References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-26-3067-2008

Reconnection in a slow Coronal Mass Ejection

Poletto

¹ Bemporad

² Landini

³ Romoli

INAF – Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory, Firenze, Italy

INAF – Astronomical Observatory, Pino Torinese, Torino, Italy

Dept. of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Firenze, Italy

15 10 2008

26 10 3067 3075

2008

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/26/3067/2008/angeo-26-3067-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/26/3067/2008/angeo-26-3067-2008.pdf

This paper aims at studying reconnection occurring in the aftermath of the 28 May 2004, CME, first imaged by the LASCO (Large Angle and Spectrometric Coronagraph) C2 at 11:06 UT. The CME was observed in White Light and UV radiation: images acquired by the LASCO C2 and C3 coronagraphs and spectra acquired by UVCS (Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer) allowed us to identify the level at which field lines, stretched outwards by the CME ejection, reconnect below the CME bubble. As the CME propagates outwards, reconnection occurs at increasingly higher levels. The process goes on at a low pace for several hours: here we give the profile of the reconnection rate vs. heliocentric distance over a time interval of ≈14 h after the CME onset, extending estimates of the reconnection rate to larger distances than previously inferred by other authors. The reconnection rate appears to decrease with time/altitude. We also calculate upper and lower limits to the density in the diffusion region between 4 and 7 <I>R</I><sub>⊙</sub> and conclude by comparing estimates of the classical and anomalous resistivity in the diffusion region with the value inferred from the data. The latter turns out to be ≥5 order of magnitudes larger than predicted by classical or anomalous theories, pointing to the need of identifying the process responsible for the observed value.

References 1

Aurass, H., Vršnak, B., and Mann, G.: Shock-excited radio burst from reconnection outflow jet?, Astron. Astrophys., 384, 273–281, 2002.

Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R., and Klimchuck, J. A.: A model for Solar Coronal Mass Ejections, Astrophys. J., 510, 485–493, 1999.

Bárta, M., Vršnak, B., and Karlick\'y, M.: Dynamics of plasmoids formed by the current sheet tearing, Astron. Astrophys., 477, 649–655, 2008.

Bemporad, A., Poletto, G., Suess, S. T., et al.: Current Sheet evolution in the aftermath of a CME event, Astrophys. J., 638, 1110–1128, 2006.

Bemporad, A., Raymond, J. C., Poletto, G., et al.: A comprehensive study of the initiation and early evolution of a Coronal Mass Ejection from Ultraviolet and White-Light data, Astrophys. J., 655, 576–590, 2007.

Ciaravella, A., Raymond, J. C., Li, J., et al.: Elemental abundances and Post-Coronal Mass Ejection Current Sheet in a very hot Active Region, Astrophys. J., 575, 1116–1130, 2002.

Fletcher, L. and Hudson, H.: Spectral and spatial variations of flare Hard X-ray footpoints, Solar Phys., 210, 307–321, 2002.

Fletcher, L., Pollock, J. A., and Potts, H. E.: Tracking of TRACE ultraviolet flare footpoints, Solar Phys., 222, 279–298, 2004.

Forbes, T. G.: A review on the genesis of coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 23 153–23 166, 2000.

Forbes, T. G. and Acton, L. W.: Reconnection and field line shrinkage in solar flares, Astrophys. J., 459, 330–341, 1996.

Gardner, L. D., Atkins, N., Fineschi, S., et al.: Efficiency variations of UVCS/SOHO based on laboratory measurements of replica gratingsi, Proc. SPIE, 4139, 362–369, 2000.

Hundhausen, A. J.: The origin and propagation of Coronal Mass Ejections, in: Sixth International Solar Wind Conference, edited by: Pizzo, V. J., Holzer, T., Sime, D. G., 181 p., 1987.

Isobe, H., Takasaki, H., and Shibata, K.: Measurements of the energy release rate and reconnection rate in solar flares, Astrophys. J., 632, 1184–1195, 2005.

Karlick\'y, M., Bárta, M., Mészárosová, H., et al.: Time scales of the slowly drifting pulsating structure observed during the April 12, 2001 flare, Astron. Astrophys., 432, 705–712, 2005.

