (TH-D) was located inside geosynchronous orbit around
midnight in the interval from 09:25 to 09:55 UT. During this period, two
distinct magnetic dipolarizations with tailward ion flows are observed by
TH-D. The first one is indicated by the magnetic elevation angle increase from
15 to 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around 09:30:40 UT. The tailward perpendicular velocity is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The second one is presented by
the elevation angle increase from 25 to 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around 09:36 UT, and the
tailward perpendicular velocity is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These two significant dipolarizations are accompanied
with the sharp increase in the energy flux of energetic electron inside
geosynchronous orbit. After a 5 min expansion
of the near-Earth plasma sheet (NEPS), THEMIS-E (TH-E) located outside geosynchronous orbit also detected this tailward expanding plasma sheet with ion flows of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>150 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dipolarization propagates tailward
with a speed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> along a 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction between TH-D and TH-E within 5 min. These dipolarizations with tailward ion flows observed inside geosynchronous orbit indicate a new
energy transfer path in the inner magnetosphere during substorms.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e276">Magnetic dipolarization can be observed at or inside geosynchronous orbit
during intense substorms with high Auroral Electrojet (AE) indices (AE &gt; 500 nT)
(e.g., Dai et al., 2015; Nagai, 1982; Nosé et al., 2014; Ohtani et al.,
2018). Dipolarizations are marked by the magnetic elevation angle increase
with the decrease in the radial components of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component (Liu and Liang, 2009; Duan et al., 2011;
Dai et al., 2014, 2015). Ohtani et al. (2018) presented the statistical
characteristics of magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit. They
reported that the dipolarization region expanded in the azimuthal direction
with a speed of 60 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using multiple
satellite conjunction observations at or inside geosynchronous orbit, Dai et
al. (2015) reported that the large dipolarization electric field was
associated with a substorm injection of MeV electrons into the inner
magnetosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e354">Magnetic dipolarizations are accompanied with complex ion bulk flows in the
near-Earth plasma sheet (NEPS) (e.g., Duan et al., 2008; Liang et al., 2009).
Especially, it is more complex in the inner edge of NEPS. Usually, the
substorm-associated dipolarizations in the NEPS are accompanied with earthward ion bulk flows (e.g., Angelopoulos et al., 1992; Baumjohann et al.,
1999; Duan et al., 2011; Liang et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2008; Nakamura et
al., 2009; Shiokawa et al., 1998). Using the conjunction observations of
the Time History of
Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) multiple probes in the NEPS, Duan et al. (2011) pointed out that the
dipolarization at inner edge of the near-Earth plasma sheet had no one-to-one
relationship with the earthward ion bulk flow. Lui et al. (1999) pointed out
that dipolarization at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected with<?pagebreak page290?> tailward
flows. Inside geosynchronous orbit, magnetic dipolarizations were detected
with the earthward ion bulk flow (Dai et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e375">Near-Earth dipolarizations with low-frequency waves are detected with thermal
ions and electron energization (e.g., Dai et al., 2015; Liang et al., 2009;
Nosé et al., 2014; Ohtani et al., 2018). These energetic particles are
the main source of inner magnetosphere during substorms and storms. Nosé et
al. (2014) proposed that the dipolarizations associated with low-frequency
fluctuations were observed in the inner magnetosphere during the storm main
phase. These low-frequency electromagnetic waves can accelerate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ions in the perpendicular direction. The low-frequency waves can accelerate
particles crossing the magnetic field with a large perpendicular electric field
(e.g., Dai et al., 2014, 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Nosé et al., 2014).
Usually, dipolarization associated dispersionless energetic particle
injections are accompanied with earthward ion bulk flows in the NEPS (Dai et
al., 2015). But few reports show dipolarizations with a sharp increase in the energy flux of energetic particles are associated with tailward
ion flows at or inside geosynchronous orbit.</p>
      <p id="d1e389">The ballooning mode which occurred in the near-Earth plasma sheet is associated
with a tailward expansion of the plasma sheet during substorms (Liu, 1997; Liu et
al., 2008; Liu and Liang, 2009; Liang et al., 2009; Saito et al., 2008). Liu
et al. (2008) pointed out that the ballooning mode could excite a
quasi-electrostatic field a few minutes before local current disruption and
that the perturbations associated with the ballooning instability propagated downtail.</p>
      <p id="d1e393">In this paper we present dipolarizations with tailward ion flows inside geosynchronous orbit during an intense substorm expansion phase. The
observations of an intense substorm on 27 August 2014 by THEMIS-D (TH-D) and
THEMIS-E (TH-E) are presented in detail in Sect. 2. Discussions and conclusions of our
observations are displayed in the last section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Observations of an intense substorm on 27 August 2014</title>
      <p id="d1e404">The OMNI data of the solar wind, interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and the Disturbance Storm Time (Dst) and AE geomagnetic field indices, during a storm on 27 August 2014, are
presented in Fig. 1. The minimum value of SYM-H index is about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90 nT, as shown in Fig. 1f and implies that a moderate storm had taken place.
