References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-26-499-2008

Comparison of Birkeland current observations during two magnetic cloud events with MHD simulations

Korth

¹ Anderson

B. J.

¹ Lyon

J. G.

² Wiltberger

The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA

Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA

High Altitude Observatory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

26 03 2008

26 3 499 516

2008

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/26/499/2008/angeo-26-499-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/26/499/2008/angeo-26-499-2008.pdf

Low altitude field-aligned current densities obtained from global magnetospheric simulations are compared with two-dimensional distributions of Birkeland currents at the topside ionosphere derived from magnetic field observations by the constellation of Iridium satellites. We present the analysis of two magnetic cloud events, 17–19 August 2003 and 19–21 March 2001, where the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) rotates slowly (~10°/h) to avoid time-aliasing in the magnetic perturbations used to calculate the Birkeland currents. In the August 2003 event the IMF rotates from southward to northward while maintaining a negative IMF By during much of the interval. During the March 2001 event the IMF direction varies from dawnward to southward to duskward. We find that the distributions of the Birkeland current densities in the simulations agree qualitatively with the observations for northward IMF. For southward IMF, the dayside Region-1 currents are reproduced in the simulation, but appear on average 5° further poleward of their observed location, while the nightside Region-1 currents and the Region-2 currents are largely under-represented. Comparison of the observed and simulated Birkeland current distributions, which are intimately related to the plasma drifts at the ionosphere, shows that the ionospheric convection pattern in the MHD model and its dependence on the IMF orientation is essentially correct. The Birkeland total currents in the simulations are about a factor of 2 larger than observed during southward IMF. For Bz>0 the disparity in the total current is reduced and the simulations for purely northward IMF agree with the observations to within 10%. The disparities in the magnitudes of the Birkeland currents between the observations and the simulation results are a combined effect of the simulation overestimating the ionospheric electric field and of the Iridium fits underestimating the magnetic perturbations. The marginal difference in the latitude resolution of the ionospheric grids in the simulations and the observations is shown to have only secondary effect on the magnitudes of the Birkeland currents. The electric potentials in the simulation for southward IMF periods are twice as large as those obtained from measurements of the plasma drift velocities by DMSP, implying that the reconnection rates in the simulation are too large.

References 1

Anderson, B J., Takahashi, K., and Toth, B A.: Sensing global Birkeland currents with Iridium engineering magnetometer data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 4045–4048, 2000.

Anderson, B J., Takahashi, K., Kamei, T., Waters, C L., and Toth, B A.: Birkeland currents sytem key parameters derived from Iridium observations: Method and initial validation results, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1079, \doi10.1029/2001JA000080, 2002.

Baker, K B. and Wing, S.: A new magnetic coordinate system for conjugate studies at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 9139–9143, 1989.

Barbosa, D D.: An Energy Principle for High-Latitude Electrodynamics, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 2881–2890, 1984.

Baumjohann, W. and Treumann, R A.: Basic Space Plasma Physics, Imperial College Press, London, 1997.

Burch, J L., Reiff, P H., Menietti, J D., Heelis, R A., Hanson, W B., Shawhan, S D., Shelley, E G., Sugiura, M., Weimer, D R., and Winningham, J D.: IMF $B_y$-Dependent Plasma Flow and Birkeland Currents in the Dayside Magnetosphere, 1. Dynamics Explorer Observations, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1577–1593, 1985.

Cowley, S. W H.: Comments on the Merging of Nonantiparallel Magnetic Fields, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 3455–3458, 1976.

Crooker, N U.: Dayside Merging and Cusp Geometry, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 951–959, 1979.

Erlandson, R E., Zanetti, L J., Potemra, T A., Bythrow, P F., and Lundin, R.: IMF $B_y$ Dependence of Region 1 Birkeland Currents Near Noon, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 9804–9814, 1988.

Fedder, J A. and Lyon, J G.: The Earth's magnetosphere is 165 $R_E$ long: Self-consistent currents, convection, magnetospheric structure, and processes for northward interplanetary magnetic field, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3623–3635, 1995.

Fedder, J A., Lyon, J G., Slinker, S P., and Mobarry, C M.: Topological structure of the magnetotail as a function of interplanetary magnetic field direction, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 3613–3621, 1995a.

Fedder, J A., Slinker, S P., Lyon, J G., and Elphinstone, R D.: Global numerical simulation of the growth phase and the expansion onset for substorm observed by Viking, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19 083–19 093, 1995b.

Fedder, J A., Slinker, S P., and Lyon, J G.: A comparison of global numerical simulation results to data for the January~27–28, 1992, Geospace Environment Modeling challenge event, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14 799–14 810, 1998.

