Annales Geophysicae (2001) 19: 707–721 c ○ European Geophysical Society 2001

Abstract. We examine the large-scale ultraviolet aurora and convection responses to a series of flux transfer events that immediately followed a sharp and isolated southward turning of the IMF. During the interval of interest, SuperDARN was monitoring the plasma convection in the dayside northern ionosphere, while the VIS Earth Camera and the Far Ul-traviolet Imager (UVI) were monitoring the northern hemisphere’s ultraviolet aurora. Reconnection signatures were seen in the SuperDARN HF radar data in the postnoon sector following a sharp southward turning of the IMF. The presence of flux transfer events is supported by measurements of a classic dispersed ion signature in the low-altitude cusp from the DMSP spacecraft. Subsequent to the onset of reconnection, the postnoon convection and ultraviolet aurora expanded in concert, reaching 18 MLT in half an hour. The auroral oval was found to move equatorward at the convection speed in the 16–18 MLT sector, implying that it was related directly to an adiaroic magnetospheric boundary. In the present study, we have estimated the field-aligned current response to magnetic reconnection in terms of the vorticity of the ionospheric plasma convection velocity. The convection velocities were obtained using two methods: (a) direct reconstruction of the full vector velocities from bistatic measurements of the convection by the SuperDARN HF radars in a relatively small region of the auroral zone, and (b) from global-scale spherical harmonic fits to the SuperDARN velocities deduced from the map potential model. Regions of high vorticity, which were predicted to be an estimate of a component of the total field-aligned current, agree extremely well with the images of the dayside UV aurora, indicating that, in this case, the plasma vorticity is an excellent estimator of the morphology of dayside field-aligned currents (FACs). The morphology of the aurora and ionospheric electric field in the postnoon sector supports the existence of a dayside current wedge induced in response to dayside reconnection. Key words. Magnetospheric physics (auroral phenomena; magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions; solar wind magne-tosphere interactions)


Introduction
Ground-based measurements are an essential component of the study of dayside magnetic reconnection occurring at the distant magnetopause.In situ measurements have shown that reconnection can be bursty in nature (Haerendel et al., 1978, Russell and Elphic, 1978, 1979;Lockwood and Wild, 1993;Kuo et al., 1995), and this is known to directly affect the ionosphere.The STARE radar measurements of Goertz et al. (1985) suggested that periodic anti-sunward flows in the ionosphere seen poleward of the convection reversal boundary may be indicative of bursts of dayside reconnection.It has since been shown that the ionosphere does respond to these bursts of magnetic flux transfer.Elphic et al. (1990) presented in situ bipolar magnetic variations from the ISEE 2 spacecraft that were followed several minutes later by ionospheric convection enhancements observed by the EISCAT radar and by dayside auroral breakups observed by an all-sky camera.More recently, a unique conjunction of ground-based HF radar observations of a poleward moving ionospheric flow burst and of magnetically conjugate in situ measurements of a bipolar magnetic field signature at the magnetopause were reported by Neudegg et al. (1999).High velocity poleward moving patches of HF radar backscatter observed by Pinnock et al. (1991Pinnock et al. ( , 1993) ) were linked to magnetopause flux transfer events (FTEs) by low-altitude particle data from DMSP satellites.Moen et al. (1995) observed antisunward propagating red-line auroral features in the postnoon sector, poleward of sunward flow measured by EISCAT, and related these to particle data obtained during a DMSP overpass.The combined ionospheric observations by meridian scanning photometers and HF radars with low altitude particle measurements from the DMSP satellite of Yeoman et al. (1997) demonstrated that strong HF radar echoes, poleward moving red-line auroral features, and dispersed ion precipitation features were collocated.Multiinstrument case studies employing all-sky cameras, meridian scanning photometers, and arrays of ground magnetometers have all presented possible evidence of the appending of regions of newly reconnected magnetic flux to the dayside polar cap, followed by ionospheric convection and aurora which is excited in response to reconnection (Sandholt et al., 1999;Øieroset et al., 1996).McWilliams et al. (2000a) revealed that on a statistical basis the distribution of HF radar convection velocity fluctuations is extremely similar to both the distribution of the "inter-FTE interval" observed in the vicinity of reconnection (Lockwood and Wild, 1993;Kuo et al., 1995), and the distribution of the temporal separation between poleward moving auroral forms (Fasel, 1995).Milan et al. (2000) presented combined observations of the ionospheric convection velocities observed by the CUT-LASS Finland HF radar and of the dayside ultraviolet aurora observed by the Far Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) following a southward turning of the IMF under disturbed conditions.The mainly antisunward convection velocities had a dawnward (westward) component, as expected for the upstream positive IMF B y component, while bands of UV aurora appeared to bifurcate and move eastward.The difference between the phase velocity of the UV auroral bands and the ionospheric convection velocity led Milan et al. (2000) to conclude that the magnetopause reconnection site was propagating azimuthally along the dusk flank of the magnetopause, peeling flux from the dayside magnetopause during largescale FTEs.
In the present paper, we continue the study of an interval of data presented by McWilliams et al. (2000b), in what will henceforth be referred to as Paper 1. Paper 1 was a detailed examination of the phase velocity of a patch of antisunwardmoving HF radar echoes and the first ever two-dimensional convection velocities within such a patch.The velocity comparison revealed a prolonged interval during which it was concluded that the reconnection site propagated azimuthally along the magnetopause, peeling away flux in the manner described by Milan et al. (2000).Early multi-instrument studies have also revealed qualitative evidence of an expansion of the footprint of the magnetospheric reconnection X-line, but the instruments employed did not allow for a demonstration of the phase speed of such an expansion (Sandholt et al., 1999;Øieroset et al., 1996).In the present study, we will examine more closely the relationship between the auroral and convection responses to a series of FTEs.In particular, we will relate the ionospheric convection measurements to the dayside auroral morphology, incorporating ultraviolet images, field-aligned current (FAC) estimates, and particle precipitation data from low altitude orbiting satellites.Such combined electric field and auroral observations allow for a unified view of the particle and field characteristics of the dayside reconnection process to be assembled, including FACs, which directly link the ionosphere and magnetosphere.The results from Paper 1 will be supplemented with particle precipitation data from the DMSP-F11 spacecraft, and the localised postnoon sector analysis of convection, aurora, and FACs will be extended to encompass a more global picture of the magnetospheric and ionospheric responses to reconnection.

