<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-34-1011-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Plasma fluctuations at the flanks of the Earth's magnetosheath <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> at ion
kinetic scales</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Plasma fluctuations at the flanks of the Earth's magnetosheath at ion
kinetic scales}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Rakhmanova et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rakhmanova</surname><given-names>Liudmila</given-names></name>
          <email>rakhlud@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Riazantseva</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zastenker</surname><given-names>Georgy</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 84/32
Profsoyuznaya Street, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Moscow, 117997, Russian
Federation</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Liudmila Rakhmanova (rakhlud@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>34</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>1011</fpage><lpage>1018</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>September</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>October</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>We present a statistical study of the magnetosheath plasma fluctuation
spectra at a high-frequency range (with frequencies from 0.01 to 10 Hz).
Variations of ion flux value and its direction are considered. The direction
of ion flux is characterized by a polar angle – the deviation of the ion
flux vector from the Sun–Earth line. We consider 290 Fourier's spectra that
can be described by two power laws with a break, i.e., a change of slope. The
ion flux fluctuation spectra are shown to have breaks at higher frequencies
compared to the polar angle spectra. We compare the frequency of the break
with the gyrostructure frequency for a number of cases. We show the polar
angle break frequency to usually be smaller than the gyrostructure frequency.
The dependencies of spectrum parameters such as the slopes and the break
frequency on plasma parameters are also considered.</p>
  </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Interplanetary physics (solar wind plasma) – magnetospheric physics (magnetosheath) – space plasma physics (turbulence)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Space plasma is often in a turbulent state and can serve as a natural
laboratory for turbulence exploration. Nowadays a number of spacecraft
scanning the solar wind (SW) and the Earth's magnetosheath (MSH) provide
large data sets of in situ measurements for the exploration of turbulence in
these two regions. Solar wind turbulence has been studied for the past
several decades. The results of the investigation are summarized in
Alexandrova et al. (2013). Thus, the solar wind turbulence cascade was well
discussed at the MHD scales and around the ion characteristic scales (e.g.,
Markovskii et al., 2008; Riazantseva et al., 2015; Šafránková et
al., 2013a, 2015, 2016) as well as between the ion and electron scales (e.g.,
Chen et al., 2012, 2013a, b; Sahraoui et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The magnetosheath turbulence is less well studied. Unlike the solar wind
turbulence, it evolves between two <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>boundaries – the<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> magnetopause and
the bow shock. The main feature of the magnetosheath is the ion temperature
anisotropy that results from the presence of the boundaries and is also a
source of free energy that leads to wave generation. A variety of wave modes
and instabilities observed in the MSH is described in Lacombe et
Belmont (1995) and Schwartz et al. (1996). Spectra of the magnetic
fluctuations in the MSH in a large frequency range were discussed by a number
of researchers (e.g., Anderson et al., 1994; Czaykowska et al., 2001;
Sahraoui et al., 2006, 2013; Alexandrova, 2008; Alexandrova et al., 2008;
Huang et al., 2014). These spectra exhibit the presence of several scales, as
it was shown for solar wind spectra. As far as we are aware, spectra of
plasma (i.e., ion flux or ion density) fluctuations in the magnetosheath are
described for frequencies as small as 1 Hz (e.g., Shevyrev et al., 2003) for
the lack of direct plasma measurements with better temporal resolution. A
statistical analysis of the ion flux fluctuation spectra together with a
comparison between the solar wind and magnetosheath spectra was discussed in
Riazantseva et al. (2016). The present study continues the study of
Riazantseva et al. (2016). We deal with the enlarged statistics and consider
fluctuations of both ion flux value and its direction. We present a
statistical analysis of spectral properties of the magnetosheath plasma
fluctuations with frequencies up to 10 Hz. We consider a set of the spectrum
indexes and break frequencies and compare them to those obtained previously
for the solar wind plasma fluctuations as well as magnetosheath magnetic
field fluctuations. Also, we compare the frequency of the break to various
plasma and magnetic field parameters in order to uncover the processes that
are responsible for the change in slope.</p>
      <p>Note that ion cyclotron waves and mirror waves are supposed to be dominant in
the MSH at the frequencies explored in the present study (e.g., Alexandrova
et al., 2004; Sahraoui et al., 2003; Anderson et al., 1994). However, the
identification of wave modes requires magnetic field measurements unavailable
on Spektr-R. For this reason, we do not distinguish wave modes affecting the
plasma fluctuation spectra in the present paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Observations</title>
      <p>Our study is based on data of the BMSW (fast solar wind monitor) instrument
(Zastenker et al., 2013; Šafránková et al., 2013b) on board the
Spektr-R spacecraft. Though Spektr-R was designed for astrophysical purposes,
its orbit (apogee <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, perigee <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, duration <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 days) is convenient for monitoring the SW
and MSH parameters. The BMSW instrument located on the solar panel of the
spacecraft is angled nearly directly at the Sun (within 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and
provides continuous measurements of the solar wind plasma parameters. The
instrument is equipped with the DSS probe determining the precise direction
of the Sun. BMSW consists of six Faraday cups: three of them face sunward and
provide the ion flux value measurements with 31 ms resolution and the other
three cups are inclined by 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and used for determination of the flux
direction.</p>
      <p>An example of the BMSW measurements in the MSH is shown in Fig. 1. The
spacecraft location for the analyzed case is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>18</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the GSE coordinate system. Figure 1 demonstrates a typical
ion flux value and polar angle measurements at the MSH flank. The polar angle
– <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> – is defined as the angle between the ion flux vector and the
instrument axis <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BMSW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The angle between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BMSW</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> axis
and the Sun–Earth line (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GSE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> usually varies within the limits
of 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This angle is measured by the DSS probe. Thus, one has to use
a further parameter determined with some errors in order to recalculate the
polar angle to the GSE system. Such recalculation results in additional noise
arising at high frequencies, which we are interested in. For this reason in
the present study, we deal with the polar angle in the BMSW coordinate
system. As we concentrate on the fluctuations of the polar angle and its
fluctuation spectra, such an approach seems to be reasonable.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>An example of the magnetosheath ion flux value (top panel) and polar
angle (bottom panel) measurements by BMSW during period 11:40–12:40 on
13 October 2011.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>A comparison of the ion flux value and polar angle measurements with the help
of the BMSW instrument in the SW was discussed by Zastenker et al. (2015).
