<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-37-235-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Global sounding of F region irregularities by COSMIC<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> during a geomagnetic storm</article-title><alt-title>Global sounding of F region irregularities</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Global sounding of F region irregularities}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K. Hocke et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Hocke</surname><given-names>Klemens</given-names></name>
          <email>klemens.hocke@iap.unibe.ch</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2178-9920</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Huixin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7073-4366</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Pedatella</surname><given-names>Nicholas</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Guanyi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7383-6173</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Applied Physics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Klemens Hocke (klemens.hocke@iap.unibe.ch)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>37</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>235</fpage><lpage>242</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>1</day><month>November</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>21</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e137">We analyse reprocessed electron density profiles and total
electron content (TEC) profiles of the ionosphere in September 2008 (around
solar minimum) and September 2013 (around solar maximum) obtained by the
Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate
(COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3). The TEC profiles describe the total electron content
along the ray path from the GPS satellite to the low Earth orbit as function
of the tangent point of the ray. Some of the profiles in the magnetic polar
regions show small-scale fluctuations on spatial scales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. Possibly
the trajectory of the tangent point intersects spatial electron density
irregularities in the magnetic polar region. For derivation of the morphology
of the electron density and TEC fluctuations, a 50 km high-pass filter is
applied in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> domain, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance between a reference
point (bottom tangent point) and the tangent point. For each profile, the
mean of the fluctuations is calculated for tangent point altitudes between
400 and 500 km. At first glance, the global maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC are quite similar. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC
might be more reliable since it is based on fewer retrieval assumptions. We
find a significant difference if the arithmetic mean or the median is applied
to the global map of September 2013. In agreement with literature,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC is enhanced during the post-sunset rise of the equatorial
ionosphere in September 2013, which is associated with spread F and
equatorial plasma bubbles. The global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC at solar maximum
(September 2013) has stronger fluctuations than those at solar minimum
(September 2008). We obtained new results when we compare the global maps of
the quiet phase and the storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012.
It is evident that the TEC fluctuations are increased and extended over the
southern magnetic polar region at the day of the geomagnetic storm. The
north–south asymmetry of the storm response is more pronounced in the upper
ionosphere (ray tangent points <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km) than in the lower
ionosphere (ray tangent points <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 km).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e244">GPS radio occultation can be regarded as a bistatic limb sounding of the
atmosphere where the transmitter is on a GPS satellite and the receiver is on
a low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite. The technique was described in detail by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.1"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.2"/>. Since the GPS radio occultation
technique performs atmospheric limb sounding, the vertical resolution is
about 1 km or better in the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e253">GPS radio occultation was already utilized to derive global maps of sporadic
E layers around 90–120 km altitude <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.3"/>. Our
study aims to retrieve global maps with the amplitude of small-scale
ionospheric irregularities with scales from 2 to 50 km in the ionospheric
F2 region between 400 and 500 km altitude using the GPS radio occultation
technique. F region irregularities
induce phase and amplitude scintillations in radio signals.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.4"/> showed a scheme of a global scintillation map where the
scintillations are strong at high geomagnetic latitudes in the polar caps or
after sunset around the geomagnetic Equator (20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to
20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). <?pagebreak page236?><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.5"/> classified the F region irregularities
into three groups: equatorial spread F, high-latitude irregularities and
mid-latitude irregularities. Satellite measurements of the electric field and
plasma density fluctuations indicate that the high-latitude ionosphere is
highly structured and bounded by an extremely sharp transition between the
disturbed polar region and the quiet ionosphere outside <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.6"/>.
The authors identify three main sources in the production of high-latitude
irregularities. There are production by particle precipitation, generation by
electrostatic turbulence and plasma instabilities. In addition, quasi-direct
current electric fields play an essential role in transporting irregular
plasma at high latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e290">Recently, global distributions of topside ionospheric irregularities (above
the LEO orbit) were retrieved by using in situ data of LEO satellites
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.8"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.9"/> attempted to extract the
fluctuations of total electron content along the GPS-LEO link at tangent
point altitudes between 400 and 600 km. However, the global coverage of the
occultation events of the early GPS/MET experiment was poor, and the
measurement phase was during a solar minimum in 1995 when less ionospheric
irregularities are expected. Another approach is the use of the ground
station network of GPS and GLONASS receivers. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="text.10"/> monitored
high-latitude ionospheric irregularities during the geomagnetic storm of June
2015 and derived polar maps of the distribution of the plasma irregularities
based on the observations of the ground station network. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.11"/>
analysed the scintillations of the GPS signals received by COSMIC-FORMOSAT-3.
