<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-33-245-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Azimuthal velocity shear within an Earthward fast flow – further evidence for magnetotail untwisting?</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Azimuthal velocity shear within a fast flow}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Pitk\"{a}nen et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pitkänen</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          <email>timo.pitkanen@space.umu.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5681-0366</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hamrin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-4442</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Norqvist</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Karlsson</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Nilsson</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7787-2160</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Kullen</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0349-0645</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Imber</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Milan</surname><given-names>S. E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Physics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Space and Plasma Physics, School of Electrical Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">T. Pitkänen (timo.pitkanen@space.umu.se)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>33</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>245</fpage><lpage>255</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>It is well known that nonzero interplanetary magnetic field <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions lead to a twisted
magnetotail configuration. The plasma sheet is rotated around its axis and
tail magnetic field lines are twisted, which causes an azimuthal displacement
of their ionospheric footprints. According to the untwisting hypothesis, the
untwisting of twisted field lines is suggested to influence the azimuthal
direction of convective fast flows in the nightside geospace. However, there
is a lack of in situ magnetospheric observations, which show actual
signatures of the possible untwisting process. In this paper, we report
detailed Cluster observations of an azimuthal flow shear across the neutral
sheet associated with an Earthward fast flow on 5 September 2001. The
observations show a flow shear velocity pattern with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign
change, near the neutral sheet (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within a fast flow during the
neutral sheet flapping motion over the spacecraft. Firstly, this implies that
convective fast flows may not generally be unidirectional across the neutral
sheet, but may have a more complex structure. Secondly, in this event tail
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the flow shear are as expected by the untwisting hypothesis. The
analysis of the flow shear reveals a linear dependence between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> close to the neutral sheet and suggests that Cluster crossed
the neutral sheet in the dawnward part of the fast flow channel. The
magnetospheric observations are supported by the semi-empirical T96 and TF04
models. Furthermore, the ionospheric SuperDARN convection maps support the
satellite observations proposing that the azimuthal component of the
magnetospheric flows is enforced by a magnetic field untwisting. In summary,
the observations give strong supportive evidence to the tail untwisting
hypothesis. However, the T96 ionospheric mapping demonstrates the limitations
of the model in mapping from a twisted tail.</p>
  </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Magnetospheric physics (magnetospheric configuration and dynamics; magnetotail; plasma convection)</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Theoretical considerations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.1"/>, observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> as well as simulations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> show that nonzero
interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions lead to a twisted
magnetotail configuration. The entire tail plasma sheet is rotated around its
axis and tail magnetic field lines are twisted from the north–south
symmetry: an additional <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> term collinear to the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears in the
tail <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.4"/>, with higher values in the plasma sheet than the
lobes and the maximum close to the neutral sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>The twisting is expected to be closely associated with plasma convection in
the nightside geospace. Observations of nightside ionospheric convection have
shown that fast transient azimuthal flow bursts are regularly seen in the
midnight sector specifically during northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominating IMF and
nonsubstorm conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. These flow bursts have
been suggested to be a manifestation of the untwisting process of the twisted
tail field lines during the magnetic field reconfiguration following
reconnection in a twisted tail <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.7"/>.</p>
      <p>According to the tail untwisting hypothesis by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.8"/>, tail twisting
introduced by a prolonged exposure to significant IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> causes the
ionospheric footprints of a reconnecting tail field line to be azimuthally
displaced in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. Consequently, the newly
reconnected field line will have to travel faster in one hemisphere to
convect, via dusk or dawn, back towards dayside. This gives rise to the fast
azimuthal flow bursts observed in the nightside ionosphere. The situation of
the untwisting of magnetic field lines in a positively twisted tail (the
field lines twisted counter-clockwise and the neutral sheet rotated clockwise
around the Sun–Earth line when viewed from downtail looking Earthward)
according to the hypothesis is illustrated in Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schematic illustration of the untwisting of tail field lines under a
positive IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure (positive twisting), when viewed from the tail
towards the Earth. The thick solid and dashed arrows indicate the expected
azimuthal convection directions in the magnetotail and the conjugate
convection flows in the ionosphere, respectively. The thin dashed line marks
the tilted neutral sheet. The black square marks a satellite position at an
azimuthal flow reversal within the Earthward transported untwisting field
lines (see Fig. 2) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">after</named-content></xref>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Interhemispheric observations of ionospheric azimuthal flow bursts support
the above idea of untwisting and have confirmed that the asymmetric
convection patterns in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are resembling
mirror images of each other <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.10"/>. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.11"/> have
presented simultaneous in situ magnetospheric observations made when these
flow bursts were seen in the ionosphere. The observations showed that these
ionospheric azimuthal flow bursts were associated with Earthward fast flows,
which had a convective azimuthal velocity component matching the ionospheric
measurements.</p>
      <p>Recently, motivated by the results by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.12"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.13"/> using
Cluster data conducted a statistical investigation of a possible IMF
dependence (and hence twist-dependence) of the direction of the azimuthal
convection velocity component of the Earthward magnetotail fast flows. It was
found that the azimuthal flow direction of the fast flows and the orientation
of the IMF show a correlation and in such a manner that is consistent with
the untwisting hypothesis. Surprisingly, the correlation was found to be
quite strong regardless of the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> direction. One could expect stronger
correlation for northward IMF conditions, since ionospheric azimuthal flow
bursts are observed mainly during northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominating IMF. For
southward IMF, clearly azimuthally oriented ionospheric flow bursts in the
midnight sector are much less frequent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.14"/>. Also, it has been
shown both observationally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.15"/> and in simulations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.16"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> that the twist of the tail plasma
sheet around its axis is considerably stronger for northward than for
southward IMF. Whether this is true even for the degree of magnetic field
line twisting remains to be shown. One possible interpretation of the results
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.17"/> is that the untwisting process could be occurring in the
tail to some extent for all nonzero IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, and not only
limited to those of northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominating IMF. This possibility
should be studied further.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Schematic illustration of the untwisting of positively twisted tail
field lines when looking down from the north. The dotted lines indicate the
reconnection line in the nightside ionosphere and in the magnetotail. The
solid arrowed curves show the ionospheric convection streamlines and the
thick dashed arrows depict the azimuthal flow bursts associated with the
untwisting. The straight lines represent field lines, which connect the two
hemispheres via the reconnection line. The short solid arrows indicate the
directions of convective magnetotail fast flows associated with the
untwisting. For clarity, the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are coloured
by black and grey, respectively, and the ionospheric convection patterns are
slightly separated. The black square marks a satellite position in the region
where an azimuthal flow shear with a reversal generated by the untwisting
field lines can be observed if the satellite is moving in the north–south
direction across the neutral sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">after</named-content></xref>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The untwisting hypothesis predicts a generation of an azimuthal flow shear by
the Earthward transported untwisting magnetic field lines. Figure 2
illustrates the situation for positive tail twisting. In the figure the black
square indicates a spacecraft that would observe an azimuthal velocity
reversal when moving in the north–south direction across the neutral sheet.