Ko, Y.-K., Raymond, J. C., Lin, J., et al.: Dynamical and physical properties of a post-Coronal Mass Ejection Current Sheet, Astrophys. J., 594, 1068–1084, 2003.

Lin, J. and Forbes, T. G.: Effects of reconnection on the coronal mass ejection process, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 2375–2392, 2000.

Lin, J., Ko, Y.-K., Sui, L., et al.: Direct observations of the magnetic reconnection site of an eruption on 2003 November 18, Astrophys. J., 622, 1251–1264, 2005.

Lin, J., Li, J., Forbes, T. G., et al.: Features and properties of Coronal Mass Ejection/Flare current sheets, Astrophys. J., 658, L123–126, 2007.

Narukage, N. and Shibata, K.: Statistical analysis of reconnection inflows in solar flares observed with SOHO EIT, Astrophys. J., 637, 1122–1134, 2006.

Nitta, S.-Y.: Continuous transition from fast magnetic reconnection to slow reconnection and change of the reconnection system structure, Astrophys. J., 663, 610–624, 2007.

Oreshina, A. V. and Somov, B. V.: Slow and fast magnetic reconnection. I. Role of radiative cooling, Astron. Astrophys., 331, 1078–1086, 1998.

Parker, E. N.: Sweet's mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluids, J. Geophys. Res., 62, 509–520, 1957.

Parker, E. N.: The solar-flare phenomenon and the theory of reconnection and annihiliation of magnetic fields, Astrophys. J. Supplement, 8, 177–211, 1963.

Petschek, H. E.: Magnetic field annihilation, in: AAS-NASA Symposium on the Physics of solar flares, NASA-SP50, edited by: Hess, W. N., 425 p., 1964.

Poletto, G. and Kopp, R. A.: Large-scale electric fields resulting from magnetic reconnection in the corona, in: The lower Atmosphere of Solar Flares, edited by: Neidig, D. F., 453 p., 1986.

Priest, E. R.: Solar magneto-hydrodynamics, Dordrecht, Holland; Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co., p. 79–80, 1982.

Priest, E. T. and Forbes, T. G.: Magnetic reconnection, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 122, 2000.

Qiu, J., Lee, J., Gary, D. E., et al.: Motion of flare footpoint emission and inferred electric field in reconnecting current sheets, Astrophys. J., 565, 1335–1347, 2002.

Riley, P., Lionello, R., Mikić, Z., et al.: Bursty reconnection following solar eruptions: MHD simulations and comparison with observations, Astrophys. J., 655, 591–597, 2007.

Schwenn, R., Raymond, J. C., Alexander, D., et al.: Coronal Observations of CMEs, Space Sci. Rev., 123, 127–176, 2006.

Somov, B. V. and Oreshina, A. V.: Slow and fast magnetic reconnection. II. High-temperature turbulent-current sheet, Astron. Astrophys., 354, 703–713, 2000.

Švestka, Z., Fàrnik, F., Hick, P., et al.: Large-scale active coronal phenomena in YOHKOH SXT images, I, Solar Phys., 161, 331–363, 1995.

Sweet, P. A.: The neutral point theory of solar flares, in: Electromagnetic phenomena in Cosmical Physics, IAU Symp. No 6, edited by: Lehnert, B., 123 p., 1958.

Tsuneta, S.: Structure and dynamics of magnetic reconnection in a solar flare, Astrophys. J., 456, 840–849, 1996.

Vršnak, B. and Skender, M.: 2 1/2-Dimensional reconnection model and energy release in solar flares, Solar Phys., 226, 97–119, 2005.

Wagner, W. J.: Coronal Mass Ejections, Annual Review Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 267–289, 1984.

Webb, D. F., Burkepile, J., Forbes, T. G., et al.: Observational evidence of new current sheets trailing coronal mass ejections, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A12), 1440, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA009923, 2003.

Yashiro, S., Gopalswamy, N., Michalek, G., et al.: A catalog of white light coronal mass ejections observed by the SOHO spacecraft, J. Geophys. Res., 109(A7), A07105, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010282, 2004.

Yokoyama, T., Akita, K., Morimoto, T., et al.: Clear evidence of reconnection inflow of a solar flare, Astrophys. J., 546, L69–72, 2001.