ANGEO Annales Geophysicae ANGEO Ann. Geophys. 1432-0576 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/angeo-28-1827-2010 Sensitivity of the simulated precipitation to changes in convective relaxation time scale Mishra S. K. 1 2 Srinivasan J. 3 4 National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Bangalore, India Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India 06 10 2010 28 10 1827 1846 Copyright: © 2010 S. K. Mishra 2010 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/28/1827/2010/angeo-28-1827-2010.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/28/1827/2010/angeo-28-1827-2010.pdf

The paper describes the sensitivity of the simulated precipitation to changes in convective relaxation time scale (TAU) of Zhang and McFarlane (ZM) cumulus parameterization, in NCAR-Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). In the default configuration of the model, the prescribed value of TAU, a characteristic time scale with which convective available potential energy (CAPE) is removed at an exponential rate by convection, is assumed to be 1 h. However, some recent observational findings suggest that, it is larger by around one order of magnitude. In order to explore the sensitivity of the model simulation to TAU, two model frameworks have been used, namely, aqua-planet and actual-planet configurations. Numerical integrations have been carried out by using different values of TAU, and its effect on simulated precipitation has been analyzed. <br><br> The aqua-planet simulations reveal that when TAU increases, rate of deep convective precipitation (DCP) decreases and this leads to an accumulation of convective instability in the atmosphere. Consequently, the moisture content in the lower- and mid- troposphere increases. On the other hand, the shallow convective precipitation (SCP) and large-scale precipitation (LSP) intensify, predominantly the SCP, and thus capping the accumulation of convective instability in the atmosphere. The total precipitation (TP) remains approximately constant, but the proportion of the three components changes significantly, which in turn alters the vertical distribution of total precipitation production. The vertical structure of moist heating changes from a vertically extended profile to a bottom heavy profile, with the increase of TAU. Altitude of the maximum vertical velocity shifts from upper troposphere to lower troposphere. Similar response was seen in the actual-planet simulations. With an increase in TAU from 1 h to 8 h, there was a significant improvement in the simulation of the seasonal mean precipitation. The fraction of deep convective precipitation was in much better agreement with satellite observations.

 References Arakawa, A.: The cumulus parameterization past present, and future, J. Climate, 17, 2493–2525, 2004. Betts, A. K.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part I: Observational and theoretical basis, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 677–692, 1986. Betts, A. K. and Miller, M. J.: A new convective adjustment scheme. Part II: Single column tests using GATE-wave, BOMEX, ATEX, and Arctic Airmass data sets, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 112, 693–710, 1986. Boville, B. A. and Bretherton, C. S.: Heating and dissipation in the NCAR community atmosphere model, J. Climate, 16, 3877–3887, 2003. Bretherton, C. S., Peters, M. E., and Back, L. E.: Relationships between water vapor path and precipitation over the tropical oceans, J. Climate, 17, 1517–1528, 2004. Brown, R. G. and Bretherton, C. S.: A test of the strict quasi-equilibrium theory on long time and space scales, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 624–638, 1997. Collins, W. D., et al.: Simulation of aerosol distributions and radiative forcing for INDOEX: Regional climate impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8028, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001365, 2002. Collins, W. D., , et al.: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3). Tech. Rep. NCAR/TN-464+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, 226 pp., 2004. Collins, W. D., , et al.: The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version&nbsp;3 (CAM3), J. Climate, 19, 2144–2161, 2006. Frierson, D. M. W.: The Dynamics of Idealized convection scheme on the zonally averaged tropical circulation, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1959–1976, 2007. Gates, W. L.: AMIP: the atmospheric model intercomparsion project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73, 1962–1970, 1992. Hack, J. J.: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM2), J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5551–5568, 1994. Hack, J. J., , et al.: Simulation of the Global Hydrological Cycle in the CCSM Community Atmosphere Model Version&nbsp;3 (CAM3): Mean Features, J. Climate, 19, 2199–2221, 2006. Houze Jr., R. A.: Stratiform precipitation in regions of convection: A meteorological paradox?, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2179–2196, 1997. Hurrell, J. W., Hack, J. J., Phillips, A. S., Caron, J., and Yin, J.: The Dynamical Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3), J. Climate, 19, 2162–2183, 2006. Johnson, R. H.: Partitioning tropical heat and moisture budgets into cumulus and mesoscale components: Implication for cumulus parameterization, Mon. Weather Rev., 112, 1590–1601, 1984. Lee, J.