<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-36-1347-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>First joint observations of space weather events over Mexico</article-title><alt-title>Space weather over Mexico</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Space weather over Mexico}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{V.~De~la~Luz et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>De la Luz</surname><given-names>Victor</given-names></name>
          <email>vdelaluz@igeofisica.unam.mx</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0257-4158</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Gonzalez-Esparza</surname><given-names>J. Americo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4774-1829</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Sergeeva</surname><given-names>Maria A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Corona-Romero</surname><given-names>Pedro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>González</surname><given-names>L Xavier</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Mejia-Ambriz</surname><given-names>Julio C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Valdés-Galicia</surname><given-names>Jose F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Aguilar-Rodriguez</surname><given-names>Ernesto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1136-585X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rodriguez-Martinez</surname><given-names>Mario</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-0681</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Romero-Hernandez</surname><given-names>Esmeralda</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>Ernesto</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Villanueva</surname><given-names>Pablo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Huipe-Domratcheva</surname><given-names>Elizandro</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cifuentes</surname><given-names>Gerardo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Hernandez</surname><given-names>Esteban</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Monstein</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>CONACyT – Servicio de Clima Espacial Mexico – Laboratorio Nacional de Clima Espacial,
SCiESMEX – LANCE, Morelia, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Instituto de Geofísica, Unidad Michoacan, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Antigua carretera<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> a Patzcuaro no. 8701
Ex-Hda,
San José de la Huerta Morelia, Michoacán, C.P. 58089, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Autónoma de México, Michoacán, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Físico-Matemáticas, LANCE, Monterrey, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institute for Astronomy, Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Victor De la Luz (vdelaluz@igeofisica.unam.mx)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>36</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>1347</fpage><lpage>1360</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>9</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>15</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2018 Victor De la Luz et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e260">The Mexican Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX in Spanish) and
National Space Weather Laboratory (LANCE in Spanish) were organized in 2014
and in 2016, respectively,
to provide
space weather monitoring and alerts, as well as scientific research in
Mexico. In this work, we present the results of the first joint observations
of two events (22 June and 29 September 2015) with our local network of
instruments and their related products. This network includes the MEXART
radio telescope (solar flare and radio burst), the Compact Astronomical
Low-frequency, Low-cost Instrument for Spectroscopy in Transportable
Observatories (CALLISTO) at the MEXART station (solar radio burst), the Mexico
City Cosmic Ray Observatory (cosmic ray fluxes), GPS receiver networks
(ionospheric disturbances), and the Teoloyucan Geomagnetic Observatory (geomagnetic field). The observations show that we detected significant space
weather effects over the Mexican territory: geomagnetic and ionospheric
disturbances (22 June 2015), variations in cosmic ray fluxes, and also radio
communications' interferences (29 September 2015). The effects of these
perturbations were registered, for the first time, using space weather
products by SCiESMEX: total electron content (TEC) maps, regional geomagnetic index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
radio spectrographs of low frequency, and cosmic ray fluxes. These results
prove the importance of monitoring space weather phenomena in the region and
the need to strengthening the instrumentation network.</p>
  </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Solar
physics</kwd>
        <kwd>astrophysics</kwd>
        <kwd>and astronomy (instruments and techniques)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e283">Space weather (SW) phenomena influence the performance and
reliability of different modern technological systems; see for instance
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="normal.1"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="normal.2"/>. The country has
developed a significant infrastructure that is vulnerable to SW events, such
as electricity generation and a transportation grid, telecommunications,
electronic banking, and long pipelines for gas and oil transportation. The
effects of the Carrington geomagnetic storm in 1859 were registered in
several locations, indicating that the region is vulnerable to extreme
geomagnetic storms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e295">There are some studies of particular SW events that affected the geomagnetic
field and ionosphere in Mexico, for example <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="normal.4"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="normal.5"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="normal.6"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="normal.7"/>,
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="normal.8"/>; however, the SW phenomena in this region have not
been studied comprehensively. For instance, there is a lack of<?pagebreak page1348?> continuous
multi-instrument observations of SW phenomena in Mexico that can provide
reliable statistics for regional SW studies. Mexico is situated at low
latitudes (geographic latitudes 14–32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, geomagnetic latitudes
23–38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). Recent studies prove that the SW effects are far from
being fully understood at these latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e335">The southern half of Mexican territory is located between the northern tropic
and the Equator. The Sun's incident ray path, at maximum elevation, remains
throughout the year between 35 and 81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the northern region of the
country (Tijuana at 32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and between 53 and 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
southern region (Tapachula at 14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). These conditions match
countries with similar latitudes such as those in the north of Africa, the Arabian
Peninsula, and the south of Asia (including the south of China and India). The Sun's
paths for these latitudes increase the exposition time of the solar
projection over the ground. Consequently, this raises the probability of
radio interferences detected at ground level, produced directly or indirectly
by a solar radio burst, solar energetic particles (SEPs), and flares
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.10"/>. Models like D-Region Absorption Predictions (D-RAP)
by NOAA show this effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e381">Since 2014, Mexico has begun a strategy for SW awareness. In 2014, the
Mexican Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX) was created;
in 2016, the National Space Weather Laboratory (LANCE) and the
Repository of Space Weather Data (RICE) were established <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.12"/>.
Some of the ground-based instruments involved in the SW observations in
Mexico have been used for more than 50 years
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.13"/>. Currently, the
instrumental network provides
the possibility of measuring local geomagnetic
field variations, cosmic ray flux, solar wind parameters using interplanetary
scintillation data, solar radio bursts, radio interferences, and GPS signal delays, etc.</p>
      <p id="d1e391">The aim of this work is to estimate the impact of SW phenomena over Mexico.
We based our results on multilateral observations performed by the SCiESMEX
instrumental network. In this work, we addressed two events registered over
Mexico by SCiESMEX in 2015: on 22 June, and on 25–29 September. The first
event was mainly related to a M6.5 solar flare and a geomagnetic storm
that caused ionospheric perturbations. The second event was related to a
solar radio burst. The paper is organized as follows:
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> introduces the network of SW instruments in
Mexico. Section 3 discusses the results of observations during the two
events, and final remarks are given in the Conclusions section.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Space weather instrumental network and products</title>
      <p id="d1e404">This section describes the ground-based facilities for SW observations in
Mexico.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The Mexican Array Radio Telescope (MEXART)</title>
      <p id="d1e414">The Mexican Array Radio Telescope (MEXART) is a transit instrument dedicated to
interplanetary scintillation (IPS) observations from compact radio sources
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.14"/>. The instrument has 16 fixed latitudinal beams pointing
towards different declinations and uses the Earth's rotation to scan the
whole sky. The angular width of the beams along the east–west direction is
about 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, so a discrete radio source has a transit of about 4 min in the data series and the Sun around 8 min. The basic elements of
the radio telescope are full wavelength dipoles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m). The
radiotelescope performs observations at a frequency of 139.65 MHz with a
bandwidth of 2 MHz. More details of the instrument can be found in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="normal.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e444">The telescope allows us to remotely infer some characteristics of solar wind
streams crossing along the line of sight of the extragalactic radio sources
detected by the instrument. This includes the tracking of large-scale
interplanetary perturbations. The solar wind speeds and interplanetary
density fluctuations along the lines of sights are computed with the use of the
methods developed by SCiESMEX. When the line of sight of a radio source
passes across the solar wind electronic density inhomogeneities, the radio
signals are scattered, and a diffraction pattern is produced.</p>
      <p id="d1e447">To infer some solar wind characteristics (velocity and density fluctuations)
from the IPS data, we apply a power spectra analysis to record the transit of
the radio source. We employ a theoretical model to obtain a power spectrum of
the IPS fluctuations. This IPS theoretical spectrum incorporates different
physical parameters, including solar wind speed. We fit the theoretical model
to the observed power spectra, obtaining the solar wind speed that best
matches the observation. The solar wind speed location is assumed at the
nearest point of the Sun to the line of sight. The solar wind density
fluctuations are estimated from the area under the curve of the observed IPS
spectrum; this area is equivalent to the scintillation index <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further details
about the MEXART methodology can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="normal.16"/>. The
results of IPS observations are published weekly in the SW reports
<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e460">Reports can be found on the official web page of SCiESMEX
(<uri>http://www.sciesmex.unam.mx/blog/category/reporte-semanal-de-clima-espacial/</uri>, last access: 5 October 2018).</p></fn>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>CALLISTO station at the MEXART site</title>
      <p id="d1e475">Solar radio bursts are spontaneous emissions of electromagnetic waves at low
frequencies in the outer solar atmosphere produced by shock waves close to
the corona or in the interplanetary medium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.17"/>. The
signal received on Earth is interpreted as an increase of the radio noise
that is analyzed continuously by many solar radio spectrum observatories
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.18"/>. The global e-CALLISTO network is among these
observatories <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1349?><p id="d1e487">In 2015, a CALLISTO (Compact Astronomical Low-frequency, Low-cost Instrument for Spectroscopy in Transportable
Observatories) station was installed in the facilities of the MEXART
