<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-35-1-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Signature of ionospheric irregularities under different geophysical
conditions on SBAS performance in the western African low-latitude
region</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Signature of ionospheric irregularities}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{O.~E.~Abe et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Abe</surname><given-names>Oladipo Emmanuel</given-names></name>
          <email>oabe@ictp.it</email><email>oladipo.abe@fuoye.edu.ng</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0059-8933</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Otero Villamide</surname><given-names>Xurxo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Paparini</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ngaya</surname><given-names>Rodrigue Herbert</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Radicella</surname><given-names>Sandro M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-3715</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nava</surname><given-names>Bruno</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP),
Trieste, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physics, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State,
Nigeria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Oladipo Emmanuel Abe (oabe@ictp.it, oladipo.abe@fuoye.edu.ng)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>35</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Rate of change of TEC (ROT) and its index (ROTI) are considered a
good proxy to characterize the occurrence of ionospheric plasma
irregularities like those observed after sunset at low latitudes. SBASs
(satellite-based augmentation systems) are civil aviation systems that
provide wide-area or regional improvement to single-frequency satellite
navigation using GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) constellations.
Plasma irregularities in the path of the GNSS signal after sunset cause
severe phase fluctuations and loss of locks of the signals in GNSS receiver
at low-latitude regions. ROTI is used in this paper to characterize plasma
density ionospheric irregularities in central–western Africa under nominal
and disturbed conditions and identified some days of irregularity
inhibition. A specific low-latitude algorithm is used to emulate potential
possible SBAS message using real GNSS data in the western African low-latitude
region. The performance of a possible SBAS operation in the region under
different ionospheric conditions is analysed. These conditions include
effects of geomagnetic disturbed periods when SBAS performance appears to be
enhanced due to ionospheric irregularity inhibition. The results of this
paper could contribute to a feasibility assessment of a European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System-based SBAS in
the sub-Saharan African region.</p>
  </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Radio science (space and satellite communication)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ionosphere and its variability have a measurable impact on L-band radio
frequencies in which GNSS and its augmentation system (satellite-based augmentation system – SBAS) belong. Strong
ionospheric gradient and plasma irregularities, regularly observed after
sunset in equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) regions, are a treat to the
accuracy and availability of the SBAS in the regions. Plasma
irregularities in the path of the GNSS signals after sunset could cause
severe amplitude and phase fluctuations, and in some cases loss of locks of
the GNSS signals at the receivers' ends. This potential effect could increase
the dilution of precision, i.e affect user-GNSS geometry, and thereby reduces
the number of GNSS satellites that could monitor the IGP (ionospheric grid
point), and consequentially degrades the SBAS optimum performance. The
ionospheric plasma irregularities manifest themselves in many ways: patches,
bite-outs, equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs), equatorial spread F (ESF),
scintillation, plume, depletions of plasma density (Handerson et al., 2005),
depending on the instrument used – such as radars, ionosondes, airglows, and
satellites probes (rockets, GNSS, and so on). The effect on each instrument
depends on the scale size of the irregularities. Perkins (1975) described
ionospheric irregularities as small-scale structures in the equatorial
ionosphere, which is generally oriented to rapid plasma density fluctuation
across the geomagnetic field. All the frequencies bands in the range of high frequency,
very high frequency, ultra high frequency and low frequency suffer the effect of ionospheric irregularities, and the
intensity of the effect decreases with the increase in frequency. It is
critical in the low-latitude and the equatorial ionization anomaly region and in
high latitudes and not serious in middle latitudes. Many scientists (Chandran and Rastogi, 1972; Fejer and Kelley, 1980;
Fejer et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2002;
Manju et al., 2007; Nava et al. 2015) have associated plasma
irregularities with solar and geomagnetic activities, seasons, and geographic
locations. As an example, the threshold drift velocity for the generation of
strong early night irregularities increases linearly with solar flux (Fejer
et al., 1999). Plasma density irregularities after sunset, and sometimes to
post-midnight, can be responsible for significant disruption to radio
communication and navigation systems (Stoneback and Heelis, 2014).</p>
      <p>Before the successful implementation of the American regional SBAS
known as Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), Japan MTSAT Satellite
Augmentation System (MSAS), European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System
(EGNOS), and Indian GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation (GAGAN) system, a lot
of preliminary ionospheric studies were done in selecting a suitable
ionospheric correction algorithm. The ionospheric correction algorithm of the
first two SBASs (WAAS and EGNOS) is based on a single-shell layer
approach, while the GAGAN ionospheric algorithm uses a multi-shell layer
approach. The reason is that a large percentage of landmass of the Indian
subcontinent falls on the crest of the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA)
region (Sarma et al., 2006, 2009; Venkata Ratnam et al., 2009, 2011).