The authors showed these two quantities to be non-correlated with each other
in the majority of cases. Both quantities demonstrated rapid variations with
the level of polar angle variations being higher (in a statistical sense)
than the level of the flux value variations. We suppose that the ion flux
value fluctuations represent fluctuations of ion number density (see
Pitňa et al., 2016, for a comparison between the density and ion flux
fluctuation spectra by using BMSW data), whereas the polar angle fluctuations
represent predominantly the plasma bulk velocity variations.</p>
      <p>In the example presented in Fig. 1, the polar angle seems to vary stronger
than the flux value. However, to compare levels of fluctuations themselves,
one should deal with normalized quantities. Before calculation of the
spectra, we normalized data to the mean value for the interval. Examples of
the spectra are presented in Fig. 2. The spectra are calculated at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 min interval (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 000 points). Black and red curves show
the spectra of the normalized ion flux value and polar angle fluctuations,
respectively. One can see the power spectral density (PSD) of both normalized
quantities to be of the same order of magnitude. We emphasize the fact that
instrumental noise for the ion flux value measurements become significant at
frequencies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 Hz and higher (see Šafránková et al.,
2013b). For this reason the frequencies above 10 Hz are not shown in Fig. 2.
Since there are three Faraday cups that take part in the polar angle
determination, the polar angle measurement errors increase. Moreover, the
measurement errors of the inclined cups themselves are higher than those of
the non-inclined cups due to lower values of the incoming flux. For these
reasons the instrumental noise for the polar angle measurements usually
occurs at frequencies lower than that for the flux value. In the case shown
in Fig. 2, a flattening of the spectra of the polar angle fluctuations at
frequencies above 4 Hz (denoted with the vertical dotted line) is due to the
instrumental noise.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Example of normalized ion flux (black curves) and polar angle (red
curves) fluctuation spectra. Vertical dashed lines denote frequencies of the
breaks. The dotted line denotes the frequency of the noise beginning at the
polar angle fluctuations. Straight lines represent linear approximations of
every part of the spectra. The values of the spectral slopes are given next
to each line.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The spectra of the ion flux as well as of the polar angle fluctuations
exhibit two power laws separated with breaks. Below the break (at MHD
scales), the slope of the ion flux fluctuation spectra is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is consistent with Kolmogorov's theory.
The polar angle fluctuation spectra are flatter at MHD scales,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">angle</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At higher frequencies (kinetic scales) the
spectra become steeper: <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> and
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">angle</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?>. The spectral breaks occur at
frequencies 0.69 and 0.33 Hz for the ion flux and polar angle fluctuations,
respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Statistics</title>
      <p>Altogether, we managed to find <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 170 h of BMSW measurements in the MSH
during 2011–2013. Spektr-R traversed the MSH at the flanks. The spacecraft
trajectories are displayed in Fig. 3. Dotted lines refer to an average model
location of the magnetopause and the bow shock. Note that the positions of
the boundaries are different for each crossing due to the different
conditions in the upstream solar wind. For this reason some parts of the
trajectories do not lie in the MSH according to Fig. 3. However, every
crossing was verified manually with the help of plasma parameter measurements
and energetic spectrograms to ensure that the spacecraft does locate in the
MSH. Our statistics cover a broad range of plasma conditions: plasma density
values cover a range from 3 to 70 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a mean value of
22 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and bulk velocity ranges from 230 to 500 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a
mean value of 330 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. High values of the bulk velocity (up to
500 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are quite rare and can be caused by the spacecraft
location at the MSH flank and near the magnetotail.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Spektr-R positions during the analyzed intervals. Dotted lines
denote the average location of the magnetopause (MP) and the bow shock (BS).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>For further study, we use <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 min intervals (32 768 data points)
overlapped by half of their duration. This criterion was chosen to enable a
reliable determination of spectral slopes together with nearly constant
plasma parameters within the intervals. The whole statistical set includes
1227 intervals. We eliminate the intervals with the average polar angle value
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the increasing errors of the
parameter calculations (see Gagua et al., 2009, for a detailed description of
the method for the flux and polar angle determination). This procedure
reduces our statistical set to 671 intervals. We calculate Fourier spectra of
the ion flux value and polar angle fluctuations in the range of 0.02–16 Hz
for the whole statistical set. Due to the difference in the frequency of the
noise appearance, the approximation procedure is limited by 10 Hz for the
ion flux value fluctuation spectra and by 4 Hz for the polar angle spectra.