radio telescope (CALLISTO-MEXART station). This station forms part of the
e-CALLISTO network. Up to now, about 100 solar radio events have been
detected, and their radio noise spectrum at the site has been categorized
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.20"/>. The observations are only performed during daylight
hours, with 200 different channels ranging from 45.7 to 344.7 MHz captured
every 15 min with a resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ms.</p>
      <p id="d1e500">The product related to CALLISTO is the dynamic radio spectrograph; see
the example in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>. Its results are published every 15 min on
the web pages of RICE and the e-CALLISTO international network.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Cosmic ray observatory</title>
      <p id="d1e513">The Mexico City Cosmic Ray Observatory is equipped with two instruments: a
muon telescope and a neutron monitor (NM). The muon telescope detects the
hard component (negative and positive muons) produced by the decay of charged
pions, which are produced by interactions of the primary cosmic rays with the
atmospheric nucleus. It is composed of eight plates of a plastic scintillator;
four plates are located above the NM and four under it. The muons crossing
through the scintillators lose energy by ionization and produce fluorescent
radiation that travels to a photomultiplier
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.21"/>. The Mexico City NM type is a
6-NM64. The monitor has worked continuously since 1990. Following
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="normal.22"/>, the mean energy response for the Mexico City NM
is estimated as 24.5 GV; thus the instrument detects the low energy component
of the galactic cosmic rays.</p>
      <p id="d1e522">The cosmic ray observatory can detect flux variations caused by solar
activity, for example, when a coronal mass ejection (CME) strikes the Earth
and produces a sudden reduction in galactic cosmic ray flux intensity. This
kind of event is known as a Forbush decrease (FD)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.23"/>. The cosmic ray intensity may have a drastic
decrement up to 20  % in a few hours and the recovery is slow, typically
around 7 to 10 days. It is one of the extreme manifestations of a
transient modulation of galactic cosmic rays (GCRs). FDs are generally
correlated with stream interaction regions, interplanetary shocks, and/or CMEs
originated from the Sun
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.24"/>. The FDs
are observed by ground-based particle detectors, such as an NM. The
phenomenon is produced by the irregularities in the interplanetary magnetic
field associated with these large-scale solar wind disturbances that deflect
the cosmic ray flux, causing a reduction in the number of cosmic rays
detected at ground level <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.25"/>. The
product developed by SCiESMEX computes the cosmic ray flux in real time. The
results are included in the SW weekly report.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Geomagnetic observatory</title>
      <p id="d1e543">The Teoloyucan Geomagnetic Observatory (TEO) is located near Mexico City
(at latitude 19.746<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and longitude 99.19<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) and is
managed by the Magnetic Service at the Geophysics Institute, UNAM. It
performs the measurements of the geomagnetic field components (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a local magnetometer. The sampling rate is 5 s integrated
by 1 min, and the baseline is continuously calibrated by the Magnetic
Service's work team.</p>
      <p id="d1e585">Since 2017, SCiESMEX, in collaboration with the Magnetic Service, has
estimated the local geomagnetic field changes with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
index. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the analog of the Kp index but on a regional scale
(3 h measurements of the maximum absolute variations of the horizontal
component (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.26"/>). In agreement with the Kp index, the values
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> run from 0 to 9, with 0 representing a quiet state and
9 representing a saturated value for the most disturbed states. Each
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level relates almost logarithmically to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> deviations from
its quiet baseline <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e653">The quiet baseline is calculated by statistically removing the systematic
diurnal and monthly variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The algorithm of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calculation obtains values consistent with those reported with its planetary
counterpart (Kp). At present, for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculation, we use
data from the Teoloyucan magnetic observatory only; consequently, currently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are only regionally representative of central
Mexico. In the future, we will increase our coverage with several
magnetometers in the Mexican territory. This will substantially increase the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coverage as well as our space weather monitoring capabilities.
It is important to remark that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is under development, and its
data sets are not definitive. Further details on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calculations can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="normal.28"/> and general K-index calculations
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="normal.29"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.30"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>GPS receiver stations</title>
      <p id="d1e747">There are different GPS receiver networks operating in Mexico
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.31"/>. Data from these
networks are used to monitor SW effects on the ionosphere over the country. Vertical total electron content (TEC) values are obtained from
RINEX files of local GPS stations with the use of two methods. In the first,
calculations are performed using the US-TEC software
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.32"/>, which is an
operational product at the Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC), developed through a collaboration between the National Geodetic
Survey, SWPC by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences of the
University of Boulder, Colorado, United States. US-TEC allows near-real-time
monitoring of TEC to be performed over the region through the maps that can<?pagebreak page1350?> be constructed in
quasi-real time. For the detailed method description and its benefits,
readers are referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.33"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.34"/>. In addition,
the TayAbsTEC method is also used for TEC calculations. Its advantage is that
the receiver coordinates (specifics of the region) are taken into account.
Detailed description and benefits can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="normal.35"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="normal.36"/>. Both methods proved to provide satisfactory results
for TEC estimation in the region; see the references cited above.</p>
      <p id="d1e769">The near-real-time TEC maps over Mexico are one of the products developed by
SCiESMEX. The results of TEC estimation by different methods and the
ionospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.37"/> as a measure of ionospheric
disturbance are published in the SW weekly reports.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Repository of Space Weather Data (RICE)</title>
      <p id="d1e790">In 2015, the National Council of Science and Technology created a network of
repositories for science and technology in Mexico. SCiESMEX manages the
repository of the SW data. RICE provides the capabilities for massive and
high-speed storage and processing of data from the networks of local and
international SW instruments. The data in RICE can be processed in quasi-real
time. The results are published on the official SCiESMEX web page both in
weekly SW reports and as quasi-real-time SW values. This allows us to
perform the continuous quasi-real-time monitoring of SW conditions and to
analyze previous events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e795">Two
solar transits detected by MEXART at 139.65 MHz. Electromagnetic flux
measurements on 22 June 2015, during the occurrence of a solar flare (blue
curve) and regular quiet solar transit (green curve).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Space weather observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The event on 22 June 2015</title>
      <p id="d1e820">On 19 June 2015 at 05:00 UTC, a filament eruption was detected in the
solar southeast quadrant of the solar disk. On 21 June 2015, between 01:00 and 03:00 UTC,
two solar flares erupted from the active region 2371 (M2 and M2.6), and a
halo CME, associated with these flares, was also detected. On the same day,
at 09:44 and 18:20 UTC, two other flares were released from the solar
atmosphere, with M3 and M1 categories, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.38"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e828">Scaled X-ray
flux from the solar flare on 22 June 2015 by GOES satellite data (green curve)
and a radio flux as detected by MEXART (blue curve) at 139.65 MHz.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e837">On 22 June 2015, two CME arrivals were detected by the ACE spacecraft at
04:51 UTC (associated with the first filament eruption) and 17:59 UTC
(associated with the double-peaked M2 flare from the active region 2371 on
21 June). Shortly afterward, in the same active region, an M6 X-ray solar
flare with a full halo CME was detected at 17:59 UTC. This last CME arrived
at Earth 2 days later on 24 June at 12:58 UTC <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.39"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e846">Variations of parameters during 20–25 June 2015: H component of the
magnetic field by a local magnetometer in Mexico <bold>(a)</bold>, Dst index <bold>(b)</bold>, Kp index
<bold>(c)</bold>, and local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index <bold>(d)</bold>. Vertical lines throughout all the panels
indicate the moments of SSC, IP, MP, and RP.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Observations by MEXART</title>
      <p id="d1e885">The Sun, as the strongest radio source in the sky, is detected daily by the
MEXART. These solar transit radio observations allow us to statistically
characterize the flux and width of the Sun at 139.65 MHz and its variations
within the solar cycle. It is possible to record solar activity or a flare
during the recording of the solar transit, as occurred on 22 June 2015. During
the M6.5-class flare, the Sun was near the local zenith around 22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in declination. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows two records of
solar transits obtained by MEXART: an example of a common quiet solar
transit,
showing the expected radiation beam pattern of the antenna (green curve), and
a solar transit registered<?pagebreak page1351?> immediately after the occurrence of the solar
flare on 22 June, showing a disrupted and saturated beam pattern (blue
curve). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the signal of the X-ray flux
increase of the solar flare detected by GOES (blue curve normalized to
maximum MEXART flux) and the radio flux at 139.65 MHz detected by MEXART
(green curve). The temporal difference between the maximum of the X-ray
emission detected by the GOES satellite and the solar transit detected by
MEXART is about 30 min. The flux in the MEXART data was saturated. MEXART
detected the signature of the solar flare with a considerable increment in
the radiation flux.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e903">Forbush decrease detected by the Mexico City Cosmic Ray Observatory,
generated by the M-class solar flares on 21 to 22 June.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Observations by CALLISTO</title>
      <p id="d1e920">During this event, the CALLISTO-MEXART station was still under initial
configurations and did not detect the event.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Geomagnetic storm detected with local magnetometer data</title>
      <p id="d1e931">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows the development of the geomagnetic storm from
20 to 25 June 2015 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). Variations of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of the magnetic field were measured at the Teoloyucan
Geomagnetic Observatory (TEO). According to our magnetic data, three sudden
storm commencements (SSCs) provoked by the interplanetary shocks (Astafyeva et
al., 2017) of different intensities occurred during this interval: 21 June at
16:46 UTC, 22 June at 05:47 UTC, and 22 June at 18:30 UTC. An intense
geomagnetic storm followed the last SSC, with its main phase (MP) between 22
and 23 June. Unfortunately, some data were lost because the energy supply
failed in the magnetic observatory between 03:33 and 21:13 UTC on 23 June.
