<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-34-171-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Modeling of ion dynamics in the inner geospace during <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> enhanced magnetospheric activity</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Ion dynamics in the inner geospace during enhanced
magnetospheric activity}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~Tsironis et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tsironis</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          <email>ctsironis@noa.gr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anastasiadis</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff1">
          <name><surname>Katsavrias</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-697X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Daglis</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-3442</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Space Applications and
Remote Sensing, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> National Observatory of Athens, Athens,
Greece</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Physics, National and Kapodistrian University
of Athens, Athens, Greece</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">C. Tsironis (ctsironis@noa.gr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>34</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>171</fpage><lpage>185</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>We investigate the effect of magnetic disturbances on the ring current
buildup and the dynamics of the current systems in the inner geospace by
means of numerical simulations of ion orbits during enhanced magnetospheric
activity. For this purpose, we developed a particle-tracing model that solves
for the ion motion in a dynamic geomagnetic field and an electric field due
to convection, corotation and Faraday induction and which mimics
reconfigurations typical to such events. The kinematic data of the
test particles is used for analyzing the dependence of the system on the
initial conditions, as well as for mapping the different ion species to the
magnetospheric currents. Furthermore, an estimation of Dst is given in terms
of the ensemble-averaged ring and tail currents. The presented model may
serve as a tool in a Sun-to-Earth modeling chain of major solar eruptions,
providing an estimation of the inner geospace response.</p>
  </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Magnetospheric physics (plasma sheet; solar wind–magnetosphere interactions; storms and substorms)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>During each solar cycle, sequences of eruptive flares are followed
by coronal mass ejections and interplanetary shocks, some of which arrive
near Earth. At times when the solar wind enters into Earth's
magnetosphere, these solar eruptions modify the dynamic conditions in
geospace and trigger space weather effects like geomagnetic storms and
magnetospheric substorms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.1"/>. Geomagnetic
storms occur when the energy transfer from the Sun to geospace intensifies,
as a result of the occurrence of magnetic reconnection at the dayside
magnetopause during periods when the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) has
a strong and prolonged southward component <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.2"/>. Magnetospheric
substorms are caused by the variability in the north–south orientation of the
IMF and evolve as energy loading–dissipation cycles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.3"/>. This
kind of activity brings up a configuration change in the magnetosphere,
including the ionosphere, and enhances the ring current and corresponding
current systems flowing on the magnetopause, along the magnetotail and in the
Birkeland regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">see in</named-content></xref>. The associated dynamic
processes evolve in a variety of timescales, from days for geomagnetic storms
and hours for magnetospheric substorms down to minutes, or even seconds, for
local plasma instabilities.</p>
      <p>Solar eruptions are characterized as geoeffective when the magnetospheric
response amounts to large electromagnetic perturbations, with severe
consequences for the performance of ground-based power and communication
networks as well as for spacecraft and weather satellites <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.5"/>. A
major goal in space weather research is to predict the dynamic state of the
geospace from measured solar wind and IMF data, so as to timely distinguish
those events that are harmful. In this respect, the simulation of physical
processes dominating extreme space weather conditions, such as magnetic
reconnection, convective plasma transport and charged particle acceleration,
is required <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.6"/>. For numerous events, magnetospheric activity
can be described by means of a few geomagnetic indices, like Kp and Dst,
which can in principle be derived from solar wind and IMF values. However,
these indices include systematic and/or statistical errors which limit the
capability to establish consistent (causal) correlations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.7"/>.
Therefore, more detailed, large-scale numerical solvers of the coupled solar
wind–magnetosphere system may be employed; such models have advanced with the
increased availability of computer resources.</p>
      <p>There are cases where global fluid and magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations
reproduce the observed changes in the magnetic topology to quite good
accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.8"/>. However, their use has limitations due
to missing physics for the description of non-collisional processes in a
multi-species plasma. Kinetic solvers and test-particle simulations, with a
description of the plasma motions in adjustable physics detail, increase the
reliability at smaller scales by properly addressing effects like thermal
instabilities and anomalous transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.9"/>. The
drawback of microscopic models for global simulations is the large demand on
computer resources; to cope with this, it is customary to separately model
each source playing an important role in the dynamics: the ring current, the
near-Earth tail currents, the radiation belts and the magnetopause. In this
frame, the origin and transport of ring current and radiation belt particles
during storm time, their interaction with the tail current, the escape of
high-energy particles and the dynamic connection with the substorm phases
have been addressed through the analysis of observations and dedicated
numerical simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p>For the description of the ring current dynamics, the plasma current
distributions at the near-Earth region have been modeled in terms of the
bounce-averaged, drift-kinetic equation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="text.11"/> described the particle
drifts in the storm-time field in terms of the initial and boundary particle
distributions, with the coefficients in the kinetic equation calculated from
the Hamiltonian description of motion. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.12"/> modeled the
radially diffusive plasma dynamics in self-consistence with the fields by
coupling the kinetic equation with a 3-D, force-balanced magnetic equilibrium
code and a MHD solver for the convection electric field. In another
self-consistent treatment, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.13"/> employed a collisionless kinetic
code together with a model for the electrostatic potential, taking into
account the current closure with the ionosphere. The specific model has been
coupled to the code of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="author.14"/>, where it serves as the solver for
the electric field.</p>
      <p>The method we adopt in this work is to directly follow the 3-D particle
trajectories under the effect of the electric and magnetic forces during the
dynamic phases of the disturbance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.15"><named-content content-type="pre">see,
for example,</named-content></xref>. An advantage of studying the
individual particle motions is the physics insight gained, as well as the
statistics built from ensembles of particles. In such models, the Lorentz
equation of motion is solved, either in its full form or reduced in terms of
the guiding-center approximation, and the driving forces are (as above) the
dynamic magnetic field coming from the superposition of the Earth's
terrestrial magnet with the fields generated by the magnetospheric current
sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.16"/>, and the electric field due to large-scale
plasma convection and corotation with the Earth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.17"/>. An
important factor, however, is the modeling of the electric field component
induced by the time variation in the magnetic field. The specific field
is involved in the strong acceleration of charged particles which is
observed during geomagnetic disturbances; however, there are a relatively low
number of test-particle-based studies which have been performed in this
direction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">like, for example,</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>It becomes apparent that the modeling of the near-Earth plasma response to
geoeffective solar events is of major importance for the improvement of space
weather prediction. The model requirements are a consistent description of
the geomagnetic and electric fields, the computation of the Sun-driven plasma
dynamics and the assessment of the numerical data for the estimation of
parameters related to space weather, including benchmarks against
ground-based and satellite observations. In this paper, we present results
from the simulation of the electric and magnetic fields and of the energetic
particles in the inner magnetosphere, focusing on the ring current buildup
and decay when disturbances are occurring. The physics of our model for the
forces driving the plasma dynamics are cast in a form suitable for use with 3-D
test-particle codes. Provided that there are suitable simulation data, a statistical evaluation
for the dynamics of the different ion types is performed over the initial
conditions, and an ensemble-averaged estimation of the Dst index stemming
from the ring and tail current populations is given.</p>
      <p>The structure of the paper is as follows: in Sect. 2, the physics model for
the geomagnetic and electric fields is explained, accompanied by field-line
tracing and equipotential contour simulations, and, following that, we
describe the main aspects of the particle-tracing model. In Sect. 3 we
present the numerical results: the different types of ion motion found in the
disturbed magnetosphere, the statistical analysis of the particle dynamics
and the estimation of the Dst index. Finally, in the concluding section,
the merits of this work are summarized, the limitations of our model are
discussed and further studies are proposed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Description of the model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Geomagnetic field</title>
      <p>The magnetic field in geospace is expressed as the sum of two
contributions: the first one is from the Earth's terrestrial field, whereas
the second comes from the external field generated by the electric currents
flowing inside the magnetosphere (including the magnetopause). The Earth's
magnetic field is well approximated as the one of a tilted dipole magnet
with inverse polarity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.19"/>. In geocentric solar magnetospheric
(GSM) Cartesian coordinates, the expression of the dipole field is

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ter</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="" open="{"><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cos</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="." close="}"><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cos</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>6378</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km is the Earth radius, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 000 nT is the value of the
magnetic field on the surface, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
direction vector and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tilt angle. We note here that, since
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ter</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies very slowly (through <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
comparison to the solar activity and its geomagnetic response, it may be
considered time-independent in the context of our computations.</p>
      <p>The second component of the geomagnetic field, denoted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is generated by the electric currents which result from the
interaction of the magnetospheric plasma with the solar wind <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.20"/>.