The multi-shell layer algorithm caters to the effect of the strong ionospheric
vertical drift and strong ionospheric gradients, a common feature of the
crest of EIA (Suryanarayana Rao, 2007).</p>
      <p>Although much research on the occurrences of equatorial ionospheric plasma
irregularities in affecting SBAS performances has been done extensively in
the American and Asian sectors, including the Indian subcontinent (2000; Rama
Rao et al., 2006; Walter et al., 2007; Pandya et al. 2007; Sparks et al.,
2011; Seo et al., 2011; Sunda et al., 2013), a well-defined study on
the occurrences of plasma irregularities and its effect on SBAS performance
in the low-latitude African sector, where the ionosphere is more turbulent
compared to the Indian subcontinent, is still lacking. The reason could be
because to date there is no operational SBAS in the region
and the GNSS ground observations are limited in a way.</p>
      <p>This study presents the analysis of the impact of ionospheric plasma
irregularities on the performance of a possible SBAS in the western African
low-latitude region using experimental data obtained from the region.
Furthermore, a detail study was carried out to investigate the period of
strong occurrences of ionospheric plasma irregularities during two well-known
equinoctial periods and the transition months to equinoctial periods
(February and August) as well as transition periods from equinoctial months (May and
November). The study uses an SBAS simulator containing a specific single-shell-layer ionospheric correction algorithm. In this study, rate of change
of TEC index (ROTI) is use to characterize the occurrence of the ionospheric
plasma irregularities. Details of the SBAS simulator and the ROTI procedures
are expressed in Sect. 2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data source and analysis</title>
      <p>In order to evaluate the effect ionospheric plasma irregularities in the western
African equatorial region on SBAS performance, the 30 s intervals of
ground-based GNSS data from the IGS (International GNSS Services) network and
other publicly available networks (AFREF, NIGNET, SONEL) of the stations over
the region are used. The characteristic months of the equinoctial seasons and
the transition months to equinoctial periods (February and August) and from
equinoctial periods (May and November) of year 2013 as shown in Table 1 are
considered. These periods are known to have a high occurrence of ionospheric
plasma variability in western Africa (Ouattara et al., 2012; Zoundi et al.,
2012; Abe et al., 2013). The spatial distribution of the GNSS ground-based
receiver stations used with respect to the magnetic equator is given in Fig. 1.
ROTI (rate of change of TEC index) is estimated over these stations in order
to measure the intensity of plasma irregularities encountered by the GNSS
signals passing through the region (Eqs. 1 and 2). To avoid multipath and
some errors associated with tropospheric influences, satellites whose elevation
mask angle is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn> 30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered in the ROTI estimate. ROTI
has been established to be a proxy for ionospheric irregularities (Pi et al.,
1997; Jiyun et al., 2006; Basu et al., 1999). Pi et al. (1997) defined ROTI
as a GPS-based index that characterizes the severity of the fluctuations
and detects the presence of ionospheric irregularities and irregular structure of
the TEC spatial gradient. The ionospheric plasma irregularity-inhibited days
are obtained following the Nishioka et al. (2008) proposal. Ionospheric
plasma irregularities are assumed inhibited when the difference between
nighttime (18:00–24:00 LT) ROTI and daytime
(06:00–18:00 LT) ROTI (Eq. 3) is less than or equal to 0.075 TECu min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
0.075 TECu min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is considered the threshold for the occurrences of
ionospheric irregularities being the statistical daytime mean noise of ROTI
obtained over the region. The details of the inhibited days are given in
Table 1, including the geomagnetic activity index characterizing each day.
The inhibited days are categorized into two geomagnetic conditions using Ap
index: geomagnetically quiet and disturbed conditions. Quiet conditions are when
the daily average of Ap <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT, and disturbed conditions are when the
daily average of Ap <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 nT. The critical period in terms of presence
of ionospheric plasma irregularities is equinoctial months (Abdu et al.,
1981; Tsunoda, 1985) and some months that are before or after the
equinoctial months.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Distributions of GNSS receivers over central–western African equatorial
and low-latitude region.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correspondence of ionospheric irregularity inhibition with SBAS
performance in January (left) and April (right) 2013.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>To illustrate the effect of the ionospheric plasma irregularities on SBAS
performance in central–western African equatorial and low-latitude
region, the 30 s interval data rates are interpolated to 1 s intervals, the
SBAS data format, using the Lagrange interpolation method and processed with a
specific algorithm of magicSBAS platform. The Lagrange interpolation is
a polynomials-based interpolation technique that gives non-monotonous
outputs. Details can be obtained in Jeffreys and Jeffreys (1988). magicSBAS is a
state-of-the-art, multi-constellation, operational SBAS test bed developed by
GMV. It implements real wide-area correction algorithms, and the SBAS
augmentation message produced by magicSBAS is compliant with SBAS
international standards such as RTCA/DO-229D and International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Standard And Recommended Practices (SARPs) (Cezón et
al., 2014). It is important to stress that specific version of magicSBAS
algorithm optimizes the SBAS performance in low latitudes. Details of
magicSBAS can be obtained from Cezón et al. (2014). An availability map of operational approach with vertical
guidance and first level of service (APV-I) (one of the outputs
of magicSBAS) is defined as the percentage of epochs
in which the protection level is below alert limits. For this, the APV-I service
horizontal protection level (HPL) is &lt; 40 m and vertical protection
level (VPL) is &lt; 50 m over the total period of the epoch (ICAO, 2001).