According to the hypothesis, the flow reversal is expected to be located at
or close to the neutral sheet for untwisting field lines near local midnight.
Farther away from midnight, i.e. towards the dawn and dusk flanks of the
region of untwisting field lines, the flow reversal is predicted to be
situated above or below the neutral sheet: the division between dawnward and
duskward flows is the interface between the dawnward and duskward moving
field lines, which is inclined relative to the tilted neutral sheet. Figure 1
shows the situation for positive tail twisting, in the case where the flow
reversal is located below and above the neutral sheet dawnward and duskward
of the centremost untwisting field lines, respectively (see also
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.19"/>, their Fig. 6c). Note that in such a situation it is
expected that the tail field lines are twisted significantly out of a
meridian plane and have a fairly small inclination angle to the neutral
sheet.</p>
      <p>However, there is a lack of reported observations of the flow shear and the
untwisting process in general in the magnetosphere. Some indications of a
flow shear have been suggested to be observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.20"/>. Their
observations from either side of the tail neutral sheet showed convective
flows with opposite azimuthal sense in the opposite sides of the neutral
sheet, which suggests closed field lines twisted significantly out of a
meridian plane. In addition to that case, which occurred during northward and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominating IMF conditions, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.21"/> have reported an azimuthal
flow shear across the neutral sheet in association with an Earthward fast
flow. This event occurred during southward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominating IMF
conditions. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.22"/> suggested that the flow shear could be related to
untwisting, but could not rule out a possibility of it to be related to
internal flow patterns within the fast flow channel (depleted bubble), since
the flow shear was observed only by one spacecraft. Besides these two
studies, also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.23"/> have reported an indication of an azimuthal
velocity shear across the neutral sheet during a fast flow in their fast flow
example event. However, they showed only single satellite measurements and
did not discuss the event any further. It is clear that detailed observations
about these fast flow-associated azimuthal flow shears with reversals are
needed to understand their nature and how they are related to a magnetotail
fast flow and possible untwisting of closed field lines in the magnetotail.</p>
      <p>In this paper, we analyse and discuss the flow shear event identified by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.24"/> in more detail. We will extend their preliminary single
spacecraft analysis by taking the full advantage of the Cluster
multispacecraft observations. In addition, ionospheric convection
measurements by the SuperDARN network are used for analysing the Cluster
observations in terms of the untwisting hypothesis. The paper is organized as
follows: the instrumentation used is described in Sect. 2, the flow shear
event is presented in Sect. 3 and discussed in Sect. 4, and the summary of
the results together with conclusions are given in Sect. 5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Cluster spacecraft positions in GSM on 5 September 2001
at 11:26 UT. <bold>(b)</bold> Zoomed view.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Instrumentation</title>
      <p>The magnetospheric observations for this study are made by the Cluster
satellites (C1–C4). We use spin-resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 s) velocity data from
the Hot Ion Analyser (HIA) detector (C1 and C3) and from the COmposition
DIstribution Function (CODIF) detector (C4) of the Cluster Ion Spectrometry
(CIS) instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.25"/>. In addition, 3-spin resolution
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 s) omni-directional ion energy distribution data in particle
energy flux units from the C1 CIS HIA detector are presented. Magnetic field
data, as well as spin resolution, come from the FluxGate Magnetometer
experiment (FGM) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.26"/>. Since the C2 spacecraft has no operational
CIS instrument onboard, we do not show any data from the C2 satellite. IMF
data presented in this study are 1 min ACE satellite measurements propagated
to the bow shock nose provided by the OMNI database
(<uri>http://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>). The IMF and magnetospheric data are
presented in the geocentric solar magnetic (GSM) coordinates throughout the
study if not stated otherwise.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> IMF components, <bold>(b)</bold> Cluster C1 HIA
omni-directional ion energy spectrogram, and <bold>(c</bold>–<bold>e)</bold> Cluster
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> field components during the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4 h period prior the fast flow event
occurring at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11:22–11:34 UT on 5 September 2001. The time interval
of the fast flow event is marked by yellow shading.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The ionospheric observations used in this study are 2 min large-scale
ionospheric convection maps provided by SuperDARN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.27"/>.
SuperDARN is an international network of HF radars located around the polar
regions of both hemispheres. The radars provide continuous monitoring of the
large-scale horizontal ionospheric plasma flow in the polar ionospheres and
their data are hence suitable for comparison with flow observations from
Cluster. The SuperDARN convection maps are derived by fitting a solution for
the electrostatic potential, which is expressed in spherical harmonics, to
the line-of-sight velocity measurements (“Map Potential” model;
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="altparen.28"/>). The equipotentials of the solution represent the plasma
streamlines of the modelled convection pattern. Where no measurement points
are available, information from the statistical model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.29"/>,
parameterized by concurrent IMF conditions, is used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Overview</title>
      <p>The fast flow event occurred on 5 September 2001 at about 11:22–11:34 UT.