We observe spectra of various types: with two power laws, similar to those
shown in Fig. 2 and by Riazantseva et al. (2016), with a flattening in a
break vicinity, like those shown by Chen et al. (2013b) and
Šafránková et al. (2013a, 2015), and with peaks in a vicinity of
the break, similar to those shown by Alexandrova et al. (2006) and
Alexandrova (2008). In this paper, we focus on the spectra with two clear
power laws divided with the break at ion scales amounting to 43 % of
cases, i.e., 290 spectra.</p>
      <p>We compare PSD for both quantities in the MSH. We calculate PSD on two
scales: 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 and 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.001 Hz, to estimate a level of the
high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) fluctuations. The two ranges are
generally associated with kinetic and MHD scales, respectively (statistics of
the break frequency values are discussed further in the text). The PSD
histograms together with corresponding Gauss distributions for both
quantities at both scales are presented in Fig. 4. The distributions show
that (i) at kinetic scales both flux value and polar angle fluctuation levels
are by 4–5 orders of magnitude lower than at MHD scales and (ii) power
density of the ion flux value fluctuations is slightly higher than that of
the polar angle fluctuations though the difference lies within the standard
deviations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Histograms of PSD values for high-frequency (HF, top panel) and
low-frequency (LF, bottom panel) fluctuations of ion flux value (black columns)
and polar angle (grey columns) in the MSH. Gauss fits and their parameters
for each distribution are shown.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Histograms of the slopes <bold>(a)</bold> below the break and
<bold>(b)</bold> above the break for the ion flux value (black) and polar angle
(grey) fluctuation spectra in the MSH. Frequency of the break for the ion
flux value and polar angle spectra <bold>(c)</bold> in the MSH and
<bold>(e)</bold> in the SW. Histograms of the ratio between the break frequency
of the flux value and polar angle fluctuation spectra <bold>(d)</bold> in the MSH
and  <bold>(f)</bold> in the SW. Corresponding Gauss distributions together with
their parameters (mean values and standard deviations) are shown for every
histogram.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Figure 5a–d show the spectral indexes for all intervals. The slope values
below (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>1) and above (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>2) the spectral break are shown in panels a and b,
respectively; the break frequency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in panel c.
Black histograms (hereinafter) refer to the spectra of the ion flux value
fluctuations and grey histograms to the spectra of the polar angle
fluctuations. The Gaussian fits of the distributions together with their
parameters (mean values and standard deviations) are also shown in each
panel. For both quantities the slopes below the spectral break cover a range
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2] with mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2, respectively. This result is similar to the result of
Riazantseva et al. (2016) for the ion flux fluctuation spectra in the MSH.
Taking into account standard deviations, these values correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
predicted by Kolmogorov's theory. This result is also consistent with
Alexandrova et al. (2008), who reported the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the spectral
slope of the magnetic field fluctuations in the flank MSH below the break.</p>
      <p>For the ion flux value, the slopes above the spectral break also show a broad
distribution peaked at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3, as shown by Riazantseva et
al. (2016) for the ion flux fluctuation spectra in the MSH. This value is
consistent with the results of the statistical study of the MSH magnetic
spectra by Huang et al. (2014) and the results of a number of case studies by
Alexandrova el al. (2008). However, the polar angle spectra are usually
slightly steeper in the dissipation range with the slopes ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.2
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 with a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6. All the distributions are
nearly Gaussian.</p>
      <p>The spectral break of the ion flux fluctuations ranges from 0.08 to 3.8.
However, the number of spectra with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; 1.8 Hz
is small, &lt; 5 %. The distribution may be described by two
Gaussian fits with
&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 Hz
and
&lt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">_</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &gt; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 Hz.
The two-peak approximation was chosen since the same distribution in the SW
exhibits two clear peaks (discussed further in this section). In the SW, the
break frequency of the ion flux fluctuation spectra is significantly higher
– 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 (Riazantseva et al., 2016). For the polar angle
fluctuations the distribution of the break frequencies is more confined –
from 0.07 to 1.04 Hz – and can be described with a Gauss peak with a mean
value of 0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 Hz.</p>
      <p>To make sure that the difference between the break frequencies of different
parameters takes place, we present the distribution of the frequency ratio –
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">flux</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">angle</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> –
calculated for each spectrum (shown in Fig. 5d). One can see that usually the
spectral break of the ion flux value fluctuations in the MSH occurs at
frequencies 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 times higher than the break of the polar angle
fluctuation spectra. Thus, in the MSH the fluctuation spectra of the ion flux
value and polar angle exhibit significant differences that are statistically
verified.</p>
      <p>The slopes of the ion flux fluctuation spectra were shown to be nearly the
same in the SW and MSH in both frequency ranges under study (Riazantseva et
al., 2016). Figure 5 demonstrates that the slopes of the ion flux value and
polar angle fluctuation spectra in the MSH are roughly equal. Thus, one can
suppose the ion flux value and polar angle spectral slopes to also be roughly
equal in the SW. This hypothesis was verified. The mean values of the polar
angle spectral slopes are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.0</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the frequency range below and above the break, respectively. Taking
into account standard deviations, these values are consistent with the values
of the slopes of the ion flux fluctuation spectra in the SW (shown by
Riazantseva et al. (2016) to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn> 0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and with the values of the slopes of the polar angle fluctuation
spectra in the MSH (presented above).</p>
      <p>Since we have observed the difference in the break frequencies of the flux
value and polar angle fluctuations in the MSH, a comparison between these
quantities in the SW is required. Figure 5e presents histograms of the break
frequencies of the flux value and polar angle fluctuation spectra in the SW.