The most important components are (i) The magnetopause current, which is
controlled by the solar wind's dynamic pressure <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (ii) the
magnetotail currents, which extend from 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to well beyond 100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
(iii) the ring current, flowing around the Earth inside a toroidal band
approximately within [3,9] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The external field's spatial dependence is
defined by the distribution of the current sources, and its time dependence
by the evolution of these sources during quiet time and the events.</p>
      <p>The mainstream of models for the static part of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to the
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="author.21"/> algorithms T89, T96 and TS05 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">see</named-content><named-content content-type="post">and
references therein</named-content></xref>, follows a data-based approach towards
correlation with parameters of geomagnetic activity like <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the IMF
vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the planetary index Kp and the
disturbance storm-time index Dst <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.23"/>. In T89, a
physics-based description of the magnetospheric currents and the
corresponding vector potential was introduced; the T96 model improved T89 in
the description of the magnetopause geometry and the equatorial tail physics,
whereas TS05 upgraded T96 with the inclusion of storm and substorm dynamics.
All models require specific parameter values at input: in T89, Kp and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are to be given; in T96, apart from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
Dst and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas TS05 requires the input
of T96 plus six additional parameters,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, related to the storm-time
effects.</p>
      <p>For the visualization of the magnetic field, one employs the standard
field-line tracing technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.24"/>. In 2-D, the field-line map is
a clear picture only on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> planes, as a result from the existing
symmetries of the magnetosphere's geometry in the GSM system: the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is the line connecting Sun and Earth, whereas the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis may always be
placed on the magnetic dipole axis. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> we show the map of
the total magnetic field on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane defined by the meridian <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as
computed with the T89 model. We present two cases with different values of
the Kp index, one relevant to quiet time (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and one reflecting
storm-time conditions (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for the typical inclination of the Earth's
dipole (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The typical properties of the geomagnetic
field appear in the results; for example, in the second case, where Kp is
larger, the field lines are more dense close to the Equator and towards Earth
due to the rise in the convection intensity.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Geomagnetic field map on the GSM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane, as calculated with the
T89 model, for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in a case where the magnetosphere is
<bold>(a)</bold> quiet (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> disturbed (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>For proper application of the Tsyganenko models, the role of the
differences between the models and the properties of the computed physics,
especially in strongly disturbed cases, has to be investigated. The benchmark
of these models against observations is an issue that has been addressed by a
number of authors. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.25"/> performed a comparison of T89 and T96
with magnetic field data from the Cluster mission, and the results have shown
noticeable deviations only in the outer ring current region on the
nightside and near the cusp. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.26"/> utilized T96 and TS05 in a
geomagnetic backtracing code and benchmarked against AMS-02 data, finding
significant differences near Earth only for storm conditions (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nPa). Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.27"/> performed a detailed statistical
comparison of all established models and, based on the results, the use of
models that include magnetospheric asymmetry is encouraged when Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
regions including the dayside and the dawn–dusk neighborhood.</p>
      <p>A comparison of T89, T96 and TS05 is presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The
reference case involves a strongly perturbed, non-tilted dipole, and the
exact input for each model is given in Table 1. The differences in the
computation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by the different models are quantified in terms of
the relative deviations <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn>05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn>89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Within the limits
set by the differences in the input of T89 with respect to the other
models, the quantitative comparison does not exhibit very large deviations in most of the region of interest (approximately within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
along <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> along <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and always inside the magnetopause
boundary). Noticeable deviations, ranging from 50 % to 150 %, appear
in the outer region on the nightside, near the cusp on the dayside and in the
far-Earth magnetopause, which is in agreement with the benchmarks presented
above. Consequently, the specific choice of field model is not expected to
play a crucial role in the test-particle results.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Input to the Tsyganenko models T89, T96 and TS05 for the benchmark case
computations presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.97}[.97]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kp</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Dst</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, …, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">nT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">nPa</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">nT</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">T89</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">T96</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5,  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TS05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.5,  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">8, 5, 9, 30, 19, 60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Computation of the relative deviation between the computations of
the geomagnetic field, for zero tilt angle in a disturbed magnetosphere
(Kp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and  Dst <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT), using the models <bold>(a)</bold> T89 and T96 and <bold>(b)</bold> T89 and
TS05.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The dynamic part of the magnetic field is determined by the modification of
the geomagnetic parameters in time. With introduction of the vector <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with components the input parameters required for each Tsyganenko
model (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>Kp] for T89), the partial derivative of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over
time is cast in the form

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the functions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be specified analytically, in terms of an
approximation by continuous functions, or directly as a time series of
observations (the derivatives then being computed as discrete-time finite
differences). In principle, the terms <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are not available in analytic form; these could be discretized and
computed by repetitive usage of the numerical field model for the parameter
values of interest, but, in this fashion, the computing cost heavily
increases. In order to simplify the computation, these terms are approximated
by the variation in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the start and stop times of
the event <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and by a normalized profile function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
this frame, the total field is expressed as<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">dip</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hspace{1.5cm}}?><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>In our model, an event starts at time <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, stops at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, during this
interval, it evolves in phases described by the function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined on the basis of
the properties of the magnetic field, as observed in measurements. Here, we
refer to events which have an initial “growth” period where the field
strength is increasing to high values, followed by a (shorter) “relaxation”
phase where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> returns to its previous levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.28"/>. To this
end, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is chosen to be

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In the above, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a product of Heaviside
step functions and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time stamp of the growth phase, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are fitting coefficients. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> we illustrate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a
substorm event with time stamps <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min,
and five fitting parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Electric field</title>
      <p>The electric field is divided into three components
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.29"/>: the first one is due to plasma convection in the
magnetosphere, the second stems from near-Earth plasma corotation, and the
third one is generated by the dynamic variation in the geomagnetic field
during the events. The slow timescale of the convection and corotation
processes in comparison to the overall plasma dynamics allows for their
consideration as electrostatic. A variety of models have been developed for
the calculation of the electrostatic potential <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that generates the
convection–corotation field: (i) the Volland–Stern–Maynard–Chen (VSMC) model
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx43" id="paren.30"/>, based on an empirical dawn–dusk potential
distribution with Kp dependence and magnetopause shielding; (ii) the E5D
model, a transpolar, Kp-driven analytical approximation of the convection
potential <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.31"/>; (iii) the Boyle–Reiff–Hairston (BRH) model,
which describes the convection field with a polar-cap potential function
driven by the solar wind and the IMF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.32"/>; and (iv) the Weimer
(WM) model, which is derived from a combination of low-altitude measurements
of the convection velocities at high latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.33"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the modeling of geomagnetic
events and their different phases for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The effect of the model differences to the computed dynamics in the
transition to stormy conditions is again put under question. In
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.34"/>, against the background of plasma kinetic simulations, the BRH
and VSMC models were compared and the results did not yield measurable
differences, except from regions near the magnetopause and the distant tail.