During the main phase of this moderate storm, there was an intense substorm
with the AE maximum value 700 nT around 10:10 UT. The beginning of
this intense substorm expansion phase was around 09:31 UT with decrease in AL index. A significant substorm enhancement occurred around 09:48 UT with
a sharp decrease in AL index and an increase in AE index.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e416">The solar wind, IMF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and geomagnetic indices
between 01:00 and 23:00 UT on 27 August 2014. From top to bottom, panels
<bold>(a–g)</bold> show the change of solar wind dynamic pressure
<bold>(a)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IMF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in geocentric solar magnetospheric (GSM) coordinates <bold>(b)</bold>, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of the solar wind flow speed in GSM coordinates <bold>(c)</bold>,
electric field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold>, AE–AU–AL indices <bold>(e)</bold>,
SYM-H index <bold>(f)</bold> and ASY-H index <bold>(g)</bold>.
From left to right, the vertical dotted lines in <bold>(a–g)</bold> panels mark
the times 01:48, 06:42, 09:31, 09:48, 21:56 and 22:35 UT, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e495"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>During this intense substorm, THEMIS probes (Angelopoulos, 2008) TH-D and
TH-E were both located in the near-Earth magnetotail. Figure 2 displays the
orbits of TH-D and TH-E from 09:20 to 10:00 UT in the solar magnetic (SM)
coordinate system. At 09:30 UT, locations of these two spacecraft in SM
coordinates were (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.10, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06, 0.43) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for TH-D and
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.26, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.28, 0.99) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for TH-E, respectively. The TH-D
orbit plot shows that it was located inside geosynchronous orbit at the
beginning of this intense substorm expansion phase. On the other hand, TH-E
was located outside geosynchronous orbit. These two spacecraft presented good
conjunction observations during this intense substorm expansion phase. The
instruments adopted in our investigations were a fluxgate magnetometer (FGM) (Auster et al., 2008), an
electrostatic analyzer (ESA) (McFadden et al., 2008), an electric field
instrument (EFI) (Bonnell et al., 2008) and a solid state telescope (SST) on-board the THEMIS probes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e553">The orbits of TH-D and TH-E in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane and
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane from 09:20 to 10:00 UT on 27 August 2014,
which were in the nightside magnetosphere. The arrow shows the flying
direction of the satellites. TH-D is red and TH-E is blue.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e592">Figure 3 shows the plasma parameters and the electromagnetic field detected
by TH-D mostly inside geosynchronous orbit at around midnight in the interval
from 09:25 to 09:55 UT. The solar magnetic (SM) coordinate system is adopted.
The panels from top to bottom represent the following: the total magnetic
field value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component; the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
components; the magnetic field elevation angle defined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; the ion and electron
density and temperature; the plasma value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nT</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which determines the location of the satellite
(Miyashita et al., 2000); three components of ion bulk flow velocity parallel
(black line) and perpendicular (red line) to the magnetic field, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; three components of the electric field, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue); three components of convection electric
field from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">V</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue), respectively. Figure 3 displays the distinct fluctuations of
the magnetic field and plasma density and velocity at around 09:30 and
09:36 UT, respectively. The magnetic elevation angle has two step
enhancements as displayed in Fig. 3c. The first increase in elevation angle
is from about 15 to 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the interval from 09:30:34 to
09:30:54 UT, which are marked by the left two vertical dashed lines in
Fig. 3. The total magnetic field value and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component both
decrease. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component increases weakly from about 35 to 45 nT. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component has obvious fluctuations around 0 nT. These magnetic
signatures indicate a magnetic dipolarization had taken place inside
geosynchronous orbit around (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.10, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06, 0.43) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During
this weak magnetic field dipolarization, the plasma beta value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
increases from around 0.5 to 1.0. The electron density and temperature both
increase. The ion density also increases, but the ion temperature decreases.