For this reason, we show the Dst index (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) as the
measure of geomagnetic field change on a global scale to define the beginning
of the recovery (RP) of the geomagnetic field.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e949">Ionospheric and geomagnetic parameters during 20–25 June 2015:
observed (TEC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 27-day median (TEC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">med</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) TEC values for
the UCOE station <bold>(a)</bold>,
ionospheric weather <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index corresponding to the logarithmic deviation
DTEC
for the UCOE station <bold>(b)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component <bold>(c)</bold>, and Dst index <bold>(d)</bold> variations.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1003">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c shows the Kp index. The highest Kp values during
the storm correspond to minimal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-component values.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>d illustrates the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived
from TEO data. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reached its maximum value
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on 23 June 2015 during the main phase of the storm. The
gray area in the plot means TEO data were missing. It is important to consider that currently the
local geomagnetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index is undergoing a validation process.
The results shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c are considered preliminary. In
the near future, we will increase the number of magnetometers at different
sites in the country. This will produce a better coverage for the comparison of the
geomagnetic response in different regions in Mexico.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1073">Regional TEC maps constructed for two time moments during the
disturbance (panels <bold>a</bold> and <bold>c</bold>) and for the same moments under quiet geomagnetic
conditions (panels <bold>b</bold> and <bold>d</bold>). The location of GPS stations whose data were used
are marked by red points (for more details, we have prepared a video of a
period of 38 days from 24 May to 30 June 2015 at 24 FPS at
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/aztec/videos/tecmaps01.mp4</uri>, last access: 5 October 2018).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page1353?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS4">
  <label>3.1.4</label><title>Cosmic ray observations</title>
      <p id="d1e1105">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the FD observed by the
Mexico City NM. From the baseline, the minimum of the FD is estimated as
6.6 %. The interval to reach the minimum was about 74 h, and the whole
event lasted about 10 days. The event began on 22 June at 01:00 UTC. There
was an abrupt flux decay on 22 June at 19:00 UTC, and it reached the first
minimum on 23 June at 03:00 UTC, covering a decrease of at least 5 % in an
interval of about 8 h. This main phase of the FD might well be
associated with the arrival of the CME on 22 June at 17:59 UTC. The behavior
of the cosmic ray fluxes correlated with the geomagnetic disturbances as
described in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>. Other NM stations around the world also
confirmed this FD event. This event shows that the Mexico City NM works
properly, and it detects the variations of cosmic rays associated with SW
events. Unfortunately, the muon telescope at Mexico City was off at the time
of the event.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS5">
  <label>3.1.5</label><title>Ionospheric disturbances detected with the use of GPS data</title>
      <?pagebreak page1354?><p id="d1e1120">The geomagnetic storm between 22 and 23 June 2015 discussed here caused
ionospheric disturbances over Mexico. First, let us consider the data from a
single GPS receiver. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a illustrates the behavior of one
of the main ionospheric parameters, TEC, during 20 and 25 June 2015. The
values of the observed TEC (blue curve) and it 27-day running median (gray
dotted curve) are shown for the UCOE GPS station located at the MEXART site
(latitude 19.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, longitude 101.68<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W). Median TEC values
serve as a quiet reference. The TEC values observed from 20 to 21 June 2015,
followed a quiet pattern (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a). The difference between the
observed and median TEC curves during these days is within the day-to-day
variability limits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.40"/>. In contrast, during the geomagnetic
storm, TEC showed the positive phase of the ionospheric disturbance, which
commenced exactly with the beginning of the main phase of the storm at
18:30 UTC on 22 June (see vertical lines throughout the panels of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>). TEC then showed the negative phase of disturbance with
the beginning of the recovery phase of the storm approximately at 04:00 UTC
on 23 June and further during the next days. Full TEC recovery, to its
quiet level, did not occur until 28 June 2015 (not shown for the economy of
space). These results are in line with other ionospheric studies of this
event <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.41"/>. We used the ionosphere weather <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.42"/> to estimate the intensity of the
ionospheric disturbance. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index specifies the ionosphere from a quiet
state to an intense storm. The categories of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> index correspond to the
logarithmic deviation of TEC from its quiet median: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEC</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">med</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
TEC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the observed TEC value and TEC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">med</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
median value calculated over 27 days prior to the day of observation (blue
and gray dotted curves in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, respectively). The value
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TEC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.301</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to the
classification provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="normal.43"/>, this is the intensely
negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> storm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the least negative storm magnitude.
Such a disturbed state of the ionosphere can lead to a negative impact on
different systems. For example, the range of the frequencies used within the
high-frequency (HF) band can narrow significantly. Such negative storms are especially
dangerous during the night hours when critical frequencies of the ionosphere
are lower than during the daytime. This was the case in our study: the most intense
negative DTEC minimum on 23 June (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b) occurred
during the local night hours.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1290">Type III solar radio burst detected by CALLISTO-MEXART on 29 September 2015.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f07.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1299">One of the products that SCiESMEX offers to its users is the regional TEC
maps, which illustrate TEC distribution over Mexico. Such maps are a useful
instrument for the qualitative estimation of the ionosphere state; see for instance
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.44"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.45"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.46"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.47"/>.
The example is provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. Data from 22 GPS
receivers were used to construct these TEC maps. The main diurnal TEC maximum
is usually observed near 14:00 local time (LT) (20:00 UTC) throughout Mexico during
all four seasons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.48"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1323">Type III solar radio burst registered by e-CALLISTO station on
29 September 2015. <bold>(a)</bold> Alaska station; <bold>(b)</bold>
Roswell station, New Mexico. In both records the radio burst is registered at 19:23 UTC.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1338">The results for 14:00 LT on the day of the maximum positive TEC
disturbance on 22 June 2015 are compared to the results for the same hour on
the quiet geomagnetic day of 3 June 2015 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a, b). The
map for 3 June 2015 can serve as a quiet reference as it was one of the
quietest days of the month (Dst<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT, Kp<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The moment of 14:00 LT was also a moment of
the largest difference (positive disturbance) between the disturbed and quiet
TEC values during the considered ionospheric disturbance<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d1e1411">For more
details, we have prepared a video of a 38-day period from 24 May 2015 to
30 June 2015 at 24 FPS at
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/aztec/videos/tecmaps01.mp4</uri> (last
access: 5 October 2018)</p></fn>. If one compares the
plots in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b, we see that the picture is rather
different: the electron concentration in the ionosphere was increased over
the whole of Mexico on the day of the storm. TEC growth can lead to the increase of
errors in the object location with signals of global positioning systems. The
difference between these two maps proves that the ionosphere structure
changed significantly during the disturbance. In addition, we illustrate TEC
distribution maps constructed for 05:00 LT (11:00 UTC) on 23 June 2015 (the
moment of the most intensely negative TEC disturbance), and for the same
moment of the quiet day on 3 June 2015 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c, d).
Clearly, the TEC was lower on this day.</p>
      <p id="d1e1422">As TEC is an integral parameter that characterizes electron content in the
cross unit section from the ground to a GPS satellite, it does not permit
precise conclusions to be made about the variations in different ionospheric
layers (their peak density and height). The ionospheric sounding data are
usually used for that. There are no ionosonde measurements in Mexico at the
moment. Installation is a part of our future work. To sum up, the geomagnetic
storm that started on 22 June 2015 provoked the ionospheric disturbance over
Mexico, which was characterized by the positive phase and then the negative phase.
