<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/angeo-24-751-2006</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Flux closure during a substorm observed by Cluster, Double Star, IMAGE FUV, SuperDARN, and Greenland magnetometers</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Milan</surname>
<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wild</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hubert</surname>
<given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Carr</surname>
<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lucek</surname>
<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bosqued</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Watermann</surname>
<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Slavin</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Department of Communication Systems, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4WA, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Laboratory of Planetary and Atmospheric Physics, University of Liege, Liege, B-4000 Belgium</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<addr-line>Department of Physics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<label>5</label>
<addr-line>Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, CESR/CNRS, 31028 Toulouse Cedex, France</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<label>6</label>
<addr-line>Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<label>7</label>
<addr-line>Laboratory for Extraterrestrial Physics, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>23</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>751</fpage>
<lpage>767</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 2006 S. E. Milan et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2006</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"  xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/24/751/2006/angeo-24-751-2006.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/24/751/2006/angeo-24-751-2006.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/24/751/2006/angeo-24-751-2006.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/24/751/2006/angeo-24-751-2006.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>We examine magnetic flux closure during an extended
substorm interval on 29&amp;nbsp;August 2004 involving a two-stage onset and
subsequent re-intensifications. Cluster and Double Star provide observations
of magnetotail dynamics, while the corresponding auroral evolution,
convection response, and substorm current wedge development are monitored by
IMAGE FUV, SuperDARN, and the Greenland magnetometer chain, respectively.
The first stage of onset is associated with the reconnection of closed flux
in the plasma sheet; this is accompanied by a short-lived auroral
intensification, a modest substorm current wedge magnetic bay, but no
significant ionospheric convection enhancement. The second stage follows the
progression of reconnection to the open field lines of the lobes;
accompanied by prolonged auroral bulge and westward-travelling surge
development, enhanced magnetic bays and convection. We find that the tail
dynamics are highly influenced by ongoing dayside creation of open flux,
leading to flux pile-up in the near-tail and a step-wise down-tail motion of
the tail reconnection site. In all, 5&amp;nbsp;dipolarizations are observed, each
associated with the closure of ~0.1 GWb of flux. Very simple
calculations indicate that the X-line should progress down-tail at a speed
of 20 km s&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;, or 6 &lt;i&gt;R&lt;sub&gt;E&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; between each dipolarization.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="17"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>