This dipolarization accompanied by tailward ion bulk flows, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the perpendicular component to the magnetic field in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, is detected by TH-D,
as shown in Fig. 3g. The perpendicular velocity in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction is
mainly dawnward at the beginning of this dipolarization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The electric field detected by TH-D also has large
fluctuations with negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values<?pagebreak page291?> during the first depolarization as
shown in Fig. 3j. During the intervals from 09:30:34 to 09:30:54 UT, the
convection electric field direction is dawnward with a large magnitude,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as presented in Fig. 3k. The second magnetic
field elevation angle increases sharply at around 09:36 as displayed in
Fig. 3c marked by the right two vertical dashed lines. The elevation angle
increases from about 25 to 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during the interval from 09:36:06 to
09:36:21 UT. The magnetic field has similar variations to the first
dipolarization signatures. Especially, the second dipolarization has larger
elevation angle maximum value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as marked by the fourth
vertical dashed line in Fig. 3c. During the second dipolarization, the
tailward ion bulk flows perpendicular to the magnetic field is also detected
by TH-D, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as presented in Fig. 3g. Also
the significant negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component is accompanied by this intense
dipolarization in Fig. 3j and k.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1166">The electromagnetic field and plasma parameters detected by TH-D in
intervals from 09:25 to 09:55 UT on 27 August 2014. The solar magnetic (SM)
coordinate system is adopted. From top to bottom, panels show <bold>(a)</bold>
the total magnetic field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red), <bold>(b)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (green) and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue), <bold>(c)</bold> the magnetic field elevation
angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(d)</bold> ion and electron density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> ion and electron temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(f)</bold> plasma beta <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(g)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of ion parallel velocity and perpendicular
velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">parx</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">perpx</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(h)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
component of ion parallel velocity and perpendicular velocity
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pary</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">perpy</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <bold>(i)</bold> the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component
of ion parallel velocity and perpendicular velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">parz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">perpz</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(j)</bold> the electric field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) by assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(k)</bold> the electric field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) calculated by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The black vertical dashed lines mark the times
09:30:34, 09:30:54, 09:36:06 and 09:36:21 UT, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page292?><p id="d1e1531">During the intervals of magnetic dipolarizations with tailward ion bulk flows
detected by TH-D inside geosynchronous orbit, TH-E observed a very weak
increase in the magnetic field elevation angle and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component
around 09:35 and 09:41 UT, as shown in Fig. 4b and c, about 5 min after the two
dipolarizations detected by TH-D. The ion and electron densities and
temperature increase weakly from very low values as displayed in Fig. 4d and
e. Outside geosynchronous orbit, TH-E observed very low beta values, as shown
in Fig. 4f, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around 09:35 and
09:41 UT, respectively. An interesting phenomenon, where the weak dipolarization
was with tailward ion bulk flows, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, was also detected by TH-E around 09:35 UT, as shown in
Fig. 4g. The perpendicular velocity is dominated in the negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1647">The electromagnetic field and plasma parameters detected by TH-E in intervals from 09:25 to 09:55 UT on 27 August 2014. The figure format is
the same as Fig. 3. The black vertical dashed lines mark the times 09:35:36
and 09:36:18 UT.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1659">The energetic electrons energy flux (psef) and pitch angle (pa) distribution of energetic electrons detected by the SST on-board TH-D
in 3 s time resolution. The red vertical lines mark the times 09:30:38 and
09:36:09 UT.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/289/2019/angeo-37-289-2019-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1668">The energy fluxes of energetic electrons associated with the intense electric