These phases of ionospheric disturbance correlated with the phases of
geomagnetic disturbance. The structure of the ionosphere was significantly
changed during the geomagnetic storm, which could lead to negative
consequences for different technological systems.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1427">Light curve of the type III solar radio burst detected on 29 September 2015 with a signal-to-noise ratio of 32.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>The event on 26 September 2015</title>
      <p id="d1e1445">The second event that we address in this study is related to the solar radio
burst. It was detected by the CALLISTO-MEXART station and the MEXART radio
telescope at 19:22 UTC on 2 September 2015. This solar radio burst was
associated with a weak M1.1 solar flare that started at 19:20 UTC, peaked
at 19:24, and ended at 19:27 UTC. The closest CME related to this event was
recorded by LASCO at 20:00:04 UTC. According to SWPC/NOAA this particular
CME did not hit the Earth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.49"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1355?><p id="d1e1451">The solar radio event registered by CALLISTO-MEXART
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) shows the characteristic dynamic solar
spectrum of a radio burst type III. The type II and type III spectrums differ
in their dynamics. While type III shows an emission in consecutive short
periods (minutes) of time and covers a wide wavelength bands, the type II
radio burst is derived from high to low frequencies for a long period of time
(days) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.50"/>. Related to this event, SWPC releases an ALTTP2
code where a type II burst at 19:30 UTC was reported (serial number: 1025). The
type III solar radio burst was confirmed by two independent CALLISTO
stations: Roswell, New Mexico, and Alaska (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>).
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> shows the light curve of the event
constructed on the basis of CALLISTO data. The maximum peak of the event was
characterized by a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 32.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1465">29 September 2015 records by MEXART (blue curve) and CALLISTO-MEXART (green curve) at approximately 140 MHz.
The flux was scaled in order to compare the response of both instruments.
</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/36/1347/2018/angeo-36-1347-2018-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1475">Both instruments, the MEXART radio telescope and the CALLISTO-MEXART, have a common
band: approximately 140 MHz. Consequently, both instruments can detect the
same events.</p>
      <p id="d1e1478">We rescaled (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) the fluxes obtained by two instruments to compare
them. The results are given in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, where we
show the event observed at the same band by both instruments. We see that the
solar radio burst was detected by both instruments. This is the first record
of a solar radio burst type III by the MEXART radio telescope confirmed by
the CALLISTO station simultaneous observation. The flux registered by both
instruments opens the possibility of using MEXART as a solar radio monitor
(not only for IPS observations) with high time resolution and a better
sensitivity. The SNR only for the 140 MHz channel of CALLISTO is 18, and for
the MEXART, it is 224 for the closest band.</p>
      <p id="d1e1490">The records show several disturbances in radio communications between 50 and
75 MHz and radio noise between 110 and 170 MHz for around 2 min at
the site of observation. This is the first spectrum that shows a radio
blackout over Mexico related to SW. This radio blackout could probably affect
the frequencies lower than 50 MHz. The local time of the radio burst was
about 11:20, close to noon locally. The ionosonde measurements could provide
us with information if the HF band (3–30 MHz) was affected by the event. As
mentioned above, SCiESMEX currently has no ionosonde measurements in Mexico. The installation of the ionosondes<?pagebreak page1356?> for oblique ionospheric sounding
is planned for our future work.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1502">We presented the results of the first joint observations of SW phenomena in
Mexico. We addressed two SW events that occurred on 22 June and 29
September 2015. Features of the behavior of SW parameters were obtained with
the use of different local instruments installed in Mexico. The main results
are the following.</p>
      <p id="d1e1505"><list list-type="bullet">
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1510">A solar flare was detected by the MEXART radio telescope on 22 June 2015, in
agreement with GOES satellite data. This example proves the possibility of
using MEXART for solar flare detection if the flares occur during the local
daylight hours.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1516">For the first time we presented a solar radio event (29 September 2015)
detected by the MEXART radio telescope that is confirmed by the<?pagebreak page1357?> CALLISTO-MEXART
station. The measurements by CALLISTO-MEXART were in accord with other CALLISTO
observations. This proves that both ground-based local instruments (MEXART
and CALLISTO-MEXART) can be used for the monitoring of solar radio bursts
which occur during local daylight hours in Mexico. The advantage of the
MEXART instrument is better sensitivity for such events. Note also that we
report, for the first time, a radio blackout over Mexico related to SW
phenomena.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1522">Local cosmic ray data indicate SW phenomena in Mexico. This is due to the
fact that the irregularities in the interplanetary magnetic field, associated
with large-scale solar wind disturbances, deflect the cosmic ray flux
measured in the center of Mexico. For example, a Forbush decrease was
recorded, associated with the passing of the CME detected during the event in
June 2015.</p>
          </list-item>
          <list-item>

      <p id="d1e1528">Local geomagnetic field variations from 21 to 25 June 2015 caused an intense
ionospheric disturbance over Mexico. Local magnetometer data were in accord
with the variations of the Dst index. The regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mex</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index
allowed us to estimate the rate of geomagnetic disturbance in Mexico. The
phases of ionospheric disturbance correlated with the phases of geomagnetic
disturbance in time. The results are in agreement with other ionospheric
studies of this event. It was revealed that the structure of the ionosphere
was significantly changed during the geomagnetic storm, which could lead to
negative consequences for different technological systems. As the ionosphere
state was only estimated with TEC data, no conclusions about the changes in
each ionospheric layer can be made.</p>
          </list-item>
        </list></p>
      <p id="d1e1544">Some lessons can be learned from this first study in order to enhance the SW
monitoring and the development of a comprehensive ground-based
multi-instrument data set in Mexico. We must increase the number of
magnetometers, located at different sites, to have local measurements at
different regions in real time. The installation of more CALLISTO stations in
Mexico will allow us to understand the effects of radio communications'
disruption with more accuracy. For the case of TEC maps computed over Mexican
territory, the next step is to improve the spatial resolution of TEC maps by
increasing the number of GPS stations available and by bettering our TEC
calibration methods. One of the future steps for improving the computations
of TEC maps is to implement a homogeneous distribution of GPS stations
throughout the ground territory. More detailed analysis could be done with
ionospheric sounding data from ionosondes. Thus, ionosonde data are
needed to complement both radio blackout studies and ionospheric radio
propagation conditions over Mexico. The incorporation of a network of
magnetometers and ionosondes in Mexico in the next year will significantly
improve the coverage and quality of our space weather data.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1552">Callisto data are publicly and freely available at
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/callisto</uri> (CALLISTO, 2018). MEXART data are publicly and freely available at
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/mexart</uri> (MEXART, 2018).
Cosmic ray data can be found at <uri>http://132.248.105.25/</uri> (Cosmic Ray, 2018).
Geomagnetic data in real time are available at <uri>http://132.248.6.186/TEOonline.html</uri> (Geomagnetic, 2018).
Observational, navigational, and meteorological RINEX files collected by the Trans-boundary,
Land and Atmosphere Longterm Observational and Collaborative Network (TLALOCNet) are
publicly and freely available in the TLALOCNet archive (<uri>http://tlalocnet.udg.mx</uri>; TlalocNet, 2018). Observational RINEX files from the SSN GPS network are available upon
request to SSNdata@sismologico.unam.mx.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1570">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1347-2018-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1347-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1579">EA  and PV are the technicians in charge of the Callisto station and
the MEXART radiotelescope.
The processing and data analysis for Callisto MEXART station was developed by VDlL, and EHD. CM is the PI of the e-Callisto
network and is taking care of data archiving, pre-processing, image-generation and
quality control of CALLISTO data
and CM are the people in charge of Callisto data analysis and processing.
JAGE, EAR, and JMA are the
people on charge of MEXART data analysis.
MAS, MR, and ERH are the team focused
in Ionosphere analysis.
The Cosmic Ray data analysis were performed by XG and JFVG.
Geomagnetic analysis and processing was developed by EH, GC,
and PCR.
The data adqusition in the RICE repository was developed by VDlL and EHD.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1585">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1591">This article is part of the special issue “Space weather
connections to near-Earth space and the atmosphere”. It is a result of the
6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Simpósio Brasileiro de Geofísica Espacial e Aeronomia
(SBGEA), Jataí, Brazil, 26–30 September 2016.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1606">Thanks are expressed to Catedras CONACyT (CONACyT Fellow) for supporting this work.