Imaging the ultraviolet aurora
Measurements of the far ultraviolet aurora have been obtained by the Visible Imaging System (VIS) Earth Camera (Frank et al., 1985) and by the Far Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) (Torr et al., 1995), both aboard the Polar spacecraft.The imagers are mounted on a despun platform allowing for uninterrupted views of the aurora.
UVI measures auroral emission in the Lyman-Birge-Hopfield bands, resulting from electron impact excitation of N 2 .The imager has two filters centred at 150 nm and 170 nm, which isolate the LBHs and LBHl bands, respectively.The auroral features presented in this study are evident in both LBHs and LBHl, but are perhaps somewhat more apparent in the LBHs images.Therefore, the LBHs data is presented here.The integration time of the images is 36 seconds, and the field of view covers the duskside auroral oval during the interval of interest.The Polar spacecraft is at an altitude of approximately 5.4 R E , and the spatial resolution of UVI is 22 to 25 km in the ionosphere.
The VIS Earth Camera monitors the aurora with a relatively broad passband at far ultraviolet wavelengths (124-149 nm), and is primarily sensitive to the atomic oxygen emission at 130.4 nm.The integration time of the camera is 32.5 s.At an altitude of 5.4 R E , the spatial resolution of the Earth Camera in the atmosphere is approximately 50 km.At this altitude the camera is capable of imaging the entire northern auroral zone.Both the LBHs emission, seen by UVI, and the OI emission seen by VIS are due to electron impact excitation, and are therefore comparable.An examination of the region of overlap in the prenoon sector showed that the large-scale auroral features are present in the images from both instruments, and this is evident, for example, in Fig. 5.

Measuring ionospheric plasma convection
The Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) is an international collaborative network of HF radars that monitor ionospheric plasma convection in the northern and southern polar regions (Greenwald et al., 1995).The radars normally sound 16 beams sequentially to form a full 52 • azimuth scan.During the present interval of interest, a high-time resolution mode was employed with a beam dwell time of 3 s, and each of the SuperDARN radar pairs was synchronised to perform a full sixteen-beam scan every minute.Seventy-five range gates are measured along each beam and the range to the first gate is 180 km.The gate length is 45 km, which is comparable to the VIS Earth Camera pixel size during this interval.The typical angular resolution is 3.2 • , or a halfpower beam width of about 85 km at the half-range mark of 1500 km.The analysis of the autocorrelation function of the echoes from the transmitted 7-pulse sequence yields backscattered spectra from which the backscattered power, the mean Doppler velocity (an estimate of the component of the ionospheric plasma drift velocity along the beam), and the spectral width can be determined.During the interval of interest in the present study, three of the SuperDARN radars were receiving backscattered signals from large portions of the dayside auroral zone.
The Co-operative UK Twin Located Auroral Sounding System (CUTLASS) (Milan et al., 1997) is the easternmost pair of SuperDARN radars in the northern hemisphere.Backscatter measurements from both CUTLASS radars, located at Hankasalmi, Finland (62.3 • N, 26.6 • E) and at Þykkvibaer, Iceland (63.8 • N, 19.2 • W), were made in the postnoon sector.It was the data from this radar pair that were examined in detail in Paper 1.The SuperDARN radar at Stokkseyri, Iceland (63.9 • N, 20.0 • W) was monitoring plasma convection in the prenoon sector.Therefore, excellent coverage of the dayside auroral oval was achieved.HF radars are particularly sensitive to cusp region backscatter (Milan et al., 1998).The F-region irregularities produced by soft particle precipitation in the footprint of the cusp manifest themselves as discrete radar auroral forms near magnetic local noon.

Previous results from Paper 1
Paper 1 consisted of a detailed analysis of the first twodimensional measurements ever made of the ionospheric convection velocity vectors within the footprint of the newly reconnected flux tubes.These were measured between 10:58 UT and 11:25 UT on 24 November 1998.A prolonged period of northward IMF had resulted in a very quiet magnetosphere.The B y component of the IMF was predominantly negative, with a small positive excursion at approximately 11:25 UT.Following a sharp southward turning of the IMF, a patch of high-power radar backscatter appeared in the fields of view of the HF radar pair very close to local noon.The feature then proceeded towards 18 MLT over the next half hour where it left the radar's field of view.The trajectory of the feature is illustrated in Fig. 1.The full-vector convection measurements allowed for a comparison of the ionospheric plasma convection velocity V E×B and the phase velocity V ph of the footprint of the newly reconnected flux tubes.This comparison revealed that the motion of the patch of backscatter was comprised of two main stages, which are marked in Fig. 1.Initially the phase speed of the patch was very fast and varied rapidly, with a mean speed of 1850 m s −1 , approximately twice the average convection speed of 870 m s −1 .In the second stage, the patch speed stabilised and slowed to an average value of 870 m s −1 , which was very close to the Fig. 1.As described in Paper 1, following a sharp southward turning of the IMF, a patch of radar backscatter appeared near magnetic local noon.The small black dots mark the central position of the feature, and the large yellow circles represent its approximate extent as it propagated anti-sunward into the postnoon sector.The phase speed V ph of the feature appears to be comprised of two regimes: one of fast, highly variable motion, where the mean phase speed is approximately twice the convection speed V E×B , and a second regime of slower, more steady motion, where the average phase speed is very similar to the convection speed.mean plasma convection speed of 840 m s −1 .Three ionospheric convection bursts were observed by the Þykkvibaer radar following the southward IMF turning, one approximately every 10 minutes.The second patch appeared before the phase velocity of the first patch slowed to the convection velocity.Estimates of the cross-polar cap potential difference and of the reconnection voltage were very consistent at about 60 kV.