field inside geosynchronous orbit during the two dipolarizations, as shown
in the middle panel of Fig. 5, with energies of 31 (blue), 41 (gray), 52
(red), 65.5 (black), 93 (brown) and 139 keV (purple), all simultaneously
increase at 09:30:38 and 09:36:09 UT as detected by the SST on-board
TH-D. These energetic electrons
have a quasi-perpendicular pitch angle distribution, as presented in the
bottom panel of Fig. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>3</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1679">The dipolarizations with tailward ion bulk flows inside geosynchronous orbit
are investigated in our present paper. The energy fluxes of energetic electrons accompanied these dipolarizations with energies between 31 and 139 keV
simultaneously increase inside geosynchronous orbit. In accordance with these
energetic electron pitch angle distributions, it was found that high-energy
electrons were mainly in the quasi-perpendicular direction to the magnetic field,
as shown in Fig. 5. On the other hand, the inductive electric field during
these two magnetic dipolarizations was in the dawnward direction as displayed in
Fig. 3j and k. Previous research work reported that the inductive electric
field associated with substorm dipolarization can accelerate particles in the
near-Earth plasma sheet (e.g., Dai et al., 2014, 2015; Duan et al., 2016; Fu
et al., 2011; Fok et al., 2001; Liu et al., 2010; Lui et al., 1988, 1999;
Nakamura et al., 2009; Nosé et al., 2014). As shown in Fig. 3j, at around
09:36:30 UT the inductive electric fields in the second dipolarization are
dominated in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component with a large negative value, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component also increases with a negative value
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mV m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This intense electric field can drive ions
moving into the tailward–dawnward direction. On the other hand, we can
calculate the energy quantity relationship between the electric field and
energetic electrons. The energy of such an intense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
distance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J. The energetic
electrons with energy range from 31 to 139 keV are of the same energy order
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J. It is inferred that the intense <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
perpendicularly accelerate electrons to a state of tens of kiloelectronvolts.</p>
      <p id="d1e1823">Dipolarizations occurring at the inner edge of plasma sheet are complicated
with disturbances of ion bulk flows and the electromagnetic field. Lui et
al. (1999) pointed out that near-Earth dipolarization was a
non-magnetohydrodynamic (non-MHD) process and was also accompanied with tailward ion flows. Our observations of
dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit are also associated with tailward
ion flows. This result is consistent with the report proposed by Liu et
al. (2008) that the perturbations associated with the ballooning mode in the
near-Earth plasma sheet propagate tailward. Based on the statistical studies,
Nosé et al. (2016) proposed that the occurrence probability of the
dipolarizations in the inner magnetosphere had a peak at 21:00–00:00 
magnetic local time (MLT). Our observations show that two distinct
dipolarizations with tailward flows inside geosynchronous orbit are detected
by TH-D around 00:02 and 00:05 MLT, respectively.</p>
      <?pagebreak page295?><p id="d1e1826">According to the distance between TH-D and TH-E, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.23, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.30,
0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the delay time of dipolarization from inside to
outside geosynchronous orbit, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, the dipolarization propagating
speeds or the plasma sheet expanding speeds can be estimated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Liou
et al. (2002) proposed that the dipolarization region expanding speed was
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> westward at geosynchronous
orbit. By comparing observations
between TH-D and TH-E in our investigations, the azimuth speed of
dipolarization region is obtained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These two
observational results are consistent with each other. The dipolarization
associated with the current disruption propagated tailward with a speed of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> detected by THEMIS satellites in the
near-Earth plasma sheet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2008). It is
larger than the dipolarization propagating speed from inside to outside geosynchronous orbit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The different speeds of
dipolarizations propagating tailward imply that the magnitude of the
dipolarization speed may be associated with its beginning location in
magnetotail plasma sheet.</p>
      <p id="d1e2049">On the other hand, Lui (1991) reported that substorm disturbance propagated
tailward through a rarefaction wave front accompanied by earthward flows
during the early substorm expansion phase period. Chao et al. (1977) proposed
that the rarefaction wave propagating tailward was accompanied by the
thinning of the plasma sheet and an earthward plasma flow. This earthward flow is possibly a convection flow or outflow
of magnetic reconnection from the middle magnetotail.</p>
      <p id="d1e2053">Based on the above observation analysis, we can draw the results as follows.