According to the AE indices, the event was associated with no substorm
activity (data not shown). Figure 3 displays the Cluster satellite positions
at 11:26 UT. The spacecraft were located in the premidnight sector close to
the midnight meridian at a distance of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in XGSM
(C3 position at 11:26 UT: [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.2, 1.0, 1.5] <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the IMF components, Cluster C1 ion spectrogram, and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
field components measured by Cluster C1, C3 and C4 during the 4 h prior to the fast
flow event. From Fig. 4a we note that the IMF was quite stable during that
period. The IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was negative and the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> positive during the
entire period. The IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was mainly positive, i.e. northward, but had
occasional short excursions southward. Also, except for a couple of short
intervals, the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude was greater than the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> magnitude.
The IMF conditions during the period could be hence characterized as
northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominating conditions.</p>
      <p>From the Cluster magnetic field data we note that the satellites were mainly
traversing field lines in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 4c). The ion
spectrogram from C1 (Fig. 4b) indicates that after staying in the lobe
practically continuously for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 min, Cluster entered and stayed on
closed field lines after 09:00 UT (except 09:34:29–09:45:57 UT) beyond the
fast flow event at least until <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11:40 UT, after which the Cluster
data become unavailable. Figure 4d shows that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all three
spacecraft turned positive after 08:30 UT and stayed practically positive
for more than 3 h including the fast flow event. The Cluster <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was hence
collinear with the IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for several hours prior to the fast flow event
both on open and closed field lines, which is in agreement with observations
of a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component in the tail due to the influence of nonzero IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and suggests a twisting of closed field
lines. In a nontwisting situation, the tail magnetic field in the premidnight
Northern Hemisphere would be expected to have a negative <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the
azimuthal tail field line flaring. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> components also
generally show gradual increasing and decreasing trends, respectively, during
this period. These could indicate a loading of the magnetotail analogous to a
substorm growth phase being associated with the twisting. The observed fast
flow would then be a natural manifestation of a localized tail relaxation
process. The enhancements of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the event are related
to the magnetic perturbations associated with the fast flow.</p>
      <p>When looking at the Cluster <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> components in more detail in Fig. 4c, we
notice that after 10:30 UT the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all spacecraft show oscillations.
The oscillations at C3 reach closer to the neutral sheet than those of C1 and
C4 due to C3 being the southernmost of the spacecraft (middle panel in
Fig. 3b). These oscillations have periods of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 min. We
interpret that these <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oscillations could be related to neutral/current
sheet flapping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.31"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Figure 5 shows the Cluster location in GSM at 11:26 UT together with the
magnetic field line of the T96 model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.32"/> traced through the Cluster
position. For clarity, only the C3 position is shown. From Fig. 5b we note
that the T96 field line is bent or twisted from the meridian direction in
such a way that it has a net positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component at large geocentric
distances and in the region where Cluster is located. The twist of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
field line is not uniform, but it is stronger close to the neutral sheet.
These imply that the twisting of the tail field lines is also produced in the
T96 model, and it gives support to our Cluster interpretation that there
exists a twist in the tail during the event. However, note that the T96 model
suggests that C3 at 11:26 UT would be located at the apex of the field line
close to the neutral sheet (Fig. 5a). This actually is not the case as can be
seen from the magnetic field data presented in Fig. 6, that will be discussed
in the next section and which shows that C3 (and other Cluster spacecraft as
well) are clearly above the neutral sheet at that time.</p>
      <p>The thick black line in Fig. 5b indicates the neutral sheet according to the
TF04 neutral sheet model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.33"/>. Note that the model neutral sheet here
is presented using the geocentric solar wind (GSW) coordinate system, which
differs from the GSM system in such a way that its <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is antiparallel
to the direction of the solar wind. The neutral sheet is plotted at the C3
XGSW distance where the C3 XGSW coordinate is approximated by its XGSM
coordinate. From Fig. 5b we notice that the model neutral sheet is weakly
rotated clockwise around the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis: The normal of the neutral sheet
creates an angle of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 degree with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-axis in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">YZ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> plane (not
marked in the figure). The clockwise rotation, even though weak, is
consistent with the expected neutral sheet rotation direction for positive
tail twisting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.34"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and gives additional support for the
tail twisting during the event.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a</bold>–<bold>b)</bold> Location of the Cluster 3 spacecraft (red
square) in the GSM coordinate system at 11:26 UT on 5 September 2001. The
solid loop indicates the T96 model field line traced through the spacecraft
position. <bold>(b)</bold> The thick black line indicates the TF04 model neutral
sheet in the GSW coordinate system at the C3 XGSW distance where the C3 XGSW
coordinate is approximated by its XGSM coordinate.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=142.26378pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>The flow event: Cluster</title>
      <p>In Fig. 6 we present the Cluster magnetic field data and velocity data from
the time interval of the fast flow event. The panels in the figure from top
to bottom are the following: (a) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the magnetic field
for C1 (black), C3 (green) and C4 (blue); (b) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the
magnetic field for C1, C3 and C4; (c) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the magnetic
field for C1, C3 and C4; (d) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components perpendicular to the
magnetic field (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, solid lines) of the ion bulk
velocity and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of the ion bulk velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, dashed line)
for C1; (e) same as in (d) for C3; and (f) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components
perpendicular to the magnetic field of the proton bulk velocity (solid lines)
and the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> component of the proton bulk velocity (dashed line) for C4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Cluster data on 5 September 2001 at 11:22–11:34 UT.