Low altitude particle precipitation
Particle precipitation data have been provided by the DMSP F11 satellite, which orbits at an altitude of approximately 830 km.The satellite traversed the dayside northern hemisphere between 10:56 UT and 11:04 UT, travelling from approximately 18 to 11 MLT.The electron and ion spectra in Fig. 2 demonstrate that the satellite passed through three major particle regimes as it traversed the northern hemisphere auroral zone and polar cap.These are denoted by the colourcoded bar at the top of Fig. 2. The satellite first encountered a region of high energy ions and high electron flux between approximately 10:56:30 UT and 10:59:30 UT, and this has been denoted by the green colour-code.The satellite then encountered lower energy ions and electrons.This part of the spectrum (approximately 10:59:30-11:02:00 UT) has been colour-coded yellow.At approximately 11:02 UT, a dispersed ion signature appears and it is accompanied by fluxes of low-energy electrons.This feature has been colour-Fig.2. The electron and ion spectra measured between 10:55 UT and 11:05 UT on 24 November 1998 onboard the DMSP-F11 spacecraft.The satellite passed through three major particle regimes as it traversed the northern hemisphere auroral zone and polar cap.The colour bar at the top denotes the three major particle regimes encountered by the spacecraft.coded red.These precipitation regions will be discussed in the context of the dayside ultraviolet aurora in Sect.4.2.

The ultraviolet aurora: An overview
Both the VIS Earth Camera and UVI were monitoring the northern polar cap prior to and following the southward turning of the IMF.The VIS Earth Camera was imaging the entire auroral zone, while UVI, whose field of field of view is approximately one-quarter that of the VIS Earth Camera, was directed at two smaller regions, initially at the prenoon auroral zone until the 11:12:52 UT scan, and thereafter, at the midnight sector.
The development of the northern hemisphere ultraviolet aurora captured in the VIS Earth Camera images between 10:43:48 UT and 12:11:39 UT is summarised in Fig. 3. Magnetic local noon is towards the top of the maps, and each dashed circle marks 10 • in magnetic latitude.Prior to 11:00 UT there is very little aurora visible on the dayside and it has intensities less than 3 kR.The southward turning of the IMF was shown in Paper 1 to have affected the HF radar data between 10:58 UT and 10:59 UT, and it is therefore expected that the aurora will respond synchronously.Some time between the 10:57:25 UT and the 11:01:01 UT scans, there is a brightening of the postnoon aurora centred at 14 MLT and the 75 • magnetic latitude, which agrees with the radar response.By 11:25:13 UT the postnoon aurora has developed into a bright discrete band extending from 13 MLT to 18 MLT.The bright aurora then extends further to form a nearly complete ring.A substorm that was detected by the CANOPUS magnetometer at Dawson City at 12:00 UT, as described in Paper 1, is also seen in the VIS Earth Camera images in the midnight sector from 12:03:03 UT onwards.At this time, the auroral images are beginning to suffer significant distortion as the spacecraft approaches the horizon near 9 MLT.

Convection and auroral responses to reconnection
In this section, the images of the ultraviolet auroral oval will be compared directly with ionospheric convection velocities from SuperDARN.Discussion of the CUTLASS lineof-sight data is not included here since a detailed description and analysis was presented in Paper 1.The two-dimensional convection velocities have been determined using two methods.First, where bistatic measurements of the convection have been made, i.e. in the postnoon sector by the two CUT-LASS radars, the two velocity components have been combined to produce full vector convection velocities.These merged vectors, which are illustrated in Fig. 5, are drawn with the foot of the vector at the location where the measurements were made and the arrow denoting the direction and the magnitude of the plasma flow.Second, equipotential contours have been determined by fitting a series of spherical harmonic functions to the convection velocity components measured by the SuperDARN radars and constraining the fits with statistical convection models based on upstream IMF conditions.This is known as the "map potential model" (Ruohoniemi and Baker, 1998).The electrostatic relations in the ionosphere: mean that the equipotential contours are also velocity streamlines.
Following the southward turning of the IMF, the extent of the measurements in the dayside auroral zone by the Super-DARN radars steadily increases.The coverage of the dayside auroral zone by the Þykkvibaer (E), Hankasalmi (F ), and Stokkseyri (W ) SuperDARN radars is summarised in Fig. 4. The increased data coverage of the dayside auroral zone after the southward IMF turning, especially the postnoon sector, means that the map potential model is well constrained there by measured values.The better the data coverage, the more indicative of the true ionospheric convection pattern the map potential contours are believed to be, as it is less influenced by the statistical models.The postnoon convection reversal boundary is well-defined following the southward IMF turning, while in the morning sector, it takes approximately 15 minutes for the radar coverage to extend far enough to determine accurately the prenoon convection reversal boundary away from noon.By 11:25 UT, in Fig. 4d, the three SuperDARN radars are monitoring the dayside auroral zone between 7 MLT and 19 MLT, with the convection reversal boundary well-defined between 7 MLT and 16 MLT.The comparison of the convection velocities measured by SuperDARN and the auroral images from the VIS Earth Camera and UVI reveals a unified picture of the field and particle response to reconnection following the southward IMF turning.
Fig. 5a demonstrates the state of the ionosphere prior to the first indications of a response in the HF radar data to the  southward IMF turning, as discussed in Paper 1.The equipotential contours obtained from the sixth order fit of the map potential model and the merged velocity vectors from CUT-LASS have been superimposed onto the images of the far ultraviolet aurora from both the VIS Earth Camera and UVI.There is a faint band of aurora in the postnoon sector, which is co-located with the convection reversal boundary of the map potential contours.The map potential fitting technique gives a value of 34 kV for the cross-polar cap potential difference.
Several minutes after the southward IMF turning, the convection and the aurora have evolved into the configuration presented in Fig. 5b.The cross-polar cap potential difference has doubled to 75 kV.The postnoon convection reversal obtained by the map potential model agrees very well with the independently determined CUTLASS merged convection velocities.The strongest aurora in the postnoon sector is colocated with the convection reversal boundary and it peaks at the centre of the postnoon convection cell.The prenoon aurora has become more distinct with three main bands consiting of a dark region flanked latitudinally by bands of bright aurora.While the prenoon convection cell is centred on the dark band between the two bright bands of aurora, one must exercise caution when comparing the two as the map potential contours are largely determined by a statistical convection pattern in this region.
By 11:09 UT (Fig. 5c) the cross-polar cap potential difference from the map potential model is 70 kV.The postnoon convection reversal boundary is co-located with the large band of bright aurora seen by the VIS Earth Camera.The brightest postnoon aurora is measured between 15 and 16 MLT and reaches values of about 8 kR.In the prenoon sector, the convection cell is centred on the dark region between the two bright bands of aurora as seen by UVI.While the prenoon radar coverage is not extensive, a convection reversal is directly measured between 10 and 11 MLT, which will constrain the noon portion of the prenoon convection cell.The direction of the merged CUTLASS velocity vectors in the postnoon sector agree quite well with the equipotential contours.
The postnoon aurora at 11:25 UT, seen in Fig. 5d has expanded in local time to a band stretching from 14 MLT to 18 MLT, and the measured luminosity exceeds 9 kR throughout its local time extent.The postnoon convection reversal boundary determined by the map potential model still lies very close to the band of luminous aurora in the postnoon sector, and the prenoon convection reversal boundary lies poleward of the luminous aurora in the prenoon sector.The fitted cross-polar cap potential difference is 96 kV at this time and the IMF B y component was nearly zero.