Quality of service (QoS), user differential range error indicator (UDREi),
open service geometry availability map for signal in space, and a positional
dilution of precision are considered in evaluating the SBAS performance.
However, more focus was on QoS, which is the combined arithmetic average of
SBAS horizontal and vertical protection levels within the service area, and it
is estimated at every epoch in metres. Moreover, the parameter guarantees the
safety of the SBAS user at any point in time for critical applications. To
follow the aim of the study, mean of nighttime (18–24 h) SBAS QoS is used.</p>
      <p>A statistical analysis was done to understand the level of interrelationship
between plasma irregularities and QoS, as well as to establish the level of
dependency between the plasma irregularities and SBAS in central–western
African equatorial and low-latitude region.

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ROT</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>TEC</mml:mtext><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>TEC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ROTI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mtext>ROT</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ROT</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ROTI</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>diff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ROTI</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ROTI</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <italic>i</italic> is the visible satellite and <italic>k</italic> is the time of
epoch, TEC is the total electron content, ROT is the rate of change of TEC
and ROTI is the change of change of TEC index (5 min standard
deviation of ROT at a sampling interval of 30 s).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Summary ionospheric irregularities and QoS during difference
geomagnetic activities.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.87}[.87]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">DOY 2013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ROTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>diff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">QoS (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ap (nT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Geomagnetic</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(TECu min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">conditions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">47 (16 Feb)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.006</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">60 (1 Mar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">76 (17 Mar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.048</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.99</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">72.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">86 (27 Mar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.029</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">20.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">88 (29 Mar)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">106 (16 Apr)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.046</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">135 (15 May)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.072</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">151 (31 May)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.047</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">222 (10 Aug)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.073</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">227 (15 Aug)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.037</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">14.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">267 (24 Sep)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.065</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">287 (14 Oct)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">18.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">311 (7 Nov)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">313 (9 Nov)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.030</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.49</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">22.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Disturbed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">327 (23 Nov)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.040</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Quiet</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Figure 2 presents the correspondence of ionospheric plasma irregularities (as
measured by ROTI) with SBAS QoS obtained in
central–western African low-latitude and equatorial region for the months of January and
April 2013. The month of January represents December solstitial season, while
April represents March equinoctial season. The figure shows that occurrences
of ionospheric plasma irregularities are very low throughout the month of
January, which translates to good performance in SBAS as expressed by
the value of QoS being less than 10 m throughout the month. However, a
contrary incident was recorded during the month of April; the ionospheric
plasma irregularities are very strong except day 16. The month of April is
an equinoctial month in which the magnetic meridian is closely aligned with
the solar terminator (Abdu et al., 1981; Tsunoda, 1985; Bhattacharya et al.,
2010; Tanna et al., 2013).
Lowering/inhibition of ionospheric plasma irregularities is unique and of
great interest. Therefore the performance of the SBAS simulated over
the central–western African low-latitude region as indicated by the level of
QoS is generally high (well above 10 m) for the whole month except day 16,
where the value of QoS is less than 10 m. It is worth noting that 16 April is
characterized by low (quiet) geomagnetic activities. The consequence of the
plasma inhibition observed on 16 April is illustrated in the upper panel of Fig. 2,
where the SBAS has a QoS value of 7.50 m. More of the effects of the
QoS are shown on the SBAS availability map and other SBAS outputs parameters in
Figs. 4 and 5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Correspondence of ionospheric irregularity inhibition with SBAS
performance in June (left) and October (right) 2013.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 3 illustrates the correspondence of ionospheric plasma irregularities
with the SBAS QoS performance indicator for the months of June (a
characteristic month for June solstice) and October (a characteristic month
of September equinox) 2013. It could be observed from the figure that the
level of ionospheric plasma irregularities during the month of June is very
low compared with October except 14 and 30 October. Days 14 and
30 October show another case of absence/lowering of ionospheric plasma
irregularities like 16 April, which correspond to the low value of SBAS QoS
(performance indicator) obtained in the central–western African low-latitude and
equatorial region during equinoctial season. It worth noting also that these