In the same manner, in the context of MHD plasmapause simulations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.35"/>, the comparisons between the VSMC, E5D and WM models
concluded in a similar picture for the near-Earth convection. An indirect
benchmark of the VSMC and E5D models was performed by using these, together
with the Tsyganenko models, as input to gyro-particle simulations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.36"/>. It was shown that the differences in the magnetic field
do not influence the computation as much as the ones in the electric field,
which was highlighted by significant variations in the particle trajectory
shape and the energy variation during transport. One concludes that the
choice of model should be made according to the performance under conditions
implied by the event under study; for example, VSMC offers a good global
description of transport in the plasma sheet, whereas E5D predicts the
magnetopause position better.</p>
      <p>From the aforementioned tools we choose to employ the VSMC model, which
combines sufficient accuracy in the physics description with simplicity in
the computer implementation

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kp</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kp</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rad h<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is Earth's rotation
frequency;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the magnetopause shielding factor; and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are constant parameters, which are calculated in terms of data
fitting over magnetic field measurements in the inner tail region. On the
right-hand side of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), the leftmost term represents the potential
for the convection field, in which the fraction involving Kp determines the
field intensity, whereas the rightmost term is the potential generating the
corotation field.</p>
      <p>Vector fields coming from a scalar potential are represented in terms of their
equipotential (contour) surfaces. The contour surfaces of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
calculated by solving Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) with respect to the coordinates
on a certain potential level, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> we perform a 2-D visualization of the contour lines on the
equatorial plane (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), for geospace-related parameter values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.045</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kV m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0093</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.159</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in
two cases of solar activity level with different intensity: (a) quiet time
(Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and (b) disturbed (Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The main physics properties of the
convection field are well reproduced by the model, like, for example, the global
increase in the field values as Kp increases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Contours of the convection and corotation electric potential over
the GSM <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plane on the equatorial level (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as calculated with the
VSMC model, for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.045</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kV m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0093</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.159</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(a)</bold> Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The role of the electric field component induced by the dynamic variation in
the magnetic field in properly modeling the solar-driven perturbations is
very important. This is due to the fact that it has a short space/timescale,
which is effective in accelerating ions to very high energies (as observed
during storms and substorms), whereas the convection process forms a
distribution of plasma currents of comparatively low energy. In this context,
the total electric field is expressed in terms of the potentials

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          According to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), the calculation requires knowledge of the
vector potential <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the generating function of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). It
is known, however, that, given arbitrary magnetic field, an analytic solution
for the vector potential is, in most cases, not possible. T89 involves
simplifications in the description of the plasma current sources which allow
the analytic calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the later models are
based on a more complicated formulation, including spherical harmonic
expansion and integrals of special functions, and thus cannot fall in this
category.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Particle tracing</title>
      <p>The test-particle model computes the near-Earth ion dynamics
during the geomagnetic disturbance by following the 3-D trajectories under
the effect of the associated electric and magnetic fields. The particle
trajectory is traced by solving numerically the Lorentz equation including
the gravitational force

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ER</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">^</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
gravitational acceleration (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, its value on Earth's surface)
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the particle mass and electric charge. For electrons it is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.31</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cb, while for an ion
of atomic mass <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ionization rate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1837</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="script">A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The particle motions may also be evaluated in terms of a reduction to the
full model, depending on the validity of the guiding-center (GC)
approximation over the simulated region. The GC trajectory describes the
overall motion well in cases where the electric/magnetic field variations remain
sufficiently small over each revolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.37"/>. This translates to
relations of the Larmor radius <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the rotation frequency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
the spatiotemporal scales of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><?xmltex \hspace{-0.05cm}?><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><?xmltex \hspace{-0.05cm}?><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hspace{-0.05cm}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hspace{-0.05cm}?><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) suggests that the GC approach is invalid when the
field-line curvature is comparable to the Larmor radius, as well as for heavy
ions that exhibit large periods of gyration. If the approximation is
valid, the GC equation is employed in the following form <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.38"/>

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">gc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">E</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="bold">⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">∇</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">v</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">gc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the velocity of the GC (the symbols
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the parallel and perpendicular components) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the particle's magnetic moment, which
here is an adiabatic invariant. In Eq. (9), the terms on the right-hand
side refer to the effect of the electric field, the gravitational force, the
magnetic field gradient and the magnetic curvature on the GC
drift motion.</p>
      <p>The particle-tracing scheme combines the models presented so far: T89 is
employed for the static part of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the function of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) for its time variation, VSMC is used for the electric field
due to convection and the induced part is computed on the guidelines
described near (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), and the particle motion is followed by
solving the Lorentz equation or by adopting the GC model, with the ability to
interplay between the two orbit solvers. The computation is interrupted if the particle leaves far from the inner magnetosphere, either by crashing
onto Earth (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), crossing the magnetopause or reaching a tailward
distance further than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>70</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with different stop codes so that each case is
distinguished.</p>
      <p>The orbits may be traced with the Lorentz equation, with no simplification
adopted at any stage of the computation. The GC model, in the regions where
it is valid according to the conditions (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>), is an efficient
method to provide a simpler trajectory calculation. In such a scheme, in
principle, the GC conditions of validity should be checked at every time step
and, depending on the outcome, the physics model to be applied should be
chosen. However, since this tactic radically decreases the code speed, in
practice the orbit solver is interchanged whenever the radial position of the
particle becomes less that an empirically set limit <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this frame,
an issue which should be investigated is the differences in the orbits with
respect to the computation using the full model, particularly in conditions
of amplified disturbances.</p>
      <p>In the literature, the benchmarking between the different magnetospheric
particle solvers in the presence of intense electric and magnetic fields is
not sufficiently extensive and the results are contradictory. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.39"/> performed a comparison of the GC and the Lorentz solutions
for heavy ions under the effect of a geomagnetic field given by the T89
model, and the results showed acceptable deviations in the particle flux
rates and the drift paths. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.40"/> computed
energetic ion motions using the TS05 and VSMC models for the fields, and
found measurable differences in the occurrence of large ion gyroradii and
pitch angle values close to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In such cases, some of the adiabatic
invariants are broken and the validity of the GC approximation becomes
questionable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Application of the model interchanging technique in test-particle
computations for different values of the threshold radius: <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,  and<bold>(c)</bold> maximum relative error vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In order to clarify this issue, we compute a specific trajectory for several
values of the threshold distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and compare the results in Fig. 
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. We evaluate the orbit with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(full orbit) up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>60</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and for a plain GC simulation we set
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, the position <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and the kinetic energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are plotted vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for several values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. One observes that the deviations between the Lorentz, GC and mixed
computations appear after the event has ended and are measurable for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and less important for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The deviation of the results for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
intermediate values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits an irregular behavior;
indicatively, using <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> one is still close to the full model,
whereas for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the deviation is larger and for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
particle follows a completely different orbit. This picture is verified by
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>c, where the maximum relative error from all orbit
quantities is computed as a function of the threshold radius. Due the
sensitivity of the results on the interchanging procedure, one should be
cautious with the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fm</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; for this, we choose to use only the
Lorentz model in order to provide the most reliable approach.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Numerical results</title>
      <p>In this section, the results from test-particle simulations are
shown and analyzed. The space weather scenario under study involves the
occurrence of a single magnetospheric disturbance. The growth phase of the
event starts at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a quiet magnetosphere, indexed with Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and completes after <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min by reaching a disturbed state with index
Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, the relaxation phase follows immediately and completes
after <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, during which Kp returns to its initial value, i.e.
Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Kp</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The particle starts its flight at the time stamp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which may be before (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or after (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the onset of the
growth phase, interacts with the disturbance until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and continues
moving under the effect of the restored fields until the time stamp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In the disturbed magnetosphere, three primary types of ion trajectories are
met: (i) orbits which become trapped inside the ring current, (ii) orbits
that precipitate into Earth's atmosphere, and (iii) orbits escaping
tailward or by crossing the magnetopause. We have computed these types by
sampling various initial conditions for the ion position and energy, and the
results are shown in GSM coordinates in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>.