Figure 5f represents the distribution of the frequency ratio calculated for
each spectra in the SW. The distribution of the break frequencies of the ion
flux fluctuation spectra show a clear two-peak structure with peaks at
0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7. In the MSH the break frequencies are
smaller and the two peaks are not as clearly observable. This structure of
the distribution indicates the presence of two different types of spectra
with the break frequencies differing by 2–2.5 times. This difference may be
due to different dissipation mechanisms. However, this issue is not within
the scope of the present paper and worth further study in the future. The
polar angle fluctuation spectra in the SW have breaks at frequencies from
0.08 to 1.95 with a mean value of 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Hz. Panel f in Fig. 5
indicates that in the SW the flux value fluctuation spectra have the breaks
at frequencies 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 times higher than the polar angle fluctuation
spectra. Šafránková et al. (2013) have estimated the values of
the spectral indexes for the SW ion density and bulk velocity fluctuations.
The values reported are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz for density and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Hz for velocity, where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the slopes below the break, above
the break and the break frequency, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the
density and velocity spectra, respectively. The values of the spectral
indexes obtained by Šafránková et al. (2013) for the density and
velocity fluctuations are consistent with those for the flux value reported
by Riazantseva et al. (2016) and for the polar angle presented in this study,
respectively. Moreover, Šafránková et al. (2016) showed the break
frequency of the SW density fluctuation spectra to always be higher than
those of the bulk velocity fluctuation spectra. That is the case for the ion
flux and polar angle fluctuation spectra. This fact confirms our suggestion
that the flux value fluctuations represent the fluctuations of density
whereas the polar angle fluctuations represent the variations of bulk
velocity.</p>
      <p>Thus, the spectra of the ion flux value fluctuations usually have the break
at frequencies 2–2.5 times higher than those of the polar angle fluctuations
in the MSH as well as in the SW. Ion flux fluctuations seem to have spectra
of two types with the break frequencies differing by a factor of 2–2.5 in
both regions.</p>
      <p>To find out if there are some factors influencing the spectral indexes we
calculate a correlation coefficient between the spectral indexes and plasma
parameters – density, bulk velocity and the inertial length frequency. The
latter was chosen following Šafránková et al. (2015). The
inertial length frequency is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being the proton
plasma frequency and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being bulk velocity. Significant
correlation – <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – occurs only between the break frequency of the
polar angle fluctuation spectra and the inertial length frequency. Figure 6
demonstrates the corresponding dependence. Since there is a large spread of
data points, we do not fit them with a curve. Instead, we present median
values calculated in five equidistant ranges of the inertial length
frequency.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Break frequency of the polar angle spectra as a function of the
inertial length frequency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Solid black steps refer to mean
values for five ranges of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dashed grey steps represent
standard deviation from the means.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Break frequency of the plasma fluctuations as a function of
gyrostructure frequency</title>
      <p>Another characteristic scale supposedly related to the break between MHD and
kinetic scales is the thermal gyroradius, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Galtier,
2006; Schekochihin et al., 2009; Šafránková et al., 2015).
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">th</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ion thermal speed. To find out if the scaling of
plasma fluctuations is related to the thermal gyroradius, we compare the
break frequencies of the plasma fluctuation spectra with the gyrostructure
frequency, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">bulk</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since magnetic field measurements are not available on
Spektr-R, we have to use magnetic field data from other spacecraft to
calculate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We managed to find one interval when Themis-B
(Angelopoulos, 2008) measurements in the MSH were available and Spektr-R and
Themis-B's mutual location fit to data tracing. Themis-B plasma measurements
by the ESA instrument (McFadden et al., 2008) and magnetic field measurements
by the FGM instrument (Auster et al., 2008) were taken from
<uri>http://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>. The interval is 23:50–06:55 UTC on
30 November–1 December 2012. Spektr-R is located at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>14</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the GSE system, Themis-B is located downstream from
Spektr-R at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>59</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ion flux measurements
from both spacecraft are presented in Fig. 7.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Ion flux measured by Spektr-R (black line) and by Themis-B (red
line) on 1 December 2012. Themis-B data are shifted back by 12.5 min to
match Spektr-R data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Themis-B data are shifted by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.5 min that corresponds to the plasma
propagation time. The correlation coefficient between two time series is
0.76.</p>
      <p>We calculate the frequency spectra with a 1 min step for this case. Figure 8
presents the break frequencies for the ion flux value (black triangles) and
for the polar angle (red dots) fluctuations vs. the gyrostructure frequency.