days in the month of October fall into the period of geomagnetically
disturbed/unsettled conditions with the geomagnetic Ap index of 18.1 and
13.0 nT respectively. The SBAS performance shown through the QoS
for these days is 5.12 and 5.50 m respectively. This indicates the lowest
value of QoS for the month of October and shows a good performance of
SBAS. The QoS values obtained during the lowered/inhibited plasma
irregularities clearly show that suppression/inhibition of plasma
irregularities favours space-based navigation users like SBAS. This
confirms the work of others (e.g Klobuchar et al., 2002; Huang et al., 2002;
Bandyoadhayay et al., 1997; de Paula et al., 2007), who have seen significant
contributions of ionospheric irregularities on navigation and communication
and surveillance systems.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SBAS APV-1 availability map (upper left panel), user differential
range error (UDREi) (upper right panel), open service geometry availability
map for signal in space (lower left panel) and positional dilution of
precision (lower right panel) for 14 October 2013 when irregularities
were inhibited.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>To concretize the effect of plasma irregularities on SBAS performance
in the central–western African low-latitude region, the daily APV-1 availability
map, user differential range error indicator (UDREi), open service
availability map for signal in space, and map of position of dilution of
precision for 14 and 15 October 2013 are presented in Figs. 4 and 5, showing
the level of service availability obtained during the absence and presence of
plasma irregularities respectively. The system level of service on 14 October
for both APV-1 and open service availability reached 99.9 % of the time due
to the absence of plasma irregularities at post-sunset till midnight periods
(ROTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>diff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and QoS are 0.008 TECu min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 5.14 m
respectively) as indicated in Fig. 3. More than 12 satellites monitored were
used 99 % of the time, and their UDREi is relatively low at about 5. Also the
position dilution of precision was very small, ranging from 1.91 to 2.62 m
95 % of the time. However, on 15 October, when plasma irregularities were
present with the average ROTI<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>diff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.372 TECu min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
QoS is 19.19 m. The SBAS service level for both APV-1 (critical
safety application) and open service operation could not exceed 50.0 %
and 20 % availability respectively. Although their UDREi is relatively
low as well (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6), fewer than 10 satellites monitored were used
99 % of the time. This leads to the high value of the position dilution of
precision ranges from 20.58 to 27.58 m 95 % of the time and causes
degradation to the SBAS performance. Having low values of UDREi is not
sufficient to guarantee better SBAS performance. The position dilution
of precision should be relatively low as well in order to have good
performance of the SBAS. The same trend of the service level is
observed in SBAS APV-1 and open service availability maps, UDREi and
position dilution of precision in all the days when the post-sunset plasma
irregularities are inhibited or reduced. The service level reaches 99.9 %
of the time availability in a wider coverage service area. However, during the
presence of ionospheric plasma irregularities, the level of service of APV-1
could not exceed 50.0 % of the time availability in a very small service
area. The inhibition effect is quite visible on the SBAS performance
with low QoS below 10 m. This indicates good performance of the SBAS
during the irregularity-inhibited periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SBAS APV-1 availability map (upper left panel), user differential
range error indicator (UDREi) (upper right panel), open service geometry
availability map for signal in space (lower left panel) and positional
dilution of precision (lower right panel) for 15 October 2013 when
irregularities were not inhibited.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In addition, Fig. 6 and Table 1 present the summary of the plasma
irregularity-inhibited/reduced days for the period of strong occurrences
of plasma ionospheric irregularities during two well-known equinoctial
periods and the transition months to equinoctial periods (February and
August), as well as transition periods from equinoctial months (May and November) of
the year 2013, with their correspondence SBAS QoS over the region considered. It
is clearly seen from the figure that seasons affect plasma ionospheric
inhibition. Out of the 15 cases of plasma irregularity inhibition
considered in this study, 5 cases are observed in March equinoctial season:
4 of them occurred during the disturbed conditions and only 1 case
occurred during quiet conditions. However, during the June solstice, the number of
cases recorded for ionospheric plasma inhibition is four, and all of them
occurred during quiet conditions. In September equinoctial season, two cases
were considered inhibited: one in quiet conditions and the other during the
disturbed conditions. However during December solstice, four cases were observed as
well: three during the quiet conditions and one in disturbed conditions. From the
results, it is quite evident that ionospheric plasma irregularities are
inhibited more in disturbed conditions than in quiet conditions during the
equinoctial seasons. However, in solstitial seasons, ionospheric plasma
irregularities are inhibited more during the quiet conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Summary of ionospheric irregularity-inhibited days with their
correspondence SBAS QoS.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In the same vein, Fig. 7 illustrates the statistical analysis showing the
interrelationship between ionospheric plasma irregularities as indicated by
ROTI and the SBAS performance indicator (QoS) for the months of
February, March, April, May, August, September, October and November of year
2013, the period of the study. The value of correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
79 %) indicates a good interdependent relationship between the ionospheric
plasma irregularities and SBAS performance. Also the coefficient of
determination (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 62.5 %) signifies that 62.5 % of the SBAS
performance degradation during the nighttime could be directly
accounted for by ionospheric plasma irregularities. At the same time, Fig. 8
shows the correlation analysis between the ROTI and QoS for the whole year
(1 January–31 December) of 2013. When combing the period of strong ionospheric
irregularities to the period of low ionospheric irregularities, the value of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the period of strong ionospheric irregularities decreases to