<bold>(a</bold>–<bold>c)</bold> Magnetic field components measured by the C1 (black
line), C3 (green line) and C4 (blue line) spacecraft.
<?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?><bold>(d</bold>–<bold>e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components of the ion bulk velocity for
C1 and C3 from the HIA detector. <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> components of the
proton bulk velocity for C4 from the CODIF detector. The dashed and solid
lines mark the components of the total velocity and the velocity
perpendicular to the magnetic field, respectively. The first vertical dashed
line indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reversal associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign
change at C3. The second vertical dashed line indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
reversal associated with the first <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change at C1 and C4.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The Earthward fast flow event begins at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 11:23 UT. The event is
associated with three major flow bursts (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) seen in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at C1 and C4 and a similar longer continuous one at C3 during the next
10 min (blue dashed lines in Fig. 6d–f). At first the flow in the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction at all satellites has a significant field-aligned component,
but later it turns to pure perpendicular, as can be seen from the difference
between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves (blue dashed and solid lines,
respectively). This is consistent with the fact that the satellites resided
first farther out from, and then at a later stage moved closer to, the
neutral sheet (Fig. 6a). It is known that the fast flows have a substantial
convective component in and a large field-aligned component further away from
the central plasma sheet <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.35"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>From Fig. 6d–f we notice that the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly negative during
the event at all spacecraft, i.e. the flow has a dawnward component. However,
at 11:31:13 UT the C3 velocity data show an interesting feature (Fig. 6e,
first vertical dashed line). The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component turns from negative
to positive, i.e. from dawnward to duskward. From Fig. 6a, we notice that the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change is associated with the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change from positive
to negative, i.e. the neutral sheet was flapping over the spacecraft. At
11:32:10 UT, C1 and C4 cross the neutral sheet (second vertical dashed line)
at higher ZGSM coordinates and also these spacecraft move onto southern field
lines for a short moment. Again, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change from positive to
negative is associated with the direction change of the azimuthal velocity
component <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from negative to positive, i.e. from dawnward to
duskward direction, even though the magnitudes of the duskward <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
components for C1 and especially for C4 here are small.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the main Earthward flow
(continuously <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each spacecraft. The
red line indicates a linear fit to data points close to the neutral sheet
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 nT).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In Fig. 7 we present the flow shear observed by each of the three spacecraft
as a scatter plot of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For each spacecraft, we have
plotted the data points over the time interval of the main convective
Earthward flow (continuously <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> excluding
one and two points below this threshold for C1 and C3, respectively). The
scatter plot shows a clear pattern: above the neutral sheet the flow has a
dawnward component, and below a duskward component.</p>
      <p>Thus, the multisatellite Cluster data presented in Figs. 6 and 7 show that an
azimuthal flow shear with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change may take place in the
vicinity of the neutral sheet (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within a fast flow. Since we are
dealing with bulk flow perpendicular to the magnetic field, this implies that
(assuming the frozen-in condition) magnetic field lines are in overall
convecting to opposite azimuthal directions above and below the neutral sheet
within the studied fast flow.</p>
      <p>If we view the azimuthal flow directions in the framework of the tail
untwisting hypothesis, we notice that the directions of the azimuthal flows
are in agreement with the hypothesis. For positive IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and
hence for positive twisting of the tail field lines, in the midnight sector
observed fast flow is expected to have predominantly a dawnward component in
the Northern Hemispheric and a duskward component in the Southern Hemispheric
field lines. The situation is schematically illustrated in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>However, the scatter plot reveals an interesting feature that is not directly
obvious from Fig. 6. The change of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign does not occur
precisely at but slightly below the neutral sheet. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value at the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT. There is also an indication of
higher velocities further out from the neutral sheet with a linear dependence
close to the neutral sheet. The red line in Fig. 7 indicates a linear fit to
data points from all three spacecraft close to the neutral sheet
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 nT). The fit gives a relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>53.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in
km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and nT, respectively.</p>
      <p>A growing offset between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reversal and the neutral sheet
farther away from midnight, i.e. towards the dawn and dusk flanks of the
region of untwisting field lines, is predicted by the untwisting hypothesis.