Results from Paper 1: Implications for magnetopause reconnection
The full-vector convection measurements presented in Paper 1 allowed for a comparison of the ionospheric plasma convection velocity and the phase velocity of the footprint of the newly reconnected flux tubes.This comparison revealed that the motion of the patch of backscatter was comprised of two main stages.Initially the phase speed of the patch was very fast and varyed rapidly, with the patch moving at approximately twice the convection speed.In the second stage, the patch speed stabilised and slowed to plasma convection speed.The initial difference between the con-vection and phase speeds was interpreted as the result of an extended interval of reconnection at the magnetopause as the reconnection site moved azimuthally through 4 hours in local time, peeling off flux from the magnetopause until 11:14 UT.
Once reconnection had ceased, the newly reconnected flux tubes slowed down and began to move anti-sunward at the convection speed.Three ionospheric convection bursts were observed following the southward IMF turning, one approximately every 10 minutes.The second burst appeared several minutes before reconnection was believed to cease in the first burst, implying that reconnection was continually occurring, but at different places on the magnetopause.As one episode of flux transfer peeled flux from the magnetopause, another began closer to local noon, peeling off the newly exposed geomagnetic flux.All factors discussed in Paper 1 indicated that this was an interval of moderate pulsed reconnection, and that the effects on the magnetosphere and ionosphere were considerable.

Low-altitude cusp spectra
Further evidence of reconnection is seen in the low-altitude particle precipitation data provided here by the DMSP-F11 satellite.The satellite passed through three major particle regimes, as described in Sect.3.2 with respect to Fig. 2, and these were denoted by the colour-coded bar at the top of Fig. 2. In Fig. 6, the corresponding colour-coded ionospheric footprint of the satellite track has been overlaid onto two VIS Earth Camera images of the UV aurora taken (a) at 10:57:25 UT (prior to the first effects of reconnection seen in the ionosphere, as discussed in Paper 1), and (b) at 11:01:01 UT (2-3 minutes after the reconnection signature was seen in the HF radar data in Paper 1).The potential contours deduced from the map potential technique (Ruohoniemi and Baker, 1998) for the 10:57 UT and 11:01 UT radar scans have also been superimposed on the UV images in Fig. 6.The white crosses on the DMSP track denote the satellite footprint during the one minute SuperDARN radar scans at 10:57 UT and at 11:01 UT that were used to calculate the map potential contours.
When the satellite measured the auroral zone precipitation (green colour-code), it was located in the diffuse postnoon auroral oval, as seen in the VIS Earth Camera image from 10:57:25 UT in Fig. 6a.The satellite then encountered lower energy ions and electrons, the duration of which was denoted by the yellow colour-code.At this juncture, the satellite footprint slipped into the polar cap just poleward of the bright aurora in both panels of Fig. 6.At approximately 11:02 UT, the classic dispersed ion signature in the low-altitude cusp of the distant magnetopause reconnection (e.g.Lockwood and Davis, 1996) appears, and it is accompanied by fluxes of lowenergy electrons, as is typical of the cusp.The increasing energy in the dispersed ion signature is typical of a DMSP pass through the cusp from poleward to equatorward.The dispersed ion feature was encountered as the satellite travelled along the dayside convection reversal boundary determined from the map potential model.The patch of anti-sunward moving radar backscatter that appeared after the southward IMF turning was located at the same magnetic latitude as the satellite cusp footprint, but slightly eastward.The extent of the radar patch is denoted in Fig. 6b as the small polygon centred at approximately 13:30 MLT and at 77 • magnetic latitude.This radar feature was observed near the west-ern edge of the radar's field of view, which does not extend into the region where the satellite encountered the dispersed ion signature.It would appear that the satellite is passing equatorward and eastward through an extended cusp region.
The presence of only one dispersed ion signature agrees with the CUTLASS radar measurements of only one pulsed ionospheric flow burst at this time, i.e.only one episode of reconnection is occurring at this time.In contrast, low-altitude crossings of multiple FTE footprints can exhibit stepped ion energy dispersion (Lockwood et al., 1993b).A comparative study by Neudegg et al. (2001) of flux transfer events, and convection and DMSP spectra is of a similar nature to the present study, and it is consistent with previous predictions and observations of reconnection.In their work, Neudegg et al. (2001) presented magnetically conjugate measurements of flux transfer events at the magnetopause, which were detected by Equator-S, and antisunward convection bursts in the dayside ionosphere, as measured by the SuperDARN Hankasalmi radar.These data were supplemented by images of the dayside UV aurora from the VIS Earth Camera and particle spectrograms from a DMSP pass just equatorward of the footprint of the reconnection region.The convection velocity in the throat had a dawnward component, as expected, since the upstream IMF B y component was positive during the interval.Bright UV aurora was observed in the equatorward portion of the flow channel events, located where the flow rotated from mainly westward to more poleward.This is consistent with the predicted response to reconnection (Cowley et al., 1991;Lockwood et al., 1993c;Lockwood, 1994) and with other observations of the ionospheric response to reconnection during positive IMF B y conditions (Milan et al., 2000).The Neudegg et al. (2001) conjunction did not allow the observation of dispersed ions: the DMSP-F14 footprint skimmed along the equatorward edge of the bright UV aurora where it detected structured electron precipitation that dominated the ions.This, along with the bright aurora, is suggestive of a region of upward FAC.