Šafránková et al. (2015) reported the high correlation between
the break frequency of the ion density fluctuation spectra and the
gyrostructure frequency. Šafránková et al. (2016) showed that the
break frequency of the density as well as the bulk velocity fluctuations is
always lower than the gyrostructure frequency. According to Fig. 8 the break
frequency of the ion flux fluctuations does not exhibit any dependence on the
gyrostructure frequency, though these frequencies are of the same order of
magnitude. The polar angle fluctuation spectra have the break at frequencies
lower than the gyrostructure frequency. Similar dependence was shown for the
bulk velocity spectra.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>The break frequencies of the ion flux (black triangles) and polar
angle (red dots) fluctuation spectra vs. the gyrostructure frequency
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dashed line denotes <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">break</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/1011/2016/angeo-34-1011-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We have presented a statistical study of the frequency spectral indexes for
the ion flux value and polar angle high-frequency fluctuations in the Earth's
magnetosheath. Our results can be summarized as follows:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Below the break, the spectral slopes of both quantities' fluctuations
correspond to those predicted by Kolmogorov's theory, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result is
consistent with previous studies performed for the MSH magnetic field
fluctuations (e.g., Alexandrova et al., 2008).</p></list-item><list-item><p>Above the break the ion flux value fluctuation spectra have slopes of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3. This result is consistent with the results of Huang et
al. (2014) and Alexandrova et al. (2008) obtained for the MSH magnetic field.
The polar angle fluctuation spectra in this range are usually steeper than
those of the ion flux value with a slope of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6.</p></list-item><list-item><p>For both frequency ranges and for both quantities, the values of the
spectral slopes in the MSH match the values of those in the SW (taking into
account standard deviations).</p></list-item><list-item><p>Spectra of the plasma fluctuations in the MSH have breaks at smaller
frequencies compared to those in the SW. In the MSH, the spectra of the ion
flux value fluctuations exhibit two different groups with break frequencies
of 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.17 and 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 Hz. In the SW there are also two
different types of ion flux fluctuation spectra: with the break at
0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 Hz. The presence of the ion flux
fluctuation spectra of two different types may be caused by different
processes forming the dissipation range. However, this topic should be
studied more accurately.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The polar angle fluctuation spectra have the break at frequencies 2–2.5
times smaller than the ion flux value fluctuation spectra: at frequencies
0.36 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 Hz in the MSH and at frequencies 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 Hz in
the SW.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The correlation between the spectral indexes and ambient plasma parameters
seems to be small. The only significant dependence (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) occurs for the
break frequency of the polar angle fluctuations vs. the inertial length
frequency. We did not find any dependence of other spectral indexes on plasma
parameters. Šafránková et al. (2015) have reported high
correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the break frequency of the SW density
fluctuation spectra and the gyrostructure frequency. The case study shown in
the present paper does not reveal any relation between the break frequency of
the MSH flux value fluctuation spectra and the gyrostructure frequency. The
polar angle fluctuation spectra have the break at frequencies lower than the
gyrostructure frequency. The latter result is consistent with the results of
Šafránková et al. (2016) obtained for the bulk velocity spectra.
This consistence shows the close relation between the polar angle and bulk
velocity fluctuations.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data set is available on request from the Plasma-F team, at the Experiment BMSW web page:
<uri>http://aurora.troja.mff.cuni.cz/spektr-r/project/</uri> and at the Plasma-F web
page: <uri>http://plasma-f.cosmos.ru/</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project
nos. 16-32-00818, 16-02-00669 and  16-02-00125, and by program no. 7 of
Fundamental Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{4mm}}?> The topical editor, C. Owen, thanks the two anonymous
referees for help in evaluating this paper.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexandrova, O.: Solar wind vs magnetosheath turbulence and Alfvén
vortices, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 95–108,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-95-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/npg-15-95-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Alexandrova, O., Mangeney, A., Maksimovic, M., Lacombe, C.,
Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Lucek, E. A., Décréau, P. M. E., Bosqued,
J.-M., Travnicek, P., and Fazakerley, A. N.: Cluster observations of finite
amplitude Alfvén waves and small-scale magnetic filaments downstream of a
quasi-perpendicular shock, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A05207,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA010056</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Alexandrova, O., Mangeney, A., Maksimovic, M., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N.,
Bosqued, J.-M., and André, M.: Alfvén vortex filaments observed in
magnetosheath downstream of a quasi-perpendicular bow shock, J. Geophys.
Res., 111, A12208, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JA011934</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Alexandrova, O., Lacombe, C., and Mangeney, A.: Spectra and anisotropy of
magnetic fluctuations in the Earth's magnetosheath: Cluster observations,
Ann. Geophys., 26, 3585–3596, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-3585-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-26-3585-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Alexandrova, O., Chen, C. H. K., Sorriso-Valvo, L., Horbury, T. S., and Bale,
S. D.: Solar Wind Turbulence and the Role of Ion Instabilities, Space Sci.
Rev., 178, 101–139, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0004-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-013-0004-8</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, J., Fuselier, S., Gary, S., and Denton, R.: Magnetic spectral
signatures in the Earth's magnetosheath and plasma depletion layer,
J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5877–5891, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W.,
Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P.,
Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka,
K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and
Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS fluxgate magnetometer, Space Sci. Rev., 141,
235–264, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C. H. K., Salem, C. S., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., and Bale, S. D.:
Density Fluctuation Spectrum of Solar Wind Turbulence between Ion and
Electron Scales, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 035001,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035001</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C. H. K., Boldyrev, S., Xia, Q., and Perez, J. C.: Nature of Subproton
Scale Turbulence in the Solar Wind, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 225002,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.225002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.225002</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chen, C. H. K., Howes, G. G., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Klein, K. G., and
Bale, S. D.: Kinetic Scale Density Fluctuations in the Solar Wind, AIP Conf.