Victor De la Luz acknowledges CONACyT 254497 and CONACyT 268273 for Ciencia Basica and Repositorios Institucionales. Maria A. Sergeeva acknowledges the
funding by CONACyT-AEM 2017-01-292700. Julio C. Mejia-Ambriz acknowledges
CONACyT 256033. Pedro Corona-Romero acknowledges CONACyT 254812. SCiESMEX is
partially funded by CONACyT-AEM grant 2017-01-292684, CONACyT LN 293598,
CONACyT PN 2015-173, and DGAPA-PAPIIT IN106916. Ernesto<?pagebreak page1358?> Aguilar-Rodriguez
acknowledges the DGAPA-PAPIIT project (grant: IN101718) and the CONACyT
project (grant: 220981). Mario Rodriguez-Martinez acknowledges DGAPA-PAPIIT
IA 107116 and CONACyT INFR: 253691. The authors express their gratitude to
the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC), Boulder, Colorado, USA, for
providing the analysis software used at SWPC for the operational US-TEC
product to perform TEC calculations for this study. The calculations of the local TEC values are partly based on GPS data provided by the Mexican Servicio
Sismológico Nacional (SSN, 2018; Pérez-Campos et al., 2018), the Trans-boundary,
Land and Atmosphere Longterm Observational and Collaborative Network (TLALOCNet; Cabral-Cano et al., 2018), and SSN-TLALOCNet operated by the Servicio
de Geodesia Satelital (SGS) and SSN at the Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) and UNAVCO Inc. We
gratefully acknowledge all the personnel from SSN, SGS, and UNAVCO Inc. for station maintenance, data acquisition, IT support,
and data distribution for these networks. TLALACNet, SSN-TLALOCNet, and related SGS operations are supported by the
National Science Foundation, grant number EAR-1338091, NASA-ROSES NNX12AQ08G,
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT) projects 253760, 256012, and 2017-01-5955, UNAM Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de
Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica (PAPIIT) projects IN104213, IN111509, IN109315-3, IN104813-3, and supplemental
support from UNAM Instituto de Geofísica and Centro de Ciencas de la Atmosfera. Thanks are expressed to the
Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zurich, and FHNW Windisch, Switzerland.
Whitham Reeve and Stan Nelson are thanked for providing the observations for the
stations of Alaska and Roswell, New Mexico, in the e-CALLISTO network. The authors
would like to thank Ana Caccavari for providing the magnetic field data from
Teoloyucan Geomagnetic Observatory. The authors also thank Ilya Zhivetiev
from the Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation FEB
RAS and Yury Yasyukevich and Anna Mylnikova from the Institute of
Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS for providing the TayAbsTEC software for
this study (<uri>http://www.gnss-lab.org/tay-abs-tec</uri>; last access: 30 June
2018). <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Jean-Pierre Raulin
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Alvarez-Castillo} and
{Vald{\'{e}}s-Galicia}(2010)}}?><label>Alvarez-Castillo and
Valdés-Galicia(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Alvarez-Castillo, J. and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.: Signatures of
thunderstorms in the variations of the secondary cosmic rays registered in
Mexico City, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 72,
38–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.006</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Araujo-Pradere et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Araujo-Pradere, E. A., Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Spencer, P. S. J., and Minter,
C. F.: Differential validation of the US-TEC model, Radio Sci., 42,
RS3016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006RS003459</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Astafyeva et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Astafyeva, E., Zakharenkova, I., Huba, J. D., Doornbos, E., and van
den IJssel, J.: Global Ionospheric and Thermospheric Effects of the June
2015 Geomagnetic Disturbances: Multi-Instrumental Observations and Modeling,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 716–742, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024174" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JA024174</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Balch et~al.(2004{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>Balch et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>
Balch, C., Biesecker, D., Combs, L., Crown, M., Doggett, K., Kunches, J.,
Singer, H., and Zezula, D.: Halloween space weather storms of 2003, Tech.
Rep., 1, 1–46, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Balch et~al.(2004{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>Balch et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
Balch, C., Murtagh, B., Zezula, D., Combs, L., Nelson, G., Tegnell, K.,
Crown,
M., and McGehan, B.: Intense space weather storms October 19–November 07,
2003, service assessment, NOAA, US Dep. of Commerce, Silver Spring, Md,
106, 1–47,
2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Barros et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Barros, D., Takahashi, H., Wrasse, C. M., and Figueiredo,
C. A. O. B.:
Characteristics of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by TEC map based on
ground-based GNSS receivers over South America, Ann. Geophys., 36,
91–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-91-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-36-91-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Benz et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Benz, A. O., Monstein, C., and Meyer, H.: Callisto A New Concept for
Solar Radio Spectrometers, Sol. Phys., 226, 143–151,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-5688-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-005-5688-9</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Blagoveshchensky et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Blagoveshchensky, D. V., Maltseva, O. A., and Sergeeva, M. A.: Impact of
magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution, Ann. Geophys., 36,
1057–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Buonsanto(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Buonsanto, M. J.: Ionospheric Storms – A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 88,
563–601, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1005107532631</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cabral-Cano et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cabral-Cano, E., Pérez-Campos, X., Márquez-Azúa, B.,
Sergeeva, M. A., Salazar-Tlaczani, L., DeMets, C., Adams, D.,
Galetzka, J., K., H., Feaux, K., Serra, Y. L., Mattioli, G. S., and
Miller, M. M.: TLALOCNet: A Continuous GPS-Met Array in Mexico for
Seismotectonic and Atmospheric Research, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89,
373–381,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Cabral-Cano, E., Pérez-Campos, X., Márquez-Azúa, B., Sergeeva, M. A., Salazar-Tlaczani, L.,
DeMets, C., Adams, D., Galetzka, J., Feaux, K., Serra, Y. L., Mattioli, G. S., and Miller, M.:
TLALOCNet: A Continuous GPS-Met Backbone in Mexico for Seismotectonic, and
Atmospheric Research, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 373–381,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170190" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0220170190</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>CALLISTO: Callisto-MEXART database, available at:
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/callisto</uri>, last access: 9 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Cane(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Cane, H. V.: Coronal Mass Ejections and Forbush Decreases, Space Sci.
Rev., 93, 55–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026532125747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1026532125747</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Cane et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Cane, H. V., Richardson, I. G., and von Rosenvinge, T. T.: Cosmic ray
decreases: 1964–1994, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21561–21572,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA01964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JA01964</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Cid et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Cid, C., Palacios, J., Saiz, E., Guerrero, A., and Cerrato, Y.: On
extreme geomagnetic storms, J. Space Weather   Spac., 4,
A28, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1051/swsc/2014026</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Clem and Dorman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Clem, J. M. and Dorman, L. I.: Neutron Monitor Response Functions,
Space
Sci. Rev., 93, 335–359, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026508915269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1026508915269</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Corona-Romero et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Corona-Romero, P., Sergeeva, M., Gonzalez-Esparza, J.,
Cifuentes-Nava,
G., Hernandez-Quintero, E., Caccavari, A., and Sanchez-Garcia, E.:
Mexican Geomagnetic K Index, in: Latinmag Letters, vol. 7 of Special
Issue (2017), GEP01, 1–6, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cosmic Ray: COSMICRAY database,    available at:
<uri>http://132.248.105.25/</uri>, last access: 9 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{De Nardin} et~al.(2016{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>De Nardin et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on space
weather in Latin America. 1. The beginning from the Space Science
Research, Adv. Space Res., 58, 1916–1939,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.012</ext-link>,  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{De Nardin} et~al.(2016{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>De Nardin et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on <?pagebreak page1359?>space
weather in Latin America. 2. The Research Networks Ready for Space
Weather, Ad. Space Res., 58, 1940–1959,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.013</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{De Nardin} et~al.(2016{\natexlab{c}})}}?><label>De Nardin et al.(2016c)</label><mixed-citation>Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on space
weather in Latin America. 3. Development of space weather forecasting
centers, Adv. Space Res., 58, 1960–1967, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.011</ext-link>,  2016c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Forbush(1938)</label><mixed-citation>Forbush, S. E.: On cosmic-ray effects associated with magnetic storms,
Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, J. Geophys.