Two distinct magnetic dipolarizations with tailward ion flows are observed
by TH-D inside geosynchronous orbit on 27 August 2014 during the intense
substorm with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT. TH-D was located
inside geosynchronous orbit around midnight in the interval from 09:20 to
10:00 UT. The first dipolarization is displayed by the magnetic elevation
angle increase from 15 to 25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around 09:30:40 UT. The second one is
presented by the elevation angle increase from 25 to 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around
09:36 UT. These two significant dipolarizations are accompanied by the
energy flux of energetic electrons which simultaneously increase inside geosynchronous orbit. After a 5 min expansion tailward of near-Earth plasma
sheet, TH-E located outside geosynchronous orbit also detects this tailward
expanding plasma sheet with an ion flow of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>150 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
dipolarization propagates tailward with a speed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 km s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> along a
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distance in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction between TH-D and TH-E within
5 min. These dipolarizations with tailward ion flows observed inside
geosynchronous orbit indicate a new energy transfer path in the inner
magnetosphere during substorms.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2153">The OMNI data of the solar wind, interplanetary magnetic
field (IMF), and SYM-H, AE, AU and AL geomagnetic field indices are freely
available from the Space Physics Data<?pagebreak page296?> Facility
(SPDF) at <uri>https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/omni_min.html</uri> (NASA's
GSFC, Goddard Space Flight Center, last access: 11 June 2018). THEMIS data of
the electromagnetic field and plasma parameters are publicly available from
NASA at <uri>http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/data/themis/</uri> (NASA, last access:
13 November 2018).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2165">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2171">We acknowledge NASA contract NAS5-02099 for the use of the data from the
THEMIS mission. Specifically, we thank Davin E. Larson for the use of the SST
data, Charles W. Carlson and James P. McFadden for use of the ESA data,
John W. Bonnell and Forrest S. Mozer for use of the EFI data, and
Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Hans-Ulrich Auster and Wolfgang Baumjohann for the use
of FGM data provided under the lead of the Technical University of
Braunschweig, with financial support from the German Ministry for Economy and
Technology and the German Center for Aviation and Space (DLR) under the
contract 50 OC 0302. The authors thank NASA CDAWeb and Taiwan Ascii and
ldl_save Data Archives (AIDA) for the THEMIS data. The SYM-H index was
provided by Data Analysis Center for Geomagnetism and Space Magnetism in
Kyoto, Japan. This work is supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China grants 41674167, 41731070 and 41574161 and in part by the
Specialized Research Fund for State Key Laboratories.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2176">This paper was edited by Anna Milillo and reviewed by one
anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., Kennel, C. F., Coroniti, F. V., Kivelson,
M. G., Pellat, R., Walker, R. J., Lühr, H., and Paschmann, G.: Bursty
bulk flows in the inner central plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4027,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02701" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JA02701</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W.,
Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P.,
Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka,
K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and
Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer, Space Sci. Rev., 141,
235–264, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baumjohann, W., Hesse, M., Kokubun, S., Mukai, T., Nagai, T., and
Petrukovich, A. A.: Substorm dipolarization and recovery, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 104, 24995–25000, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Delory, G. T., Hull, A. J., Ergun, R. E.,
Cully, C. M., Angelopoulos, V., and Harvey, P. R.: The Electric Field
Instrument (EFI) for THEMIS, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 303–341, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chao, J. K., Kan, J. R., Lui, A. T. Y., and Akasofu, S.-I.: A model for
thinning of the plasma sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 25, 703–710, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, L., Wygant, J. R., Cattell, C. A., Thaller, S., Kersten, K., Breneman,
A., Tang, X., Friedel, R. H., Claudepierre, S. G., and Tao, X.: Evidence for
injection of relativistic electrons into the Earth's outer radiation belt via
intense substorm electric fields, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1133–1141, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, L., Wang, C., Duan, S., He, Z., Wygant, J. R., Cattell, C. A., Tao, X.,
Su, Z., Kletzing, C., Baker, D. N., Li, X., Malaspina, D., Blake, J. B.,
Fennell, J., Claudepierre, S., Turner, D. L., Reeves, G. D., Funsten, H. O.,
Spence, H. E., Angelopoulos, V., Fruehauff, D., Chen, L., Thaller, S.,
Breneman, A., and Tang, X.: Near-Earth injection of MeV electrons associated
with intense dipolarization electric fields: Van Allen Probes observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6170–6179, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S., Liu, Z., Cao, J., Lu, L., Rème, H., Dandouras, I., and Carr, C.
M.: TC-1 observation of ion high-speed flow reversal in the near-Earth plasma
sheet during substorm, Sci. China Ser. E, 51, 1721–1730, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S. P., Liu, Z. X., Liang, J., Zhang, Y. C., and Chen, T.: Multiple
magnetic dipolarizations observed by THEMIS during a substorm, Ann. Geophys.,
29, 331–339, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-331-2011, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S. P., Dai, L., Wang, C., Liang, J., Lui, A. T. Y., Chen, L. J., He, Z.