75 %, while the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases to 56.2 %. Including the period of low values
of ROTI, Fig. 8 gives the correlation analysis of the ionospheric plasma irregularities and the SBAS performance indicator
for the year 2013. These results confirm the ionospheric plasma
irregularity occurrence during the post-sunset to post-midnight hours at
the low-latitude and equatorial regions and give an indication that an SBAS
would be severely affected in the region during those periods.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Interrelationship of ionospheric plasma irregularities and SBAS
performance for the months of February, March, April, May, August,
September, October and November of year 2013.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This paper investigates the signature of plasma irregularities on SBAS
performance in the central–western African equatorial and low-latitude region. The
main conclusions of the study are the following. (1) SBAS always
performs better when the ionospheric plasma irregularities are less active: in
solstice seasons, the performance of SBAS could be better during the
geomagnetically quiet conditions compared with disturbed conditions, whereas
in equinoctial seasons, SBAS may perform better during the
geomagnetically disturbed conditions compared with quiet one. (2) Ionospheric
plasma irregularities are reduced or inhibited more in disturbed conditions
than in quiet conditions during equinoctial seasons. Also ionospheric plasma
irregularities are reduced or inhibited more in geomagnetically quiet
conditions than disturbed conditions during solstitial seasons. (3) Plasma
irregularities contribute greatly to the nighttime degradation of the SBAS
performance in the African equatorial and low-latitude regions and
during equinoctial periods; 62.5 % of nighttime degradation could be
associated with ionospheric plasma irregularities over the region. (4) In the
absence of plasma irregularities, the SBAS service level of 99.9 % of
the time availability for both critical safety operation (APV-1) and open
service could be obtained in the western African equatorial and low-latitude
region if proper tuning of the present EGNOS algorithm were considered.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Interrelationship of ionospheric plasma irregularities and SBAS
performance for the whole year (1 January–31 December) 2013.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/35/1/2017/angeo-35-1-2017-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Though the statistics are so limited in a way due to the few days used, more
statistics could establish and affirm the proposition that inhibition is
related to the phenomenon of geomagnetically disturbed conditions. However, the
results obtained seem to provide convincing evidence that the ionospheric
irregularity inhibition is more of disturbed conditions during the
equinoctial seasons. Also the presence of plasma irregularities reduces the
number of satellites in view; this leads to the increase of the positional
dilution of precision and consequentially degrades the optimum performance
of SBAS in low-latitude regions. More work could still be done
using GNSS multi-constellations to access the potential improvement on the
SBAS performance in the region during the presence of ionospheric
plasma irregularities to consolidate the results obtained.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data used for this work are obtained from the publicly available ground-based GNSS stations of
International GNSS Services network (<uri>https://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/network/netindex.html</uri>),
AFREF (<uri>http://www.afrefdata.org</uri>), NIGNET (<uri>www.nignet.net</uri>) and
SONEL (<uri>http://www.sonel.org/-GPS-.html?lang=en</uri>).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to the European Commission for sponsoring the
Training EGNOS-GNSS in Africa (TREGA) project, a project dedicated to
training through research, with this article being one of the outputs. The
authors also thank the editor, associate editor and all the anonymous
reviewers for their objective assessment of the paper and their valuable
suggestions.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{4mm}}?> The topical editor, Kazuo Shiokawa, thanks three anonymous referees for help in evaluating this paper.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdu, M. A., Bittencourt, J. A., and Batista, I. S.: Magnetic declination
control of the equatorial F region dynamo electric field development and
spread F, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11443–11446, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Abe, O. E, Rabiu, A. B., and Adeniyi, J. O.: Variability of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0)E in the
equatorial ionosphere with solar activity, Adv. Space Res., 51, 69–75, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Basu, S., Grove, K. M., Quinn, J. M., and Doherty, P.: A Comparison of TEC
Fluctuation and Scientillation at Ascension Island, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 61, 1219–1226, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharya, S., Purohit, P. K., Tiwari, R., and Gwal, A. K.: Study of GPS
based ionospheric scintillation and its effect on dual frequency receiver, J.
Eng. Sci. Manage. Edu., 1, 55–61, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cezón, A., Cueto, M., Ramírez, E., Ostorlaza, J., Izquierdo, V.,
Pérez, D., and Sardón, E.: GMV, SBAS performance Analysis in
Equatorial Regions, ION-GNSS, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chandran, H. and Rastogi, R. G.: Equatorial spread F over solar cycle, Ann.
Geophys., 28, 709–716, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
de Paula, E. R., Kherani, E. A., Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S., Sobral, J. H.
A., Kantor, I. J., Takahashi, H., de Rezende, L. F. C., Muella, M. T. A. H.,
Rodrigues, F. S., Kinter, P. M., Ledvina, B. M.,Mitchell, C. N., and Groves
K. M.: Characteristics of the ionospheric F-region plasma irregularities over
Brazilian longitudinal sector, Ind. J. Rad. Spa. Phys., 36, 268–277, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Fejer, B. G. and Kelley, M. C.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev. Geophys.,
18, 401–454, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG018i002p00401</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fejer, B. G., Scherliess, L., and de Paula, E. R.: Effects of the vertical
plasma drift velocity on the generation and evolution of equatorial spread F,
J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19859–19869, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Handerson, S. B., Swenson, C. M., Chritensen, A. B., and Paxton, L. J.:
Morphology of the equatorial anomaly and equatorial plasma bubbles using
image subspace analysis of Global Ultraviolet Imager data, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, A11306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011080" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JA011080</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Huang, C. Y., Burke, W. J., Machuzak, J. S., Gentile, L. C., and Sultan, P.