Res., 43, 203–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TE043i003p00203" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/TE043i003p00203</ext-link>, 1938.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Geomagnetic: TEOLOYUCAN database,   available at:
<uri>http://132.248.6.186/TEOonline.html</uri>, last access: 9 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Gonz{\'{a}}lez} et~al.(2015)}}?><label>González et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>González, L. X., Valdés-Galicia, J. F., Sánchez, F.,
Muraki, Y., Sako, T., Watanabe, K., Matsubara, Y., Nagai, Y.,
Shibata, S., Sakai, T., Musalem, O., and Hurtado, A.: Re-evaluation
of the Neutron Emission from the Solar Flare of 2005 September 7, Detected by
the Solar Neutron Telescope at Sierra Negra,   Astrophys. J., 814,
1–7, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/136</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gonzalez-Esparza et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez-Esparza, A., Carrillo, A., Andrade, E., Perez, R., and
Kurtz, S.: The MEXART interplanetary scintillation array in Mexico,
Geofis. Int., 43, 61–73, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Gonz{\'{a}}lez-Esparza} et~al.(2006)}}?><label>González-Esparza et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>González-Esparza, J. A., Carrillo, A., Andrade, E., Sierra, P.,
Vazquez, S., Rodríguez, C., Pérez-Enríquez, R.,
Kurtz, S., and Blanco-Cano, X.: Calibration and testing of the MEXART
antenna using solar transits, Adv. Space Res., 38, 1824–1827,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.032</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gonzalez-Esparza et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A., De la Luz, V., Corona-Romero, P., Mejia-Ambriz,
J. C.,
Gonzalez, L. X., Sergeeva, M. A., Romero-Hernandez, E., and
Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.: Mexican Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX), Space
Weather, 15, 3–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001496" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016SW001496</ext-link>,  2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Gonzalez and Cuevas(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.  and Cuevas-Cardona,
Observations of Low Latitude Red Aurora in Mexico During the 1859 Carrington Geomagnetic Storm,
Space Weather, 16,  593–600,  2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Goodman(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Goodman, J. M.: Space Weather and Telecommunications, vol. 782, Springer US,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Gulyaeva et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Gulyaeva, T. L., Arikan, F., Hernandez-Pajares, M., and Stanislawska,
I.: GIM-TEC adaptive ionospheric weather assessment and forecast system,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 102, 329–340,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.011</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Hern{\'{a}}ndez-Pajares} et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Hernández-Pajares et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., Orus, R.,
Garcia-Rigo, A., Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S. C., and
Krankowski, A.: The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric
information since 1998, J. Geodesy, 83, 263–275,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hillan et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hillan, D. S., Cairns, I. H., and Robinson, P. A.: Type II solar radio
bursts:
2. Detailed comparison of theory with observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 117,   A06105,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JA016755</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Huipe-Domratcheva(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Huipe-Domratcheva, E.: Sistema de detección de eventos de radioemisión
solar utilizando el radioespectógrafo CALLISTO y el radiotelescopio MEXART
en el Laboratorio Nacional de Clima Espacial, tesis de licenciatura, Escuela
Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Iwai et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Iwai, K., Tsuchiya, F., Morioka, A., and Misawa, H.: IPRT/AMATERAS:
A
New Metric Spectrum Observation System for Solar Radio Bursts, Sol.
Phys., 277, 447–457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9919-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-011-9919-y</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Lanzerotti(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Lanzerotti, L. J.: Space weather effects on communications,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247–268,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7_9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7_9</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Li et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Wang, N., Li, M., Zhou, K., Yuan, Y., and Yuan, H.: Evaluation and
analysis of the global ionospheric TEC map in the frame of international GNSS
services, 60, 3718–3729, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Lockwood(1971)</label><mixed-citation>Lockwood, J. A.: Forbush Decreases in the Cosmic Radiation, Space Sci.
Rev., 12, 658–715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00173346</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{L{\'{o}}pez-Montes} et~al.(2015)}}?><label>López-Montes et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>López-Montes, R., Pérez-Enríquez, R., Araujo-Pradere,
E. A., and López Cruz-Abeyro, J. A.: Fractal and wavelet analysis
evaluation of the mid latitude ionospheric disturbances associated with major
geomagnetic storms, Adv. Space Res., 55, 586–596,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.037</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Mayaud(1980)</label><mixed-citation>Mayaud, P. N.: Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices,
Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series,
22, 1–154,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GM022</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Mejia-Ambriz et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Mejia-Ambriz, J. C., Villanueva-Hernandez, P., Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.,
Aguilar-Rodriguez, E., and Jeyakumar, S.: Observations of Interplanetary
Scintillation (IPS) Using the Mexican Array Radio Telescope (MEXART), Sol.
Phys., 265, 309–320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9562-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-010-9562-z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Mejia-Ambriz et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Mejia-Ambriz, J. C., Jackson, B. V., Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.,
Buffington, A., Tokumaru, M., and Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.:
Remote-Sensing of Solar Wind Speeds from IPS Observations at 140 and 327 MHz
Using MEXART and STEL, Sol. Phys., 290, 2539–2552,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0694-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-015-0694-z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Menvielle and Berthelier(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Menvielle, M. and Berthelier, A.: The K-derived planetary indices –
Description and availability, Rev. Geophys., 29, 415–432,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91RG00994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91RG00994</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>MEXART: MEXART database,   available at:
<uri>http://www.rice.unam.mx/mexart</uri>, last access: 9 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Minter et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Minter, C. F., Robertson, D. S., Spencer, P. S. J., Jacobson, A. R.,
Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Araujo-Pradere, E. A., and Moses, R. W.: A comparison
of Magic and FORTE ionosphere measurements, Radio Sci., 42, RS3026,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003460" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006RS003460</ext-link>,  2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Nindos et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Nindos, A., Aurass, H., Klein, K.-L., and Trottet, G.: Radio
Emission
of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections, invited Review, Sol. Phys., 253,
3–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9258-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-008-9258-9</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>OECD(2016)</label><mixed-citation>OECD: Mexico, 216, 1–253,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1787/mei-v2016-8-table79-en" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1787/mei-v2016-8-table79-en</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Campos X., Espindola, V. H., Perez, J. et al.:   The Mexican National
Seismological Service: An Overview, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 318–323,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1785/0220170186</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Richardson and Cane(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Richardson, I. G. and Cane, H. V.: Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity
Response
to Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections/Magnetic Clouds in 1995–2009,
Sol. Phys., 270, 609–627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9774-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-011-9774-x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Rodr{\'{i}}guez-Mart{\'{i}}nez} et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Rodríguez-Martínez et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Martínez, M., Pérez-Enríquez, H. R.,
Carrillo-Vargas,
A., López-Montes, R., Araujo-Pradere, E. A., Casillas-Pérez, G. A.,
and Cruz-Abeyro, J. A. L.: Ionospheric Disturbances and Their Impact on IPS
Using MEXART Observations, Sol. Phys., 289, 2677–2695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0496-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-014-0496-8</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Rodr{\'{\i}}guez-Bouza} et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Rodríguez-Bouza et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Rodríguez-Bouza, M., Paparini, C., Otero, X., Herraiz, M.,
Radicella,<?pagebreak page1360?> S. M., Abe, O. E., and Rodríguez-Caderot, G.:
Southern European ionospheric TEC maps based on Kriging technique to monitor
ionosphere behavior, Adv. Space Res., 60, 1606–1616,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Romero-Hernandez et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Romero-Hernandez, E., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., Rodriguez-Martinez, M., Sergeeva,
M., Aguilar-Rodriguez, E., Mejia-Ambriz, J., and la Luz, V. D.: Study of
ionospheric disturbances over Mexico associated with transient space weather
events, Adv. Space Res., 60, 1–253,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.042</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Sergeeva et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Sergeeva, M., Maltseva, O., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., la Luz, V. D., and
Corona-Romero, P.: Features of TEC behaviour over the low-latitude
North-American region during the period of medium solar activity, Adv.