The observed small offset suggests a possibility that in this event Cluster
crosses the neutral sheet on the dawnside of the centre of the region of
Earthward transported untwisting field lines (see discussion in Sect. 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>The flow event: SuperDARN</title>
      <p>In Fig. 8 we present two snapshots of the SuperDARN ionospheric convection
observations, one for each hemisphere made at 11:28–11:30 UT i.e. during
the fast flow event. The colour-coded vectors are the plasma flow vectors and
the solid and dashed contours indicate the contours of the ionospheric
electric potential, or equivalently, streamlines of plasma flow. The green
line marks the low-latitude boundary of the ionospheric convection (zero-flow
boundary or the Heppner–Maynard boundary below which the electric potential
is assumed to be zero). Although the plasma convection in the ionospheric
regions with no direct measurements are derived from a statistical model, the
results can be considered as quite realistic due to the rather static IMF
conditions within several hours before the event. Fortunately, the measured
flow patterns exist in the most interesting regions of the ionosphere in both
hemispheres for this event.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>SuperDARN ionospheric plasma convection <bold>(a)</bold> in the Northern
Hemisphere and <bold>(b)</bold> in the Southern Hemisphere in AACGM latitude –
magnetic local time coordinate system on 5 September 2001 at
11:28–11:30 UT. The contours of the ionospheric electric potential are
superposed by the black solid and dashed lines. The green line indicates the
low-latitude boundary of the ionospheric convection. The T96 footprint of
Cluster is marked by the red square.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/33/245/2015/angeo-33-245-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The ionospheric convection in both hemispheres show an asymmetric convection
pattern. The morning convection cell is extending into the midnight sector in
the Northern Hemisphere and the evening cell in the Southern Hemisphere. Note
that the Southern Hemisphere convection pattern covers a smaller area than
the northern pattern. This is plausibly owing to poor radar data coverage in
the Southern Hemisphere. Since there must be same amount of open magnetic
flux in the both polar caps, one might presume a similarly sized convection
pattern in both hemispheres.</p>
      <p>The red squares in Fig. 8 mark the ionospheric footprints of Cluster using
T96 model. For clarity, only the C3 footprints are shown (the footprints of
other spacecraft are closely located). From Fig. 8a we note that the Cluster
footprint in the Northern Hemisphere is mapped to the immediate vicinity of
the enhanced eastward ionospheric plasma flows in the midnight sector. These
eastward flows are consistent with the dawnward flow on northern field lines
observed by Cluster in the magnetotail. In the Southern Hemisphere, the
Cluster footprint is located slightly equatorward of the measured weak
westward plasma flows (the flow is westward at all data points in the
midnight sector even if it is somewhat difficult to distinguish it). It is
reasonable to assume that the plasma flow is westward also at the Cluster
footprint, since one might presume similarly sized convection patterns in
both hemispheres, as discussed above, and the evening cell is dominating in
the footprint region. This plasma flow could also be enhanced as the eastward
flows in the Northern Hemisphere. In that case the enhanced westward flow
would be consistent with the duskward flow measured by Cluster in southern
field lines in the tail during the event. The ionospheric convection patterns
stayed nearly the same during the time interval the fast flow event was
observed by Cluster.</p>
      <p>However, it should be kept in mind that the Cluster footprints are from a
model and represent the footprints of the same field line. If we assume that
the ionospheric convection patterns in Fig. 8 are a manifestation of the tail
untwisting process, one would expect the southern conjugate of the marked
northern footprint to map to the morning convection cell well in the morning
sector in the Southern Hemisphere (analogously as in Fig. 2). Similarly, the
northern conjugate for the marked southern footprint would be expected to map
to the evening cell in the evening sector in the Northern Hemisphere. Thus,
it is clear that the actual tail twisting and the azimuthal displacement of
the magnetic field line footprints must be much stronger and larger,
respectively, than the T96 model suggests.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, the SuperDARN measurements of ionospheric convection support
the Cluster observations of the azimuthal flow shear across the neutral
sheet. In addition, the measured flows in the magnetosphere and conjugate
ionosphere are consistent with what one would expect if the flows were caused
by the untwisting of twisted tail field lines. According to the untwisting
hypothesis, for positive IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions and hence for positive twisting
of the tail field lines, the fast flows are expected to be predominantly
eastward (dawnward) in the Northern Hemispheric and westward (duskward) in
the Southern Hemispheric midnight ionosphere (magnetotail)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.36"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. That kind of situation is schematically
illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The idea of tail untwisting has been suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.37"/> to explain
the observations of fast azimuthal flow bursts seen in ionospheric convection
in the midnight sector during predominantly northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominating
IMF and nonsubstorm conditions. However, there has been a lack of
magnetospheric observations that show the hypothesized untwisting process in
action. Only the case study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.38"/> and to some extent also by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.39"/> show magnetospheric measurements that could be related to or
explained by the untwisting phenomenon. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.40"/> report two fast flow
events in which the convective azimuthal components match the conjugate
ionospheric flows, which is in agreement with the untwisting hypothesis. In
particular in their second event, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.41"/> present observations of
opposite azimuthal convection by two Cluster satellites from either side of
the tail neutral sheet, which suggests an existence of an azimuthal flow
shear across the neutral sheet. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.42"/> report an azimuthal flow shear
across the neutral sheet observed by only one of the four Cluster satellites
in association with an Earthward fast flow, but they are not able to conclude
whether the flow shear is related to tail untwisting or not, and do not
discuss it any further.</p>
      <p>The detailed multispacecraft magnetospheric observations presented in this
paper confirm the previous indications of a possibility of an existence of an
azimuthal flow shear across the neutral sheet within a fast flow and provide
strong supportive evidence for the tail untwisting hypothesis: first, the
Cluster observations show a positive tail <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component collinear with the
concurrent IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> direction for several hours before the event. The ion
data suggest that the collinearity occurs both on open and closed field
lines, which proposes positive twisting of the tail magnetic field lines. In
addition, the T96 model produces positively twisted closed field lines and
the TF04 model an indication of a positively tilted neutral sheet for the
event, which are in agreement with the Cluster observations. The actual
plasma flow signatures within the fast flow show an azimuthal flow shear
across the neutral sheet in the direction that would be expected in
untwisting of positively twisted field lines. When comparing the flow shear
with the conjugate ionospheric flows by SuperDARN we find that the directions
of the azimuthal flow component in the opposite sides of the neutral sheet
match to the flow directions of the ionospheric flows in the corresponding
hemispheres. Furthermore, the ionospheric flow patterns resemble the flow
patterns that have been previously attributed to the occurrence of untwisting
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The azimuthal directions within the fast flow are
also consistent with the statistical results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.44"/> of
IMF-dependent favourable azimuthal flow directions of convective fast flows,
which they suggested possibly to be originated from untwisting.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the flow shear reveals a small offset between the neutral
sheet and the location at which the azimuthal flow reverses. This is the
first time such an observation is reported. The flow reversal or the change
of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign occurs slightly below the neutral sheet with an
offset of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT. The untwisting hypothesis predicts an existence
of such kind of offset. According to the hypothesis, the azimuthal flow
reversal generated by the Earthward transported untwisting magnetic field
lines is expected to be located at or close to the neutral sheet for
untwisting field lines near local midnight. Farther away from midnight, i.e.