They found a spatio-temporal distribution of the GPS scintillations which is
similar to those of equatorial spread F and equatorial plasma bubbles.
However, high-latitude F region irregularities were not found by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.12"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.13"/> derived characteristics of
medium-scale F region plasma irregularities as observed by the COSMIC radio
occultation receivers. They analysed 2 to 50 km vertical fluctuations of the
observed TEC profiles. The most intense equatorial irregularities are
observed around 20:00–24:00 magnetic local time and correspond to a
decrease in the average irregularity scale size.</p>
      <p id="d1e312">Our study is related to the study of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.14"/> but we are now
including an analysis of the change in TEC irregularities before and during a
geomagnetic storm. Our study takes advantage of the dense spatio-temporal
sampling of ionospheric occultations provided by six LEO satellites.
Section 2 describes the GPS radio occultation mission COSMIC and the data
analysis for the extraction of ionospheric fluctuations. The results are
shown and discussed in Sect. 3. The aim of this work is to study the
behaviour using the method presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.15"/> under the presence
of ionospheric irregularities during the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Instrument, data and analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e329">The joint Taiwan–US Constellation Observing System for Meteorology,
Ionosphere, and Climate/Formosa Satellite Mission 3 (COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3,
hereafter COSMIC), a constellation of six microsatellites, was launched on
15 April 2006 into a 512 km orbit. After launch the satellites were
gradually deployed to their final orbits at 800 km, a process that took
about 17 months <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e335">The study is based on reprocessed profiles of electron density
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and total electron content (TEC) from the COSMIC mission.
The TEC profiles describe the total electron content along the ray path from
the GPS to the LEO satellite as function of the ray path. The small bending
of the ray is neglected in the ionosphere. The analysed data are level1 data
(podTec) and level2 data (ionPrf) which were processed by the University
Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) in Boulder (USA). The data are
provided in the directory cosmic2013 of the COSMIC Data Analysis and Archive
Center (CDAAC). The applied retrieval technique of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles is the Abel inversion which assumes local spherical symmetry. The
number of electron density profiles is about 1000 d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with good global
coverage. The altitude sampling rate is about 1 km, and the tangent point
moves on average 180 km through the ionosphere at altitudes from 400 to
500 km over about 5 min. Thus, the profiles are usually not measured above
a fixed geographical location. This means that plasma fluctuations in the
horizontal, vertical and temporal dimension may contribute to the small-scale
fluctuations of an electron density profile or a TEC profile. We assume that
the plasma is frozen so that we do not concern ourselves with temporal
fluctuations. Further, we do not try to distinguish between horizontal and
vertical fluctuations. Instead, we consider the fluctuation in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> domain, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance between the bottom tangent point and
the tangent point. The bottom tangent point is at the lowest altitude which
is recorded for the ionospheric occultation event. The height of the bottom
tangent point is usually between 50 and 150 km. In addition, we interpolate
the profile to an equally spaced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> grid with a spacing of 1 km. Generally,
the tangent point moves approximately along a straight line trajectory in the
F region. Hence, the small-scale fluctuations are plasma fluctuations which
are projected to the trajectory line of the tangent point of the occultation
event. The sounding volume at the tangent point is like a cylinder with a
length of about 200 km in the direction of the GPS-LEO ray, and about 2 km
across the ray and about 1 km in altitude. Thus, small-scale fluctuations in
ray direction can be smoothed out, occasionally.</p>
      <?pagebreak page237?><p id="d1e394">We extract the fluctuations in electron density and TEC by means of high-pass
filtering in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> domain. In case of TEC, we have to compute the location
of the ray tangent point (height, latitude and longitude) by using the
coordinates of the GPS and the LEO satellite in the podTec file. The profiles
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or TEC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are filtered with a digital non-recursive,
finite impulse response (FIR) high-pass filter performing zero-phase
filtering by processing the profiles in forward and reverse directions. A
cutoff scale length of 50 km was selected that means that oscillations in
electron density with wavelengths less than 50 km are passing the filter.