-E., Pierrehumbert, R., Swann, A., and Lintner, B. R.: Sensitivity of stable water isotopic values to convective parameterization schemes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L23801, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040880, 2009. Lin, J. L., Mapes, B. E., Zhang, M., and Newman, M.: Stratiform precipitation, vertical heating profiles, and the Madden-Julian Oscillation, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 296–309, 2004. Locatelli, J. D. and Hobbs, P. V.: Fall Speeds and Masses of Solid Precipitation Particles, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 2185–2197, 1974. Lorant, V., McFarlane, N. A., and Scinocca, J. F.: Variability of precipitation intensity: sensitivity to treatment of moist convection in an RCM and a GCM, Clim. Dynam., 26, 183–200, 2006. Mapes, B. E. and Houze Jr., R. A.: Cloud clusters and superclusters over the oceanic warm pool, Mon. Weather Rev., 121, 1398–1415, 1993. Mapes, B. E. and Houze Jr., R. A.: Diabatic divergence profiles in western Pacific mesoscale convective systems, J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1807–1828, 1995. Mapes, B. E.: Empirical studies of unobservable parameters, 2001 ECMWF annual seminar course on physical parameterization, 2001. McFarlane, N. A.: The effect of orographically excited gravity wave drag on the general circulation of the lower stratosphere and troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 1775–1800, 1987. Meehl, G. A., , et al.: Monsoon Regimes in the CCSM3, J. Climate, 19, 2482–2495, 2006. Mishra, S. K.: The impact of convective relaxation time on the simulation of seasonal migration of ITCZ, MJO, and Kelvin waves in CAM3.0 An International Conference: Celebrating the Monsoon, IISc, Bangalore, <a href="http://www.image.ucar.edu/&nbsp;saroj/presentations.html">http://www.image.ucar.edu/&nbsp;saroj/presentations.html</a>, July 2007. Mishra. S. K., Srinivasan, J., and Nanjundiah, R. S.: The impact of time step on the intensity of ITCZ in aqua-planet GCM, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 4077–4091, 2008. Neale, R. B.: A study of the tropical response in an idealized global circulation, PhD thesis, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, UK, 1999. Neale, R. B. and Hoskins, B. J.: A standard test for AGCMs including their physical parameterizations. I: The proposal, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 1, 101–107, 2000. Rasch, P. J. and Kristjansson, J. E.: A comparison of the CCM3 model climate using diagnosed and predicted condensate parameterizations, J. Climate, 11, 1587–1613, 1998. Rasch, P. J., , et al.: A characterization of tropical transient activity in the CAM3 atmospheric hydrological cycle, J. Climate, 19, 2222–2242, 2006. Rayner, N. A., , et al.: Globally complete analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice and night marine air temperature, 1871–2000, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4407, , 2003. Reynolds, R. W., Rayner, N. A., Smith, T. M., Stokes, D. C., and Wang, W.: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate, J. Climate, 15, 1609–1625, 2002. Ricciardulli, L. and Garcia, R. R.: The excitation of equatorial waves by deep convection in the NCAR community climate model (CCM3), J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 3461–3487, 2000 Sahany, S. and Nanjundiah, R. S.: Impact of convective downdrafts on model simulations: results from aqua-planet integrations, Ann. Geophys., 26, 1877–1887, https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-26-1877-2008, 2008. Sundqvist, H.: Parameterization of condensation and associated clouds in models for weather prediction and general circulation simulation, in Physically-based Modeling and Simulation of Climate and Climate Change, vol.1, edited by: Schlesinger, M. E., 433–461, Kluwer Academic, 1998. Williamson, D. L.: Time-split versus process-split coupling of parameterizations and dynamical core, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 2024–2041, 2002. Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 2539–2558, 1996. Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the CCGCM, Atmos.-Ocean, 33, 407–446, 1995. Zhang, M., Lin, W., Bretherton, C. S., Hack, J. J., and Rasch, P. J.: A modified formulation of fractional stratiform condensation rate in the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model CAM2, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D1), 4035, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002523, 2003.