UV aurora response to southward IMF turning
The UV imagers and HF radars allow us to explore the development of the dayside ionospheric response to reconnection.The four panels in Fig. 5 represent snapshots of four stages in the reconnection process, taken over half an hour, and they are in accordance with the predictions of Cowley et al. (1991), Lockwood et al. (1993c), andLockwood (1994).
Fig. 5a reflects the state of the ionosphere prior to the southward IMF turning, and consequently prior to the start of reconnection at the dayside magnetopause.In Paper 1, it was shown that conditions in the magnetosphere were very quiet prior to reconnection, and this approaches the prereconnection steady-state condition discussed in the models.There is a faint band of aurora in the postnoon sector that is co-located with the convection reversal boundary of the map potential contours.As will be discussed in Sect.4.5, downward vorticity is related to upward FACs, and upward FACs are primarily produced by precipitating electrons, which also excite auroral emissions.While the map potential model fits very well to the data, there are relatively few data points in the prenoon sector, and we believe that the equipotential contours there are controlled to a large extent by the statistical convection pattern that constrains the map potential fit.There is, therefore, less confidence in the map potential contours in this sector, so one must exercise caution when interpretting the fitted polar cap potential difference of 34 kV.
The state of the ionosphere during its initial response to reconnection, several minutes after the southward IMF turning, is presented in Fig. 5b.In the models, this would correspond to the initial appending of a region of newly opened flux to the dayside polar cap.The cross-polar cap potential difference has increased from the estimated pre-reconnection value to 75 kV, as expected, since magnetopause reconnection results in the enhancement of ionospheric convection (Lockwood, 1991).The estimated reconnection voltage of 57 kV determined directly from the CUTLASS measurements in the postnoon sector in Paper 1 agrees very well with this estimate of the cross-polar cap potential difference.The postnoon convection reversal obtained by the map potential model agrees very well with the independently determined CUTLASS merged convection velocities.The postnoon aurora has increased in brightness, with the strongest aurora in the postnoon sector co-located with the convection reversal boundary and it peaks at the centre of the postnoon convection cell.The prenoon aurora has become more distinct with three main bands consisting of a dark band flanked latitudinally by bright aurora, and the prenoon convection cell is centred on the dark band.At this time the SuperDARN radars have achieved increased coverage of the dayside auroral zone, especially in the postnoon sector.The map potential model is, therefore, better constrained by measured values there, and less influenced by the statistical models.
The state of the ionosphere after an extended interval of reconnection is presented in Fig. 5c.According to the analysis in Paper 1, at 11:09 UT reconnection is still believed to be occurring in the first reconnection burst and the initial evidence of the second flux transfer event appeared near magnetic local noon in the Þykkvibaer radar data.The postnoon convection reversal boundary in Fig. 5c is nearly co-located with the band of bright aurora seen by the VIS Earth Camera.In the prenoon sector, the convection cell is centred on the dark region between the two bright bands of aurora, as seen by UVI.The direction of the merged CUTLASS velocity vectors in the postnoon sector agrees quite well with the equipotential contours at high latitudes, but near 75 • the merged vectors are nearly purely eastward while the equipotential contours have a slight southward component.Since the merged vectors are a more direct measure of the plasma convection velocity, this discrepancy suggests that the potential fitting technique has placed the centre of the postnoon convection cell slightly too far eastward.A comparison of the equipotential contours in panels (a) and (c) reveals an eastward increase in the longitudinal extent over which flow is likely crossing the polar cap boundary, supporting the the-sis of an expanding reconnection X-line migrating duskward along the magnetopause.
Fig. 5d represents the final stage of the models of Cowley et al. (1991), Lockwood et al. (1993c), andLockwood (1994), during which reconnection has ceased and the newly opened flux is incorporated into the polar cap.The models predict that for an isolated flux transfer event such a process would continue for about 15 minutes until the polar cap achieves a new equilibrium.The postnoon aurora at 11:25 UT in Fig. 5d extends over four hours of local time, between 14 and 18 MLT.The leading portion of newly opened flux is approximately co-located with the eastward merged vectors at 18 MLT between about 76 • and 80 • magnetic latitude.The aurora and the reconnected flux region are still expanding eastward together even after reconnection ceased at 11:14 UT, as shown in Paper 1.These measurements are consistent with the development of the polar cap boundary to a new equilibrium near 18 MLT, while magnetic reconnection is continuing near noon.The postnoon convection reversal boundary determined by the map potential model still lies very close to the band of luminous aurora in the postnoon sector, and the prenoon convection reversal boundary lies poleward of the luminous aurora in the prenoon sector.