Proc., 1539, 143–146, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4811008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4811008</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Czaykowska, A., Bauer, T. M., Treumann, R. A., and Baumjohann, W.: Magnetic
field fluctuations across the Earth's bow shock, Ann. Geophys., 19, 275–287,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-275-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-19-275-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Galtier, S.: Wave turbulence in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamics, J.
Plasma Phys., 72, 721, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022377806004521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0022377806004521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gagua, I. T., Gagua, T. I., and Zastenker, G. N.: Determination of a solar
wind ion flux value and direction using a set of integral Faraday cups for
the fast monitor of solar wind, in: WDS'09 Proceedings of Contributed Papers,
Part II: Physics of Plasmas and Ionized Media, 2–5 June 2009, Prague, Czech
Republic, 22–29, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Huang, S. Y., Sahraoui, F., Deng, X. H., He, J. S., Yuan, Z. G., Zhou, M.,
Pang, Y., and Fu, H. S.: Kinetic turbulence in the terrestrial magnetosheath:
Cluster observations, Astrophys. J. Letters, 789, L28, 6 pp.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L28" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L28</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lacombe, C. and Belmont, G.: Waves in the Earth's magnetosheath: Observations
and interpretations, Adv. Space Res., 15, 329–340, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Markovskii, S. A., Vasquez, B. J., and Smith, C. W.: Statistical analysis of
the high-frequency spectral break of the solar wind turbulence at 1 AU,
Astrophys. J., 675, 1576–1583, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/527431" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/527431</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott,
B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS ESA plasma
instrument and in-flight calibration, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 277–302,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9440-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11214-008-9440-2</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Pitňa, A., Šafránková, J., Němeček,  Z., Goncharov,
O., Němec, F., Přech, L., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.:
Density fluctuations upstream and downstream of interplanetary shocks,
Astrophys. J., 819, 41, 9 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/41" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/41</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Riazantseva, M. O., Budaev, V. P., Zelenyi, L. M., Zastenker, G. N., Pavlos,
G. P., Safrankova, J., Nemecek, Z., Prech, L., and Nemec, F.: Dynamic
properties of small scale solar wind plasma fluctuations, Philos. T. R. Soc.
A, 373, 20140146, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0146" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2014.0146</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Riazantseva, M. O., Budaev, V. P., Rakhmanova, L. S., Zastenker, G. N.,
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., and Přech, L.:
Comparison of properties of small scale ion flux fluctuations in flank
magnetosheath and in solar wind, Adv. Space Res.,
58, 166–174,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., and
Zastenker, G. N.: Ion Kinetic Scale in the Solar Wind Observed, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 110, 025004, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.025004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.025004</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., Zastenker, G.
N., Cěrmák, I., Chesalin, L., Komárek, A., Vaverka, J.,
Beránek, M., Pavlu, J., Gavrilova, E., Karimov, B., and Leibov, A.: Fast
Solar Wind Monitor (BMSW): Description and First Results, Space Sci. Rev.,
175, 165–182, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Němec, F., Přech,
L., Pitňa, A., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.: Solar wind density
spectra around the ion spectral break, Astrophys. J., 803, 107, 7 pp.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/107</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Němec, F., Přech,
L., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.: Power spectral density of
fluctuations of bulk and thermal speeds in the solar wind, Astrophys. J.,
825, 121, 8 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/121</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Sahraoui, F., Belmont, G., Rezeau, L., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Pinçon, J.
L., and Balogh, A.: Anisotropic Turbulent Spectra in the Terrestrial
Magnetosheath as Seen by the Cluster Spacecraft, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96,
075002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075002</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Sahraoui, F., Huang, S. Y., Belmont, G., Goldstein, M. L., Rétino, A.,
Robert, P., and De Patoul, J.: Scaling of the electron dissipation range of
solar wind turbulence, Astrophys. J., 777, 15, 11 pp.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/15" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/15</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Schekochihin, A. A., Cowley, S. C., Dorland, W.,   Hammett, G. W.,   Howes, G.
G.,   Quataert, E.,   and   Tatsuno, T.: Astrophysical gyrokinetics: kinetic and fluid
turbulent cascades in magnetized weakly collisional plasmas, Astrophys. J.,
Supplement Series, 182, 310, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Schwartz, S. J., Burgess, D., and Moses, J. J.: Low-frequency waves in the
Earth's magnetosheath: present status, Ann. Geophys., 14, 1134–1150,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Shevyrev, N., Zastenker, G. N., Nozdrachev, M. N., Němeěek, Z.,
Šafránková, J., and Richardson, J. D.: High and low frequency
large amplitude variations of plasma and magnetic field in the magnetosheath:
radial profile and some features, Adv. Space Res. 31, 1389–1394, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Zastenker, G. N., Šafránková, J., Nvemeveek, Z., Prech, L.,
Cermak, I., Vaverka, I., Komarek, A., Voita, J., Chesalin, L. S., Karimov, B.
T., Agafonov, Yu. N., Borodkova, N. L., Gavrilova, E. A., Gagua, T. I.,
Gagua, I. T., Dalin, P. A., D'yachkov, A. V., Koloskova, I. V., Leibov, A.