H., Zhang, Y. C., and Angelopoulos, V.: Evidence of kinetic Alfven eigenmode
in the near-Earth magnetotail during substorm expansion phase, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 121, 4316–4330, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Moore, T. E., and Spjeldvik, W. N.: Rapid enhancement of
radiation belt electron fluxes due to substorm dipolarization of the
geomagnetic field, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 106, 3873–3881, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fu, H. S., Khotyaintsev, Y. V., André, M., and Vaivads, A.: Fermi and
betatron acceleration of suprathermal electrons behind dipolarization fronts,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L16104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048528" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL048528</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Liang, J., Liu, W. W., and Donovan, E. F.: Ion temperature drop and
quasi-electrostatic electric field at the current sheet boundary minutes
prior to the local current disruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, A10215,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JA014357</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Liou, K., Meng, C.-I., Lui, A. T. Y., Newell, P. T., and Wing, S.: Magnetic
dipolarization with substorm expansion onset, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000179" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JA000179</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W.: Physics of the explosive growth phase: Ballooning instability
revisited, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 102, 4927–4931, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W. and Liang, J.: Disruption of magnetospheric current sheet by
quasi-electrostatic field, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1941–1950,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1941-2009, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Liu, W. W., Liang, J., and Donovan, E. F.: Electrostatic field and ion
temperature drop in thin current sheets: A theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
115, A03211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JA014359</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page297?><ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Liu, W. W., Liang, J., and Donovan, E. F.: Interaction between kinetic
ballooning perturbation and thin current sheet: Quasi-electrostatic field,
local onset, and global characteristics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20107,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL035757</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Lui, A. T. Y.: A synthesis of magnetospheric substorm models, J. Geophys.
Res., 96, 1849–1856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02430" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/90JA02430</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y., Lopez, R. E., Krimigis, S. M., McEntire, R. W., Zanetti, L.
J., and Potemra, T. A.: A case study of magnetotail current sheet disruption
and diversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 721–724, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y., Liou, K., Nosé, M., Ohtani, S., Williams, D. J., Mukai,
T., Tsuruda, K., and Kokubun, S.: Near-Earth dipolarization: Evidence for a
non-MHD process, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2905–2908, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott,
B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS ESA Plasma
Instrument and In-flight Calibration, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 277–302, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Miyashita, Y., Machida, S., Mukai, T., Saito, Y., Tsuruda, K., Hayakawa, H.,
and Sutcliffe, P. R.: A statistical study of variations in the near and
middistant magnetotail associated with substorm onsets: GEOTAIL observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 15913–15930, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Nagai, T.: Observed magnetic substorm signatures at synchronous altitude, J.
Geophys. Res., 87, 4405–4417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA06p04405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA087iA06p04405</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Nakamura, R., Retino, A., Baumjohann, W., Volwerk, M., Erkaev, N., Klecker,
B., Lucek, E. A., Dandouras, I., Andre, M., and Khotyaintsev, Y.: Evolution
of dipolarization in the near-Earth current sheet induced by Earthward rapid
flux transport, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1743–1754, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>NASA: THEMIS data of the electromagnetic field and plasma parameters,
available at: <uri>http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/ data/themis/</uri>, last
access: 13 November 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>NASA's GSFC: the Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF), available at:
<uri>https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/omni_min.html</uri>, last access: 11 June
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Nosé, M., Takahashi, K., Keika, K., Kistler, L. M., Koga, K., Koshiishi,
H., Matsumoto, H., Shoji, M., Miyashita, Y., and Nomura, R.: Magnetic
fluctuations embedded in dipolarization inside geosynchronous orbit and their
associated selective acceleration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
119, 4639–4655, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Nosé, M., Keika, K., Kletzing, C. A., Spence, H. E., Smith, C. W.,
MacDowall, R. J., Reeves, G. D., Larsen, B. A., and Mitchell, D. G.: Van
Allen Probes observations of magnetic field dipolarization and its associated
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux variations in the inner magnetosphere at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 7572–7589, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ohtani, S., Motoba, T., Gkioulidou, M., Takahashi, K., and Singer, H. J.:
Spatial Development of the Dipolarization Region in the Inner Magnetosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 5452–5463, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Saito, M. H., Miyashita, Y., Fujimoto, M., Shinohara, I., Saito, Y., Liou,
K., and Mukai, T.: Ballooning mode waves prior to substorm-associated
dipolarizations: Geotail observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07103,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033269</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shiokawa, K., Baumjohann, W., Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Fennell, J. F.,
Friis-Christensen, E., Lühr, H., Reeves, G. D., Russell, C. T.,
Sutcliffe, P. R., and Takahashi, K.: High-speed ion flow, substorm current
wedge, and multiple Pi 2 pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 103, 4491–4507,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit with tailward ion flows</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Electromagnetic field and plasma data from the Time History of Events and
Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) near-Earth probes are used
to investigate magnetic dipolarizations inside geosynchronous orbit on
27 August 2014 during an intense substorm with AE<sub>max</sub> ∼ 1000&thinsp;nT. THEMIS-D (TH-D) was located inside geosynchronous orbit around
midnight in the interval from 09:25 to 09:55&thinsp;UT. During this period, two
distinct magnetic dipolarizations with tailward ion flows are observed by
TH-D. The first one is indicated by the magnetic elevation angle increase from
15 to 25° around 09:30:40&thinsp;UT. The tailward perpendicular velocity is
<i>V</i><sub>⊥x</sub> ∼ −50&thinsp;km&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup>. The second one is presented by
the elevation angle increase from 25 to 45° around 09:36&thinsp;UT, and the
tailward perpendicular velocity is <i>V</i><sub>⊥x</sub> ∼ −70&thinsp;km&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup>. These two significant dipolarizations are accompanied
with the sharp increase in the energy flux of energetic electron inside
geosynchronous orbit. After a 5&thinsp;min expansion
of the near-Earth plasma sheet (NEPS), THEMIS-E (TH-E) located outside geosynchronous orbit also detected this tailward expanding plasma sheet with ion flows of −150&thinsp;km&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup>. The dipolarization propagates tailward
with a speed of −47&thinsp;km&thinsp;s<sup>−1</sup> along a 2.2&thinsp;<i>R</i><sub>E</sub> distance in the
<i>X</i> direction between TH-D and TH-E within 5&thinsp;min. These dipolarizations with tailward ion flows observed inside geosynchronous orbit indicate a new
energy transfer path in the inner magnetosphere during substorms.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS Mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., Kennel, C. F., Coroniti, F. V., Kivelson,
M. G., Pellat, R., Walker, R. J., Lühr, H., and Paschmann, G.: Bursty
bulk flows in the inner central plasma sheet, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 4027,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02701" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JA02701</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W.,
Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P.,
Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka,
K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and
Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS Fluxgate Magnetometer, Space Sci. Rev., 141,
235–264, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baumjohann, W., Hesse, M., Kokubun, S., Mukai, T., Nagai, T., and
Petrukovich, A. A.: Substorm dipolarization and recovery, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 104, 24995–25000, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Delory, G. T., Hull, A. J., Ergun, R. E.,
Cully, C. M., Angelopoulos, V., and Harvey, P. R.: The Electric Field
Instrument (EFI) for THEMIS, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 303–341, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chao, J. K., Kan, J. R., Lui, A. T. Y., and Akasofu, S.-I.: A model for
thinning of the plasma sheet, Planet. Space Sci., 25, 703–710, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, L., Wygant, J. R., Cattell, C. A., Thaller, S., Kersten, K., Breneman,
A., Tang, X., Friedel, R. H., Claudepierre, S. G., and Tao, X.: Evidence for
injection of relativistic electrons into the Earth's outer radiation belt via
intense substorm electric fields, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1133–1141, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dai, L., Wang, C., Duan, S., He, Z., Wygant, J. R., Cattell, C. A., Tao, X.,
Su, Z., Kletzing, C., Baker, D. N., Li, X., Malaspina, D., Blake, J. B.,
Fennell, J., Claudepierre, S., Turner, D. L., Reeves, G. D., Funsten, H. O.,
Spence, H. E., Angelopoulos, V., Fruehauff, D., Chen, L., Thaller, S.,
Breneman, A., and Tang, X.: Near-Earth injection of MeV electrons associated
with intense dipolarization electric fields: Van Allen Probes observations,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6170–6179, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S., Liu, Z., Cao, J., Lu, L., Rème, H., Dandouras, I., and Carr, C.
M.: TC-1 observation of ion high-speed flow reversal in the near-Earth plasma
sheet during substorm, Sci. China Ser. E, 51, 1721–1730, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S. P., Liu, Z. X., Liang, J., Zhang, Y. C., and Chen, T.: Multiple
magnetic dipolarizations observed by THEMIS during a substorm, Ann. Geophys.,
29, 331–339, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-331-2011, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Duan, S. P., Dai, L., Wang, C., Liang, J., Lui, A. T. Y., Chen, L. J., He, Z.