Motion of postnoon aurora
In Paper 1, it was shown that ionospheric plasma flowed poleward across the open-closed field line boundary in the noon sector.The equatorward motion of the boundary between high and low spectral widths (a proxy for the footprint of the reconnection X-line) and the poleward convection velocities across that boundary confirmed that this was the footprint of a region of active reconnection and estimates of 57 kV for the reconnection voltage were obtained.This value is very consistent with the cross-polar cap potential difference of 60-70 kV obtained from the map potential model, as discussed in Paper 1.
Between 16 MLT and 18 MLT, however, anti-sunward of the region of active reconnection according to the phase and convection velocity comparison, the equatorward motion of the aurora is more pronounced.The latitudinal variation of the UV auroral emissions measured by the VIS Earth Camera at (a) 13 MLT, (b) 16 MLT, and (c) 18 MLT between 10:45 UT and 12:00 UT are presented in Fig. 7.It is evident from the three panels in Fig. 7 that the brightening of the aurora following the southward turning of the IMF is not instantaneous in all local time sectors.Instead, the aurora becomes brighter at 16 MLT within three minutes of the brightening at 13 MLT, and the aurora at 18 MLT becomes brighter approximately 11 minutes after the brightening at 13 MLT.The bright aurora at 16 MLT and 18 MLT moves further equatorward than that measured at 13 MLT.At 13 MLT poleward plasma convection across the band of aurora was measured, and at 16 and 18 MLT, there was equatorward flow at the same latitude as the band of bright aurora.The equatorward motion of the postnoon auroral oval during this interval can be compared directly with the equator- ward plasma convection velocity derived from the map potential model.The poleward boundary of the postnoon aurora near 16 MLT moves approximately 4 • equatorward between 11:01:01 UT and 11:25:13 UT, amounting to a propagation velocity of 305 m s −1 .Between 11:25 UT and 11:45 UT, the poleward boundary of the postnoon aurora near 18 MLT moves approximately 3.5 • equatorward, giving a propagation velocity of 315 m s −1 .From the map potential contours during this interval the equatorward velocity perpendicular to the auroral oval was estimated to be 300±50 m s −1 .The postnoon auroral oval, therefore, moves equatorward at the plasma convection velocity.If the poleward edge of the auroral oval acts as a proxy for the polar cap boundary, the polar cap is, therefore, expanding at the plasma convection velocity, with no flow across the boundary.This "adiaroic" boundary (Siscoe and Huang, 1985) is consistent with models of reconnection-induced flows in the ionosphere in which the newly opened flux that was appended to the dayside polar cap is incorporated into a larger polar cap (Cowley et al., 1991;Lockwood et al., 1993c;Lockwood, 1994).
4.5 Field-aligned currents Sofko et al. (1995) demonstrated that SuperDARN measurements of ionospheric convection can be used to directly estimate FACs.The FAC density at ionospheric altitudes can be written explicitly as: where v is the ionospheric plasma convection velocity, B is the geomagnetic field, and P and H are the heightintegrated Pedersen and Hall conductances, respectively.According to the SuperDARN co-ordinate convention, a positive FAC is radially out of the ionosphere, nearly anti-parallel to the magnetic field in the northern hemisphere.The terms on the right-hand side of Eq. ( 2) can be grouped into two components: the ∇ • E component (the first term), and the ∇ component (the last two terms).Bostrom (1974) referred to these terms as the "magnetospheric" and the "ionospheric" FACs, respectively.The ionospheric FAC term depends on the structure of the ionosphere through its variation with the ionospheric conductance.The magnetospheric component depends on the vorticity of the plasma convection velocity.SuperDARN convection measurements give a direct determination of B • (∇ × v), which is the magnetospheric FAC per unit Pedersen conductance, J mag / P .The SuperDARN coordinate convection, which we use, where the z direction is radially out of the ionosphere, implies that an upward vorticity corresponds to a downward FAC and vice versa.This magnetospheric term is expected to dominate the ionospheric term in regions where there is little spatial variation in the Pedersen and Hall conductance.The presence of large bright auroral arcs would indicate that there exists large gradients in the ionospheric conductance.In the case of a bright auroral arc centred on the postnoon convection reversal boundary, the magnetospheric term would maximise at the brightest part of the arc, while the ionospheric terms would oppose the magnetospheric term on the sides of the arc, reducing the overall FAC there.Knowledge of the ionospheric conductance is, therefore, vital to the determination of the total FAC, but this is difficult to determine.Models are not accurate enough to represent minute-by-minute radar scans of the plasma convection, and conductivity estimates from the aurora itself are inaccurate because they can only be determined for specific spectral emission frequencies (corresponding to specific ionospheric altitude ranges), and, therefore, one cannot integrate up through the ionosphere to obtain the total conductance (Germany et al., 1994).