V., Semena, N. P., Chernov, V. V., Markov, Ya. I., Ryazanova, E. E.,
Ryazanrtseva, M. O., Shevyrev, N. N., Chrapchenkov, V. V., Chugunova, O. M.,
and Yurasov, A. S.: Fast measurements of solar wind parameters by BMSW
instrument, Cosmic Res.<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, 51, 78–89, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0010952513020081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S0010952513020081</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Zastenker, G. N., Khrapchenkov, V. V., Koloskova, I. V., Gavrilova, E. A.,
Ryazanova, E. E., Ryazantseva, M. O., Gagua, T. I., Gagua, I. T.,
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., and Voita,
J.: Rapid Variations of the Value and Direction of the Solar Wind Ion Flux,
Cosmic Res.<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, 53, 59–69, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Plasma fluctuations at the flanks of the Earth's magnetosheath  at ion kinetic scales</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">We present a statistical study of the magnetosheath plasma fluctuation
spectra at a high-frequency range (with frequencies from 0.01 to 10 Hz).
Variations of ion flux value and its direction are considered. The direction
of ion flux is characterized by a polar angle – the deviation of the ion
flux vector from the Sun–Earth line. We consider 290 Fourier's spectra that
can be described by two power laws with a break, i.e., a change of slope. The
ion flux fluctuation spectra are shown to have breaks at higher frequencies
compared to the polar angle spectra. We compare the frequency of the break
with the gyrostructure frequency for a number of cases. We show the polar
angle break frequency to usually be smaller than the gyrostructure frequency.
The dependencies of spectrum parameters such as the slopes and the break
frequency on plasma parameters are also considered.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrova, O.: Solar wind vs magnetosheath turbulence and Alfvén
vortices, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 95–108,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-95-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/npg-15-95-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrova, O., Mangeney, A., Maksimovic, M., Lacombe, C.,
Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Lucek, E. A., Décréau, P. M. E., Bosqued,
J.-M., Travnicek, P., and Fazakerley, A. N.: Cluster observations of finite
amplitude Alfvén waves and small-scale magnetic filaments downstream of a
quasi-perpendicular shock, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A05207,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010056" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JA010056</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrova, O., Mangeney, A., Maksimovic, M., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N.,
Bosqued, J.-M., and André, M.: Alfvén vortex filaments observed in
magnetosheath downstream of a quasi-perpendicular bow shock, J. Geophys.
Res., 111, A12208, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011934" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2006JA011934</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrova, O., Lacombe, C., and Mangeney, A.: Spectra and anisotropy of
magnetic fluctuations in the Earth's magnetosheath: Cluster observations,
Ann. Geophys., 26, 3585–3596, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-3585-2008" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-26-3585-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrova, O., Chen, C. H. K., Sorriso-Valvo, L., Horbury, T. S., and Bale,
S. D.: Solar Wind Turbulence and the Role of Ion Instabilities, Space Sci.
Rev., 178, 101–139, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-013-0004-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11214-013-0004-8</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, J., Fuselier, S., Gary, S., and Denton, R.: Magnetic spectral
signatures in the Earth's magnetosheath and plasma depletion layer,
J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5877–5891, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS mission, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 5–34,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9336-1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Auster, H. U., Glassmeier, K. H., Magnes, W., Aydogar, O., Baumjohann, W.,
Constantinescu, D., Fischer, D., Fornacon, K. H., Georgescu, E., Harvey, P.,
Hillenmaier, O., Kroth, R., Ludlam, M., Narita, Y., Nakamura, R., Okrafka,
K., Plaschke, F., Richter, I., Schwarzl, H., Stoll, B., Valavanoglou, A., and
Wiedemann, M.: The THEMIS fluxgate magnetometer, Space Sci. Rev., 141,
235–264, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9365-9</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. H. K., Salem, C. S., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., and Bale, S. D.:
Density Fluctuation Spectrum of Solar Wind Turbulence between Ion and
Electron Scales, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 035001,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035001" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035001</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. H. K., Boldyrev, S., Xia, Q., and Perez, J. C.: Nature of Subproton
Scale Turbulence in the Solar Wind, Phys. Rev. Lett., 110, 225002,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.225002" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.225002</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. H. K., Howes, G. G., Bonnell, J. W., Mozer, F. S., Klein, K. G., and
Bale, S. D.: Kinetic Scale Density Fluctuations in the Solar Wind, AIP Conf.
Proc., 1539, 143–146, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4811008" target="_blank">doi:10.1063/1.4811008</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Czaykowska, A., Bauer, T. M., Treumann, R. A., and Baumjohann, W.: Magnetic
field fluctuations across the Earth's bow shock, Ann. Geophys., 19, 275–287,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-275-2001" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/angeo-19-275-2001</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Galtier, S.: Wave turbulence in incompressible Hall magnetohydrodynamics, J.