In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, we have the planar projections of the orbit of an
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
ion that eventually integrates to the ring current. The motion initiates at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, before the event, with initial radius <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
magnetic local time (MLT) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, latitude <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
pitch angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and kinetic energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV, and is
followed until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 h after the event). In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>, we represent the other types of motion in 3-D space for different
ion species with the same input as before except for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the precipitating
orbit is of an H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV, whereas the escaping orbit
is of an O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Projections of a trapped O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion orbit with initial conditions
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV, moving until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h during a
disturbance with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f06.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion is launched from the plasma sheet, driven
towards Earth by the disturbed electric fields, and finally gets trapped in
the ring current. A careful examination of the numerical data yields that, in
its course to the ring current region, the ion is considerably accelerated
from the energy exchange with the electric field, whereas its pitch angle has
a random behavior before the entrance to the ring current and afterwards
varies periodically. In the case of the H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion that crashes onto Earth,
the orbit of which is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, the particle begins with
a low initial energy and is intensely accelerated, and probably due to the
relation of its pitch angle with the loss cone it ends up on the terrestrial
atmosphere at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min (well before <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with a final energy as large as
in the previous case. Finally, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b, the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion starts
with a relatively high value of energy and escapes from the inner
magnetosphere, along
the meridian at 22:00 MLT, before <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min) with a velocity gain.  The different behavior of the oxygen ions for
different initial energy is an indicator of the sensitivity of the ion
dynamics to the initial conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Three-dimensional plot of ion orbits which conclude outside the inner
magnetosphere, with initial conditions same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> apart
from <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV for H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f07.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Regarding the particle acceleration, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> we examine the
kinetic energy and the pitch angle for the motions in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, the energy of the trapped O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion appears to have a gain of about 1.3 orders of magnitude. The largest part of the
increase occurs during the relaxation phase (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where the magnetic
field exhibits a steep decrease and, consequently, the induced electric field
attains large values and accelerates the ions. Another incidence of energy
gain occurs a little after <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h well inside the ring current region. This
is connected to an intense pitch angle variation, as seen in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is displayed, which is induced by the
structure (i.e. the gradients over time and space) of the local fields at the
specific time. The kinetic energy of the H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion that crashes onto Earth
also appears to have a sizeable gain (almost 2.6 orders of magnitude) at the time of
reaching the atmosphere, after nearly 45 min of flight, whereas the
energy of the escaping O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion appears a gain of nearly 1.6 orders of
magnitude at the time it crosses the magnetopause, close to the end of the
relaxation phase.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Dynamic evolution of the <bold>(a)</bold> kinetic energy for the ion orbits
analyzed in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> and <bold>(b)</bold> pitch angle for the
trapped O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> orbit of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f08.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>For the statistical analysis of the motions, numerical data have been produced
over the trajectories of the ion species relevant to each territory of the
magnetosphere, in loops of different initial conditions for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where, each time, only one or more of these
quantities were varied. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> we present results for the final
kinetic energy and the pitch angle from different simulations with an
ensemble of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ens</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions, where the initial conditions varied
are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the first computation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> took values
in a loop from 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas, in the other case, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ranged from 0.5  to 20 keV, and all the rest of the input quantities were
equal to the values already defined: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The general picture (also
implied from the above results) is that the dependence of the particle
dynamics on the initial conditions is very sensitive, which is imprinted in
the wide regions where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit an irregular,
non-smooth variation over the values at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see especially Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). However, in all cases one identifies consecutive regions where
the ions either get accelerated or remain at low energy.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ens</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particles with initial
conditions, unless otherwise stated, same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>, vs.
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
0.5 keV<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>20 keV.
<bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same scenario as in <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f09.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, there is a spatial region from 14 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to almost
17 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where all injected ions gain significant amounts of energy, as well
as one within 21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where nearly all particles do not appear to have a
net energization. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b the probability of acceleration
appears to be larger for O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions with low energy at the event start
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV) than for initially energetic ions (having, for example,  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> keV). The specific result reveals the role of the plasma sheet as a reservoir
of oxygen ions which, on the course of storms/substorms, get accelerated and
enhance the ring current <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="post">and references therein</named-content></xref>.
Finally, in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, there are regions where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies
rapidly, suggesting rotational behavior, as well as regions where the
variation is slow, denoting motions close to ballistic. Most of the former
ions, as implied by the inbound direction of motion driven by the large
parallel velocities of the specific pitch angles, are candidates of joining
the ring current.</p>
      <p>We also analyze the kinematics of H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions using an ensemble of 1000 particles with varying <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the same input as above.
In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, we plot the final kinetic energy and pitch angle as
a function of the initial values. The overall behavior resembles that
of the (heavier) O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions; notice, for example, the regions of quasiperiodic and
quasiballistic motion in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c, similar to the ones in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c. Nevertheless, the effect of acceleration, as imprinted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a, is found to be much weaker. This is connected to the
difference in charge / mass ratio of the different ion species, and verifies
the known storm-time composition for the energy density of the ring
current, which is dominated by the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions coming from the plasma sheet,
in contrast to the situation in quiet time where H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is the majority
species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">see, for example,</named-content></xref>. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c one observes that
the regions of periodic-like pitch angle behavior are now more narrow, which
is in accordance with the fact that hydrogen ions launched from the plasma
sheet are not effective in assimilating into the ring current region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Final kinetic energy of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ens</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions as a function of
the initial <bold>(a)</bold> radial coordinate, <bold>(b)</bold> kinetic energy, and <bold>(c)</bold> final pitch
angle as a function of initial kinetic energy, for varying initial conditions
and all the remaining quantities same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f10.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Going one step further, we estimate the statistical weight of each one of the
populations formed by distributing the ions launched from the plasma sheet
to the types of orbits described in the above (ring current, near-Earth tail,
precipitating and escaping), and the outcome is shown in Table 2. The
simulations involved two different ensembles of oxygen and hydrogen ions with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ens</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 000 particles each, which were injected from the plasma sheet
with random initial conditions for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] keV and for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
all the other input being the same as above. One should notice that the
conclusions drawn from Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>, on the basis of
single-particle dynamics, are verified. We highlight that, according to the
computations, 46 % of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions of the ensemble are incorporated into the
ring current, in contrast to nearly 4 % of the H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions, whereas a little
more than 20 % in both species occupy the near-tail region; however,
25 % of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> particles and 39 % of the H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ones escape the inner
geospace.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Distribution to the ring current (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), near-tail
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), precipitating (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and escaping (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">esc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> populations of test ions injected from the plasma sheet, with initial
conditions for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] keV and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ion type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ens</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pr</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">esc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4596</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2271</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">673</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2460</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">378</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2414</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3365</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3843</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The magnetic perturbation and the connection of Dst to the ring curren, as
well as the contribution of each current source during the event phases, are
under debate. In many cases, Dst is assumed to be correlated with the ring
current energy from storm maximum well into recovery, on the basis that ring
current ions provide the primary contribution to the storm-time Dst
depression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.43"/>. However, it is suggested that Dst
is also related to other sources, the effect of which may become important
during disturbances. Based on ground measurements, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.44"/> indicate
circumstances where the tail currents dominate the Dst development during
storms. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.45"/> assess the effect of the tail currents on Dst by
introducing a correction to the total current density, in terms of
subtracting the magnetic curl in the tail regions as calculated by T89 and
T96. The tail current was found to be most dominant in the end of the growth
phase, and the accretion to Dst was estimated to scale up to 25 %.</p>
      <p>A straightforward approach to calculate the Dst index from test particles
involves the computation of the electric current densities from the particle
velocities and the derivation of the generated magnetic fields (according to
Ampere's law). However, the increased difficulty in the computation of
surface current densities from particle orbits and the complexity of
calculating the magnetic field from the electric currents, as well as the
requirement of including the real positions of the ground-based sensors,
imply a poor modeling performance. For studies related to the inner
magnetosphere, the connection of Dst with the energy of the ring current
has been described in terms of the Dessler–Parker–Sckopke (DPS) relation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.46"/>. The advantage here is that, at input, the kinetic energy of the local plasma is required, which is a scalar
quantity and simple to deduct from the test-particle results.</p>
      <p>The original DPS relation, which connects the energy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stored in a
specific plasma population of the magnetosphere with the associated magnetic
field perturbation, takes into account only those energetic particles that
gyrate around the magnetic field lines and drift longitudinally due to the
field gradient. In this context, the DPS formalism provides a sufficient
estimation of the perturbations due to the ring current dynamics, as well as
a well-balanced one of the near-Earth tail current contribution. With the
introduction of a correction term for the magnetopause current in the original relation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.47"/>, one obtains a modified equation for the Dst index,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Dst</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated to the magnetopause correction and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
the quiet-time energy level. Equation (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) yields that, in order
to estimate Dst, with the values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a specific event or scenario, one only requires the computation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the ring and tail plasma populations.</p>
      <p>In the simulations, the ring current particles are assumed to be confined
inside a torus with radii <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e. extending
from 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the near-Earth tail region is defined as the
remaining area in the simulation box ranging within [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]
along the Sun–Earth axis and [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] in the other two
directions, with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The energies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
ring and near-tail current particles are described over the average energy of
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> test ions that belong to these currents. This is quantified
by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the plasma density of each ion species in each population and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
volumes of the regions occupied by the plasma populations, accordingly given
by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the
formula for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the (ensemble) average value of the kinetic energy for
the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ions in each current is computed, at each time step, over
the particles contained inside the specific region at that time.</p>
      <p>The results of the Dst computation using the scheme described above are
presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. The event scenario explored is again the one
introduced in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, i.e. a single disturbance that begins at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from a quiet state with  Kp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, reaches its maximum level
Kp<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min and returns to the quiet state until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min.