The number of filter coefficients corresponds to three 50 km intervals, and
a Hamming window has been selected for the filter. Thus, the
high-pass filter has a fast response time to vertical changes in the electron
density profile. More details about the digital filtering are given by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.17"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e436">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a shows an example of a disturbed electron
density profile (blue line) in the southern polar region during the
geomagnetic storm of 9 March 2012. In addition, the red line shows the
low-pass-filtered profile with scales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. Panel (b) shows the
high-pass-filtered electron density fluctuations <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
scales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km. A similar analysis is performed for the TEC profiles of the
same occultation event in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. TEC is the total electron content
along the horizontal GPS-LEO link where the link is characterized by a
certain tangent point height.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e482">Example of a disturbed electron density profile from COSMIC (blue
line in <bold>a</bold>). The red line denotes the 50 km low-pass-filtered data.
The filtering is applied in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> domain, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance between
the bottom tangent point and the tangent point. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the
electron density fluctuations filtered with the 50 km high-pass filter. The
study is focused on the altitude region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km (with
exception of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e528">For each fluctuation profile (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b or
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b), we compute the mean of the absolute fluctuations within
the altitude range 400–500 km, which is called <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC and which is a measure of the mean amplitude of high-frequency
fluctuations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values of the selected
profiles are binned into 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude–longitude
grid cells and are averaged by the median function in order to get the global
distribution of F region irregularities.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e603">Example of a disturbed TEC profile from COSMIC (blue line
in <bold>a</bold>). TEC is the total electron content along the GPS-LEO link and
measured in TEC units (TECU). The red line denotes the 50 km low-pass-filtered TEC data. The filtering is applied in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> domain, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the distance between the bottom tangent point and the tangent point.
Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the TEC fluctuations filtered with the 50 km high-pass filter. The study is focused on the altitude region
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km (with exception of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e659">First at all, we compare the global maps for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a shows the result of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b shows the result for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC for
September 2013 where the COSMIC satellites collected about 30 000
occultation events. Both images have quite similar patterns, with enhanced
fluctuations in the magnetic polar regions. The coordinates of the
geomagnetic and magnetic poles were provided by the World Data Center for
Geomagnetism in Kyoto. Generally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values are a bit enhanced
compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. We suppose that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC
values are more reliable than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values since the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values require the Abel inversion and the assumption of
local spherical symmetry of the ionosphere. Thus, we provide in the following
only the results for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e770"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during
September 2013 (analysis of ionPrf files of COSMIC). <bold>(b)</bold> Global map
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC during September 2013 (analysis of podTec files of COSMIC).
Both images are derived for fluctuations with scales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km in the height
range 400–500 km. The median function is applied to the binned cells
(5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude). The geomagnetic
(magnetic) poles are indicated by the magenta (cyan) star symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e840">Another question is the influence of the averaging method on the retrieved
global map. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC map of September 2013
for the case that the arithmetic average is applied to the binned values in
the grid cells. On the other hand, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b shows the result if the
median function is applied to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values. Generally, the
arithmetic mean leads to higher values. At the Equator in particular, there
are some strong fluctuations which may result from the sporadic appearance of
equatorial plasma bubbles in the F2 region. However, in case of monthly
global maps we prefer the median function since it reduces the effect of
outliers in the data. In the case of daily maps, we only have about 1000<?pagebreak page238?> occultation events
for the globe, and here it seems to be better to apply the arithmetic mean.
