<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ANGEO</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Annales Geophysicae</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ANGEO</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ann. Geophys.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1432-0576</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Springer Verlag</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00585-996-1480-x</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title>Errors due to random noise in velocity measurement using incoherent-scatter radar</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>P. J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Etemadi</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>McCrea</surname>
<given-names>I. W.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Todd</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group><aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<addr-line>Adran Ffiseg, Prifysgol Cymru Aberystwyth, SY23 3BZ, Wales</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<addr-line>Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW1, England</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<addr-line>Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, England</addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<addr-line>University of Fiji, Fiji</addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>1996</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<issue>12</issue>
<fpage>1480</fpage>
<lpage>1486</lpage>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright: &#x000a9; 1996 P. J. S. Williams et al.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>1996</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>© European Geosciences Union 1996</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/14/1480/1996/angeo-14-1480-1996.html">This article is available from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/14/1480/1996/angeo-14-1480-1996.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/14/1480/1996/angeo-14-1480-1996.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/14/1480/1996/angeo-14-1480-1996.pdf</self-uri>
<abstract>
<p>The random-noise errors involved in measuring
the Doppler shift of an &apos;incoherent-scatter&apos; spectrum are predicted
theoretically for all values of &lt;i&gt;T&lt;sub&gt;e&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt;/&lt;i&gt;T&lt;sub&gt;i&lt;/sub&gt;&lt;/i&gt; from
1.0 to 3.0. After correction has been made for the effects of convolution during
transmission and reception and the additional errors introduced by subtracting
the average of the background gates, the rms errors can be expressed by a simple
semi-empirical formula. The observed errors are determined from a comparison of
simultaneous EISCAT measurements using an identical pulse code on several
adjacent frequencies. The plot of observed versus predicted error has a slope of
0.991 and a correlation coefficient of 99.3%. The prediction also agrees well
with the mean of the error distribution reported by the standard EISCAT analysis
programme.</p>
</abstract>
<counts><page-count count="7"/></counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body/>
<back>
</back>
</article>