Two thousand test particles were used for the computation, divided in two different
ensembles: one of 1000 oxygen ions launched from the plasma sheet, and one of
1000 hydrogen ions started in the ring current. The initial conditions for
the MLT and the pitch angle were the same for both species, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the initial radii, latitudes and kinetic
energies were assigned randomly within different ranges for each species: for
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged in [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] keV, while for H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> the corresponding intervals were
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>], [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] keV. The test ions were traced from 8 min before the beginning of the event until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min, and at each time step the
Dst index was computed from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) and associated
relations, where it was assumed that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dyn</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nPa, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT/nPa<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dps</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">rc</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ntl</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>a we plot the dynamic evolution of Dst, and the
contributions from the ring current and the near-Earth tail plasma
distributions to its value are given for comparisons. A qualitative agreement
with the usual evolution of Dst during a substorm is seen: during the
growth phase, Dst decreases continuously, with the most rapid variation
being around the interchange from growth to relaxation phase, and values of
Dst indicating magnetic perturbation persist for some time after the event
termination. Overall, the contribution of the ring current to Dst is larger
than the one coming from the energetic particles in the near-Earth tail
region. The contribution of the tail current is measurable up to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h,
with a maximum near the end of the event growth (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h), and from there
on the Dst is essentially determined only by the ring current; this is in
agreement with the behavior stated in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.48"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.49"/>. The
contribution to Dst by the tail current is found equal to 30 % on the
average. This is a little larger than the reported figure of 25 % in the
literature; however, such deviations are justified considering the adopted
assumptions in these models.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Analysis of Dst based on an ensemble of 2000 test ions, 1000 O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
launched from the plasma sheet and 1000 H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ring current, during
the event introduced in Sect. 2: <bold>(a)</bold> dynamic evolution of Dst and of
its ring/tail current contributions and <bold>(b)</bold> correlation of the maxima of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Dst<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
and Kp, computed by varying only Kp in <bold>(a)</bold>, as compared to formerly
derived results.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/171/2016/angeo-34-171-2016-f11.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A comparison of Kp and Dst during geomagnetic events is necessary for
assessing their differences in response to different storm-time current
systems. In cases where the dynamic pressure and the IMF both refer to
the same category in storm magnitude, the minimum Dst is expected to
decrease as a function of Kp. This has been verified in terms of an
additional computation, where the maximum value of Kp during the event,
attained right at the end of the growth phase, was modified from 1 to 7
(these are the minimum and maximum disturbance levels allowed by the T89
model) and, in each case, the minimum Dst value was recorded.</p>
      <p>The correlation of the maximum values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>Dst<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> and Kp is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>b and, as expected, has an increasing monotony. In the same
figure, our result is compared to the linear regression curves derived from
the statistical evaluation of data from substorm events during 1987–1996
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.50"/> and storms in the period 1996–1999 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.51"/>. The
comparison with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="author.52"/> shows an agreement
only in the range of values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Kp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="author.53"/> only
for Kp <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which correspond to moderate and intense events. The main
sources of disagreement in the other ranges are probably connected to the
difference of the reference values of the geomagnetic disturbance (dynamic
pressure, IMF, plasma density) in the analyzed data with respect to the
input given to the code, as well as to the differences with the corresponding
values in the data set employed by the T89 model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this paper, we employ a collection of models for the electric
and magnetic field in the inner magnetosphere for the investigation of the
dynamic evolution of the ring current and the near-Earth tail ion population
during the occurrence of magnetospheric disturbances. Within this research
framework, we have developed an orbit-solving code which computes the
test-particle motion due to convection, corotation and Faraday induction in
the dynamic magnetic and electric fields of the magnetosphere. We have used
the code to study the ion dynamics, and in particular the dependence of ion
acceleration on the initial conditions. Furthermore, we performed a numerical
estimation of the Dst index based on the test-particle energies. The
results of all computations have been found to be in qualitative agreement with
previous studies on the ring current evolution during magnetospheric
activity.</p>
      <p>The ion motions have been traced by solving the nonrelativistic Lorentz
equation, without adopting simplifications at any stage of the computation.
In practice, one usually shifts to the GC equations when the
particle reaches a distance smaller than a threshold radius, from where on
the GC approximation is empirically assumed to be valid. In
this respect, the choice of retaining the full-orbit description prevents inaccuracies from occurring in cases where some of the adiabatic invariants are broken.
During intense disturbances, such cases have the potential to occur locally in
space/time, and we have verified this situation by finding major deviations
in the computation of a specific trajectory for several values of the
threshold distance.</p>
      <p>The analysis of test-particle orbits reveals fragments of the ion dynamics
during the disturbance. We have identified three main types of ion
orbits: orbits getting trapped around Earth, orbits precipitating in the
Earth's atmosphere, and others escaping from the inner geospace. During the
event, a percentage of oxygen ions launched from the plasma sheet are found
to be accelerated and become trapped in the ring current. However,
hydrogen ions (which are known to populate the ring current during quiet
times), mainly escape from the inner geospace when launched from the plasma
sheet. The largest part of the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> acceleration occurs during the
relaxation phase, where the magnetic field exhibits a steep decrease and,
consequently, the induced electric field attains large values. The addition
of this component to the convection field provides a mechanism for the
observed energization levels of ions which drift towards the ring current
region, contrary to an electric field purely due to plasma convection
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.54"><named-content content-type="pre">a similar result was found in</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Further analysis of the ion motions reveals a sensitive dependence of the
particle dynamics on the initial conditions. We have found regions in
geospace, including the plasma sheet, from where injected oxygen ions get preferentially accelerated, while ions starting from other regions may or
may not appear a net energization depending on the initial energy. For
O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> launched from the plasma sheet, the possibility for acceleration is
found to be larger for ions having low energy at the beginning of the event.
Consequently, the composition of the ring current may be modified by oxygen
ions, the majority of which are initially in specific phase-space regions,
which get accelerated and drift towards Earth. These findings are consistent
with the results of previous studies on the role of substorms on the ring
current dynamics, and have been verified here by an additional simulation.</p>
      <p>For the effect of each current source to the Dst index during the event
phases, we have concluded that one should, in principle, also account for the
dependence of Dst on other effective sources apart from the ring
current energy. Our computation of the Dst, in terms of the
Dessler–Parker–Sckopke relation and test-particle results, indicates a
measurable contribution from the near-Earth tail current of 30 % on the
average, and yields a fair agreement with other estimations indicated in the
literature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %). In the course of the event, the largest
contribution of the tail current occurs during the growth phase, and persists
for some time past its maximum. Thereafter, the effect of the tail currents
gradually fades away, and the value of Dst is driven only by the ring current.