It is not good to apply the median function if only a few values are present.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e864"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC during September 2013 obtained by the arithmetic mean of the
values in the binned cells. <bold>(b)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC during
September 2013 obtained by the median of the values in the binned cells. The
geomagnetic (magnetic) poles are indicated by the magenta (cyan) star
symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e892">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC on local time and
magnetic latitude during September 2013, obtained by the median function for
tangent points between 400 and 500 km altitude. At low latitudes, there is
an enhancement of the strength of irregularities after sunset and before
midnight. The increase in the strength of the F2 region irregularities is
possibly due to spread F. The post-sunset rise of the equatorial F layer is
regularly seen in ionospheric measurements, and this phenomenon is associated
with the occurrence of spread F <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.18"/>. One form of
spread F is the equatorial plasma bubbles which are upwelling during the
post-sunset phase of the equatorial ionosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.19"/>. At high
magnetic latitudes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC is enhanced at each local time in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e920">It is also interesting to investigate the solar cycle effect in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC global maps. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a shows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC at solar
minimum in September 2008 while Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b depicts <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC at solar
maximum in September 2013. In particular, the fluctuations are stronger in the
magnetic polar regions during solar maximum. A small increase is observed for
the equatorial TEC fluctuations during solar maximum. The observations of a
sharp transition between high-latitude irregularities and those outside of
the polar region is in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e952">A large geomagnetic storm occurred on 15 July 2012. The geomagnetic index Ap
had a value of 78, and a maximum Kp value of 7 was reached. We selected this
event since the geomagnetic storm was not preceded by another storm. The
storm started after 18:00 UT on 14 July 2012. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows the
BX, BY and BZ components of the interplanetary magnetic field (near to the
Earth) as provided by the Omniweb data centre of the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA). Further the temporal evolution of the Kp index
is shown in panel (d). For the data analysis, 2 d intervals are indicated by
the vertical lines for the quiet phase and the storm phase in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. During the storm phase, positive anomalies occur in BX and
BY while a negative BZ anomaly is present. That means BZ is southward and the
interplanetary magnetic field can reconnect with the magnetospheric field
lines, which results in high geomagnetic activity during the storm. According
to theory and former observations, the positive deviations of BX and BY
during the storm phase shall generate an asymmetric storm response in the
Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.21"/> found
that geomagnetic activity is larger in the southern hemispheric winter than
in the northern hemispheric summer. The 15 July 2012 geomagnetic storm was
analysed in detail by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.22"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e967">Dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC on local time and magnetic latitude during
September 2013, obtained by the median function for tangent points between 400
and 500 km altitude. At low latitudes, there is an enhancement of the
strength of irregularities after sunset and before midnight, possibly due to
equatorial plasma bubbles.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f05.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page239?><p id="d1e984"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>In the following, we average the TEC disturbances over all local times during
the quiet phase (12 July 2012 12:00:00 UT to 14 July 2012 12:00:00 UT) and
compare this result to the storm phase (14 July 2012 12:00:00 UT to
16 July 2012 12:00:00 UT). Here, we use the arithmetic average since the
number of occultation events is not sufficient for the median function. We
compare the global maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC (with tangent points at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km) during the quiet phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a), and during
the geomagnetic storm phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values of the
selected profiles are binned into 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude–longitude grid cells. The spatial resolution in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> is
selected to be lower than in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> since the number of occultation
events is 1405 for the quiet phase and 1993 for the storm phase. Comparing
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a and b, it is evident that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC is increased during
the storm phase. Particularly, the southern magnetic polar region shows a
strong increase in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values. There are also patterns of
enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values at low latitudes during the storm phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1076"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC during September 2008 (solar
minimum). <bold>(b)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC during September 2013 (solar
maximum). The geomagnetic (magnetic) poles are indicated by the magenta
(cyan) star symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f06.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1104">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the behaviour of the scintillation index S4 during
the quiet phase and the storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012.
S4 is provided by the COSMIC data centre (scnLv1 files) and is derived from
the amplitude scintillations of the GPS signal at a certain tangent point
height. For the global map, the arithmetic means of the S4 values with
tangent point heights between 400 and 500 km were taken. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>
shows similar patterns to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. During the storm phase enhanced S4
values are found at low latitudes and in the southern magnetic polar region.
Compared to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, the S4 map of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> has a smaller
contrast.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1119">BX, BY and BZ of the interplanetary magnetic field <bold>(a–c)</bold>
and Kp index of the geomagnetic activity <bold>(d)</bold>. 2 d intervals during
the quiet phase before the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012 and during the
storm phase are indicated by the vertical lines.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=307.289764pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1137"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC (tangent points at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km) during the quiet phase, and <bold>(b)</bold> during the
storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012. The arithmetic mean is
applied to the values of the binned cells (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in latitude and longitude). The geomagnetic (magnetic) poles are indicated by
the magenta (cyan) star symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1200"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map of the scintillation index S4 (tangent
points at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km) during the quiet phase, and
<bold>(b)</bold> during the storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012.
