References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-32-1035-2014

Difference between even- and odd-numbered cycles in the predictability of solar activity and prediction of the amplitude of cycle 25

Yoshida

Shizuoka University, 836, Ohya, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, 422-8529, Japan

25 08 2014

32 8 1035 1042

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/32/1035/2014/angeo-32-1035-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/32/1035/2014/angeo-32-1035-2014.pdf

It was shown previously that the sunspot number (SSN) at a point 3 years before the minimum is well correlated with the maximum SSN of the succeeding cycle, and a better correlation is obtained when the maximum SSN is replaced by the average SSN over a cycle for which the average SSN is calculated by dividing cycles at a point 3 years before the minimum (Yoshida and Yamagishi, 2010; Yoshida and Sayre, 2012). Following these findings, we demonstrate in this paper that the correlation between the SSN 3 years before the minimum and the amplitude of the coming cycle differs significantly between even-numbered and odd-numbered cycles: the correlation is much better for even-numbered cycles. Further, it is shown that the amplitude of even-numbered cycles is strongly correlated with that of the succeeding odd-numbered cycles, while the correlation between amplitudes of odd-numbered cycles and those of succeeding even-numbered cycles is very poor. Using the excellent correlations, we estimate the maximum SSN of the current cycle 24 at 81.3 and predict the maximum SSN of cycle 25 to be 115.4 ± 11.9. It is of note, however, that a peak of the SSN has been observed in February 2012 and the peak value 66.9 is considerably smaller than the estimated maximum SSN of cycle 24. We conjecture that the second higher peak of the SSN may appear.

References 1

Belucz, B. and Dikpati, M.: Role of asymmetric meridional circulation in producing north-south asymmetry in a solar cycle dynamo model, Astrophys. J., 779, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/4">https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/4</a>, 2013.

Cameron, R. and Schussler, M.: Solar cycle prediction using precursors and flux transport models, Astrophys. J., 659, 801–811, 2007a.

Cameron, R. and Schussler, M.: Are solar cycle predictable?, Astron. Nachr, 328, 1087–1091, 2007b.

Cameron, R. and Schussler, M.: A robust correlation between growth rate and amplitude of solar cycles: Consequences for prediction methods, Astrophys. J., 685, 1291–1296, 2008.

Charbonneau, P. and Dikpati, M.: Stochastic fluctuations in a Babcock-Leighton model of the solar cycle, Astrophys. J., 543, 1027–1043, 2000.

Dikpati, M. and Gilman, P. A.: Simulating and predicting solar cycles using a flux-transport dynamo, Astrophys. J., 649, 498–514, 2006.

Dikpati, M., de Toma, G., and Gilman, P. A.: Predicting the strength of solar cycle 24 using a flux-transport dynamo-based tool, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, L05102, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025221">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025221</a>, 2006.

Dikpati, M., Gilman, P. A., de Toma, G., and Ghosh, S. S.: Simulating solar cycles in northern and southern hemisphere by assimilatingmagnetic data into a calibrated flux-transport dynamo, Solar Physics, 245, 1–17, 2007.

Dikpati, M., Gilman, P. A., and de Toma, G.: The Waldmeier effect: An artifact of the definition of Wolf sunspot number?, Astrophys. J., 673, L99–L101, 2008.

Hathaway, D. H. and Wilson, R. M.: Geomagnetic activity indicates large amplitude for sunspot cycle 24, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18101, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027053">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027053</a>, 2006.

Hathaway, D. H., Nandy, D., Wilson, R. M., and Reichmann, E. J.: Evidence that a deep meridional flow sets the sunspot cycle period, Astrophys. J., 589, 665–670, 2003.

Hathaway, D. H., Nandy, D., Wilson, R. M., and Reichmann, E. J.: Erratum: "Evidence that a deep meridional flow sets the sunspot cycle period, Astrophys. J., 602, p. 543, 2004.

Kane, R. P.: A preliminary estimate of the size of the coming solar cycle 24, based on Ohl's precursor method, Solar Phys., 243, 205–217, 2007.

Ohl, A. I.: Forecast of sunspot maximum number of cycle 20, Solice Donie, 9, 84–85, 1966.

Pesnell, W. D.: Prediction of solar cycle 24, Solar Phys., 252, 209–220, 2008.

Schatten, K. H.: Fair space weather for solar cycle 24, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21106, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024363">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024363</a>, 2005.

Svalgaard, L., Cliver, E. W., and Kamide, Y.: Sunspot cycle 24: Smallest cycle in 100 years?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L01104, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021664</a>, 2005.

Thompson, R. J.: The rise of solar cycle number 22, Solar Phys., 117, 279–289, 1988.

Waldmeier, M.: Neue Eigenschaften der Sonnenfleckenkurve, Astronomische Mitteilungen Zurich, 14, 105–130, 1935.

Yeates, A. P., Nandy, D., and Mackay, D. H.: Exploring the physical basis of solar cycle predictions: Flux transport dynamics and presence of memory in advection- versus diffusion-dominated solar convection zones, Astrophys. J., 673, 544–556, 2008.

Yoshida, A. and Sayre, R.: Tendency of discreteness of the solar amplitude and intercycle relatedness, Advances in Astronomy, 2012, 519852, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/519852">https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/519852</a>, 2012.

Yoshida, A. and Yamagishi, H.: Predicting amplitude of solar cycle 24 based on a new precursor method, Ann. Geophys., 28, 417–425, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-417-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-28-417-2010</a>, 2010.