Dst retains small values (related to meaningful disturbances) for long
times after the event termination. A more accurate estimation of Dst may be
achieved with the inclusion of the physics of loss mechanisms (collisions,
cyclotron emission) and wave–particle interactions.</p>
      <p>The present work may serve as the final link in a Sun-to-Earth modeling chain
of major solar eruptions, providing an estimation of the inner geospace
response once the solar burst reaches Earth. In this frame, a comparison of
our results with other available models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.55"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, as
well as with data from observations, may act as further validation. In a relevant work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.56"/>, a benchmark of models was conducted, and the results showed that the computed ring current,
for moderate and intense disturbances, depends on the field models. In our
work, the benchmark of the T89 model has shown few differences within the
simulated region in comparison to the later models, the facilitation of which
may, however, increase the accuracy in the magnetic field. Also, the Kp
 index is used as a parameter to describe the geomagnetic field during the
disturbances, which is partially in contrast to the global character of the
specific index <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="normal.57"><named-content content-type="pre">see, for example,</named-content></xref>. In order to assess our results,
the correlation of Kp and Dst was followed and a connection was found
with previous studies.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors would like to thank   L. Vlahos and  A. Metallinou for the
useful discussions. This research was co-financed by the European Union
(European Social Fund) and Greek national funds through the Operational
Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference
Framework Research Funding Program: Thales. Investing in knowledge society
through the European Social Fund.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{4mm}}?> The
topical editor, C.-P. Escoubet, thanks the two anonymous referees for help in evaluating this paper.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Akasofu(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Akasofu, S.-I.: Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere,
Space Sci. Rev., 28, 121–190, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Arykov and Maltsev(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Arykov, A. A. and Maltsev, Y. P.: Contribution of various sources to the
geomagnetic storm field, Geomag. Aeron., 33, 67–74, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Baker et al.(1996)Baker, Pulkkinen, Angelopoulos, Baumjohann, and
McPherron</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., and
McPherron, R. L.: The neutral line model of substorms: Past results and
present view, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 975–987, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Boschini et al.(2013)Boschini, Consolandi, Della Torre, Gervasi,
Grandi, Haino, La Vacca, Pensotti, Rancoita, Rozza, and Tacconi</label><mixed-citation>Boschini, M. J., Consolandi, C., Della Torre, S., Gervasi, M., Grandi, D.,
Haino, D., La Vacca, G., Pensotti, S., Rancoita, P. G., Rozza, D., and
Tacconi, M.: Geomagnetic backtracing: A comparison of Tsyganenko 1996 and
2005 external field models with  AMS-02 data, in: 33<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
International Cosmic Ray Conference, edited by: Saa, S., Conferences, 2–9 July 2013, T. A. P.,
1148–1151, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boyle et al.(1997)Boyle, Reiff, and Hairston</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, C. B., Reiff, P. H., and Hairston, M. R.: Empirical polar cap
potentials, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 111–125, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Buneman et al.(1992)Buneman, Nishikawa, and Neubert</label><mixed-citation>
Buneman, O., Nishikawa, K.-I., and Neubert, T.: Solar wind-magnetosphere
interaction as simulated by a 3-D, EM particles code, IEEE Trans. Plasma
Sci., 20, 810–830, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chen and Schulz(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, M. W. and Schulz, M.: Ring current formation and decay: A review of
modeling work, Adv. Space Res., 17, 7–16, 1996.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cladis and Francis(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Cladis, J. B. and Francis, W. E.: Ion transport injected by AMPTE magnetotail
releases, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 5497–5504, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Daglis(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Daglis, I. A.: Geospace storm dynamics, in Effects of space weather on
technology infrastructure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
the Netherlands,  27–42, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Daglis et al.(2009)Daglis, Balasis, Ganushkina, Metallinou, Palmroth,
Pirjola, and Tsagouri</label><mixed-citation>
Daglis, I. A., Balasis, G., Ganushkina, N. Y., Metallinou, F.-A., Palmroth, M.,
Pirjola, R., and Tsagouri, I.: Investigating dynamic coupling in geospace
through the combined use of modeling, simulations and data analysis, Act.
Geophys., 57, 141–157, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Delcourt(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Delcourt, D. C.: Particle acceleration by inductive electric fields in the
inner magnetosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 64, 551–559, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Delcourt et al.(1990)Delcourt, Sauvaud, and Pedersen</label><mixed-citation>
Delcourt, D. C., Sauvaud, J. A., and Pedersen, A.: Dynamics of single-particle
orbits during the substorm expansion phase, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 853–865,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Dessler and Parker(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Dessler, A. J. and Parker, E. N.: Hydromagnetic theory of magnetic storms, J.
Geophys. Res., 64, 2239–2259, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Ebihara et al.(2003)Ebihara, Ejiri, and Nilsson</label><mixed-citation>
Ebihara, Y., Ejiri, M., and Nilsson, H.: Single particle simulation on the
storm-time ring current formation and Dst variation, Adv. Space Res., 31,
1051–1058, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Fok et al.(1999)Fok, Moore, and Delcourt</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Moore, T. E., and Delcourt, D. C.: Modeling of inner plasma sheet
and ring current during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 14557–14569,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Fok et al.(2001)Fok, Wolf, Spiro, and Moore</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Wolf, R. A., Spiro, R. W., and Moore, T. E.: Comprehensive
computational model of Earth's ring current, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
8417–8424, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Ganushkina and Pulkkinen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Ganushkina, N. Y. and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Particle tracing in the Earth's
magnetosphere and the ring current formation during storm times, Adv. Space.
Res., 30, 1817–1820, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Ganushkina et al.(2012)Ganushkina, Liemohn, and
Pulkkinen</label><mixed-citation>Ganushkina, N. Yu., Liemohn, M. W., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Storm-time ring
current: model-dependent results, Ann. Geophys., 30, 177–202,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-177-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-30-177-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Greenspan and Hamilton(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Greenspan, M. E. and Hamilton, D. C.: A test of the Dessler-Parker-Sckopke
relation during magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5419–5430, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Honkonen et al.(2013)Honkonen, Rastaetter, Grocott, Pulkkinen,
Palmroth, Raeder, Ridley, and Wiltberger</label><mixed-citation>
Honkonen, I., Rastaetter, L., Grocott, A., Pulkkinen, A., Palmroth, M., Raeder,
J., Ridley, A. J., and Wiltberger, M.: On the performance of global
magnetohydrodynamic models in the Earth's magnetosphere, Sp. Weather, 11,
313–326, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Huttunen et al.(2002)Huttunen, Koskinen, and Schwenn</label><mixed-citation>Huttunen, K. E. J., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Schwenn, R.: Variability of
magnetospheric storms driven by different solar wind perturbations, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, SPM 20–1, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JA900171</ext-link>,  2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Jordanova et al.(2010)Jordanova, Zaharia, and Welling</label><mixed-citation>Jordanova, V. K., Zaharia, S., and Welling, D. T.: Comparative study of ring
current development using empirical, dipolar, and self-consistent magnetic
field simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A00J11, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015671" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JA015671</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Khazanov(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Khazanov, G. V.: Kinetic theory of the inner magnetospheric plasma, Springer,
New York, USA, 429–489, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Khazanov et al.(2004)Khazanov, Liemohn, Newman, Fok, and
Ridley</label><mixed-citation>Khazanov, G. V., Liemohn, M. W., Newman, T. S., Fok, M.-C., and Ridley, A.