towards the dawn and dusk flanks of the region of untwisting field lines, the
flow reversal should be situated above or below the neutral sheet. Whether
the reversal should be located below the neutral sheet in the dawnside and
above in the duskside, or vice versa, depends on whether the tail is twisted
positively or negatively, respectively. In the event studied in this paper,
the flow reversal is located below the neutral sheet, which for positive tail
twisting suggests a possibility that the neutral sheet crossing occurs in the
dawnward part of the channel of the Earthward fast flow.</p>
      <p>However, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> offset is small and its magnitude is
comparable with (in fact smaller than) the standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT
derived from the regression analysis (red line in Fig. 7). Hence, one may
argue that deducing the Cluster neutral sheet crossing region using the
offset in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component would not be justified. On the other hand,
there is a possibility that the plasma frame in the vicinity of the spacecraft
could be moving dawnward at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which would
cause the offset.</p>
      <p>The question also arises, whether the observed flow shear and azimuthally
oppositely directed flows can be explained by any other mechanism.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.45"/> suggested their event to be related to untwisting, but also
discussed the possibility that the flows could be related to flow patterns
internal to the fast flow channel (depleted bubble). They lacked SuperDARN
ionospheric flow observations from both hemispheres and thus could not draw
any definite conclusions regarding the cause for the shear in the flows.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.46"/>, on the other hand, had supportive ionospheric data available
and concluded that the oppositely directed azimuthal flows in the
magnetosphere in their event were due to untwisting. Fortunately, for our
event, SuperDARN observations are available in both hemispheres, and they
together with the Cluster observations give support to the untwisting
scenario. The results of this study further suggest that the oppositely
directed azimuthal flows above and below the neutral sheet are a global
property of the channel of the Earthward fast flow and not any local
disturbance within the flow pattern.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, we have presented detailed multispacecraft observations made
by Cluster of an azimuthal velocity shear in the perpendicular flow component
within an Earthward fast flow in the magnetotail. The fast flow event, which
occurred on 5 September 2001, showed a clear flow shear velocity pattern,
i.e. a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change, around the neutral sheet (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
associated with a fast flow during the neutral sheet flapping motion across
the satellite locations. This suggests that the convection within the proper
flow channel of a fast flow may not generally be azimuthally unidirectional
across the neutral sheet, but may have a more complex structure.</p>
      <p>The event was associated with northward and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominating IMF conditions
without any signatures of substorm activity. However, the magnetospheric data
measured by Cluster showed some signatures that could possibly be related to
a twisting-associated stretching of the magnetotail before the event,
analogously to a substorm growth phase. The observed fast flow would then be
a natural manifestation of a localized tail relaxation process. Generally,
both the Cluster observations and the T96 model suggest a twisting of closed
field lines in the positive direction (positive <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collinear with the
positive IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, the TF04 model indicates weak but
consistent tilt of the neutral sheet.</p>
      <p>During the fast flow, all the three Cluster satellites (C1, C3 and C4)
observed a change of the azimuthal velocity component from dawnward to
duskward when moving from northern field lines to southern field lines as the
neutral sheet moved in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ZGSM direction over the satellites. The
directions of the azimuthal flows at both sides of the neutral sheet are in
agreement with that which would be expected for the flow directions if the
flows were directed due to untwisting during the magnetic field
reconfiguration following reconnection in a twisted tail
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>The flow reversal i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sign change did not occur precisely at
the neutral sheet but was displaced somewhat below it. At the reversal the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> component had a value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nT. In addition, an indication of
a linear dependence between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was found close to
the neutral sheet (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 nT). A linear fit gave a
relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>53.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>23.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in km s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and nT, respectively.</p>
      <p>This observation of an offset between the neutral sheet and the flow reversal
is the first reported in the literature. However, the untwisting hypothesis
predicts an existence of such kind of offset. Towards the dawn and dusk
flanks of the flow channel the flow reversal is expected to be situated above
or below the neutral sheet depending on the tail twisting direction. The
observations provide us with the opportunity to infer the neutral sheet
crossing region in respect to the dawn–dusk extent of the fast flow channel
in the framework of the untwisting hypothesis. In this event, the neutral
sheet crossing was inferred to occur in the dawnward part of the channel of
the Earthward fast flow. However, we cannot rule out uncertainties associated
with the offset (smaller than the standard deviation) nor other explanations
like the possibility of motion of the plasma frame in the vicinity of the spacecraft
as factors that could affect the correctness of our inference. The linear
dependence between the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> close to the neutral sheet
within the fast flow is also an interesting new finding and it should be
investigated whether this relation is a typical feature for fast flows during
nonzero IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p>During the event, ionospheric convection observed by the SuperDARN radars
showed enhanced eastward plasma flows in the Northern Hemisphere and
plausible westward flows in the Southern Hemisphere in the conjugate regions.
This is consistent with the azimuthal flow directions measured by Cluster.
However, obviously, there exists a problem with proper mapping of the Cluster
measurements into the ionosphere. In this event, the T96 mapping provided a
clearly too small azimuthal displacement for mapped footprints due to T96
model underestimation of the true twisting in the magnetotail. However, the
ionospheric observations resemble those flow patterns previously attributed
to the untwisting of twisted tail field lines <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>
supporting the possibility that the flows measured by Cluster were due to
untwisting. Hence, by combining all evidence provided by the data presented
here, we suggest that the fast flows observed in the magnetosphere were a
manifestation of the untwisting of twisted tail field lines, although the
proper ionospheric mapping of magnetospheric observations from a twisted tail
remains a problem. Thus, fully consistent conclusions cannot be drawn.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, the event presented in this paper provides strong supportive
evidence for the untwisting hypothesis which explains the occurrence of
azimuthally directed flows in the nightside ionosphere and magnetosphere by
untwisting of twisted magnetic field lines during nonzero IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
conditions. Albeit our observations show a clear multispacecraft example of
an azimuthal flow shear across the neutral sheet within a fast flow, more
observations are needed to establish whether the flow shears with reversals
are an essential feature of the structure of the fast flows.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank the CIS and FGM teams and the Cluster Active Archive for
the Cluster data and GSFC SPDF/OMNIWeb for the solar wind data. The authors
also acknowledge the PIs of the SuperDARN radars for the radar data. WDC for
Geomagnetism, Kyoto, is acknowledged for the AE index data. The work by
T. Pitkänen and M. Hamrin was supported by the Swedish National Space
Board project 78/11AB. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{4mm}}?> Topical Editor
C.-P. Escoubet thanks V. A. Sergeev and one anonymous referee for their help
in evaluating this paper.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Balogh et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Balogh, A., Carr, C. M., Acuña, M. H., Dunlop, M. W., Beek, T. J., Brown,
P., Fornacon, K.-H., Georgescu, E., Glassmeier, K.-H., Harris, J., Musmann,
G., Oddy, T., and Schwingenschuh, K.: The Cluster Magnetic Field
Investigation: overview of in-flight performance and initial results, Ann.