The arithmetic mean is applied to the values of the binned cells
(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude and longitude). The
geomagnetic (magnetic) poles are indicated by the magenta (cyan) star symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1254"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Finally, we wanted to know how the geomagnetic storm acts on the lower
ionosphere, where we perform the same analysis but for TEC with ray tangent
points from 200 to 300 km altitude. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> shows the result of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 km, and it can be compared to
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>, which showed the results for ray tangent points at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km in the upper ionosphere. The number of analysed
occultation events is 1176 during the quiet phase and 1603 during the storm
phase. The number of occultation events is a bit smaller in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>
than in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> since some occultations did not reach down to the 100 km
ray tangent point height which we took as a lower limit to ensure a good
filtering process of the TEC values with tangent points at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 km. It is obvious that the quiet phase is not so quiet in
the lower ionosphere, where TEC variations still occur in the polar regions
and at low latitudes. During the storm phase (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b), the
disturbed polar regions are extended and the intensity is stronger compared
to the quiet phase. In addition the disturbances at low and middle (northern)
latitudes are increased during the storm phase. It is obvious that the
patterns of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC values at low and middle latitudes vary strongly
with longitude. In case of the lower ionosphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>) the
north–south asymmetry of the storm response is not so pronounced as in the
upper ionosphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1332"><bold>(a)</bold> Global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC (tangent points at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 km) during the quiet phase, and <bold>(b)</bold> during the
storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012. The arithmetic mean is
applied to the values of the binned cells (10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in latitude and longitude). The geomagnetic (magnetic) poles are indicated by
the magenta (cyan) star symbols.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/37/235/2019/angeo-37-235-2019-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page241?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1403">The study is based on reprocessed profiles of electron density and total
electron content from the COSMIC mission. We applied a special analysis
method to extract the spatial fluctuations in electron density and total
electron content where we calculate the mean value of the absolute values of
the 50 km high-pass-filtered fluctuations in the altitude region from 400 to
500 km. The analysis method filtered the irregularities along the path of
the tangent point.</p>
      <p id="d1e1406">The global maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC are quite similar to those of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We find a significant difference if the arithmetic mean or the
median is applied to the global map of September 2013. In agreement with
numerous ionospheric observations from the literature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC is enhanced
during the post-sunset rise of the equatorial ionosphere in September 2013.
The post-sunset rise is associated with spread F and equatorial plasma
bubbles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.23"/>. At high magnetic latitudes, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC is
enhanced during each hour of the day in September 2013.</p>
      <p id="d1e1446">The global map of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>TEC at solar maximum (September 2013) has stronger
fluctuations than those at solar minimum (September 2008). We find a new
result when we compare the global maps of the quiet phase and the storm phase
of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012. It is evident that the TEC
fluctuations (ray tangent points at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 400–500 km) are increased and
extended over the southern magnetic polar region during the storm phase. This
north–south asymmetry is possibly caused by the positive deviations of the BX
and BY components of the interplanetary magnetic field. Similar results but
less contrast are provided by the global maps of the scintillation index S4.</p>
      <p id="d1e1470">We find enhanced TEC fluctuations at low latitudes but confined to certain
areas. In the lower ionosphere (ray tangent points <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200–300 km),
the north–south asymmetry of the geomagnetic storm response is less
pronounced than at upper altitudes. The spatio-temporal sampling of the
ionosphere by the six LEO satellites of the COSMIC mission is actually not
sufficient for a case study of a geomagnetic storm. However, our study gives
a first impression of what can be achieved in the future if a larger number
(e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of LEO satellites with GPS receivers were to be launched.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1502">Routines for data analysis and visualization are available
upon request by Klemens Hocke.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1508">The level2 data are available at the COSMIC Data Analysis
and Archive Center (CDAAC; <uri>https://www.cosmic.ucar.edu/</uri>, last access:
14 April 2019).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1517">KH carried out the data analysis.
All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data set.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1523">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1529">We thank the two reviewers for their corrections of the manuscript. We thank
the COSMIC Data Analysis and Archive Center (CDAAC). The study was supported
by Swiss National Science Foundation under grant number 200021-165516.
Nicholas Pedatella was supported by US National Science Foundation grant
AGS-1033112. The National Center for Atmospheric Research is sponsored by the
National Science Foundation. Huixin Liu acknowledges support from JSPS
KAKENHI grants 18H01270, 18H04446, and 17KK0095. Guanyi Ma thanks the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC no. 11473045, and
11503040).</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1534">This paper was edited by Dalia Buresova and reviewed by two
anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aarons(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Aarons, J.: Global morphology of ionospheric scintillations, IEEE
Proceedings, 70, 360–378, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Anthes et al.(2008)Anthes, Bernhardt, Chen, Cucurull,
Dymond, Ector, Healy, Ho, Hunt, Kuo, Liu, Manning,
McCormick, Meehan, Randel, Rocken, Schreiner, Sokolovskiy,
Syndergaard, Thompson, Trenberth, Wee, Yen, and
Zeng</label><mixed-citation>Anthes, R. A., Bernhardt, P. A., Chen, Y., Cucurull, L., Dymond,
K. F., Ector, D., Healy, S. B., Ho, S.-P., Hunt, D. C., Kuo,<?pagebreak page242?> Y.-H.,
Liu, H., Manning, K., McCormick, C., Meehan, T. K., Randel, W. J.,
Rocken, C., Schreiner, W. S., Sokolovskiy, S. V., Syndergaard, S.,
Thompson, D. C., Trenberth, K. E., Wee, T.-K., Yen, N. L., and
Zeng, Z.: The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Mission: Early Results, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89,  313–334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arras et al.(2010)Arras, Jacobi, Wickert, Heise, and
Schmidt</label><mixed-citation>Arras, C., Jacobi, C., Wickert, J., Heise, S., and Schmidt, T.: Sporadic E
signatures revealed from multi-satellite radio occultation measurements, Adv.