J.: Magnetospheric convection electric field dynamics and stormtime particle
energization: case study of the magneticstorm of 4 May 1998, Ann. Geophys.,
22, 497–510, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-497-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-22-497-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Korth et al.(2002)Korth, Friedel, Frutos-Alfaro, Mouikis, and
Zonga</label><mixed-citation>
Korth, A., Friedel, R. H. W., Frutos-Alfaro, F., Mouikis, C. G., and Zonga, Q.:
Ion composition of substorms during storm-time and non-storm-time periods,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 64, 561–566, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Lemon et al.(2004)Lemon, Wolf, Hill, Sazykin, Spiro, Toffoletto,
Birn, and Hesse</label><mixed-citation>Lemon, C., Wolf, R. A., Hill, T. W., Sazykin, S., Spiro, R. W., Toffoletto,
F. R., Birn, J., and Hesse, M.: Magnetic storm ring current injection modeled
with the RCM and a self-consistent magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
L21801, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020914</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>McCollough et al.(2008)McCollough, Gannon, Baker, and
Gehmeyr</label><mixed-citation>McCollough, J. P., Gannon, J. L., Baker, D. N., and Gehmeyr, M.: A statistical
comparison of commonly used external magnetic field models, Sp. Weather, 6,
S10001, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008SW000391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008SW000391</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>McIlwain(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
McIlwain, C. E.: A Kp dependent equatorial electric field model, Adv. Space
Res., 6, 187–197, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Metallinou(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Metallinou, F.-A.: Dynamics of magnetospheric substorms in geospace, Phd
thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 83–100, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Moretto et al.(2006)Moretto, Vennerstroem, Olsen, Rastaetter, and
Raeder</label><mixed-citation>
Moretto, T., Vennerstroem, S., Olsen, N., Rastaetter, S., and Raeder, J.: Using
global magnetospheric models for simulation and interpretation of Swarm
external field measurements, Earth Planets Space, 58, 439–449, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Northrop(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Northrop, T. G.: The guiding centre approximation to charged particle motion,
Ann. Phys,, 15, 79–101, 1961.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>O'Brien and McPherron(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, T. P. and McPherron, R. L.: An empirical phase space analysis of ring
current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay, J. Geophys Res.,
105, 7707–7719, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Parks(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Parks, G. K. (Ed.): Physics of space plasmas: An introduction,
Addison-Wesley,
New York, USA, 261–323, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Pierrard et al.(2008)Pierrard, Khazanov, Cabrera, and
Lemaire</label><mixed-citation>Pierrard, V., Khazanov, G. V., Cabrera, J., and Lemaire, J.: Influence of the
convection electric field models on predicted plasmapause positions during
magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A08212, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012612" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JA012612</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Pulkkinen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Pulkkinen, T. I.: Space weather: Terrestrial perspective, Living Rev. Solar
Phys., 4, 1–60, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Pulkkinen et al.(2005)Pulkkinen, Tsyganenko, Reiner, and
Friedel</label><mixed-citation>
Pulkkinen, T. I., Tsyganenko, N. A., Reiner, H., and Friedel, W., eds.: The
inner magnetosphere: Physics and modeling, American Geophysical Union,
Washington, USA, 1–73, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Rostocker(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Rostoker, G.: Effects of substorms on the stormtime ring current index Dst,
Ann. Geophys., 18, 1390–1398, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1390-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-000-1390-2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Rostoker(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Rostoker, G.: Geomagnetic indices, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 10, 935–950,
1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Russell(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, C. T.: The solar wind interaction with the Earth's magnetosphere, IEEE
Trans. Plasma Sci., 28, 1818–1830, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Schwenn(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwenn, R.: Space weather: The solar perspective, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 3,
1–72, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Sckopke(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
Sckopke, N.: A general relation between the energy of trapped particles and the
disturbance field near the Earth, J. Geophys Res., 71, 3125–3134, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Shibahara and Nose(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Shibahara, K. and Nose, M.: Violation of the guiding center approximation for
energetic ions in the deep inner magnetosphere during magnetic storms, in:
Proceedings of the 2009 AGU Fall Meeting, AGU Conference Series, 14–18 December 2009, pp.
SM11A–1540, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Stern(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Stern, D.: The motion of a proton in the equatorial magnetosphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 80, 595–599, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Tsyganenko(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Tsyganenko, N. A.: Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere:
a review, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1745–1772, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Turner et al.(2000)Turner, Baker, Pulkkinen, and
McPherron</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, N. E., Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., and McPherron, R. L.: Evaluation
of the tail current contribution to Dst, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5431–5440,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Volland(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Volland, H.: A semiempirical model of large-scale magnetospheric electric
fields, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 171–180, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Weimer(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Weimer, D. R.: Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to
calculating Joule heating rates, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A05306, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Woelffle et al.(2011)Woelffle, Boscher, and Dandouras</label><mixed-citation>Woelfflé, A., Boscher, D., and Dandouras, I.: Plasma transport modelling
in the inner magnetosphere: effects of magnetic field, electric field and
exospheric models, Ann. Geophys., 29, 427–442,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-427-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-29-427-2011</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Woodfield et al.(2007)Woodfield, Dunlop, Holme, Davies, and
Hapgood</label><mixed-citation>
Woodfield, E. E., Dunlop, M. W., Holme, R., Davies, J. A., and Hapgood, M. A.:
A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko models, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, A06248, ISSN: 0148-0227,  2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Modeling of ion dynamics in the inner geospace during  enhanced magnetospheric activity</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">We investigate the effect of magnetic disturbances on the ring current
buildup and the dynamics of the current systems in the inner geospace by
means of numerical simulations of ion orbits during enhanced magnetospheric
activity. For this purpose, we developed a particle-tracing model that solves
for the ion motion in a dynamic geomagnetic field and an electric field due
to convection, corotation and Faraday induction and which mimics
reconfigurations typical to such events. The kinematic data of the
test particles is used for analyzing the dependence of the system on the
initial conditions, as well as for mapping the different ion species to the
magnetospheric currents. Furthermore, an estimation of Dst is given in terms
of the ensemble-averaged ring and tail currents. The presented model may
serve as a tool in a Sun-to-Earth modeling chain of major solar eruptions,
providing an estimation of the inner geospace response.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Akasofu(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Akasofu, S.-I.: Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere,
Space Sci. Rev., 28, 121–190, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Arykov and Maltsev(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Arykov, A. A. and Maltsev, Y. P.: Contribution of various sources to the
geomagnetic storm field, Geomag. Aeron., 33, 67–74, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baker et al.(1996)Baker, Pulkkinen, Angelopoulos, Baumjohann, and
McPherron</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., and
McPherron, R. L.: The neutral line model of substorms: Past results and
present view, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 975–987, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Boschini et al.(2013)Boschini, Consolandi, Della Torre, Gervasi,
Grandi, Haino, La Vacca, Pensotti, Rancoita, Rozza, and Tacconi</label><mixed-citation>
Boschini, M. J., Consolandi, C., Della Torre, S., Gervasi, M., Grandi, D.,
Haino, D., La Vacca, G., Pensotti, S., Rancoita, P. G., Rozza, D., and
Tacconi, M.: Geomagnetic backtracing: A comparison of Tsyganenko 1996 and
2005 external field models with  AMS-02 data, in: 33<sup><i>r</i><i>d</i></sup>
International Cosmic Ray Conference, edited by: Saa, S., Conferences, 2–9 July 2013, T. A. P.,
1148–1151, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Boyle et al.(1997)Boyle, Reiff, and Hairston</label><mixed-citation>
Boyle, C. B., Reiff, P. H., and Hairston, M. R.: Empirical polar cap
potentials, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 111–125, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Buneman et al.(1992)Buneman, Nishikawa, and Neubert</label><mixed-citation>
Buneman, O., Nishikawa, K.-I., and Neubert, T.: Solar wind-magnetosphere
interaction as simulated by a 3-D, EM particles code, IEEE Trans. Plasma
Sci., 20, 810–830, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chen and Schulz(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, M. W. and Schulz, M.: Ring current formation and decay: A review of
modeling work, Adv. Space Res., 17, 7–16, 1996.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cladis and Francis(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Cladis, J. B. and Francis, W. E.: Ion transport injected by AMPTE magnetotail
releases, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 5497–5504, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Daglis(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Daglis, I. A.: Geospace storm dynamics, in Effects of space weather on
technology infrastructure, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
the Netherlands,  27–42, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Daglis et al.(2009)Daglis, Balasis, Ganushkina, Metallinou, Palmroth,
Pirjola, and Tsagouri</label><mixed-citation>
Daglis, I. A., Balasis, G., Ganushkina, N. Y., Metallinou, F.-A., Palmroth, M.,
Pirjola, R., and Tsagouri, I.: Investigating dynamic coupling in geospace
through the combined use of modeling, simulations and data analysis, Act.
Geophys., 57, 141–157, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Delcourt(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Delcourt, D. C.: Particle acceleration by inductive electric fields in the
inner magnetosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 64, 551–559, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Delcourt et al.(1990)Delcourt, Sauvaud, and Pedersen</label><mixed-citation>
Delcourt, D. C., Sauvaud, J. A., and Pedersen, A.: Dynamics of single-particle
orbits during the substorm expansion phase, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 853–865,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Dessler and Parker(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Dessler, A. J. and Parker, E. N.: Hydromagnetic theory of magnetic storms, J.
Geophys. Res., 64, 2239–2259, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Ebihara et al.(2003)Ebihara, Ejiri, and Nilsson</label><mixed-citation>
Ebihara, Y., Ejiri, M., and Nilsson, H.: Single particle simulation on the
storm-time ring current formation and Dst variation, Adv. Space Res., 31,
1051–1058, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Fok et al.(1999)Fok, Moore, and Delcourt</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Moore, T. E., and Delcourt, D. C.: Modeling of inner plasma sheet
and ring current during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 14557–14569,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Fok et al.(2001)Fok, Wolf, Spiro, and Moore</label><mixed-citation>
Fok, M.-C., Wolf, R. A., Spiro, R. W., and Moore, T. E.: Comprehensive
computational model of Earth's ring current, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
8417–8424, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ganushkina and Pulkkinen(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Ganushkina, N. Y. and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Particle tracing in the Earth's
magnetosphere and the ring current formation during storm times, Adv. Space.