Space Res., 60, 1838–1849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.021</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Sergeeva et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Sergeeva, M., Maltseva, O., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., Mejia-Ambriz, J., la Luz,
V. D., Corona-Romero, P., Gonzalez, L., Gatica-Acevedo, V., Romero-Hernandez,
E., Rodriguez-Martinez, M., and Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.: TEC behavior over the
Mexican region, Ann. Geophys., 60, 1594–1605, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Stenkin et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Stenkin, Y. V., Djappuev, D. D., and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.:
Neutrons
in extensive air showers, Phys. Atom. Nucl., 70, 1088–1099,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778807060117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S1063778807060117</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{SWPC(2015{\natexlab{a}})}}?><label>SWPC(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>SWPC: SWPC PRF 2092, Space Weather Highlights 28 September–4 October 2015,
<uri>http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2092.pdf</uri>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{SWPC(2015{\natexlab{b}})}}?><label>SWPC(2015b)</label><mixed-citation>SWPC: SWPC PRF 2077, Space Weather Highlights 15 June–21 June 2015
<uri>http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2077.pdf</uri>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{SWPC(2015{\natexlab{c}})}}?><label>SWPC(2015c)</label><mixed-citation>SWPC: SWPC PRF 2078, Space Weather Highlights 22 June–28 June 2015
<uri>http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2078.pdf</uri>, 2015c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{SWPC(2015{\natexlab{d}})}}?><label>SWPC(2015d)</label><mixed-citation>SWPC: D Region Absorption Repors SWX DRAP20 C SWPC 20150622175800 GLOBAL, <uri>https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/drap/data/2015/06/SWX_DRAP20_C_SWPC_20150622.tar.gz</uri>,
2015d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
SSN: Servicio Sismológico Nacional, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Mexico, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>TlalocNet: TLALOCNET database,   available at:
<uri>http://tlalocnet.udg.mx</uri>, last access: 9 October 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Yasyukevich et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Yasyukevich, Y. V., Mylnikova, A. A., Kunitsyn, V. E., and Padokhin,
A. M.: Influence of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases on the
determination accuracy of the absolute total electron content in the
ionosphere, Geomagn. Aeronomy, 55, 763–769,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321506016X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S001679321506016X</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Yizengaw et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Yizengaw, E., Doherty, P., and Fuller-Rowell, T.: Is Space Weather Different
Over Africa, and If So, Why? An AGU Chapman Conference Report, Space Weather,
11, 389–391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20063" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/swe.20063</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>First joint observations of space weather events over Mexico</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The Mexican Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX in Spanish) and
National Space Weather Laboratory (LANCE in Spanish) were organized in 2014
and in 2016, respectively,
to provide
space weather monitoring and alerts, as well as scientific research in
Mexico. In this work, we present the results of the first joint observations
of two events (22 June and 29 September 2015) with our local network of
instruments and their related products. This network includes the MEXART
radio telescope (solar flare and radio burst), the Compact Astronomical
Low-frequency, Low-cost Instrument for Spectroscopy in Transportable
Observatories (CALLISTO) at the MEXART station (solar radio burst), the Mexico
City Cosmic Ray Observatory (cosmic ray fluxes), GPS receiver networks
(ionospheric disturbances), and the Teoloyucan Geomagnetic Observatory (geomagnetic field). The observations show that we detected significant space
weather effects over the Mexican territory: geomagnetic and ionospheric
disturbances (22 June 2015), variations in cosmic ray fluxes, and also radio
communications' interferences (29 September 2015). The effects of these
perturbations were registered, for the first time, using space weather
products by SCiESMEX: total electron content (TEC) maps, regional geomagnetic index <i>K</i><sub>mex</sub>,
radio spectrographs of low frequency, and cosmic ray fluxes. These results
prove the importance of monitoring space weather phenomena in the region and
the need to strengthening the instrumentation network.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alvarez-Castillo and
Valdés-Galicia(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Alvarez-Castillo, J. and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.: Signatures of
thunderstorms in the variations of the secondary cosmic rays registered in
Mexico City, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 72,
38–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.10.006</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Araujo-Pradere et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Araujo-Pradere, E. A., Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Spencer, P. S. J., and Minter,
C. F.: Differential validation of the US-TEC model, Radio Sci., 42,
RS3016, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003459</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Astafyeva et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Astafyeva, E., Zakharenkova, I., Huba, J. D., Doornbos, E., and van
den IJssel, J.: Global Ionospheric and Thermospheric Effects of the June
2015 Geomagnetic Disturbances: Multi-Instrumental Observations and Modeling,
J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 122, 716–742, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024174" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024174</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Balch et al.(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>
Balch, C., Biesecker, D., Combs, L., Crown, M., Doggett, K., Kunches, J.,
Singer, H., and Zezula, D.: Halloween space weather storms of 2003, Tech.
Rep., 1, 1–46, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Balch et al.(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>
Balch, C., Murtagh, B., Zezula, D., Combs, L., Nelson, G., Tegnell, K.,
Crown,
M., and McGehan, B.: Intense space weather storms October 19–November 07,
2003, service assessment, NOAA, US Dep. of Commerce, Silver Spring, Md,
106, 1–47,
2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Barros et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Barros, D., Takahashi, H., Wrasse, C. M., and Figueiredo,
C. A. O. B.:
Characteristics of equatorial plasma bubbles observed by TEC map based on
ground-based GNSS receivers over South America, Ann. Geophys., 36,
91–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-91-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-91-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Benz et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Benz, A. O., Monstein, C., and Meyer, H.: Callisto A New Concept for
Solar Radio Spectrometers, Sol. Phys., 226, 143–151,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-5688-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-005-5688-9</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Blagoveshchensky et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Blagoveshchensky, D. V., Maltseva, O. A., and Sergeeva, M. A.: Impact of
magnetic storms on the global TEC distribution, Ann. Geophys., 36,
1057–1071, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1057-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Buonsanto(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Buonsanto, M. J.: Ionospheric Storms – A Review, Space Sci. Rev., 88,
563–601, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005107532631</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cabral-Cano et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Cabral-Cano, E., Pérez-Campos, X., Márquez-Azúa, B.,
Sergeeva, M. A., Salazar-Tlaczani, L., DeMets, C., Adams, D.,
Galetzka, J., K., H., Feaux, K., Serra, Y. L., Mattioli, G. S., and
Miller, M. M.: TLALOCNet: A Continuous GPS-Met Array in Mexico for
Seismotectonic and Atmospheric Research, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89,
373–381,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Cabral-Cano, E., Pérez-Campos, X., Márquez-Azúa, B., Sergeeva, M. A., Salazar-Tlaczani, L.,
DeMets, C., Adams, D., Galetzka, J., Feaux, K., Serra, Y. L., Mattioli, G. S., and Miller, M.:
TLALOCNet: A Continuous GPS-Met Backbone in Mexico for Seismotectonic, and
Atmospheric Research, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 373–381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170190" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170190</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
CALLISTO: Callisto-MEXART database, available at:
<a href="http://www.rice.unam.mx/callisto" target="_blank">http://www.rice.unam.mx/callisto</a>, last access: 9 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Cane(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Cane, H. V.: Coronal Mass Ejections and Forbush Decreases, Space Sci.
Rev., 93, 55–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026532125747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026532125747</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cane et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Cane, H. V., Richardson, I. G., and von Rosenvinge, T. T.: Cosmic ray
decreases: 1964–1994, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 21561–21572,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA01964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JA01964</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cid et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Cid, C., Palacios, J., Saiz, E., Guerrero, A., and Cerrato, Y.: On
extreme geomagnetic storms, J. Space Weather   Spac., 4,
A28, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2014026</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Clem and Dorman(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Clem, J. M. and Dorman, L. I.: Neutron Monitor Response Functions,
Space
Sci. Rev., 93, 335–359, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026508915269" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026508915269</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Corona-Romero et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Corona-Romero, P., Sergeeva, M., Gonzalez-Esparza, J.,
Cifuentes-Nava,
G., Hernandez-Quintero, E., Caccavari, A., and Sanchez-Garcia, E.:
Mexican Geomagnetic K Index, in: Latinmag Letters, vol. 7 of Special
Issue (2017), GEP01, 1–6, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cosmic Ray: COSMICRAY database,    available at:
<a href="http://132.248.105.25/" target="_blank">http://132.248.105.25/</a>, last access: 9 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>De Nardin et al.(2016a)</label><mixed-citation>
Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on space
weather in Latin America. 1. The beginning from the Space Science
Research, Adv. Space Res., 58, 1916–1939,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.012</a>,  2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>De Nardin et al.(2016b)</label><mixed-citation>
Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on space
weather in Latin America. 2. The Research Networks Ready for Space
Weather, Ad. Space Res., 58, 1940–1959,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.013</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>De Nardin et al.(2016c)</label><mixed-citation>
Dinardini, C., Dasso, S., and Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.: Review on space
weather in Latin America. 3. Development of space weather forecasting
centers, Adv. Space Res., 58, 1960–1967, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.011</a>,  2016c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Forbush(1938)</label><mixed-citation>
Forbush, S. E.: On cosmic-ray effects associated with magnetic storms,
Terrestrial Magnetism and Atmospheric Electricity, J. Geophys.
Res., 43, 203–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/TE043i003p00203" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/TE043i003p00203</a>, 1938.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Geomagnetic: TEOLOYUCAN database,   available at:
<a href="http://132.248.6.186/TEOonline.html" target="_blank">http://132.248.6.186/TEOonline.html</a>, last access: 9 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>González et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
González, L. X., Valdés-Galicia, J. F., Sánchez, F.,
Muraki, Y., Sako, T., Watanabe, K., Matsubara, Y., Nagai, Y.,
Shibata, S., Sakai, T., Musalem, O., and Hurtado, A.: Re-evaluation
of the Neutron Emission from the Solar Flare of 2005 September 7, Detected by
the Solar Neutron Telescope at Sierra Negra,   Astrophys. J., 814,
1–7, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/136</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Gonzalez-Esparza et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez-Esparza, A., Carrillo, A., Andrade, E., Perez, R., and
Kurtz, S.: The MEXART interplanetary scintillation array in Mexico,
Geofis. Int., 43, 61–73, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>González-Esparza et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
González-Esparza, J. A., Carrillo, A., Andrade, E., Sierra, P.,
Vazquez, S., Rodríguez, C., Pérez-Enríquez, R.,
Kurtz, S., and Blanco-Cano, X.: Calibration and testing of the MEXART
antenna using solar transits, Adv. Space Res., 38, 1824–1827,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.09.032</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Gonzalez-Esparza et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A., De la Luz, V., Corona-Romero, P., Mejia-Ambriz,
J. C.,
Gonzalez, L. X., Sergeeva, M. A., Romero-Hernandez, E., and
Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.: Mexican Space Weather Service (SCiESMEX), Space
Weather, 15, 3–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001496" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016SW001496</a>,  2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Gonzalez and Cuevas(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.  and Cuevas-Cardona,
Observations of Low Latitude Red Aurora in Mexico During the 1859 Carrington Geomagnetic Storm,
Space Weather, 16,  593–600,  2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Goodman(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Goodman, J. M.: Space Weather and Telecommunications, vol. 782, Springer US,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Gulyaeva et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Gulyaeva, T. L., Arikan, F., Hernandez-Pajares, M., and Stanislawska,
I.: GIM-TEC adaptive ionospheric weather assessment and forecast system,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 102, 329–340,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.06.011</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Hernández-Pajares et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Hernández-Pajares, M., Juan, J. M., Sanz, J., Orus, R.,
Garcia-Rigo, A., Feltens, J., Komjathy, A., Schaer, S. C., and
Krankowski, A.: The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric
information since 1998, J. Geodesy, 83, 263–275,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Hillan et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Hillan, D. S., Cairns, I. H., and Robinson, P. A.: Type II solar radio
bursts:
2. Detailed comparison of theory with observations, J. Geophys.
Res.-Space, 117,   A06105,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA016755</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Huipe-Domratcheva(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Huipe-Domratcheva, E.: Sistema de detección de eventos de radioemisión
solar utilizando el radioespectógrafo CALLISTO y el radiotelescopio MEXART
en el Laboratorio Nacional de Clima Espacial, tesis de licenciatura, Escuela
Nacional de Estudios Superiores Unidad Morelia, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Iwai et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Iwai, K., Tsuchiya, F., Morioka, A., and Misawa, H.: IPRT/AMATERAS:
A
New Metric Spectrum Observation System for Solar Radio Bursts, Sol.
Phys., 277, 447–457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9919-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9919-y</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lanzerotti(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Lanzerotti, L. J.: Space weather effects on communications,
Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 247–268,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7_9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34578-7_9</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Li et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Wang, N., Li, M., Zhou, K., Yuan, Y., and Yuan, H.: Evaluation and
analysis of the global ionospheric TEC map in the frame of international GNSS
services, 60, 3718–3729, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Lockwood(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Lockwood, J. A.: Forbush Decreases in the Cosmic Radiation, Space Sci.
Rev., 12, 658–715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173346</a>, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>López-Montes et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
López-Montes, R., Pérez-Enríquez, R., Araujo-Pradere,
E. A., and López Cruz-Abeyro, J. A.: Fractal and wavelet analysis
evaluation of the mid latitude ionospheric disturbances associated with major
geomagnetic storms, Adv. Space Res., 55, 586–596,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.037</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Mayaud(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
Mayaud, P. N.: Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices,
Washington DC American Geophysical Union Geophysical Monograph Series,
22, 1–154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GM022</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mejia-Ambriz et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Mejia-Ambriz, J. C., Villanueva-Hernandez, P., Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.,
Aguilar-Rodriguez, E., and Jeyakumar, S.: Observations of Interplanetary
Scintillation (IPS) Using the Mexican Array Radio Telescope (MEXART), Sol.
Phys., 265, 309–320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9562-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-010-9562-z</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Mejia-Ambriz et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Mejia-Ambriz, J. C., Jackson, B. V., Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.,
Buffington, A., Tokumaru, M., and Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.:
Remote-Sensing of Solar Wind Speeds from IPS Observations at 140 and 327&thinsp;MHz
Using MEXART and STEL, Sol. Phys., 290, 2539–2552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0694-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-015-0694-z</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Menvielle and Berthelier(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Menvielle, M. and Berthelier, A.: The K-derived planetary indices –
Description and availability, Rev. Geophys., 29, 415–432,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91RG00994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91RG00994</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
MEXART: MEXART database,   available at:
<a href="http://www.rice.unam.mx/mexart" target="_blank">http://www.rice.unam.mx/mexart</a>, last access: 9 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Minter et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Minter, C. F., Robertson, D. S., Spencer, P. S. J., Jacobson, A. R.,
Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Araujo-Pradere, E. A., and Moses, R. W.: A comparison
of Magic and FORTE ionosphere measurements, Radio Sci., 42, RS3026,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003460" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RS003460</a>,  2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Nindos et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Nindos, A., Aurass, H., Klein, K.-L., and Trottet, G.: Radio
Emission
of Flares and Coronal Mass Ejections, invited Review, Sol. Phys., 253,
3–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9258-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9258-9</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>OECD(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
OECD: Mexico, 216, 1–253,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1787/mei-v2016-8-table79-en" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1787/mei-v2016-8-table79-en</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Pérez-Campos X., Espindola, V. H., Perez, J. et al.:   The Mexican National
Seismological Service: An Overview, Seismol. Res. Lett., 89, 318–323,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170186</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Richardson and Cane(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Richardson, I. G. and Cane, H. V.: Galactic Cosmic Ray Intensity
Response
to Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections/Magnetic Clouds in 1995–2009,
Sol. Phys., 270, 609–627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9774-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-011-9774-x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Rodríguez-Martínez et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez-Martínez, M., Pérez-Enríquez, H. R.,
Carrillo-Vargas,
A., López-Montes, R., Araujo-Pradere, E. A., Casillas-Pérez, G. A.,
and Cruz-Abeyro, J. A. L.: Ionospheric Disturbances and Their Impact on IPS
Using MEXART Observations, Sol. Phys., 289, 2677–2695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0496-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0496-8</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Rodríguez-Bouza et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodríguez-Bouza, M., Paparini, C., Otero, X., Herraiz, M.,
Radicella, S. M., Abe, O. E., and Rodríguez-Caderot, G.:
Southern European ionospheric TEC maps based on Kriging technique to monitor
ionosphere behavior, Adv. Space Res., 60, 1606–1616,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.008</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Romero-Hernandez et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Romero-Hernandez, E., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., Rodriguez-Martinez, M., Sergeeva,
M., Aguilar-Rodriguez, E., Mejia-Ambriz, J., and la Luz, V. D.: Study of
ionospheric disturbances over Mexico associated with transient space weather
events, Adv. Space Res., 60, 1–253,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.042</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Sergeeva et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Sergeeva, M., Maltseva, O., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., la Luz, V. D., and
Corona-Romero, P.: Features of TEC behaviour over the low-latitude
North-American region during the period of medium solar activity, Adv.
Space Res., 60, 1838–1849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.06.021</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Sergeeva et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Sergeeva, M., Maltseva, O., Gonzalez-Esparza, J., Mejia-Ambriz, J., la Luz,
V. D., Corona-Romero, P., Gonzalez, L., Gatica-Acevedo, V., Romero-Hernandez,
E., Rodriguez-Martinez, M., and Aguilar-Rodriguez, E.: TEC behavior over the
Mexican region, Ann. Geophys., 60, 1594–1605, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Stenkin et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Stenkin, Y. V., Djappuev, D. D., and Valdés-Galicia, J. F.:
Neutrons
in extensive air showers, Phys. Atom. Nucl., 70, 1088–1099,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778807060117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778807060117</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>SWPC(2015a)</label><mixed-citation>
SWPC: SWPC PRF 2092, Space Weather Highlights 28 September–4 October 2015,
<a href="http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2092.pdf" target="_blank">http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2092.pdf</a>, 2015a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>SWPC(2015b)</label><mixed-citation>
SWPC: SWPC PRF 2077, Space Weather Highlights 15 June–21 June 2015
<a href="http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2077.pdf" target="_blank">http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2077.pdf</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>SWPC(2015c)</label><mixed-citation>
SWPC: SWPC PRF 2078, Space Weather Highlights 22 June–28 June 2015
<a href="http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2078.pdf" target="_blank">http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/weekly/pdf/prf2078.pdf</a>, 2015c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>SWPC(2015d)</label><mixed-citation>
SWPC: D Region Absorption Repors SWX DRAP20 C SWPC 20150622175800 GLOBAL, <a href="https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/drap/data/2015/06/SWX_DRAP20_C_SWPC_20150622.tar.gz" target="_blank">https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/drap/data/2015/06/SWX_DRAP20_C_SWPC_20150622.tar.gz</a>,
2015d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
SSN: Servicio Sismológico Nacional, Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional
Autónoma de México, Mexico, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
TlalocNet: TLALOCNET database,   available at:
<a href="http://tlalocnet.udg.mx" target="_blank">http://tlalocnet.udg.mx</a>, last access: 9 October 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Yasyukevich et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Yasyukevich, Y. V., Mylnikova, A. A., Kunitsyn, V. E., and Padokhin,
A. M.: Influence of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases on the
determination accuracy of the absolute total electron content in the
ionosphere, Geomagn. Aeronomy, 55, 763–769,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321506016X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/S001679321506016X</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Yizengaw et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Yizengaw, E., Doherty, P., and Fuller-Rowell, T.: Is Space Weather Different
Over Africa, and If So, Why? An AGU Chapman Conference Report, Space Weather,
11, 389–391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20063" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/swe.20063</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