H., Zhang, Y. C., and Angelopoulos, V.: Evidence of kinetic Alfven eigenmode
in the near-Earth magnetotail during substorm expansion phase, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 121, 4316–4330, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Moore, T. E., and Spjeldvik, W. N.: Rapid enhancement of
radiation belt electron fluxes due to substorm dipolarization of the
geomagnetic field, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 106, 3873–3881, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, H. S., Khotyaintsev, Y. V., André, M., and Vaivads, A.: Fermi and
betatron acceleration of suprathermal electrons behind dipolarization fronts,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L16104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048528" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048528</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Liang, J., Liu, W. W., and Donovan, E. F.: Ion temperature drop and
quasi-electrostatic electric field at the current sheet boundary minutes
prior to the local current disruption, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 114, A10215,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014357</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Liou, K., Meng, C.-I., Lui, A. T. Y., Newell, P. T., and Wing, S.: Magnetic
dipolarization with substorm expansion onset, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000179" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000179</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W.: Physics of the explosive growth phase: Ballooning instability
revisited, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 102, 4927–4931, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W. and Liang, J.: Disruption of magnetospheric current sheet by
quasi-electrostatic field, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1941–1950,
https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-1941-2009, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W., Liang, J., and Donovan, E. F.: Electrostatic field and ion
temperature drop in thin current sheets: A theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
115, A03211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014359</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, W. W., Liang, J., and Donovan, E. F.: Interaction between kinetic
ballooning perturbation and thin current sheet: Quasi-electrostatic field,
local onset, and global characteristics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L20107,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL035757</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y.: A synthesis of magnetospheric substorm models, J. Geophys.
Res., 96, 1849–1856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02430" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/90JA02430</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y., Lopez, R. E., Krimigis, S. M., McEntire, R. W., Zanetti, L.
J., and Potemra, T. A.: A case study of magnetotail current sheet disruption
and diversion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 721–724, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y., Liou, K., Nosé, M., Ohtani, S., Williams, D. J., Mukai,
T., Tsuruda, K., and Kokubun, S.: Near-Earth dipolarization: Evidence for a
non-MHD process, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2905–2908, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott,
B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS ESA Plasma
Instrument and In-flight Calibration, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 277–302, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Miyashita, Y., Machida, S., Mukai, T., Saito, Y., Tsuruda, K., Hayakawa, H.,
and Sutcliffe, P. R.: A statistical study of variations in the near and
middistant magnetotail associated with substorm onsets: GEOTAIL observations,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 105, 15913–15930, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Nagai, T.: Observed magnetic substorm signatures at synchronous altitude, J.
Geophys. Res., 87, 4405–4417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA06p04405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA087iA06p04405</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Nakamura, R., Retino, A., Baumjohann, W., Volwerk, M., Erkaev, N., Klecker,
B., Lucek, E. A., Dandouras, I., Andre, M., and Khotyaintsev, Y.: Evolution
of dipolarization in the near-Earth current sheet induced by Earthward rapid
flux transport, Ann. Geophys., 27, 1743–1754, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
NASA: THEMIS data of the electromagnetic field and plasma parameters,
available at: <a href="http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/ data/themis/" target="_blank">http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/ data/themis/</a>, last
access: 13 November 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
NASA's GSFC: the Space Physics Data Facility (SPDF), available at:
<a href="https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/omni_min.html" target="_blank">https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/form/omni_min.html</a>, last access: 11 June
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nosé, M., Takahashi, K., Keika, K., Kistler, L. M., Koga, K., Koshiishi,
H., Matsumoto, H., Shoji, M., Miyashita, Y., and Nomura, R.: Magnetic
fluctuations embedded in dipolarization inside geosynchronous orbit and their
associated selective acceleration of O<sup>+</sup> ions, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
119, 4639–4655, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nosé, M., Keika, K., Kletzing, C. A., Spence, H. E., Smith, C. W.,
MacDowall, R. J., Reeves, G. D., Larsen, B. A., and Mitchell, D. G.: Van
Allen Probes observations of magnetic field dipolarization and its associated
O<sup>+</sup> flux variations in the inner magnetosphere at <i>L</i><i>&lt;</i>6.6,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 121, 7572–7589, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Ohtani, S., Motoba, T., Gkioulidou, M., Takahashi, K., and Singer, H. J.:
Spatial Development of the Dipolarization Region in the Inner Magnetosphere,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 123, 5452–5463, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Saito, M. H., Miyashita, Y., Fujimoto, M., Shinohara, I., Saito, Y., Liou,
K., and Mukai, T.: Ballooning mode waves prior to substorm-associated
dipolarizations: Geotail observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07103,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033269</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Shiokawa, K., Baumjohann, W., Haerendel, G., Paschmann, G., Fennell, J. F.,
Friis-Christensen, E., Lühr, H., Reeves, G. D., Russell, C. T.,
Sutcliffe, P. R., and Takahashi, K.: High-speed ion flow, substorm current
wedge, and multiple Pi 2 pulsations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 103, 4491–4507,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