Radio Sci., 8, 225–230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-8-225-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/ars-8-225-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Carter et al.(2013)Carter, Zhang, Norman, Kumar, and
Kumar</label><mixed-citation>Carter, B. A., Zhang, K., Norman, R., Kumar, V. V., and Kumar, S.: On the
occurrence of equatorial F-region irregularities during solar minimum using
radio occultation measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 892–904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgra.50089</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Cherniak and Zakharenkova(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Cherniak, I. and Zakharenkova, I.: New advantages of the combined GPS
and
GLONASS observations for high-latitude ionospheric irregularities monitoring:
case study of June 2015 geomagnetic storm, Earth  Planets  Space, 69,
66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0652-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-017-0652-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Fejer and Kelley(1980)</label><mixed-citation>Fejer, B. G. and Kelley, M. C.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev.
Geophys. Space Ge., 18, 401–454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG018i002p00401</ext-link>,
1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Hajj et al.(2002)Hajj, Kursinski, Romans, Bertiger, and
Leroy</label><mixed-citation>Hajj, G. A., Kursinski, E. R., Romans, L. J., Bertiger, W. I., and
Leroy, S. S.: A technical description of atmospheric sounding by GPS
occultation, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 64,
451–469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00114-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00114-6</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Hocke et al.(2001)Hocke, Igarashi, Nakamura, Wilkinson,
Wu, Pavelyev, and Wickert</label><mixed-citation>Hocke, K., Igarashi, K., Nakamura, M., Wilkinson, P., Wu, J.,
Pavelyev, A., and Wickert, J.: Global sounding of sporadic E layers by
the GPS/MET radio occultation experiment, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 63, 1973–1980,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00063-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00063-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Hocke et al.(2002)Hocke, Igarashi, and Pavelyev</label><mixed-citation>Hocke, K., Igarashi, K., and Pavelyev, A.: Irregularities of the topside
ionosphere observed by GPS/MET radio occultation, Radio Sci., 37,
13-1–13-11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RS002599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001RS002599</ext-link>,  2002.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Rocken et al.(1997)Rocken, Anthes, Exner, Hunt,
Sokolovskiy, Ware, Gorbunov, Schreiner, Feng, Herman, Kuo, and
Zou</label><mixed-citation>Rocken, C., Anthes, R., Exner, M., Hunt, D., Sokolovskiy, S.,
Ware,
R., Gorbunov, M., Schreiner, W., Feng, D., Herman, B., Kuo, Y.-H.,
and Zou, X.: Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29849–29866,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02400" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD02400</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Studer et~al.(2012)Studer, Hocke, and K{\"{a}}mpfer}}?><label>Studer et al.(2012)Studer, Hocke, and Kämpfer</label><mixed-citation>
Studer, S., Hocke, K., and Kämpfer, N.: Intraseasonal oscillations of
stratospheric ozone above Switzerland, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 74, 189–198, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Tsunoda(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Tsunoda, R. T.: Time evolution and dynamics of equatorial backscatter
plumes. I – Growth phase, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 139–149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA01p00139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA086iA01p00139</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Tsunoda et al.(2018)Tsunoda, Saito, and Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>Tsunoda, R. T., Saito, S., and Nguyen, T. T.: Post-sunset rise of equatorial
F
layer – or upwelling growth?, Prog. Earth Planet. Sc., 5, 22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0179-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40645-018-0179-4</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Wang et al.(2013)Wang, Lou, Li, Shen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Lou, W., Li, P., Shen, X., and Li, Q.: Monitoring the ionospheric
storm effect with multiple instruments in North China: July 15–16, 2012
magnetic storm event, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy.,
102, 261–268, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.021</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Watson and Pedatella(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Watson, C. and Pedatella, N. M.: Climatology and Characteristics of