Geophys., 19, 1207–1217, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1207-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-19-1207-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Chisham et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Chisham, G., Lester, M., Milan, S. E., Freeman, M. P., Bristow, W. A.,
Grocott, A., McWilliams, K. A., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Yeoman, T. K., Dyson, P.
L., Greenwald, R. A., Kikuchi, T., Pinnock, M., Rash, J. P. S., Sato, N.,
Sofko, G. J., Villain, J.-P., and Walker, A. D. M.: A decade of the Super
Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN): Scientific achievements, new
techniques and future directions, Surv. Geophys., 28, 33–109,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10712-007-9017-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10712-007-9017-8</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Cowley(1981)</label><mixed-citation>Cowley, S. W. H.: Magnetospheric asymmetries associated with the Y-component
of the IMF, Planet. Space Sci., 29, 79–96, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(81)90141-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0032-0633(81)90141-0</ext-link>,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Fairfield(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Fairfield, D. H.: On the average configuration of the geomagnetic field, J.
Geophys. Res., 84, 1950–1958, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JA084iA05p01950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JA084iA05p01950</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Greenwald et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Greenwald, R. A., Baker, K. B., Dudeney, J. R., Pinnock, M., Jones, T. B.,
Thomas, E. C., Villain, J.-P., Cerisier, J.-C., Senior, C., Hanuise, C.,
Hunsucker, R. D., Sofko, G., Koehler, J., Nielsen, E., Pellinen, R., Walker,
A. D. M., Sato, N., and Yamagishi, H.: Darn/SuperDarn: A global view of the
dynamics of high-latitude convection, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 761–796,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00751350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00751350</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Grocott et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Grocott, A., Cowley, S. W. H., and Sigwarth, J. B.: Ionospheric flow during
extended intervals of northward but <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dominated IMF, Ann. Geophys., 21,
509–538, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-21-509-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-21-509-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Grocott et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Grocott, A., Badman, S. V., Cowley, S. W. H., Yeoman, T. K., and Cripps, P.
J.: The influence of IMF By on the nature of the nightside high-latitude
ionospheric flow during intervals of positive IMF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ann. Geophys., 22,
1755–1764, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1755-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-22-1755-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Grocott et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Grocott, A., Yeoman, T. K., Milan, S. E., and Cowley, S. W. H.: Interhemispheric
observations of the ionospheric signature of tail reconnection during IMF-northward
non-substorm intervals, Ann. Geophys., 23, 1763–1770, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1763-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-1763-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Grocott et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Grocott, A., Yeoman, T. K., Milan, S. E., Amm, O., Frey, H. U., Juusola, L.,
Nakamura, R., Owen, C. J., Rème, H., and Takada, T.: Multi-scale
observations of magnetotail flux transport during IMF-northward non-substorm
intervals, Ann. Geophys., 25, 1709–1720, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-1709-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-25-1709-2007</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Grocott et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Grocott, A., Milan, S. E., and Yeoman, T. K.: Interplanetary magnetic field
control of fast azimuthal flows in the nightside high-latitude ionosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L08102, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033545</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Kaymaz et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Kaymaz, Z., Siscoe, G. L., Luhmann, J. G., Lepping, R. P., and Russell, C.
T.: Interplanetary magnetic field control of magnetotail field geometry: IMP
8 observations, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 11113–11126, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JA00300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JA00300</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Kaymaz et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Kaymaz, Z., Siscoe, G., Luhmann, J. G., Fedder, J. A., and Lyon, J. G.:
Interplanetary magnetic field control of magnetotail field: IMP 8 data and
MHD model compared, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 17163–17172,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/95JA00593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JA00593</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Kullen and Janhunen(2004a)</label><mixed-citation>Kullen, A. and Janhunen, P.: Relation of polar auroral arcs to magnetotail
twisting and IMF rotation: a systematic MHD simulation study, Ann. Geophys.,
22, 951–970, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-951-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-22-951-2004</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Kullen and Janhunen(2004b)</label><mixed-citation>Kullen, A. and Janhunen, P.: Erratum “Relation of polar auroral arcs to
magnetotail twisting and IMF, rotation: a systematic MHD simulation study”,
Ann. Geophys., Ann. Geophys., 22, 2655–2655, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-2655-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-22-2655-2004</ext-link>,
2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Lui(1986)</label><mixed-citation>
Lui, A. T. Y.: Polar wind influence on magnetotail configuration and
dynamics, in: Solar wind magnetosphere coupling, edited by: Kamide, Y. and
Slavin, J. A., 671, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Owen et al.(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Owen, C. J., Slavin, J. A., Richardson, I. G., Murphy, N. and Hynds, R. J.:
Average motion, structure and orientation of the distant magnetotail
determined from remote sensing of the edge of the plasma sheet boundary layer
with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 keV ions, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 185–204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JA02417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JA02417</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Petrukovich et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Petrukovich, A. A., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Schödel, R., and Mukai,
T.: Are earthward bursty bulk flows convective or field-aligned, J. Geophys.