J.: Equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP satellites during a full solar
cycle: toward a global climatology, J. Geophys. Res., 107, A12,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009398" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JA009398</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
ICAO: Procedures for Air Navigation Services: Air Traffic Management, Doc
4444, 14th Edn., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Jiyun, L., Pullen, S., Datta-Baruna, S.,
and Enge, P.: Assessment of Nominal Ionosphere Spatial Decorrelation for
LAAS, IEEE/ION PLANS, 506–514, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Klobuchar, J. A., Doherty, P. H., Bakry El-Arini, M., Lejune, R., Dehel, T.,
de Paula, E. R., and Rodrigues, F. S.: Ionospheric issues for a SBAS in the
equatorial region, IES2002, Alexandria, USA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Lee, C., Liu, J. Y., Reinisch, B. W., Chen, W. S., and Chu, F. D.: The effect
of prereversal drift, the EIA asymmetry, and magnetic activity on the
equatorial spread F during solar maximum, Ann. Geophys., 23, 745–751,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-745-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-745-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Manju, G., Devacia, C. V., and Sridharan, R.: On the seasonal variations of
the threshold height for the occurrence of equatorial spread F during solar
minimum and maximum year, Ann. Geophys., 25, 855–861,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-855-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-25-855-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Nava, B., Rodríguez-Zuluaga, J., Alazo-Cuartas, K., Kashcheyev, A.,
Migoya-Orué, Y., Radicella, S. M., Amory-Mazaudier, C., and Fleury, R.:
Middle and low latitude ionosphere response to 2015 St. Patrick's Day
geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., Special issue on Big Storms,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Nishioka, M. A., Saito, A., and Tsugawa, T.: Occurrence characteristics of
plasma bubbles derived from global ground-based GPS receiver networks, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, A05301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JA012605</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Ouattara, F., Gnabahou, D. A., and Amory-Mazaudier, C.: Seasonal, Diurnal,
and Solar-Cycle Variations of Electron Density at Two West Africa Equatorial
Ionization Anomaly Stations, Int. J. Geophys., 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/640463" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2012/640463</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Pandya, N., Gran, M., and Paredes, E.: WAAS Performance Improvement with a
new Undersampled ionospheric gradient threat model metric, Proceedings of the
2007 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego,
CA, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Perkins, F. W.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev. Geophys., 13, 884 pp., 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Pi, X., Mannucci, A. J., Lindqdwister, U. J., and Ho, C. M.: Monitoring of
Global Ionospheric Irregularities using the worldwide GPS, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 24, 2283–2286, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97GL02273" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97GL02273</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Rama Rao, P. V. S., Gopi, S., Krishna, K., Niranjan, K., and Prasad, D. S. V. V. D.: Study of Spatial and Temporal
Characteristics of L-Band Scintillations over the Indian Low-Latitude Region
and Their Possible Effects on GPS Navigation, Ann. Geophys., 24, 1567–1580,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1567-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-24-1567-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Sarma, A. D., Prasad, N., and Madhu, T.: Investigation of suitability of
grid-based ionospheric models for GAGAN, Electron. Lett., 42, 478–479,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:20063036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1049/el:20063036</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Sarma, A. D., Venkata Ratnam, D., and Krishna Reddy, D.: Modelling low
latitude ionosphere using modified planar fit method for GAGAN, IET Radar
Sonar Navig., 3, 609–619, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0022</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Seo, J., Walter T., and Enge, P.: Availability Impact on GPS Aviation Due to
Strong Ionospheric Scintillation, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 47, 1963–1973,
2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Sparks, L., Blanch, J., and Pandya, N.: Estimating ionospheric delay using
Kriging: 1. Methodology, Radio Sci., 46, RSOD21,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004667" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011RS004667</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Stoneback, R. A. and Heelis, R. A.: Identifying equatorial ionospheric
irregularities using in situ ion drift, Ann. Geophys., 32, 421–429,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-421-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-32-421-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Sunda, S., Vyas, B. M., Satish, S. V., Khekale, P. V., and Parikh, K. S.:
Improvement of position accuracy with GAGAN and the impact of scintillation
on GNSS, Positioning, 4, 282–288, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/pos.2013.44028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4236/pos.2013.44028</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Suryanarayana Rao, K. N.: GAGANThe Indian satellite based navigation system,
Indian J. Radio Sci. Phys., 36, 293–302, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Tanna, H. J., Karia, S. P., and Pathak, K. N.: A study of L band scintillations during the initial phase of rising solar activity
at an Indian low latitude station, Adv. Space Res., 52, 412–421, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Tsunoda, R.: Control of the seasonal and longitudinal occurrence of
equatorial scintillations by the longitudinal gradient in integrated E region
Pedersen conductivity, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 447–456,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA01p00447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA090iA01p00447</ext-link>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Venkata Ratnam, D., Sujatha, C. H., Sarma, A. D., and Ravindran, S.:
Modelling of GAGAN TEC data using spherical harmonic functions, paper
presented at International Conference on Computers and Devices for
Communication, Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., Kolkota, India, 14–16 December,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Venkata Ratnam, D., Sarma, A. D., Satya Srinivas, V., and Sreelatha, P.:
Performance evaluation of selected ionospheric delay models during
geomagnetic storm conditions in low-latitude region, Radio Sci., 46, RS0D08,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010RS004592</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Walter, T., Rajagopal, S., Datter-Barua, S., and Blanch, J.: Protecting
Against Unsampled Ionospheric Threat, Proceeding of Beacon Satellite
Symposium, Trieste, Italy, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zoundi, C., Ouattara, F., Fleury, R., Amory-Mazaudier, C., and Lassudrie
Duchesne, P.: Seasonal TEC Variability in West Africa Equatorial Anomaly
Region. European Journal of Scientific Research, EuroJournals, 77, 309–319,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Signature of ionospheric irregularities under different geophysical conditions on SBAS performance in the western African low-latitude region</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Rate of change of TEC (ROT) and its index (ROTI) are considered a
good proxy to characterize the occurrence of ionospheric plasma
irregularities like those observed after sunset at low latitudes. SBASs
(satellite-based augmentation systems) are civil aviation systems that
provide wide-area or regional improvement to single-frequency satellite
navigation using GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) constellations.
