References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-32-353-2014

Differences in mid-latitude stratospheric winds between reanalysis data and versus radiosonde observations at Prague

Kozubek

¹ Laštovička

¹ Križan

Institute of Atmospheric Physics ASCR, Bocni II, 14131 Prague, Czech Republic

11 04 2014

32 4 353 366

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/32/353/2014/angeo-32-353-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/32/353/2014/angeo-32-353-2014.pdf

Reanalysis data are very useful for studying the stratosphere. They can be used for analysis of long-term trends (temperature, wind speed, humidity, etc.) or analysis of global atmospheric dynamics, etc. There are various reanalysis projects that provide outputs which are not identical. In this paper, we mutually compare three of them, ERA-40, ERA-Interim and NCEP/NCAR, and compare them with balloon radiosonde observations from Prague, Port Hardy and Valentia stations. This comparison is done for wind speed and direction at pressure levels 100 and 10 hPa and for various periods between 1957 and 2009. The results show that the differences between reanalysis vary. Wind speed data from all three analyses reasonably agree except for the 10 hPa historical data before 1966 and particularly ERA-40 data at the end of the data series (1998–2001). The quality of the ERA-40 10 hPa stratospheric wind data has been proven to be substantially worse over the last four ERA-40 years of 1998–2001 (2002) compared to previous years, both in wind speed and wind direction. The reanalysis data results are compared with radiosonde observations from Prague, Port Hardy and Valentia stations at 10 hPa for the months of February between 1989 and 2009. The results show that there are sometimes surprisingly large differences, more for ERA-Interim versus Prague measurements. Differences in wind direction greater than 45° (outliers) between the reanalysis data and Prague observations in wind direction occur in Februaries predominantly when winds in Prague are in "minor" sectors, such as north, northeast and east (easterlies), whereas "major" sectors, particularly the dominant W (westerlies) wind sector, exhibit almost no outliers.

References 1

Akperov, M. G. and Mokhov, I. I.: A comparative analysis of the method of extratropical cyclone identification, Izvestiya, Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 46, 574–590, 2010.

Berrisford, P., Dee, D., Fielding, K., Fuentes, M., Kallberg, P., Kobayashi, S., and Uppala, S.: The ERA-Interim Archive, ERA Report Series. 1. Technical Report. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, 2009.

Birner, T.: Recent widening of the tropical belt from global tropopause statistics: Sensitivities, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D23109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014664">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014664</a>, 2010.

Brönnimann, S., Stickler, A., Griesser, T., Fischer, A.M., Grant, A., Ewen, T., Zhou, T., Schraner, M., Rozanov, E., and Peter, T.: Variability of large-scale atmospheric circulation indices for the northern hemisphere during the past 100 years, Meteorol. Z., 18, 379–396, 2009.

Courtier, P., Andersson, E., Heckley, W., Vasiljevic, D., Hamrud, M., Hollingsworth, A., Rabier, F., Fisher, M., and Pailleux, J.: "The ECMWF Implementation of Three Dimensional Variational Assimilation 3D-Var. Pt I: Formulation, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 124, 1783–1808, 1998.

Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553–597, 2011.

Greatbatch, R. J. and Rong, P. P.: Discrepancies between different northern hemisphere summer atmospheric data products, J. Climate, 19, 1261–1273, 2006.

Iwasaki, T., Hamada, H., and Miyazaki, K.: Comparison of Brewer-Dobson circulations diagnosed from reanalyzes, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 87, 997–1006, 2009.

Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996

Kanamitsu, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Woollen, J., Yang, S.-K., Hnilo, J. J., Fiorino, M., and Potter, G. L.: NCEP-DEO AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2), 1631–1643, B. Atmos. Meteorol. Soc., 2002.

Kistler, R., Kalnay, E., Collins, W., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Kanamitsu, M., Kousky, V., van den Dool, H., Jenne, R., and Fiorino, M.: "The NCEP 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 247–267, 2001.

Lehmann, E. and Nevir, P.: Uncertainties in relative atmospheric angular momentum computed from zonal winds in reanalysis data, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D09101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016658">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016658</a>, 2012.

Laštovička, J., Akmaev, R. A., Beig, G., Bremer, J., Emmert, J. T., Jacobi, C., Jarvis, M. J., Nedoluha, G., Portnyagin, Yu. I., and Ulich, T.: Emerging pattern of global change in the upper atmosphere and ionosphere, Ann. Geophys., 26, 1255–1268, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-1255-2008">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-1255-2008</a>, 2008.

Laštovička, J., Križan, P., and Kozubek, M.: Long-term trends in the middle atmosphere dynamics at northern middle latitudes – one regime or two different regimes?, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 10, 2633–2668, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-2633-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-2633-2010</a>, 2010.

Martineau, P. and Son, S.-W.: Quality of reanalysis data during stratospheric vortex weakening and intensification events, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L22801, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045237">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045237</a>, 2010.

Masaki, Y.: Wind field differences between three meteorological reanalysis data sets detected by evaluating atmospheric excitation of Earth rotation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D07110, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008893">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008893</a>, 2008.

Onogi, K., Tsutsui, J., Koide, H., Sakamoto, M., Kobayashi, S., Hatsushika, H., Matsumoto, T., Yamazaki, N., Kamahori, H., Takahashi, K., Kadokura, S., Wada, K., Kato, K., Oyama, R., Ose, T., Mannoji, N., and Taira, R.: The JRA-25 Reanalysis, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 85, 369–432, 2007.

Paek, H. and Huang, H.-P.: A comparison of the interannual variability in atmospheric angular momentum and length-of-day using multiple reanalysis data sets, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D20102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018105">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018105</a>, 2012.

Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. D.: The National Meteorological Center Spectral Statistical Interpolation Analysis System, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747–176, 1992.

Reichle, R. H.: The MERRA-Land Data Product, version 1.1. GMAO Technical Report, NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 2012.

Screen, J. A. and Simmonds, I.: Erroneous Arctic Temperature Trends in the ERA-40 Reanalysis: A Closer Look, J. Climate, 24, 2620–2627, 2011.

Simmons, A. J., Jones, P. D., da Costa Bechtold, V., Beljaars, A. C. M., Kållberg, P. W., Saarinen, S., Uppala, S. M., Viterbo, P., and Wedi, N.: Comparison of trends and low frequency variability in CRU, ERA-40, and NCEP/NCAR analyses of surface air temperature, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24115, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005306">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005306</a>, 2004.

Trigo, I. F.: Climatology and interannual variability of storm tracks in the Euro-Atlantic sector: a comparison between ERA-40 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyzes, Clim. Dynam., 26, 127–143, 2006.

Uppala, S. M., Kållberg, P. W., Simmons, A. J., Andrae, U., Da Costa Bechtold, V., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J. K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G. A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R. P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M. A., Beljaars, A. C. M., Van De Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B. J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P. A. E. M., Jenne, R., Mcnally, A. P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, N. A., Saunders, R. W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K. E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J.: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, 2005.

Watarai, Y. and Tanaka, H. L.: Characteristics of the JRA-25 dataset from the viewpoint of global energetics, SOLA, 3, 9–12, 2007.

Žagar, N., Tribbia, J., Anderson, J., and Raeder, K.: Uncertainties of estimates of inertio-gravity energy in the atmosphere. Part I: Intercomparison of four analysis systems, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3837–3857, 2009.

Zhao, Y. and Li, J.: Discrepancy of mass transport between the Northern and Southern hemispheres among the ERA-40, NCEP/NCAR, NCEP-DOE AMIP-2, and JRA-25 reanalysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L20804, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027287">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027287</a>, 2006.