ANGEO Annales Geophysicae ANGEO Ann. Geophys. 1432-0576 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/angeo-27-1679-2009 Ionospheric storms at geophysically-equivalent sites – Part 1: Storm-time patterns for sub-auroral ionospheres Mendillo M. 1 Narvaez C. 1 Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA 07 04 2009 27 4 1679 1694 Copyright: © 2009 M. Mendillo 2009 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/27/1679/2009/angeo-27-1679-2009.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/27/1679/2009/angeo-27-1679-2009.pdf

The systematic study of ionospheric storms has been conducted primarily with groundbased data from the Northern Hemisphere. Significant progress has been made in defining typical morphology patterns at all latitudes; mechanisms have been identified and tested via modeling. At higher mid-latitudes (sites that are typically sub-auroral during non-storm conditions), the processes that change significantly during storms can be of comparable magnitudes, but with different time constants. These include ionospheric plasma dynamics from the penetration of magnetospheric electric fields, enhancements to thermospheric winds due to auroral and Joule heating inputs, disturbance dynamo electrodynamics driven by such winds, and thermospheric composition changes due to the changed circulation patterns. The ~12&deg; tilt of the geomagnetic field axis causes significant longitude effects in all of these processes in the Northern Hemisphere. A complementary series of longitude effects would be expected to occur in the Southern Hemisphere. In this paper we begin a series of studies to investigate the longitudinal-hemispheric similarities and differences in the response of the ionosphere's peak electron density to geomagnetic storms. <br><br> The ionosonde stations at Wallops Island (VA) and Hobart (Tasmania) have comparable geographic and geomagnetic latitudes for sub-auroral locations, are situated at longitudes close to that of the dipole tilt, and thus serve as our candidate station-pair choice for studies of ionospheric storms at geophysically-comparable locations. They have an excellent record of observations of the ionospheric penetration frequency (<I>fo</I>F2) spanning several solar cycles, and thus are suitable for long-term studies. During solar cycle #20 (1964–1976), 206 geomagnetic storms occurred that had <I>A<sub>p</sub></I>&ge;30 or <I>K<sub>p</sub></I>&ge;5 for at least one day of the storm. Our analysis of average storm-time perturbations (percent deviations from the monthly means) showed a remarkable agreement at both sites under a variety of conditions. Yet, small differences do appear, and in systematic ways. We attempt to relate these to stresses imposed over a few days of a storm that mimic longer term morphology patterns occurring over seasonal and solar cycle time spans. Storm effects versus season point to possible mechanisms having hemispheric differences (as opposed to simply seasonal differences) in how solar wind energy is transmitted through the magnetosphere into the thermosphere-ionosphere system. Storm effects versus the strength of a geomagnetic storm may, similarly, be related to patterns seen during years of maximum versus minimum solar activity.

 References Balan, N. and Rao, P. B.: Dependence of ionospheric response on the local time of sudden commencement and the intensity of geomagnetic storms, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 52, 269–275, 1990. Barth, C. A., Baker, D. N., and Mankoff, K. D.: Magnetospheric control of the energy input into the thermosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1629, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014362, 2002. Baumgardner, J., Wroten, J., Semeter, J., Kozyra, J., Buonsanto, M., Erickson, P., and Mendillo, M.: A very bright SAR arc: implications for extreme magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, Ann. Geophys., 25, 2593–2608, 2008. Burns, A. G., Killeen, T. L., Wang, W., and Roble, R. G.: The solar-cycle-dependent response to geomagnetic storms, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 66, 1–14, 2004. Burns, A. G., Solomon, S. C., Wang, W., and Killeen, T. L.: The ionospheric and thermospehric response to CMEs: Challenges and successes, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 69, 77–85, 2007. Duncan, R. A.: F-region seasonal and magnetic-storm behaviour, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 31, 59–70, 1969. Emery, B. A., Lathuillere, C., Richards, P. G., Roble, R. G., Buonsanto, M. J., Knipp, D. J., Wilkinson, P., Sipler D. P., and Niciejewski, R.: Time dependent thermospheric neutral response to the 2–11 November 1993 storm period, J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys., 61, 329–350, 1999. Emery, B., Coumans, V., Evans, D., Germany, G., Greer, M., Holeman, E., Kadinsky-Cade, K., Rich, F., and Xu, W.: Seasonal, Kp, solar wind and solar flux variations in long-term single-pass satellite estimates of electron and ion auroral hemispheric power, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A06311, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012866, 2008. Emery, B., Richardson, I., Evans, D., and Rich, F.: Solar wind structure sources and periodicities of auroral electron power over three solar cycles, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., in