Res., 106, 21221–21215, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JA900019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JA900019</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Pitkänen et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Pitkänen, T., Hamrin, M., Norqvist, P., Karlsson, T., and Nilsson, H.: IMF
dependence of the azimuthal direction of earthward magnetotail fast flows,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5598–5604, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2013GL058136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013GL058136</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Raj et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Raj, A., Phan, T., Lin, R. P., and Angelopoulos, V.: Wind survey of
high-speed bulk flows and field-aligned beams in the near-Earth plasma sheet,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1419, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JA007547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JA007547</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Rème et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Rème, H., Aoustin, C., Bosqued, J. M., Dandouras, I., Lavraud, B.,
Sauvaud, J. A., Barthe, A., Bouyssou, J., Camus, Th., Coeur-Joly, O., Cros,
A., Cuvilo, J., Ducay, F., Garbarowitz, Y., Medale, J. L., Penou, E.,
Perrier, H., Romefort, D., Rouzaud, J., Vallat, C., Alcaydé, D., Jacquey,
C., Mazelle, C., d'Uston, C., Möbius, E., Kistler, L. M., Crocker, K.,
Granoff, M., Mouikis, C., Popecki, M., Vosbury, M., Klecker, B., Hovestadt,
D., Kucharek, H., Kuenneth, E., Paschmann, G., Scholer, M., Sckopke, N.,
Seidenschwang, E., Carlson, C. W., Curtis, D. W., Ingraham, C., Lin, R. P.,
McFadden, J. P., Parks, G. K., Phan, T., Formisano, V., Amata, E.,
Bavassano-Cattaneo, M. B., Baldetti, P., Bruno, R., Chionchio, G., Di Lellis,
A., Marcucci, M. F., Pallocchia, G., Korth, A., Daly, P. W., Graeve, B.,
Rosenbauer, H., Vasyliunas, V., McCarthy, M., Wilber, M., Eliasson, L.,
Lundin, R., Olsen, S., Shelley, E. G., Fuselier, S., Ghielmetti, A. G.,
Lennartsson, W., Escoubet, C. P., Balsiger, H., Friedel, R., Cao, J.-B.,
Kovrazhkin, R. A., Papamastorakis, I., Pellat, R., Scudder, J., and Sonnerup,
B.: First multispacecraft ion measurements in and near the Earth's
magnetosphere with the identical Cluster ion spectrometry (CIS) experiment,
Ann. Geophys., 19, 1303–1354, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-19-1303-2001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-19-1303-2001</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Ruohoniemi and Baker(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Ruohoniemi, J. M. and Baker, K. B.: Large-scale imaging of high-latitude
convection with Super Dual Auroral Radar Network HF radar observations, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 20797–20811, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/98JA01288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JA01288</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Ruohoniemi and Greenwald(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Ruohoniemi, J. M. and Greenwald, R. A.: Statistical patterns of high-latitude
convection obtained from Goose Bay HF radar observations, J. Geophys. Res.,
101, 21743–21764, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JA01584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JA01584</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Russell(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, C. T.: The configuration of the magnetosphere, in: Critical Problems
of Magnetospheric Physics, edited by: Dyer, E. R., National Academy of
Sciences, Washington, DC, 1, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Sergeev et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Sergeev, V., Runov, A., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Zhang, T. L., Balogh,
A., Louarnd, P., Sauvaud, J.-A., and Reme, H.: Orientation and propagation of
current sheet oscillations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L05807,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL019346</ext-link>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Tsyganenko(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Tsyganenko, N. A.: Modeling the Earth's magnetospheric magnetic field
confined within a realistic magnetopause, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 5599–5612,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/94JA03193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94JA03193</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Tsyganenko and Fairfield(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Tsyganenko, N. A. and Fairfield, D. H.: Global shape of the magnetotail
current sheet as derived from Geotail and Polar data, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
A03218, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JA010062</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Tsyganenko et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>Tsyganenko, N. A., Karlsson, S. B. P., Kokubun, S., Yamamoto, T., Lazarus, A.
J., Ogilvie, K. W., and Russell, C. T.: Global configuration of the
magnetotail current sheet as derived from Geotail, Wind, IMP 8 and ISEE 1/2
data, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6827–6841, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JA03621" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JA03621</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Walker et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Walker, R. J., Richard, R. L., Ogino, T., and Ashour-Abdalla, M.: The
response of the magnetotail to changes in the IMF orientation: The
magnetotail's long memory, Phys. Chem. Earth C, 24, 221–227, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Walsh et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Walsh, A. P., Fazakerley, A. N., Lahiff, A. D., Volwerk, M., Grocott, A.,
Dunlop, M. W., Lui, A. T. Y., Kistler, L. M., Lester, M., Mouikis, C., Pu,
Z., Shen, C., Shi, J., Taylor, M. G. G. T., Lucek, E., Zhang, T. L., and
Dandouras, I.: Cluster and Double Star multipoint observations of a plasma
bubble, Ann. Geophys., 27, 725–743, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-725-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-27-725-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Zhang et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T. L., Baumjohann, W., Nakamura, R., Balogh, A., and Glassmeier,
K.-H.: A wavy twisted neutral sheet observed by CLUSTER, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
29, 1899–1902, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015544" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015544</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Zhang et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, T. L., Nakamura, R., Volwerk, M., Runov, A., Baumjohann, W.,
Eichelberger, H. U., Carr, C., Balogh, A., Sergeev, V., Shi, J. K., and
Fornacon, K.-H.: Double Star/Cluster observation of neutral sheet
oscillations on 5 August 2004, Ann. Geophys., 23, 2909–2914,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-2909-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-2909-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