Frank, L A., Ashour-Abdalla, M., Berchem, J., Raeder, J., Paterson, W R., Kokubun, S., Yamamoto, T., Lepping, R P., Coroniti, F V., Fairfield, D H., and Ackerson, K L.: Observations of plasmas and magnetic fields in Earth's distant magnetotail: Comparison with a global MHD model, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19 177–19 190, 1995.

Goodrich, C C., Lyon, J G., Wiltberger, M., Lopez, R E., and Papadopoulos, K.: An overview of the impact of the January~10–11, 1997 magnetic cloud on the magnetopshere via global MHD simulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 2537–2540, 1998.

Gosling, J T., Thomsen, M F., Bame, S J., and Elphic, R C.: Plasma flow reversals at the dayside magnetopause and the origin of asymmetric polar cap convection, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 8073–8084, 1990.

Iijima, T. and Potemra, T A.: Large-Scale Characteristics of Field-Aligned Currents Associated With Substorms, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 599–615, 1978.

Iijima, T. and Shibaji, T.: Global Characteristics of Northward IMF-Associated (NBZ) Field-Aligned Currents, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 2408–2424, 1987.

Iijima, T., Potemra, T A., Zanetti, L J., and Bythrow, P F.: Large-Scale Birkeland Currents in the Dayside Polar Region During Strongly Northward IMF: A New Birkeland Current System, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7441–7452, 1984.

Korth, H., Anderson, B J., Wiltberger, M J., Lyon, J G., and Anderson, P C.: Intercomparison of Ionospheric Electrodynamics From the Iridium Constellation With Global MHD Simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A07 307, \doi10.1029/2004JA010428, 2004.

Korth, H., Anderson, B J., Frey, H U., and Waters, C L.: High-Latitude Electromagnetic and Particle Energy Flux During an Event With Sustained Strongly Northward IMF, Ann. Geophys., 23, 999–999, 2005.

Lepping, R P., Acuna, M H., Burlaga, L E., Farrell, W M., Slavin, J A., Schatten, K H., Mariani, F., Ness, N F., Neubauer, F M., Whang, Y C., Byrnes, J B., Kennon, R S., Panetta, P V., Scheifele, J., and Worley, E M.: The WIND magnetic field investigation, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 207–229, 1995.

Lopez, R E., Goodrich, C C., Wiltberger, M., and Lyon, J G.: Simulation of the March 9, 1995 substorm and initial comparison to data, in: Geospace Mass and Energy Flow: Results from the International Solar-Terrestrial Physics Program, edited by: Horwitz, J. L., Gallagher, D. L., and Peterson, W. K., Geophysical Monograph 104, pp. 237–245, 1998.

Lyon, J G., Lopez, R E., Goodrich, C C., Wiltberger, M., and Papadopoulos, K.: Simulation of the March~9, 1995, substorm: Auroral brightening and the onset of lobe reconnection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 3039–3042, 1998.

Lyon, J G., Fedder, J A., and Mobarry, C M.: The Lyon–Fedder–Mobarry (LFM) global MHD magnetospheric simulation code, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 66, 1333–1350, 2004.

Maezawa, K.: Magnetospheric Convection Induced by the Positive and Negative Z Components of the Interplanetary Magnetic Field: Quantitative Analysis Using Polar Cap Magnetic Records, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2289–2303, 1976.

Massetti, S.: Antiparallel magnetic merging signatures during IMF $B_y\gg0$: longitudinal and latitudinal cusp aurora bifurcations, Ann. Geophys., 24, 2299–2311, 2006.

McComas, D J., Bame, S J., Barker, P L., Feldman, W C., Phillips, J L., Riley, P., and Griffee, J W.: Solar Wind Electron Proton Alpha Monitor (SWEPAM) for the Advanced Composition Explorer, Space Sci. Rev., 86, 563–612, 1998.

Mobarry, C M., Fedder, J A., and Lyon, J G.: Equatorial plasma convection from global simulations of the Earth's magnetosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7859–7874, 1996.

Moore, T E., Fok, M.-C., and Chandler, M O.: The dayside reconnection X line, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1332, \doi10.1029/2002JA009381, 2002.

Ogilvie, K W., Chornay, D J., Fritzenreiter, R J., Hunsaker, F., Keller, J., Lobell, J., Miller, G., Scudder, J D., Sittler, E C., Torbert, R B., Bodet, D., Needell, G., Lazarus, A J., Steinberg, J T., Tappan, J H., Mavretic, A., and Gergin, E.: SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the WIND spacecraft, Space Sci. Rev., 71, 55–77, 1995.