Localised FACs derived from merged velocities
To evaluate the plasma vorticity using SuperDARN radar data in the area formed by the intersection of two radar beams (a "merge cell"), one integrates the plasma velocity along the closed path formed by the four edges of the merge cell (Sofko, et al., 1995;McWilliams, 1997).The velocity along the boundary is determined by averaging the convection velocity in the merge cell with velocity components in the adjacent merge cells surrounding it.Consequently, the vorticity is a smoothed value over an area of roughly 5 intersection cells, or about 3.6×10 4 km 2 .The SuperDARN HF radars, therefore, give an indication of large-scale magnetospheric FACs.
The ten minute plasma vorticity maps from 11:00-11:30 UT are presented in Fig. 8. Since each vorticity estimate requires data from several beam intersection regions, gaps in the data are very detrimental to the quality of the vorticity maps.The radar data has been averaged over 10 minutes in an attempt to fill in the gaps.The circles are the HF radar estimates of the amount of upward FAC per unit Pedersen conductance (µA m −2 S −1 ), and the crosses are the HF radar estimates of the downward.The FAC estimates have been overlaid onto the VIS Earth Camera images that occur closest to the centre of the 10 minute averages.A quiet time statistical auroral oval has also been added.In each panel of Fig. 8 there is a band of upward FAC co-located with the intense ultraviolet aurora and this band has an average FAC density of approximately 0.2 µA m −2 S −1 .In panels (b) and (c), the upward FAC is flanked on the poleward edge by a downward FAC band.These FAC patterns are consistent with the statistical distribution obtained from magnetic field perturbations measured aboard the Triad satellite (Iijima and Potemra, 1976) and from the Viking satellite (Erlandson et al., 1988).
A gap is evident in both the UV aurora and the vorticity estimates measurements between 13 and 14 MLT in Fig. 8a.It persists in panel (b) and to a lesser extent in panel (c).The apparent drop out in the CUTLASS data in the vicinity of the gap is due to the nearly vorticity-free flow measured there.In the single-scan merged data (not shown), the CUTLASS radars measured an eastward electric field, directed from the dark region to the bright aurora in the vicinity of the gap.The gradient in the auroral brightness in the vicinity of the gap would suggest that the FAC estimate from the convection vorticity is too simplistic, needing also to include the ionospheric conductance.The co-located upward FAC estimate and bright aurora in Fig. 8 indicate that the direction of the FAC estimate in these regions is likely to be correct.The eastern edge of the UV aurora gap appears to move eastward with the region of newly reconnected flux from the first episode of flux transfer, with the centre of the newly opened flux region lying at the same local time as the eastern end of the gap.As seen in both Fig. 8 and Fig. 3, the gap in the aurora is located between approximately 13 and 14 MLT in the 11:06:01 UT VIS image, and the eastern edge of the bright aurora has moved closer to 15 MLT by the 11:09:37 UT VIS image.After this time, it is difficult to determine the effect of the initial burst of reconnection on the aurora, since (as discussed in Paper 1) a second patch of anti-sunward moving radar backscatter, indicative of a second burst of reconnection, appeared closer to noon at 11:10 UT in the Þykkvibaer data.There is also evidence for a third FTE signature in the Þykkvibaer data at 11:20 UT.The FACs induced by several bursts of reconnection are expected to combine to form a complex pattern of currents in the auroral zone and polar cap (Lockwood et al., 1993a).These observations suggest that the aurora and convection are responding to rapidly varying FACs near the reconnection region, with a downward FAC displaying its footprint in the auroral gap and an upward FAC with its footprint in the adjacent bright aurora to the east with possible current closure via the Pedersen current along the eastward electric field in the ionosphere.Further combined field and particle measurements of the type presented here are essential to confirm the existence of the dayside current wedge.Russell et al. (1974) originally suggested that the application of a reconnection voltage to the magnetopause could modify the magnetopause current, thereby inducing a cur- rent circuit in the dayside magnetosphere similar in form to the substorm current wedge.Further consideration of this concept was presented several years later by Glaßmeier and Heppner (1992) who postulated that reconnection would lead to a "magnetopause counter current" fed by the upward and downward FACs associated with the Alfvén pulses launched from the merging region to reduce magnetic stress along the newly opened field lines.Some evidence of the current circuit was presented by Glaßmeier (1992) in their study of equivalent ionospheric currents and FACs deduced from ground-based magnetometers.Glaßmeier (1992) discussed a "counter-current," or "reconnection current," generated in response to magnetic field deformation in the merging region, and went on to propose that the FACs generated by the reconnection-induced Alfvén pulses are associated with ionospheric travelling convection twin-vortices.Glaßmeier (1992) proposed that the circuit including these FACs, which initially would have the same sense as the dayside Region 1 FACs, and the magnetospheric counter-current, would form a transitory current loop associated with travelling convection twin-vortices which he called the "dayside current wedge." The combined auroral and convection data presented in Fig. 8 offer evidence of the existence of the ionospheric portion of such a magnetospheric current circuit.The small-scale FAC structure inferred from the ultraviolet aurora and the direct measurement of an eastward electric field in the region of newly reconnected flux tubes are consistent with the dayside current wedge illustrated in Fig. 9.The induced current on the magnetopause, which is effectively a diminution of the magnetopause current, can close by FACs at the ends of the reconnection X-line, which are directed towards the ionosphere on the western end and away from the ionosphere on the eastern end.The circuit is completed via an eastward ionospheric Pedersen current.The eastward motion of the auroral gap and the region of newly reconnected flux is in accordance with the eastward expansion of the reconnection X-line deduced in Paper 1. 4.5.2Global FACs derived from the map potential model In Fig. 5, it was demonstrated that the convection reversal boundary, determined both from the map potential model and the bistatic measurements of the ionospheric convection, was colocated with a band of bright aurora in the postnoon sector and with a dark band between two bands of luminous aurora in the prenoon sector.The sense of ionospheric plasma vorticity in the postnoon sector is downward, implying an upward magnetospheric FAC according to Eq. ( 2).An upward FAC is produced primarily by precipitating electrons, which can give rise to the aurora, as was seen by the VIS Earth Camera.The situation is reversed in the prenoon sector with an upward vorticity implying a downward FAC.In this case, the FAC is formed by upward moving electrons and downward moving ions, both of which are not energetic enough to excite ultraviolet aurora.The luminous bands of aurora poleward and equatorward of the convection reversal boundary are formed by precipitating electrons in upward FACs, which close through the ionosphere with the downward FAC at the convection reversal boundary.
It is possible to take this large-scale, qualitative convection and aurora comparison a step further by quantifying the vorticity of the map potential contours, which are velocity streamlines.In Fig. 10, the magnetospheric FAC per unit Pedersen conductance, B • (∇ × v), derived from the map potential equipotential contours are presented along with the potential contours from which they were derived for (a) 10:57 UT, (b) 11:06 UT, (c) 11:10 UT, and (d) 11:25 UT.These are the same times presented in the convection and aurora comparison in Fig. 5.The vorticity has been colourcoded such that negative vorticity (into the ionosphere) corresponds to a positive FAC component (red), and a positive vorticity (out of the ionosphere) corresponds to a negative FAC component (blue).In the postnoon sector, the convection reversal boundary gives rise to a large band of downward vorticity and, therefore, a large band of upward FAC.The opposite case is true for the prenoon convection reversal boundary.The FAC estimates from the map potential model in Fig. 10 agree extremely well with the morphology of the UV aurora presented in Fig. 5, with bands of upward FAC co-located with bands of bright aurora, and bands of downward FAC co-located with dark regions in the auroral images.Due to the excellent agreement between the positions of the convection reversal boundary and the auroral emissions during this interval, at this time we take regions of high plasma vorticity to be indicative of regions of strong FAC.While the agreement between the location of the FAC bands and auroral emissions is very good, it is important to note, for example, that the latitudinal extent of the upward FAC is much broader than that of the bright auroral emissions in the postnoon sector.This apparent discrepancy underlines the importance of ionospheric conductance gradients in the determination of the FAC, as given in Eq. ( 2).The bands of aurora in Fig. 5 are very similar in form to the statistical distribution of FACs obtained from magnetic field perturbations measured aboard the Triad satellite (Iijima and Potemra, 1976).In the postnoon sector, a large-scale upward (bright) Region 1 FAC was flanked poleward and equatorward by the downward (dark) Region 0 and Region 1 FACs, respectively.In the prenoon sector, a large-scale downward (dark) Region 1 FAC was found to be flanked poleward and equatorward in the noon sector by upward (bright) Region 0 and Region 1 FACs, respectively.The FAC estimations from both the merge and map potential techniques agree very well with the FAC distribution predicted in Paper 1 for an azimuthally expanding reconnection X-line, as presented in Fig. 10 of Paper 1.