press, 2009. Essex, E. A., Mendillo, M., Schödel, J. P., Klobuchar, J. A., da Rosa, A. V., Yeh, K. C., Fritz, R. B., Hibberd, F. H., Kersley, L., Koster, J. R., Matsoukas, D. A., Nakata, Y., and Roelofs, T. H.: A global response of the total electron content of the ionosphere to the magnetic storms of 17 December and 18 June 1972, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 43, 293–306, 1981. Foster, J., Buonsanto, M. J., Mendillo, M., Nottingham, D., Rich, F., and Denig, W.: Coordinated stable auroral red arc observations: Relationship to plasma convection, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 11429–11439, 1994. Forster, J. C. and Rideout, W.: Midlatitude TEC enhancements during the October 2003 superstorm, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, L12904, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021719, 2005. Fuller-Rowell, T. J., Codrescu, M. V., Rishbeth, H., Moffett, R. J., and Quegan, S.: On the seasonal response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 2343–2353, 1996. Hibberd, F. H. and Ross, W. J.: Variations in total electron content and other Ionospheric parameters associated with magnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 72, 5331–5337, 1967. Gasda, S. and Richmond, A. D.: Longitudinal and interhemispheric variations or auroral ionospheric electrodynamics in a realistic geomagnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 4011–4021, 1998. Lanzerotti, L. J., Cogger, L. L., and Mendillo, M.: Latitude dependence of ionosphere total electron content: Observations during sudden commencement storms, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1287–1306, 1975. Lei, J., Wang, W., Burns, A., Solomon, S., Richmond, A., Wiltberger, M., Goncharenko, L., Coster, A., and Reinisch, B.: Observations and simulations of the ionospheric and thermospheric response to the December 2006 geomagnetic storm: Initial phase, J. Geophys. Res., 113, A01314, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012807, 2008. Matsushita, S.: A study of the morphology of ionospheric storms, J. Geophys. Res., 64, 305–321, 1959. Matuura, N.: Theoretical models of ionospheric storms, Space Sci. Rev., 13, 124–189, 1972. Mendillo, M.: Ionospheric total electron content behavior during geomagnetic storms, Nature, 234, 23–24, 1971. Mendillo, M.: A study of the relationship between geomagnetic storms and ionospheric disturbances at mid-latitudes, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 349–358, 1973. Mendillo, M.: Storms in the ionosphere: Patterns and processes for total electron content, Rev. Geophys., 44, RG4001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000193, 2006. Mendillo, M., Huang, C.-L., Pi, X.-Q., Rishbeth, H., and Meier, R.: The global asymmetry in ionospheric total content, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 67, 1377–1387, 2005. Mendillo, M. and Klobuchar, J. A.: Total electron content: Synthesis of past storm Studies and needed future work, Radio Sci., 41, RS5S02, https://doi.org/1029/2005RS003394, 2006. Mendillo, M., Papagiannis, M. D., and Klobuchar, J. A.: Average behavior of the midlatitude F-region parameters N$_T$, N$_\max$ and $\tau $ during geomagnetic storms, J. Geophys. Res., 77, 4891–4895, 1972. Mendillo, M., Klobuchar J. A., and Hajeb-Hosseinieh, H.: Ionospheric disturbances: Evidence for the contraction of the plasmasphere during severe geomagnetic storms, Planet. Space Sci., 22, 223–236, 1974. Mendillo, M., He, X.-Q., and Rishbeth, H.: How the effects of winds and electric fields in F2-layer storms vary with latitude and longitude: A theoretical study, Planet. Space Sci., 40, 595–606, 1992. Obayashi, T.: Morphology of storms in the ionosphere, Res. Geophys., 1, edited by: Odishaw, H., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 335–366, 1964. Qian, L., Solomon, S. C., and Kane, T. J.: Seasonal variation of thermospheric density and composition, J. Geophys. Res., 114, A01312, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013643, 2009. Prölss, G. W.: Ionospheric F-Region Storms, in: Handbook of Atmospheric Electrodynamics, vol. 2, edited by: Volland, H., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL USA, Ch. 8, pp. 195–248, 1995. Ridley, A.: Effects of seasonal changes in the ionospheric conductances on magnetospheric field-aligned currents, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L05101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028444, 2007. Rishbeth, H.: Ionospheric storms and the morphology of magnetic disturbances, Planet. Space Sci., 11, 31–43, 1963. Rishbeth, H. and Garriott, O. K.: Introduction to Ionospheric Physics, Academic Press, International Geophys. Series #14, New York, 1969. Rishbeth, H. and Müller-Wodarg, I. C. F.: Why is there more ionosphere in January than in July? The annual asymmetry in the F2-layer, Ann. Geophys., 24, 3293–3311, 2006. Schunk, R. W. and Nagy, A. F.: Ionospheres: Physics, Plasma Physics and Chemistry, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd ed., 2009. Stenbaek-Nielsen, H. C. and Otto, A.: Conjugate auroras and the interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 2223–2232, 1997. Taylor, J. R.: An Introduction to Error Analysis, University Science Books, Sausalito, CA USA, 2nd ed., Ch. 4, pp. 102–103, 1997.