Ohtani, S., Potemra, T A., Newell, P T., Zanetti, L J., Iijima, T., Watanabe, M., Blomberg, L G., Elphinstone, R D., Murphree, S., Yamauchi, M., and Woch, J G.: Four large-scale field-aligned current systems in the dayside high-latitude region, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 137–153, 1995.

Onsager, T G. and Fuselier, S A.: The location of magnetopause reconnection for northward and southward interplanetary magnetic field, in: Solar System Plasmas in Space and Time, edited by: Burch, J. L. and White, J. H., Geophysical Monograph 84, p 183, American Geophysical Union, Washington, 1994.

Raeder, J., Berchem, J., Ashour-Abdalla, M., Frank, L A., Paterson, W R., Ackerson, K L., Kokubun, S., Yamamoto, T., and Slavin, J A.: Boundary layer formation in the magnetotail: Geotail observations and comparison with a global MHD simulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 951–954, 1997.

Raeder, J., Berchem, J., and Ashour-Abdalla, M.: The Geospace Environment Modeling Grand Challenge: Results from a Global Geospace Circulation Model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14 787–14 797, 1998.

Raeder, J., McPherron, R L., Frank, L A., Kokubun, S., Lu, G., Mukai, T., Paterson, W R., Sigwarth, J B., Singer, H J., and Slavin, J A.: Global simulation of the Geospace Environment Modeling substorm challenge event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 381–395, 2001.

Reiff, P H. and Burch, J L.: IMF $B_\mathrmy$-Dependent Plasma Flow and Birkeland Currents in the Dayside Magnetosphere, 2. A Global Model for Northward and Southward IMF, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1595–1609, 1985.

Richmond, A D. and Kamide, Y.: Mapping Electrodynamic Features of the High-Latitude Ionosphere From Localized Observations: Technique, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 5741–5759, 1988.

Ridley, A J., Zeeuw, D. L D., and Gombosi, T I.: Using the steady state MHD results to predict the global state of the magnetosphere-ionosphere system, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30 067–30 076, 2001.

Ridley, A J., Hansen, K C., Toth, G., Zeeuw, D. L D., Gombosi, T I., and Powell, K G.: University of Michigan MHD results of the Geospace Global Circulation Model metrics challenge, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1290, \doi10.1029/JA000253, 2002.

Russell, C T.: The configuration of the magnetosphere, in: Problems in Magnetospheric Physics, edited by: Dyer, E. R., pp 1–16, National Academy of Science, Washington, 1972.

Sandholt, P E., Farrugia, C J., and Denig, W F.: Detailed dayside auroral morphology as a function of local time for southeast IMF orientation: implications for solar wind–magnetosphere coupling, Ann. Geophys., 22, 3537–3560, 2004.

Slinker, S P., Fedder, J A., and Chen, J.: Global MHD simulation of the magnetosphere and ionosphere for 1930–2330~UT on November~3, 1993, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 26 243–26 250, 1998.

Slinker, S P., Fedder, J A., Emery, B A., Baker, K B., Lummerzheim, D., Lyon, J G., and Rich, F J.: Comparison of global MHD simulations with AMIE simulations for the events of May~19–20, 1996, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 28 379–28 395, 1999.

Smith, C W., L'Heureux, J., Ness, N F., Acuña, M H., Burlaga, L F., and Scheifele, J.: The ACE Magnetic Fields Experiment, Space Sci. Rev., 86, 613–632, 1998.

Toffoletto, F R., Sazykin, S., Spiro, R W., Wolf, R A., and Lyon, J G.: RCM meets LFM: Initial results of one-way coupling, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys., 66, 1361–1370, 2004.

Vennerstrøm, S., Moretto, T., Rastätter, L., and Raeder, J.: Field-aligned currents during northward interplanetary magnetic field: Morphology and causes, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A06 205, \doi10.1029/2004JA010802, 2005.

Waters, C L., Anderson, B J., and Liou, K.: Estimation of global field aligned currents using the Iridium System magnetometer data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2165–2168, 2001.

Waters, C L., Anderson, B J., Greenwald, R A., Barnes, R J., and Ruohoniemi, J M.: High Latitude Poynting Flux From Combined Iridium and SuperDARN Data, Ann. Geophys., 22, 2861–2875, 2004.

Wiltberger, M., Pulkkinen, T I., Lyon, J G., and Goodrich, C C.: MHD simulation of the magnetotail during the December~10, 1996, substorm, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 27 649–27 663, 2000.

Zanetti, L J., Potemra, T A., Iijima, T., Baumjohann, W., and Bythrow, P F.: Ionospheric and Birkeland Current Distributions for Northward Interplanetary Magnetic Field: Inferred Polar Convection, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 7453–7458, 1984.