References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-31-835-2013

THEMIS and ground-based observations of successive substorm onsets following a super-long growth phase

Liu

J.-M.

¹ ² Kamide

¹ Zhang

B.-C.

¹ Hu

H.-Q.

¹ Yang

H.-G.

SOA Key Laboratory for Polar Science, Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, 200136, China

Sate Key Laboratory of Space Weather, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

06 05 2013

31 5 835 843

2013

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/31/835/2013/angeo-31-835-2013.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/31/835/2013/angeo-31-835-2013.pdf

We present four successive substorm events, which followed a super-long, as long as 9 h, growth phase on 5 December 2008, observed by the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interaction during Substorms (THEMIS) and the GOES 11 satellite with simultaneous coverage by the Alaska and THEMIS ground magnetometers. Several interesting and unique features were found for these cases. The interplanetary magnetic field was steadily southward and the solar wind speed was slow, less than 450 km s<sup>−1</sup>, which are thought to drive the long growth phase for the following onsets. At least four substorm expansion onsets occurred, including a double-onset event, which appears to be a challenge to the reconnection hypothesis for double-onset substorm and favored an instability mechanism for the onsets and could not be explained by the two neutral line models. For the onsets at 09:32 UT and 09:42 UT, the dipolarization signature was observed by GOES 11, which was located earthward of THEMIS C and THEMIS B. THEMIS C satellite caught a delayed and much weaker signature 1–3 min after GOES 11. THEMIS B observed no relating signature. These observations provide us with direct evidence that these events initiated at the near-earth region. The observations of THEMIS C and THEMIS B around the onsets favor the near-earth instabilities model for substorm onset.

References 1

Angelopoulos, V., McFadden, J. P., Larson, D., Carlson, C. W., Mende, S. B., Frey, H., and Phan, T.: Tail reconnection triggering substorm onset, Science, 321, 931–935, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1160495">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160495</a>, 2008.

Atkinson, G.: An approximate flow equation for geomagnetic flux tubes and its application to polar substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 5373–5382, 1967.

Baker, D. N., Pulkkinen, T. I., Angelopoulos, V., Baumjohann, W., and McPherron, R. L.: Neutral line model of substorms: Past results and present view, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 12975–13010, 1996.

Cheng, C. C., Russell, C. T., Reeves, G. D., Connors, M., and Moldwin, M. B.: On the relationship between double-onset substorm, pseudobreakup, and IMF variation: The September 1999 event, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A07201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010778">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010778</a>, 2005.

Cheng, C.-C., Russell, C. T., Angelopoulos, V., Mann, I. R., Glassmeier, K.-H., and Baumjohann, W.: THEMIS observations of double-onset substorms and their association with IMF variations, Ann. Geophys., 29, 591–611, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-591-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-591-2011</a>, 2011.

Hsu, T. S. and McPherron, R. L.: Average characteristics of triggered and nontriggered substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A07208, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009933">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009933</a>, 2004.

Kamide, Y., Akasofu, S. I., and Rieger, E. P.: Coexistence of two substorms in the midnight sector, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 1620–1624, 1977.

Kokubun, S. and McPherron, R. L.: Substorm signatures at synchronous altitude, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 11265–11277, 1981.

Liu, J.-M., Zhang, B.-C., Kamide, Y., Wu, Z.-S., Hu, Z.-J., and Yang, H.-G.: Spontaneous and trigger-associated substorms compared: Electrodynamic parameters in the polar ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A01207, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015773">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015773</a>, 2011.

Lopez, R., Sibeck, D., McEntire, R., and Krimigis, S.: The energetic ion substorm injection boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 109–117, 1990.

Lui, A. T. Y.: A synthesis of magnetospheric substorm models, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1849–1856, 1991.

Lui, A. T. Y.: Current disruption in the Earth's magnetosphere: Observations and models, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 13067–13088, 1996.

Lui, A. T. Y.: Determination of the substorm initiation region from a major conjunction interval of THEMIS satellites, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A00C04, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013424">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013424</a>, 2008.

McPherron, R. L.: Magnetospheric substorms, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 17, 657–681, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RG017i004p00657">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG017i004p00657</a>, 1979.

McPherron, R. L., Russell, C. T., and Aubry, M.: Satellite studies of magnetospheric substorms on August 15, 1968, 9. Phenomenological model for substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 78, 3131–3149, 1973.

Mende, S., Angelopoulos, V., Frey, H. U., Donovan, E., Jackel, B., Glassmeier, K.-H., McFadden, J. P., Larson, D., and Carlson, C. W.: Timing and location of substorm onsets from THEMIS satellite and ground based observations, Ann. Geophys., 27, 2813–2830, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-2813-2009">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-2813-2009</a>, 2009.

Nagai, T.: Observed magnetic substorm signatures at synchronous altitude, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 4405–4417, 1982.

Ohtani, S.-I.: Substorm trigger processes in the magnetotail: Recent observations and outstanding issues, Space Sci. Rev., 95, 347–359, 2001.

Rostoker, G.: Triggering of expansive phase intensifications of magnetospheric substorms by northward turnings of the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 6981–6993, 1983.

Shukhtina, M. A., Dmitrieva, N. P., and Sergeev, V. A.: Quantitative magnetotail characteristics of different magnetospheric states, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1019–1032, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1019-2004">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-22-1019-2004</a>, 2004.