References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-31-387-2013

The relationship between the magnetosphere and magnetospheric/auroral substorms

Akasofu

S.-I.

International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK 99775 Fairbanks, USA

04 03 2013

31 3 387 394

2013

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/31/387/2013/angeo-31-387-2013.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/31/387/2013/angeo-31-387-2013.pdf

On the basis of auroral and polar magnetic substorm studies, the relationship between the solar wind-magnetosphere dynamo (the DD dynamo) current and the substorm dynamo (the UL dynamo) current is studied. The characteristics of both the DD and UL currents reveal why auroral substorms consist of the three distinct phases after the input power ε is increased above 1018 erg s−1. (a) The growth phase; the magnetosphere can accumulate magnetic energy for auroral substorms, when the ionosphere cannot dissipate the power before the expansion phase. (b) The expansion phase; the magnetosphere releases the accumulated magnetic energy during the growth phase in a pulse-like manner in a few hours, because it tries to stabilize itself when the accumulated energy reaches to about 1023 erg s−1. (c) The recovery phase; the magnetosphere becomes an ordinary dissipative system after the expansion phase, because the ionosphere becomes capable of dissipating the power with the rate of 1018 ~ 1019 erg s−1. On the basis of the above conclusion, it is suggested that the magnetosphere accomplishes the pulse-like release process (resulting in spectacular auroral activities) by producing plasma instabilities in the current sheet, thus reducing the current. The resulting contraction of the magnetic field lines (expending the accumulated magnetic energy), together with break down of the "frozen-in" field condition at distances of less than 10 RE, establishes the substorm dynamo that generates an earthward electric field (Lui and Kamide, 2003; Akasofu, 2011). It is this electric field which manifests as the expansion phase. A recent satellite observation at a distance of as close as 8.1 RE by Lui (2011) seems to support strongly the occurrence of the chain of processes suggested in the above. It is hoped that although the concept presented here is very crude, it will serve in providing one way of studying the three phases of auroral substorms. In turn, a better understanding of auroral substorms will also be useful in studying the magnetosphere, because various auroral activities can be the visible guide for this endeavor.

References 1

Akasofu, S.-I.: The development of the auroral substorm, Planet Space Sci., 12, 273–282, 1964.

Akasofu, I.-I.: Energy coupling between the solar wind and the magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 28, 121–190, 1981.

Akasofu, S.-I.: Meridian chains of magnetometers as a powerful "remoste sensing" tool in determining electromagnetic quantities in the ionosphere on a global scale, EOS, 66, 465–466, 1985.

Akasofu, S.-I.: Confirmation of the validity of the electric current distribution determined by a ground-based magnetometer network, Geophys. J. Inst., 109, 191–196, 1992.

Akasofu, S.-I.: A source of aurorally electrons and the magnetospheric current systems, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8006, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009547">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009547</a>, 2003.

Akasofu, S.-I.: Several `controversial' issues on substotms, Space Sci. Rev., 113, 1–40, 2004.

Akasofu, S.-I.: The choice of the concept of magnetic field lines or of electric current lines: Alfvén medal lecture, Ann. Geophys., 29, 1215–1232, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1215-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-1215-2011</a>, 2011.

Akasofu, S.-I.: Auroral morphology:A historical account and major auroral features during auroral substorms, 29–38, in: Auroral Phenomenology and Magnetospheric Processes, Earth and Other Planetts, edited by: Keiling, A., Donovan E., Begenal, F., and Karlsson, T., AGU Monograph 197, Washington, D.C., 2012.

Akasofu, S.-I., Lui, A. T. Y., and Meng, C.-I.: Importance of auroral features in the search for substorm onset processes, J. Geophys. Res., 115, A08218, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016064">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JA016064</a>, 2010.

Alfvén, H.: The second approach to cosmical electrodynamics, 439–444, in: The Birkeland Symposium on Aurora and Magnetic Storms, edited by: Egeland, A. and Holtet, J., Contre National de la Researche Scientifique, 1967.

Alfvén, H.: Electric currents in cosmic plasmas, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 15, 271–284, 1977.

Birn, J., Hesse, M., and Schindler, K.: Formation of thin current sheets in space plasmas, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6843–6852, 1998.

Bristow, W. A. and Jensen, P.: A superposed epoch study of Super DARN convection observations during suubstorms, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A06232, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012049">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA012049</a>, 2007.

Bostrom, R.: A model of the auroral electrojet, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 4983–4999, 1964.

Bostrom, R.: Ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling, 45–59, in: Magnetospheric Physics, edited by: McCormac, B. M., Dordrecht, D. Reidel-Holland Pub. Co., 1974.

Chapman, S.: An outline of a theory ofmagnetic storms, Proc. Roy. Soc., 97, 61–83, 1918.

Chapman, S. and Ferrao, V. C. A.: The geomagnetic ring current, I. its radial stability, Terr. Mag., 46, 1–6, 1941.

Donovan, E., Liu, W., Liang, J., Spanswick, E., Voronkov, I., Connors, M., Syrjäsuo, M., Baker, G., Jackel, B., Trondsen, T., Greffen, M., Angelopoulos, V., Russell, C. T., Mende, S. B., Frey, H. U., Keiling, A., Carlson, C. W., McFadden, J. P., Glassmeier, K.-H., Auster, U., Hayashi, K., Sakaguchi, K., Shiokawa, K., Wild, J. A., and Rae, I. J.: Simultaneous THEMIS in situ and auroral observations of a small substorm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L17S18, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033794">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033794</a>, 2008.

Frank, L. A. and Craven, J. D.: Imaging results from Dynamic Explorer 1, Rev. Geophys., 26, 240–283, 1988.

Frank, L. A. and Sigwarth, J. B.: Finding concerning the positions of substorm onsets with auroral images from the Polar spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 12747–12761, 2000.

Horton, W. and Doxas, I.: A low-dimensional energy-conserving state space model for substorm dynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 27223–27237, 1996.

Jacquey, C., Sauvaud, J. A., and Dandouras, J.: Location and propagation of the magnetotail current disruption during substorm expansion: Analysis and simulation of an ISEE multi-onset event, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 389–392, 1991.

Jacquey, C., Sauvaud, J. A., and Dandouras, J.: Tailward propagating cross-tail current disruption and dynamics of near-earth tail: a multi-point measurement analysis, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 983–986, 1993.

Kamide, Y., Ahn, B.-H., Akasofu, S.-I., Baumjohann, W., Friis-Christensen, E., Kroehl, H., Maurer, A., Richmond, A. D., Rostoker, G., Spiro, R. W., Walker, J., and Zeizev, A.: Globall distribution of ionospheric and field-aligned currents during substorms as determined from six IMS meridian chains of magnetometers: Initial results, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 8228–8240, 1982.

Lui, A. T. Y.: Reduction of the cross-tail current during near-Earth depolarization with multisatellite observations. J. Geophys. Res., 116, A12239, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017107">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017107</a>, 2011.

Lui, A. T. Y. and Kamide, Y.: A fresh perspective of the substorm current system and its dynamo, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1958, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017835">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017835</a>, 2003.

Lyons, L. R., McPherron, R. L., Zesta, E., Reeves, G. D., Sigwarth, J. B., and Frank, L. A.: Timing of substormm signatures during the November 24, 1996, Geospace Environment Modeling Event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 349–359, 2001.

Sun, W., Xu, S.-Y., and Akasofu, S.-I.: Mathematical separation of directly-driven and unloading components in the ionospheric equivalent currents during substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 11695–11700, 1998.