References

ANGEO

Annales Geophysicae

ANGEO

Ann. Geophys.

1432-0576

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/angeo-25-341-2007

The role of atmospheric boundary layer-surface interactions on the development of coastal fronts

Malda

² ¹ Vilà-Guerau de Arellano

¹ van den Berg

W. D.

² Zuurendonk

I. W.

Wageningen University, Meteorology and Air Quality Section, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

Meteo Consult B.V., Agro Business Park 99–101, 6700 AP Wageningen, The Netherlands

08 03 2007

25 2 341 360

2007

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/341/2007/angeo-25-341-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/25/341/2007/angeo-25-341-2007.pdf

Frictional convergence and thermal difference between land and sea surface are the two surface conditions that govern the intensity and evolution of a coastal front. By means of the mesoscale model MM5, we investigate the influence of these two processes on wind patterns, temperature and precipitation amounts, associated with a coastal front, observed on the west coast of The Netherlands in the night between 12 and 13 August 2004. The mesoscale model MM5 is further compared with available observations and the results of two operational models (ECMWF and HIRLAM). HIRLAM is not capable to reproduce the coastal front, whereas ECMWF and MM5 both calculate precipitation for the coastal region. The precipitation pattern, calculated by MM5, agrees satisfactorily with the accumulated radar image. The failure of HIRLAM is mainly due to a different stream pattern at the surface and consequently, a different behaviour of the frictional convergence at the coastline. The sensitivity analysis of frictional convergence is carried out with the MM5 model, by varying land surface roughness length (z0). For the sensitivity analysis of thermal difference between sea and land surface, we changed the sea surface temperature (SST). Increasing surface roughness implies stronger convergence near the surface and consequently stronger upward motions and intensification of the development of the coastal front. Setting land surface roughness equal to the sea surface roughness means an elimination of frictional convergence and results in a diminishing coastal front structure of the precipitation pattern. The simulation with a high SST produces much precipitation above the sea, but less precipitation in the coastal area above land. A small increment of the SST results in larger precipitation amounts above the sea; above land increments are calculated for areas near the coast. A decrease of the SST shifts the precipitation maxima inland, although the precipitation amounts diminish. In the situation under study, frictional convergence is the key process that enhances the coastal front intensity. A thermal difference between land and sea equal to zero still yields the development of the coastal front. A lower SST than land surface temperature generates a reversed coastal front. This study emphasizes the importance of accurate prescription of surface conditions as input of the numerical weather prediction model to improve coastal front predictability.

References 1

Ballentine, R. J.: A numerical investigation of New England coastal frontogenesis, Mon. Wea. Rev., 108, 1479–1497, 1980.

Blackadar, A. K.: Modelling the nocturnal boundary layer, preprints, third symp. on atmospheric turbulence, diffusion, and air quality, Raleigh, NC, Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 1, 46–49, 1976.

Blackadar, A. K.: High resolution model of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in environmental science and engineering, edited by: Pfaffin, J. and Ziegler, E., vol. 1, No. 1, Gordon and Breach, 50–85, 1979.

Bosart, L. F., Vaudo, C. J., and Helsdon Jr., J. H.: Coastal frontogenesis, J. Appl. Meteorol., 11, 1236–1258, 1972.

Bosart, L. F.: New England coastal frontogenesis, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 101, 957–978, 1975.

Braun, S. A. and Tao, W. K.: Sensitivity of high-resolution simulations of hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 3941–3961, 2000.

Burk, S. D. and Thompson, W. T.: A vertically nested regional numerical weather prediction model with second-order closure physics, Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 2305–2324, 1989.

de Rooy, W., Kok, K., Tijm, S., and Vogelezang, D.: Een ontspoord Hirlam model?, Meteorologica, 13–4, 7–10, 2004.

Dudhia, J.: A nonhydrostatic version of the Penn State – NCAR mesoscale model: Validation tests and simulation of an Atlantic cyclone and cold front, Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 1493–1513, 1993.

Grell, G. A.: Prognostic evaluation of assumptions used by cumulus parameterizations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 764–787, 1993.

Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN-398 + STR, 122 p., 1995.

Gustavsson, T., Lindqvist, S., Borne, K., and Bogren, J.: A study of sea and land breezes in an archipelago on the west-coast of Sweden, Int. J. Climatol., 15, 785–800, 1995.

Janjic, Z. I.: The step-mountain Eta coordinate model – Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes, Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 927–945, 1994.

Kain, J. S. and Fritsch, J. M.: The Kain-Fritsch scheme. The representation of Cumulus convection in numerical models, Meteorol. Monogr., No. 46, edited by: Emmanuel, K. A. and Raymond, D. J., Amer. Meteorol. Soc., 165–170, 1993.

Kain, J. S.: The Kain-Fritsch convective parameterization: an update, J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 170–181, 2004.

Lange, B., Larsen, S., Hojstrup, J., and Barthelmie, R.: Importance of thermal effects and sea surface roughness for offshore wind resource assessment, J. Wind Eng. and Ind. Aer. 92, 959–988, 2004.

Louis, J. F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 17, 187–202, 1979.

Louis, J. F., Tiedtke, M. M., and Geleyn, J. F.: Planetary boundary layer parameterization, ECMWRF Workshop Proc., 59–79, 1981.

Melas, D., Lavagnini, A., and Sempreviva, A. M.: An investigation of the boundary layer dynamics of Sardinia Island under sea-breeze conditions, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 516–524, 2000.

Ng, K. H. and Spalding, D. B.: Turbulence model for boundary layer near walls, Phys. Fluids, 15, 20–30, 1972.

Oncley, S. P. and Dudhia, J.: Evaluation of surface fluxes from MM5 using observations, Mon. Wea. Rev., 123, 3344–3357, 1995.

Roeloffzen, J. C., van den Berg, W. D., and Oerlemans, J.: Frictional convergence at coastlines, Tellus, 38A, 397–411, 1986.

Sass, B. H., Nielsen, N. W., Jørgensen, J. U., and Amstrup, B.: The operational DMI-HIRLAM System, 2nd rev. edn., DMI Technical Report, 99–21, available from http://www.dmi.dk, 1999.

Telisman Prtenjak, M. and Grisogono, B.: Idealised numerical simulations of diurnal sea breeze characteristics over a step change in roughness, Meteorol. Zeitschr., 11, 345–360, 2002.

van den Berg, W. D.: Coastal frontogenesis in The Netherlands: observations and modelling, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 239 p, 1987.

Wisse, J. S. P. and Vilà-Guerau, J. de Arellano: Analysis of the role of the planetary boundary layer schemes during a severe convective storm, Ann. Geophys., 22, 1861–1874, 2004.

Zhang, D. L. and Anthes, R. A.: A high-resolution model of the planetary boundary layer – sensitivity tests and comparisons with SESAME-79 data, J. Appl. Meteorol., 21, 1594–1609, 1982.

Zhong, S. Y. and Takle, E. S.: An observational study of sea-breeze and land-breeze circulation in an area of complex coastal heating, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31, 1426–1438, 1992.