Plasma irregularities in the path of the GNSS signal after sunset cause
severe phase fluctuations and loss of locks of the signals in GNSS receiver
at low-latitude regions. ROTI is used in this paper to characterize plasma
density ionospheric irregularities in central–western Africa under nominal
and disturbed conditions and identified some days of irregularity
inhibition. A specific low-latitude algorithm is used to emulate potential
possible SBAS message using real GNSS data in the western African low-latitude
region. The performance of a possible SBAS operation in the region under
different ionospheric conditions is analysed. These conditions include
effects of geomagnetic disturbed periods when SBAS performance appears to be
enhanced due to ionospheric irregularity inhibition. The results of this
paper could contribute to a feasibility assessment of a European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System-based SBAS in
the sub-Saharan African region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdu, M. A., Bittencourt, J. A., and Batista, I. S.: Magnetic declination
control of the equatorial F region dynamo electric field development and
spread F, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11443–11446, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abe, O. E, Rabiu, A. B., and Adeniyi, J. O.: Variability of <i>f</i>(0)E in the
equatorial ionosphere with solar activity, Adv. Space Res., 51, 69–75, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Basu, S., Grove, K. M., Quinn, J. M., and Doherty, P.: A Comparison of TEC
Fluctuation and Scientillation at Ascension Island, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 61, 1219–1226, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharya, S., Purohit, P. K., Tiwari, R., and Gwal, A. K.: Study of GPS
based ionospheric scintillation and its effect on dual frequency receiver, J.
Eng. Sci. Manage. Edu., 1, 55–61, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Cezón, A., Cueto, M., Ramírez, E., Ostorlaza, J., Izquierdo, V.,
Pérez, D., and Sardón, E.: GMV, SBAS performance Analysis in
Equatorial Regions, ION-GNSS, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Chandran, H. and Rastogi, R. G.: Equatorial spread F over solar cycle, Ann.
Geophys., 28, 709–716, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
de Paula, E. R., Kherani, E. A., Abdu, M. A., Batista, I. S., Sobral, J. H.
A., Kantor, I. J., Takahashi, H., de Rezende, L. F. C., Muella, M. T. A. H.,
Rodrigues, F. S., Kinter, P. M., Ledvina, B. M.,Mitchell, C. N., and Groves
K. M.: Characteristics of the ionospheric F-region plasma irregularities over
Brazilian longitudinal sector, Ind. J. Rad. Spa. Phys., 36, 268–277, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Fejer, B. G. and Kelley, M. C.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev. Geophys.,
18, 401–454, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG018i002p00401" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/RG018i002p00401</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Fejer, B. G., Scherliess, L., and de Paula, E. R.: Effects of the vertical
plasma drift velocity on the generation and evolution of equatorial spread F,
J. Geophys. Res., 104, 19859–19869, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Handerson, S. B., Swenson, C. M., Chritensen, A. B., and Paxton, L. J.:
Morphology of the equatorial anomaly and equatorial plasma bubbles using
image subspace analysis of Global Ultraviolet Imager data, J. Geophys. Res.,
110, A11306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011080" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005JA011080</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, C. Y., Burke, W. J., Machuzak, J. S., Gentile, L. C., and Sultan, P.