Medium-Scale F Region Ionospheric Plasma Irregularities Observed by COSMIC
Radio Occultation Receivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
123, 8610–8630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JA025696</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Wu et al.(2005)Wu, Ao, Hajj, de La Torre Juarez, and
Mannucci</label><mixed-citation>Wu, D. L., Ao, C. O., Hajj, G. A., de La Torre Juarez, M., and
Mannucci, A. J.: Sporadic E morphology from GPS-CHAMP radio occultation,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A01306,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010701" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JA010701</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Zakharenkova and Astafyeva(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Zakharenkova, I. and Astafyeva, E.: Topside ionospheric irregularities as
seen from multisatellite observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 807–824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JA020330</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Global sounding of F region irregularities by COSMIC during a geomagnetic storm</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>We analyse reprocessed electron density profiles and total
electron content (TEC) profiles of the ionosphere in September 2008 (around
solar minimum) and September 2013 (around solar maximum) obtained by the
Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate
(COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3). The TEC profiles describe the total electron content
along the ray path from the GPS satellite to the low Earth orbit as function
of the tangent point of the ray. Some of the profiles in the magnetic polar
regions show small-scale fluctuations on spatial scales  &lt; 50&thinsp;km. Possibly
the trajectory of the tangent point intersects spatial electron density
irregularities in the magnetic polar region. For derivation of the morphology
of the electron density and TEC fluctuations, a 50&thinsp;km high-pass filter is
applied in the <i>s</i> domain, where <i>s</i> is the distance between a reference
point (bottom tangent point) and the tangent point. For each profile, the
mean of the fluctuations is calculated for tangent point altitudes between
400 and 500&thinsp;km. At first glance, the global maps of Δ<i>N</i><sub>e</sub>
and ΔTEC are quite similar. However, ΔTEC
might be more reliable since it is based on fewer retrieval assumptions. We
find a significant difference if the arithmetic mean or the median is applied
to the global map of September 2013. In agreement with literature,
ΔTEC is enhanced during the post-sunset rise of the equatorial
ionosphere in September 2013, which is associated with spread F and
equatorial plasma bubbles. The global map of ΔTEC at solar maximum
(September 2013) has stronger fluctuations than those at solar minimum
(September 2008). We obtained new results when we compare the global maps of
the quiet phase and the storm phase of the geomagnetic storm of 15 July 2012.
It is evident that the TEC fluctuations are increased and extended over the
southern magnetic polar region at the day of the geomagnetic storm. The
north–south asymmetry of the storm response is more pronounced in the upper
ionosphere (ray tangent points <i>h</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp;400–500&thinsp;km) than in the lower
ionosphere (ray tangent points <i>h</i>&thinsp; = &thinsp;200–300&thinsp;km).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Aarons(1982)</label><mixed-citation>
Aarons, J.: Global morphology of ionospheric scintillations, IEEE
Proceedings, 70, 360–378, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Anthes et al.(2008)Anthes, Bernhardt, Chen, Cucurull,
Dymond, Ector, Healy, Ho, Hunt, Kuo, Liu, Manning,
McCormick, Meehan, Randel, Rocken, Schreiner, Sokolovskiy,
Syndergaard, Thompson, Trenberth, Wee, Yen, and
Zeng</label><mixed-citation>
Anthes, R. A., Bernhardt, P. A., Chen, Y., Cucurull, L., Dymond,
K. F., Ector, D., Healy, S. B., Ho, S.-P., Hunt, D. C., Kuo, Y.-H.,
Liu, H., Manning, K., McCormick, C., Meehan, T. K., Randel, W. J.,
Rocken, C., Schreiner, W. S., Sokolovskiy, S. V., Syndergaard, S.,
Thompson, D. C., Trenberth, K. E., Wee, T.-K., Yen, N. L., and
Zeng, Z.: The COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 Mission: Early Results, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 89,  313–334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-89-3-313</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arras et al.(2010)Arras, Jacobi, Wickert, Heise, and
Schmidt</label><mixed-citation>
Arras, C., Jacobi, C., Wickert, J., Heise, S., and Schmidt, T.: Sporadic E
signatures revealed from multi-satellite radio occultation measurements, Adv.