Res., 30, 1817–1820, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Ganushkina et al.(2012)Ganushkina, Liemohn, and
Pulkkinen</label><mixed-citation>
Ganushkina, N. Yu., Liemohn, M. W., and Pulkkinen, T. I.: Storm-time ring
current: model-dependent results, Ann. Geophys., 30, 177–202,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-177-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-30-177-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Greenspan and Hamilton(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Greenspan, M. E. and Hamilton, D. C.: A test of the Dessler-Parker-Sckopke
relation during magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5419–5430, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Honkonen et al.(2013)Honkonen, Rastaetter, Grocott, Pulkkinen,
Palmroth, Raeder, Ridley, and Wiltberger</label><mixed-citation>
Honkonen, I., Rastaetter, L., Grocott, A., Pulkkinen, A., Palmroth, M., Raeder,
J., Ridley, A. J., and Wiltberger, M.: On the performance of global
magnetohydrodynamic models in the Earth's magnetosphere, Sp. Weather, 11,
313–326, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Huttunen et al.(2002)Huttunen, Koskinen, and Schwenn</label><mixed-citation>
Huttunen, K. E. J., Koskinen, H. E. J., and Schwenn, R.: Variability of
magnetospheric storms driven by different solar wind perturbations, J.
Geophys. Res., 107, SPM 20–1, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900171" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JA900171</a>,  2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Jordanova et al.(2010)Jordanova, Zaharia, and Welling</label><mixed-citation>
Jordanova, V. K., Zaharia, S., and Welling, D. T.: Comparative study of ring
current development using empirical, dipolar, and self-consistent magnetic
field simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A00J11, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015671" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JA015671</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Khazanov(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Khazanov, G. V.: Kinetic theory of the inner magnetospheric plasma, Springer,
New York, USA, 429–489, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Khazanov et al.(2004)Khazanov, Liemohn, Newman, Fok, and
Ridley</label><mixed-citation>
Khazanov, G. V., Liemohn, M. W., Newman, T. S., Fok, M.-C., and Ridley, A.
J.: Magnetospheric convection electric field dynamics and stormtime particle
energization: case study of the magneticstorm of 4 May 1998, Ann. Geophys.,
22, 497–510, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-497-2004" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-22-497-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Korth et al.(2002)Korth, Friedel, Frutos-Alfaro, Mouikis, and
Zonga</label><mixed-citation>
Korth, A., Friedel, R. H. W., Frutos-Alfaro, F., Mouikis, C. G., and Zonga, Q.:
Ion composition of substorms during storm-time and non-storm-time periods,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 64, 561–566, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Lemon et al.(2004)Lemon, Wolf, Hill, Sazykin, Spiro, Toffoletto,
Birn, and Hesse</label><mixed-citation>
Lemon, C., Wolf, R. A., Hill, T. W., Sazykin, S., Spiro, R. W., Toffoletto,
F. R., Birn, J., and Hesse, M.: Magnetic storm ring current injection modeled
with the RCM and a self-consistent magnetic field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31,
L21801, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020914" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL020914</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>McCollough et al.(2008)McCollough, Gannon, Baker, and
Gehmeyr</label><mixed-citation>
McCollough, J. P., Gannon, J. L., Baker, D. N., and Gehmeyr, M.: A statistical
comparison of commonly used external magnetic field models, Sp. Weather, 6,
S10001, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008SW000391" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008SW000391</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>McIlwain(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
McIlwain, C. E.: A Kp dependent equatorial electric field model, Adv. Space
Res., 6, 187–197, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Metallinou(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Metallinou, F.-A.: Dynamics of magnetospheric substorms in geospace, Phd
thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 83–100, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Moretto et al.(2006)Moretto, Vennerstroem, Olsen, Rastaetter, and
Raeder</label><mixed-citation>
Moretto, T., Vennerstroem, S., Olsen, N., Rastaetter, S., and Raeder, J.: Using
global magnetospheric models for simulation and interpretation of Swarm
external field measurements, Earth Planets Space, 58, 439–449, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Northrop(1961)</label><mixed-citation>
Northrop, T. G.: The guiding centre approximation to charged particle motion,
Ann. Phys,, 15, 79–101, 1961.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>O'Brien and McPherron(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Brien, T. P. and McPherron, R. L.: An empirical phase space analysis of ring
current dynamics: Solar wind control of injection and decay, J. Geophys Res.,
105, 7707–7719, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Parks(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Parks, G. K. (Ed.): Physics of space plasmas: An introduction,
Addison-Wesley,
New York, USA, 261–323, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Pierrard et al.(2008)Pierrard, Khazanov, Cabrera, and
Lemaire</label><mixed-citation>
Pierrard, V., Khazanov, G. V., Cabrera, J., and Lemaire, J.: Influence of the
convection electric field models on predicted plasmapause positions during
magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A08212, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012612" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JA012612</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Pulkkinen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Pulkkinen, T. I.: Space weather: Terrestrial perspective, Living Rev. Solar
Phys., 4, 1–60, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Pulkkinen et al.(2005)Pulkkinen, Tsyganenko, Reiner, and
Friedel</label><mixed-citation>
Pulkkinen, T. I., Tsyganenko, N. A., Reiner, H., and Friedel, W., eds.: The
inner magnetosphere: Physics and modeling, American Geophysical Union,
Washington, USA, 1–73, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Rostocker(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Rostoker, G.: Effects of substorms on the stormtime ring current index Dst,
Ann. Geophys., 18, 1390–1398, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00585-000-1390-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00585-000-1390-2</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Rostoker(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Rostoker, G.: Geomagnetic indices, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 10, 935–950,
1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Russell(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, C. T.: The solar wind interaction with the Earth's magnetosphere, IEEE
Trans. Plasma Sci., 28, 1818–1830, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Schwenn(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schwenn, R.: Space weather: The solar perspective, Living Rev. Solar Phys., 3,
1–72, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Sckopke(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
Sckopke, N.: A general relation between the energy of trapped particles and the
disturbance field near the Earth, J. Geophys Res., 71, 3125–3134, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Shibahara and Nose(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Shibahara, K. and Nose, M.: Violation of the guiding center approximation for
energetic ions in the deep inner magnetosphere during magnetic storms, in:
Proceedings of the 2009 AGU Fall Meeting, AGU Conference Series, 14–18 December 2009, pp.
SM11A–1540, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Stern(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Stern, D.: The motion of a proton in the equatorial magnetosphere, J. Geophys.
Res., 80, 595–599, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Tsyganenko(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Tsyganenko, N. A.: Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere:
a review, Ann. Geophys., 31, 1745–1772, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Turner et al.(2000)Turner, Baker, Pulkkinen, and
McPherron</label><mixed-citation>
Turner, N. E., Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., and McPherron, R. L.: Evaluation
of the tail current contribution to Dst, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5431–5440,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Volland(1973)</label><mixed-citation>
Volland, H.: A semiempirical model of large-scale magnetospheric electric
fields, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 171–180, 1973.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Weimer(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Weimer, D. R.: Improved ionospheric electrodynamic models and application to
calculating Joule heating rates, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A05306, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Woelffle et al.(2011)Woelffle, Boscher, and Dandouras</label><mixed-citation>
Woelfflé, A., Boscher, D., and Dandouras, I.: Plasma transport modelling
in the inner magnetosphere: effects of magnetic field, electric field and
exospheric models, Ann. Geophys., 29, 427–442,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-427-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-29-427-2011</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Woodfield et al.(2007)Woodfield, Dunlop, Holme, Davies, and
Hapgood</label><mixed-citation>
Woodfield, E. E., Dunlop, M. W., Holme, R., Davies, J. A., and Hapgood, M. A.:
A comparison of Cluster magnetic data with the Tsyganenko models, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, A06248, ISSN: 0148-0227,  2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
