References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-25-863-2007

The ionospheric response in the Brazilian sector during the super geomagnetic storm on 20 November 2003

Becker-Guedes

¹ Sahai

¹ Fagundes

P. R.

¹ Espinoza

E. S.

² Pillat

V. G.

¹ Lima

W. L. C.

³ Basu

Su.

⁴ Basu

Sa.

⁵ Otsuka

⁶ Shiokawa

⁶ MacKenzie

E. M.

⁷ Pi

⁸ Bittencourt

J. A.

⁹

Universidade do Vale do Paraiba (UNIVAP), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

Radio Observatorio de Jicamarca, Instituto Geofisico del Peru, Lima, Peru

Centro Univ. Luterano de Palmas (CEULP), Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Palmas, TO, Brazil

Center for Space Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA

Space Vehicles Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Hanscom AF Base, MA, USA

STELAB, Nagoya University, Toyokawa, Japan

Institute for Scientific Research, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE), São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil

08 05 2007

25 4 863 873

2007

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/863/2007/angeo-25-863-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/863/2007/angeo-25-863-2007.pdf

A very intense geomagnetic storm (superstorm) began with storm sudden commencement (SSC) at 08:03 UT on 20 November 2003, as a result of the coronal mass ejection (CME) by sunspot 484 hurled into space on 18 November 2003. The geomagnetic storm attained |Dst|max=472 nT at 20:00 UT (20 November). In this paper we present the simultaneous ionospheric sounding observations, using the Canadian Advanced Digital Ionosondes (CADIs), carried out from Palmas (PAL; 10.2° S, 48.2° W; dip latitude 5.5° S; a near equatorial station) and São José dos Campos (SJC; 23.2° S, 45.9° W; dip latitude 17.6° S; station located under the crest of equatorial ionospheric anomaly), Brazil. In addition, total electron content (TEC) measurements from several GPS receiving stations in the Brazilian sector during this storm are presented. The simultaneous ionospheric sounding observations carried out at SJC and PAL, and TEC observations on 3 consecutive days viz., 19 November (quiet), 20 November (disturbed) and 21 November (recovery phase) are presented. Salient features from the ionospheric observations in the Brazilian sector during the superstorm are discussed. The difference in the observed ionospheric response at the two stations (PAL and SJC) is considerable. This is not surprising given that PAL is close to the magnetic equator and SJC is near the crest of the equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA). It should be pointed out that soon after the SSC (about 4 h later), the F-region critical frequency (foF2), the F-region peak height (hpF2), and variations of virtual heights at different frequencies (iso-frequency plots) all show wavelike oscillations of the F-region during daytime at both the ionospheric sounding stations. Unusual rapid uplifting of F-region at PAL was observed during both the main and recovery phases of the storm.

References 1

Aarons, J., Mendillo, M., and Yantosca, R.: GPS phase fluctuations in the equatorial region during the MISETA 1994 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 26 851–26 862, 1996.

Abdu, M. A.: Major phenomena of the equatorial ionosphere-thermosphere system under disturbed conditions, J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys., 59, 1505–1519, 1997.

Batista, I. S., Abdu, M. A., Souza, J. R., Bertoni, F., Matsuoka, M. T., Camargo, P. O., and Bailey, G. J.: Unusual early morning development of the equatorial anomaly in the Brazilian sector during the Halloween magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A05307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011428, 2006.

Basu, Su., Basu, S., Valladares, C. E., Yeh, H.-C., Su, S.-Y., Mackenzie, E., Sultan, P. J., Aarons, J., Rich, F. J., Doherty, P., Groves, K. M., and Bullet, T. W.: Ionospheric effects of major magnetic storms during the International Space Weather Period of September and October 1999: GPS observations, VHF/UHF scintillations, and in situ density structures at middle and equatorial latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 30 389–30 413, 2001.

Batista, I. S., de Paula, E. R., Abdu, M. A., and Trivedi, N. B.: Ionospheric effects of the March 13, 1989 magnetic storm at low and equatorial latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 13 943–13 952, 1991.

Blanc, M. and Richmond, A. D.: The ionospheric disturbance dynamo, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 1669–1686, 1980.

Bruinsma, S., Forbes, J. M., Nerem, R. S., and Zhang, X.: Thermospheric density response to the 20-21 November 2003 solar geomagnetic storm from CHAMP and GRACE accelerometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A06303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011284, 2006.

Buonsanto, M. J.: Ionospheric storms – A review, Space Sci. Rev., 88, 563–601, 1999.

Burns, A. G. and Killeen, T. L.: The equatorial neutral thermosphere response to geomagnetic forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 977–980, 1992.