Summary and conclusions
In this study, we examined the UV aurora and ionospheric convection responses to an interval of pulsed reconnection at the dayside magnetopause.It is a continuation of the detailed analysis of the postnoon ionospheric convection that was presented in Paper 1 (McWilliams et al., 2000b), which revealed that the first flux transfer event lasted for approximately 15 minutes, expanding 4 hours in local time into the postnoon sector from its initial reconnection site near magnetic local noon, peeling magnetic flux from the magnetopause as it expanded.After reconnection ceased, the patch of newly reconnected flux slowed to the convection speed.Further evidence of reconnection is provided by particle precipitation data from the DMSP-F11 spacecraft.The satellite detected energy dispersed ions, the classic signature of the low-altitude cusp, in the vicinity of the radar signature of newly opened flux.The particle data confirmed the HF radar conclusion that there was only one burst of reconnection at that time, as the satellite encountered only one dispersed ion signature.
The combined aurora and convection observations of the dayside ionosphere provided snapshots of several stages in the reconnection process: (i) the quiet ionosphere prior to the southward IMF turning, (ii) the initial stage of reconnection, (iii) the latter stage of reconnection in the first reconnection burst and the appearance of the second burst in the noon sector, and (iv) the end of the convection cycle of the first reconnection burst when the polar cap attempts to incorporate the newly reconnected flux and establish a new equilibrium.These data are consistent with predictions of the ionospheric response to reconnection.The ionospheric convection and the UV aurora expanded in concert following the onset of reconnection, taking between 15 and 30 minutes for the aurora and the convection to expand to 18 MLT.The ionospheric response to reconnection was, therefore, not instantaneous in this case.
The excellent agreement between the regions of high convection vorticity and the bands of aurora led to the quantification of the convection vorticity, which pertains directly to FACs.The global-scale FACs deduced from the vorticity of the map potential model agreed very well with the images of the UV aurora and with previous statistical studies of noon sector FACs.The smaller-scale, more localised FACs obtained from the merged vectors in the postnoon sector describe the more rapidly varying FACs closer to the merging gap.The combined postnoon aurora and electric field observations were consistent with the existence of a dayside current wedge that would form in response to the removal of flux during reconnection at the magnetopause.The westward current induced in the merging region flows down to the ionosphere via a FAC on the western end of the reconnection region, then eastward in the ionosphere as the Pedersen current nears the equatorward boundary of the ionospheric cusp signature, and back out to the magnetosphere via an upward FAC on the eastern end of the merging region.The eastward motion of the auroral gap and the region of newly reconnected flux is in accordance with the eastward expansion of the reconnection X-line deduced in Paper 1.

Fig. 3 .
Fig. 3.The development of the northern hemisphere ultraviolet aurora captured in the VIS Earth Camera images between 10:43:48 UT and 12:11:39 UT.Each straight dashed line denotes one hour of local time with 12 MLT towards the top of the figure, and each dashed concentric circle marks 10 • in magnetic latitude.

Fig. 4 .
Fig.4.The map potential contours derived from the Doppler velocities measured in the dayside auroral zone by the Þykkvibaer (E), Hankasalmi (F ), and Stokkseyri (W ) SuperDARN radars.Equipotential contours have been determined by fitting a series of spherical harmonic functions to the measured convection velocity components measured by the SuperDARN radars and constraining the fits with statistical convection models based on upstream IMF conditions.Following the southward turning of the IMF, the extent of the measurements in the dayside auroral zone by the SuperDARN radars steadily increases.

Fig. 5 .
Fig. 5.The dayside utraviolet aurora measured by the VIS EarthCamera and UVI and the spherical harmonic expansion of the ionospheric equipotential contours deduced from the map potential technique(Ruohoniemi and Baker, 1998).(a) The ionospheric conditions prior to reconnection as seen in the 10:57:25 UT VIS scan of the postnoon aurora, the 10:57:32 UT UVI scan of the prenoon aurora, and the map potential contours from the 10:57-10:58 UT Su-perDARN radar scans.(b) The ionospheric conditions just following the onset of reconnection as seen in the 11:06:01 UT VIS scan of the postnoon aurora, the 11:06:44 UT UVI scan of the prenoon aurora, and the map potential contours from the 11:06-11:07 UT SuperDARN radar scans.(c) The ionospheric conditions just at the onset of the second burst of reconnection as seen in the 11:09:37 UT VIS scan of the postnoon aurora, the 11:09:48 UT UVI scan of the prenoon aurora, and the map potential contours from the 11:09-11:10 UT SuperDARN radar scans.(d) The ionospheric conditions as the remnants of the first reconnected flux region convect out of the CUTLASS fields of view as seen in the 11:25:13 UT VIS scan of the dayside aurora, and the map potential contours from the 11:25-11:26 UT SuperDARN radar scans.

Fig. 6 .
Fig. 6.The ionospheric footprint of the DMSP-F11 satellite trajectory between 10:55 UT and 11:05 UT on 24 November 1998 overlaid onto the VIS Earth Camera images of the ultraviolet aurora from (a) 10:57:25 UT and (b) 11:01:01 UT.The satellite footprint has been colour-coded to indicate the particle regimes traversed by the satellite, according to the electron and ion spectra in Fig. 2. The potential contours deduced from the map potential technique (Ruohoniemi and Baker, 1998) for (a) the 10:57 UT and (b) the 11:01 UT radar scans have been superimposed over the VIS images.The white crosses on the DMSP track denote where the satellite footprint was during the nearest HF radar scan that includes the auroral image.

Fig. 8 .
Fig. 8.The 10 minute plasma vorticity maps from 11:00-11:30 UT.The circles represent the HF radar estimate of the amount of upward FAC per unit Pedersen conductance B•(∇ × v) (µA m −2 S −1 ), and the crosses represent the downward.The FAC estimates have been overlaid onto the VIS Earth Camera images that occur closest to the centre of the 10 minute averages.A quiet time statistical auroral oval has also been added.In all panels of Fig. 8 there is a band of upward FAC co-located with the intense ultraviolet aurora and this band has an average FAC density of approximately 0.2 µA m −2 S. In panels (b) and (c) the upward FAC is flanked on the poleward edge by a band of downward FAC.

Fig. 9 .
Fig. 9.The dayside current wedge.The westward current induced in the merging region flows along the geomagnetic field lines down to the ionosphere then eastward in the ionosphere parallel to the electric field as the Pedersen current nears the equatorward boundary of the ionospheric cusp signature, and back out to the magnetosphere along the geomagnetic field.

Fig. 10 .
Fig. 10.The FAC estimate per unit Pedersen conductance B • (∇ × v) (µA m −2 S −1 ) obtained from the map potential contours for the scans starting at (a) 10:57 UT, (b) 11:06 UT, (c) 11:10 UT, and (d) 11:25 UT.The FAC direction is defined according to the SuperDARN coordinate convention, where z is radially out of the ionosphere.Negative vorticity (into the ionosphere) corresponds to a positive FAC component (red), and positive vorticity (out of the ionosphere) corresponds to a negative FAC component (blue).