Radio Sci., 8, 225–230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-8-225-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/ars-8-225-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Carter et al.(2013)Carter, Zhang, Norman, Kumar, and
Kumar</label><mixed-citation>
Carter, B. A., Zhang, K., Norman, R., Kumar, V. V., and Kumar, S.: On the
occurrence of equatorial F-region irregularities during solar minimum using
radio occultation measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 118, 892–904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgra.50089</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Cherniak and Zakharenkova(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Cherniak, I. and Zakharenkova, I.: New advantages of the combined GPS
and
GLONASS observations for high-latitude ionospheric irregularities monitoring:
case study of June 2015 geomagnetic storm, Earth  Planets  Space, 69,
66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0652-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0652-0</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Fejer and Kelley(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Fejer, B. G. and Kelley, M. C.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev.
Geophys. Space Ge., 18, 401–454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401</a>,
1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Hajj et al.(2002)Hajj, Kursinski, Romans, Bertiger, and
Leroy</label><mixed-citation>
Hajj, G. A., Kursinski, E. R., Romans, L. J., Bertiger, W. I., and
Leroy, S. S.: A technical description of atmospheric sounding by GPS
occultation, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 64,
451–469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00114-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00114-6</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Hocke et al.(2001)Hocke, Igarashi, Nakamura, Wilkinson,
Wu, Pavelyev, and Wickert</label><mixed-citation>
Hocke, K., Igarashi, K., Nakamura, M., Wilkinson, P., Wu, J.,
Pavelyev, A., and Wickert, J.: Global sounding of sporadic E layers by
the GPS/MET radio occultation experiment, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 63, 1973–1980,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00063-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(01)00063-3</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Hocke et al.(2002)Hocke, Igarashi, and Pavelyev</label><mixed-citation>
Hocke, K., Igarashi, K., and Pavelyev, A.: Irregularities of the topside
ionosphere observed by GPS/MET radio occultation, Radio Sci., 37,
13-1–13-11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RS002599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001RS002599</a>,  2002.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Rocken et al.(1997)Rocken, Anthes, Exner, Hunt,
Sokolovskiy, Ware, Gorbunov, Schreiner, Feng, Herman, Kuo, and
Zou</label><mixed-citation>
Rocken, C., Anthes, R., Exner, M., Hunt, D., Sokolovskiy, S.,
Ware,
R., Gorbunov, M., Schreiner, W., Feng, D., Herman, B., Kuo, Y.-H.,
and Zou, X.: Analysis and validation of GPS/MET data in the neutral
atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29849–29866,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02400" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD02400</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Studer et al.(2012)Studer, Hocke, and Kämpfer</label><mixed-citation>
Studer, S., Hocke, K., and Kämpfer, N.: Intraseasonal oscillations of
stratospheric ozone above Switzerland, J. Atmos.
Sol.-Terr. Phy., 74, 189–198, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Tsunoda(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsunoda, R. T.: Time evolution and dynamics of equatorial backscatter
plumes. I – Growth phase, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 139–149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA01p00139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JA086iA01p00139</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Tsunoda et al.(2018)Tsunoda, Saito, and Nguyen</label><mixed-citation>
Tsunoda, R. T., Saito, S., and Nguyen, T. T.: Post-sunset rise of equatorial
F
layer – or upwelling growth?, Prog. Earth Planet. Sc., 5, 22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0179-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-018-0179-4</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Wang et al.(2013)Wang, Lou, Li, Shen, and Li</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Lou, W., Li, P., Shen, X., and Li, Q.: Monitoring the ionospheric
storm effect with multiple instruments in North China: July 15–16, 2012
magnetic storm event, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy.,
102, 261–268, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.021</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Watson and Pedatella(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, C. and Pedatella, N. M.: Climatology and Characteristics of
Medium-Scale F Region Ionospheric Plasma Irregularities Observed by COSMIC
Radio Occultation Receivers, J. Geophys. Res.-Space,
123, 8610–8630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025696" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025696</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Wu et al.(2005)Wu, Ao, Hajj, de La Torre Juarez, and
Mannucci</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, D. L., Ao, C. O., Hajj, G. A., de La Torre Juarez, M., and
Mannucci, A. J.: Sporadic E morphology from GPS-CHAMP radio occultation,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 110, A01306,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010701" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010701</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Zakharenkova and Astafyeva(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Zakharenkova, I. and Astafyeva, E.: Topside ionospheric irregularities as
seen from multisatellite observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 120, 807–824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020330</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