Crowley, G., Hackert, C. L., Meier, R. R., Strickland, D. J., Paxton, L. J., Pi, X., Mannuci, A., Christensen, A. B., Morrison, D., Bust, G. S., Roble, R. G., Curtis, N., and Wene, G.: Global thermosphere-ionosphere response to onset of 20 November 2003 magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A10S18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011518, 2006.

Danilov, A. D. and Morozova, L. D.: Ionospheric storms in the F2 region. Morphology and Physics (Review), Geomag. Aeron., 25, 593–605, 1985.

Fejer, B. G. and Emmert, J. T.: Low-latitude ionospheric disturbance electric field effects during the recovery phase of the 19-21 October 1998 magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A12), 1454, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JA010190, 2003.

Gopalaswamy, N., Yashiro, S., Michalek, G., Xie, H., Lepping, R. P., and Howard, R. A.: Solar source of the largest geomagnetic storm of cycle 23, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L12S09, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021639, 2005.

Grant, I. F., MacDougall, J. W., Ruohoniemi, J. M., Bristow, W. A., Sofko, G. J., Koehler, J. A., Danskin, D., and Andre, D.: Comparison of plasma flow velocities determined by the ionosonde Doppler drift technique, SuperDARN radars, and patch motion, Radio Sci., 30, 1537–1549, 1995.

Greenspan, M. E., Rasmussen, C. E., Burke, W. J., and Abdu, M. A.: Equatorial density depletions observed at 840 km during the great magnetic storm of March 1989, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 13 931–13 942, 1991.

Hajkowicz, L. A.: A global study of large scale traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDS) following a step-like onset of auroral substorms in both hemispheres, Planet. Space. Sci., 38, 913–923, 1990.

Keskinen, M. J., Ossakow, S. L., Fejer, B. G., and Emmert, J.: Evolution of equatorial ionospheric bubbles during a large auroral index increase in the recovery phase of a magnetic storm, J. Geophys. Res., 111, A02303, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JA011352, 2006.

Meier, R. R., Crowley, G., Strickland, D. J., Christensen, A. B., Paxton, L. J., Morrison, D., and Hackeert, C. L.: First look at the 20 November superstorm with TIMED/GUVI: Comparisons with a thermospheric global circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A09S41, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010990, 2005.

Mendillo, M., Lin, B., and Aarons, J.: The application of GPS observations to equatorial aeronomy, Radio Sci., 35(3), 885–904, 2000.

Nicolls, M. J., Kelley, M. C., Coster, A. J., Gonzalez, S. A., and Makela, J. J.: Imaging the structure of a large-scale TID using ISR and TEC data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09812, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004019797, 2004.

Prolss, G. W.: Magnetic storm associated perturbations of the upper atmosphere, in: Magnetic Storms, edited by: Tsurutani, B. T., Gonzales, W. D., Kamide, Y., and Arballo, J. K., volume 98 of Geophys. Monogr., 227–241, 1997.

Reddy, C. A. and Nishida, A.: Magnetospheric substorms and nighttime height changes of the F2 region at middle and low latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 3039–3061, 1992.

Sahai, Y., Fagundes, P. R., Becker-Guedes, F., Bolzan, M. J. A., Abalde, J. R., Pillat, V. G., de Jesus, R., Lima, W. L. C., Crowley, G., Shiokawa, K., MacDougall, J. W., Lan, H. T., Igarashi, K., and Bittencourt, J. A.: Effects of the major geomagnetic storms of October 2003 on the equatorial and low-latitude F region in two longitudinal sectors, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A12S91, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JA010999, 2005.

Schunk, R. W. and Sojka, J. J.: Ionosphere-thermosphere space weather issues, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58, 1527–1574, 1996.

Senior, C. and Blanc, M.: On the control of magnetospheric convection by the spatial distribution of ionospheric conductivities, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 261–284, 1984.

Spiro, R. W., Wolf, R. A., and Fejer, B. G.: Penetration of high-latitude-electric-field effects to low latidudes during SUNDIAL 1984, Ann. Geophys., 6, 39–50, 1988.

Wygant, J., Rowland, D., Singer, H. J., Temerin, M., Mozer, F., and Hudson, M. K.: Experimental evidence on the role of the large spatial scale electric field in creating the ring current, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 29 527–29 544, 1998.

Zhang, Y., Paxton, L. J., Kil, H., Meng, C. –I., Mende, S. B., Frey, H. U., and Immel, T. J.: Negative ionospheric storms seen by the IMAGE FUV instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A9), 1343, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009797, 2003.