Plasma Phys., 72, 721, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022377806004521" target="_blank">doi:10.1017/S0022377806004521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gagua, I. T., Gagua, T. I., and Zastenker, G. N.: Determination of a solar
wind ion flux value and direction using a set of integral Faraday cups for
the fast monitor of solar wind, in: WDS'09 Proceedings of Contributed Papers,
Part II: Physics of Plasmas and Ionized Media, 2–5 June 2009, Prague, Czech
Republic, 22–29, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, S. Y., Sahraoui, F., Deng, X. H., He, J. S., Yuan, Z. G., Zhou, M.,
Pang, Y., and Fu, H. S.: Kinetic turbulence in the terrestrial magnetosheath:
Cluster observations, Astrophys. J. Letters, 789, L28, 6 pp.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L28" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/2041-8205/789/2/L28</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lacombe, C. and Belmont, G.: Waves in the Earth's magnetosheath: Observations
and interpretations, Adv. Space Res., 15, 329–340, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Markovskii, S. A., Vasquez, B. J., and Smith, C. W.: Statistical analysis of
the high-frequency spectral break of the solar wind turbulence at 1 AU,
Astrophys. J., 675, 1576–1583, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/527431" target="_blank">doi:10.1086/527431</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
McFadden, J. P., Carlson, C. W., Larson, D., Ludlam, M., Abiad, R., Elliott,
B., Turin, P., Marckwordt, M., and Angelopoulos, V.: The THEMIS ESA plasma
instrument and in-flight calibration, Space Sci. Rev., 141, 277–302,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11214-008-9440-2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9440-2</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Pitňa, A., Šafránková, J., Němeček,  Z., Goncharov,
O., Němec, F., Přech, L., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.:
Density fluctuations upstream and downstream of interplanetary shocks,
Astrophys. J., 819, 41, 9 pp., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/41" target="_blank">doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/41</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Riazantseva, M. O., Budaev, V. P., Zelenyi, L. M., Zastenker, G. N., Pavlos,
G. P., Safrankova, J., Nemecek, Z., Prech, L., and Nemec, F.: Dynamic
properties of small scale solar wind plasma fluctuations, Philos. T. R. Soc.
A, 373, 20140146, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0146" target="_blank">doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0146</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Riazantseva, M. O., Budaev, V. P., Rakhmanova, L. S., Zastenker, G. N.,
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., and Přech, L.:
Comparison of properties of small scale ion flux fluctuations in flank
magnetosheath and in solar wind, Adv. Space Res.,
58, 166–174,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.022" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., and
Zastenker, G. N.: Ion Kinetic Scale in the Solar Wind Observed, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 110, 025004, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.025004" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 110.025004</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., Zastenker, G.
N., Cěrmák, I., Chesalin, L., Komárek, A., Vaverka, J.,
Beránek, M., Pavlu, J., Gavrilova, E., Karimov, B., and Leibov, A.: Fast
Solar Wind Monitor (BMSW): Description and First Results, Space Sci. Rev.,
175, 165–182, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Němec, F., Přech,
L., Pitňa, A., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.: Solar wind density
spectra around the ion spectral break, Astrophys. J., 803, 107, 7 pp.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/107" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/107</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Němec, F., Přech,
L., Chen, C. H. K., and Zastenker, G. N.: Power spectral density of
fluctuations of bulk and thermal speeds in the solar wind, Astrophys. J.,
825, 121, 8 pp., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/121" target="_blank">doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/121</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Sahraoui, F., Belmont, G., Rezeau, L., Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N., Pinçon, J.
L., and Balogh, A.: Anisotropic Turbulent Spectra in the Terrestrial
Magnetosheath as Seen by the Cluster Spacecraft, Phys. Rev. Lett., 96,
075002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075002" target="_blank">doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075002</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Sahraoui, F., Huang, S. Y., Belmont, G., Goldstein, M. L., Rétino, A.,
Robert, P., and De Patoul, J.: Scaling of the electron dissipation range of
solar wind turbulence, Astrophys. J., 777, 15, 11 pp.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/15" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/15</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Schekochihin, A. A., Cowley, S. C., Dorland, W.,   Hammett, G. W.,   Howes, G.
G.,   Quataert, E.,   and   Tatsuno, T.: Astrophysical gyrokinetics: kinetic and fluid
turbulent cascades in magnetized weakly collisional plasmas, Astrophys. J.,
Supplement Series, 182, 310, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Schwartz, S. J., Burgess, D., and Moses, J. J.: Low-frequency waves in the
Earth's magnetosheath: present status, Ann. Geophys., 14, 1134–1150,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s00585-996-1134-z</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Shevyrev, N., Zastenker, G. N., Nozdrachev, M. N., Němeěek, Z.,
Šafránková, J., and Richardson, J. D.: High and low frequency
large amplitude variations of plasma and magnetic field in the magnetosheath:
radial profile and some features, Adv. Space Res. 31, 1389–1394, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Zastenker, G. N., Šafránková, J., Nvemeveek, Z., Prech, L.,
Cermak, I., Vaverka, I., Komarek, A., Voita, J., Chesalin, L. S., Karimov, B.
T., Agafonov, Yu. N., Borodkova, N. L., Gavrilova, E. A., Gagua, T. I.,
Gagua, I. T., Dalin, P. A., D'yachkov, A. V., Koloskova, I. V., Leibov, A.
V., Semena, N. P., Chernov, V. V., Markov, Ya. I., Ryazanova, E. E.,
Ryazanrtseva, M. O., Shevyrev, N. N., Chrapchenkov, V. V., Chugunova, O. M.,
and Yurasov, A. S.: Fast measurements of solar wind parameters by BMSW
instrument, Cosmic Res.+, 51, 78–89, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0010952513020081" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/S0010952513020081</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Zastenker, G. N., Khrapchenkov, V. V., Koloskova, I. V., Gavrilova, E. A.,
Ryazanova, E. E., Ryazantseva, M. O., Gagua, T. I., Gagua, I. T.,
Šafránková, J., Němeček, Z., Přech, L., and Voita,
J.: Rapid Variations of the Value and Direction of the Solar Wind Ion Flux,
Cosmic Res.+, 53, 59–69, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