J.: Equatorial plasma bubbles observed by DMSP satellites during a full solar
cycle: toward a global climatology, J. Geophys. Res., 107, A12,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009398" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JA009398</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
ICAO: Procedures for Air Navigation Services: Air Traffic Management, Doc
4444, 14th Edn., 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Jiyun, L., Pullen, S., Datta-Baruna, S.,
and Enge, P.: Assessment of Nominal Ionosphere Spatial Decorrelation for
LAAS, IEEE/ION PLANS, 506–514, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Klobuchar, J. A., Doherty, P. H., Bakry El-Arini, M., Lejune, R., Dehel, T.,
de Paula, E. R., and Rodrigues, F. S.: Ionospheric issues for a SBAS in the
equatorial region, IES2002, Alexandria, USA, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, C., Liu, J. Y., Reinisch, B. W., Chen, W. S., and Chu, F. D.: The effect
of prereversal drift, the EIA asymmetry, and magnetic activity on the
equatorial spread F during solar maximum, Ann. Geophys., 23, 745–751,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-745-2005" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-23-745-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Manju, G., Devacia, C. V., and Sridharan, R.: On the seasonal variations of
the threshold height for the occurrence of equatorial spread F during solar
minimum and maximum year, Ann. Geophys., 25, 855–861,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-855-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-25-855-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Nava, B., Rodríguez-Zuluaga, J., Alazo-Cuartas, K., Kashcheyev, A.,
Migoya-Orué, Y., Radicella, S. M., Amory-Mazaudier, C., and Fleury, R.:
Middle and low latitude ionosphere response to 2015 St. Patrick's Day
geomagnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., Special issue on Big Storms,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Nishioka, M. A., Saito, A., and Tsugawa, T.: Occurrence characteristics of
plasma bubbles derived from global ground-based GPS receiver networks, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, A05301, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012605" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JA012605</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Ouattara, F., Gnabahou, D. A., and Amory-Mazaudier, C.: Seasonal, Diurnal,
and Solar-Cycle Variations of Electron Density at Two West Africa Equatorial
Ionization Anomaly Stations, Int. J. Geophys., 1–9, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/640463" target="_blank">doi:10.1155/2012/640463</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Pandya, N., Gran, M., and Paredes, E.: WAAS Performance Improvement with a
new Undersampled ionospheric gradient threat model metric, Proceedings of the
2007 National Technical Meeting of the Institute of Navigation, San Diego,
CA, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Perkins, F. W.: Ionospheric irregularities, Rev. Geophys., 13, 884 pp., 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Pi, X., Mannucci, A. J., Lindqdwister, U. J., and Ho, C. M.: Monitoring of
Global Ionospheric Irregularities using the worldwide GPS, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 24, 2283–2286, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97GL02273" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/97GL02273</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Rama Rao, P. V. S., Gopi, S., Krishna, K., Niranjan, K., and Prasad, D. S. V. V. D.: Study of Spatial and Temporal
Characteristics of L-Band Scintillations over the Indian Low-Latitude Region
and Their Possible Effects on GPS Navigation, Ann. Geophys., 24, 1567–1580,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-24-1567-2006" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-24-1567-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, A. D., Prasad, N., and Madhu, T.: Investigation of suitability of
grid-based ionospheric models for GAGAN, Electron. Lett., 42, 478–479,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:20063036" target="_blank">doi:10.1049/el:20063036</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Sarma, A. D., Venkata Ratnam, D., and Krishna Reddy, D.: Modelling low
latitude ionosphere using modified planar fit method for GAGAN, IET Radar
Sonar Navig., 3, 609–619, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0022" target="_blank">doi:10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0022</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Seo, J., Walter T., and Enge, P.: Availability Impact on GPS Aviation Due to
Strong Ionospheric Scintillation, IEEE T. Aero. Elec. Sys., 47, 1963–1973,
2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Sparks, L., Blanch, J., and Pandya, N.: Estimating ionospheric delay using
Kriging: 1. Methodology, Radio Sci., 46, RSOD21,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011RS004667" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011RS004667</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Stoneback, R. A. and Heelis, R. A.: Identifying equatorial ionospheric
irregularities using in situ ion drift, Ann. Geophys., 32, 421–429,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-32-421-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-32-421-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Sunda, S., Vyas, B. M., Satish, S. V., Khekale, P. V., and Parikh, K. S.:
Improvement of position accuracy with GAGAN and the impact of scintillation
on GNSS, Positioning, 4, 282–288, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/pos.2013.44028" target="_blank">doi:10.4236/pos.2013.44028</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Suryanarayana Rao, K. N.: GAGANThe Indian satellite based navigation system,
Indian J. Radio Sci. Phys., 36, 293–302, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Tanna, H. J., Karia, S. P., and Pathak, K. N.: A study of L band scintillations during the initial phase of rising solar activity
at an Indian low latitude station, Adv. Space Res., 52, 412–421, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Tsunoda, R.: Control of the seasonal and longitudinal occurrence of
equatorial scintillations by the longitudinal gradient in integrated E region
Pedersen conductivity, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 447–456,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA01p00447" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/JA090iA01p00447</a>, 1985.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Venkata Ratnam, D., Sujatha, C. H., Sarma, A. D., and Ravindran, S.:
Modelling of GAGAN TEC data using spherical harmonic functions, paper
presented at International Conference on Computers and Devices for
Communication, Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., Kolkota, India, 14–16 December,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Venkata Ratnam, D., Sarma, A. D., Satya Srinivas, V., and Sreelatha, P.:
Performance evaluation of selected ionospheric delay models during
geomagnetic storm conditions in low-latitude region, Radio Sci., 46, RS0D08,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010RS004592" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010RS004592</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Walter, T., Rajagopal, S., Datter-Barua, S., and Blanch, J.: Protecting
Against Unsampled Ionospheric Threat, Proceeding of Beacon Satellite
Symposium, Trieste, Italy, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Zoundi, C., Ouattara, F., Fleury, R., Amory-Mazaudier, C., and Lassudrie
Duchesne, P.: Seasonal TEC Variability in West Africa Equatorial Anomaly
Region. European Journal of Scientific Research, EuroJournals, 77, 309–319,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
